AllRefer.com Reference and Encyclopedia Resource 

AllRefer Channels :: Health | Yellow Pages | | Reference | Weather

November 26, 2009  
 Earth & Environment
 Literature & Arts
 Philosophy & Religion
 Medicine
 People
 Places
 Science & Technology
 Plants & Animals
 Social Science & Law
 Sports & Everyday Life
 History
 Country Studies
A B C D E F G H I J

K L M N O P Q R S

T U V W X Y Z

 United States
 Mexico
 Canada
 Other countries
A B C D E F G H I J

K L M N O P Q R S

T U V W X Y Z

 Countries
 Flags
 Maps

You are here : AllRefer.com > Reference > Encyclopedia > Crime And Law Enforcement > confession
By Alphabet : Encyclopedia A-Z > C

confession, Crime And Law Enforcement

Related Category: Crime And Law Enforcement

confession, in law, the formal admission of criminal guilt, usually obtained in the course of examination by the police or prosecutor or at trial. For a confession to be admissible as evidence against an accused individual, it generally must have been procured voluntarily after the person was informed of his or her right to remain silent and right to consult an attorney (see Miranda v. Arizona). If a confession is obtained through torture, threats, prolonged interrogation, or false promises of immunity from prosecution, it is inadmissible, but law enforcement officials may and do use psychological pressure, which can lead to false confessions. A signed confession is presumed to be voluntary, and the accused must introduce proof that it was extorted in order to prevent its introduction at the trial. In 1981 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that murder defendants should be informed of their right to remain silent during interviews with psychologists, who might later testify for the prosecution that the client was "dangerous" and thus deserving of a stiff penalty. A 1986 ruling stated that a criminal defendant entering a plea of "not guilty" had the right to describe to the court how his confession was obtained by police. The ideal of a voluntary confession was upset recently, however, in the case of Arizona v. Fulminante (1991). There, the Supreme Court ruled that coerced confessions do not invariably nullify a conviction, but can be regarded merely as "harmless errors" : at least where additional incriminating evidence is available. Usually, a person who does not plead guilty cannot be convicted solely on the basis of his confession.

See P. Brooks, Troubling Confessions: Speaking Guilt in Law and Literature (2000).



The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia Copyright © 2009, Columbia University Press.
Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.



Topics that might be of interest to you:

evidence
Miranda v. Arizona

Related Categories:

Social Sciences and the Law > Law


More articles from AllRefer Reference on confession



SITE MAPS


Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to AllRefer.com | Add AllRefer.com Search to your site
| Healthopedia.com  
Copyright © 2009 Par Web Solutions All Rights reserved.
Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.