AllRefer.com Reference and Encyclopedia Resource 

AllRefer Channels :: Health | Yellow Pages | | Reference | Weather

November 22, 2009  
 Earth & Environment
 Literature & Arts
 Philosophy & Religion
 Medicine
 People
 Places
 Science & Technology
 Plants & Animals
 Social Science & Law
 Sports & Everyday Life
 History
 Country Studies
A B C D E F G H I J

K L M N O P Q R S

T U V W X Y Z

 United States
 Mexico
 Canada
 Other countries
A B C D E F G H I J

K L M N O P Q R S

T U V W X Y Z

 Countries
 Flags
 Maps

You are here : AllRefer.com > Reference > Encyclopedia > U.S. History > Fundamental Orders
By Alphabet : Encyclopedia A-Z > F

Fundamental Orders, U.S. History

Related Category: U.S. History

Fundamental Orders, in U.S. history, the basic law of the Connecticut colony from 1639 to 1662, formally adopted (Jan. 14, 1639) by representatives from the towns of Hartford, Wethersfield, and Windsor, meeting at Hartford. Thomas Hooker, John Haynes, and Roger Ludlow were most influential in framing the document. It was not "the first written constitution that shaped a government," as it has been popularly called; nor did it mark the beginning of a "commonwealth democracy" : another misconception fostered by 19th-century historians straining hard to mark the foundations of American democracy. Its provisions for voting in what is now Connecticut reveal how far from democratic it actually was. However, this deficiency is no reflection on the importance or soundness of the document, for political democracy as we know it today was virtually nonexistent in the 17th cent. except in such rare cases as the Rhode Island colony under Roger Williams. Indeed the Puritans regarded unconfined democracy as an aberration. To them only the most substantial, respectable, and reliable Christians were considered worthy to build up a community essentially religious in design. The Fundamental Orders consisted of a preamble and 11 orders or laws. The preamble bound the inhabitants of the three towns to be governed in all things by the orders that followed, and these were similar to the statute laws elsewhere in New England, differing only in that they were shaped into a brief, clear, compact frame of government (Ludlow, a lawyer, is believed chiefly responsible for the excellence of the final form). The government, or "combination," as Hooker called it, confirmed the system that had functioned in the three towns since 1636 and was very like the Massachusetts model. The main concern of the Fundamental Orders was the welfare of the community; the individual always had to give way if the needs of the community at large so required. The charter of Connecticut in 1662 superseded and was largely based on the Fundamental Orders.

See C. M. Andrews, The Beginnings of Connecticut, 1632–1662 (1934).



The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia Copyright © 2009, Columbia University Press.
Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.



Topics that might be of interest to you:

Connecticut, state, United States
Hartford
John Haynes
Thomas Hooker
Roger Ludlow

Related Categories:

History > United States and Canada


More articles from AllRefer Reference on Fundamental Orders



SITE MAPS


Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to AllRefer.com | Add AllRefer.com Search to your site
| Healthopedia.com  
Copyright © 2009 Par Web Solutions All Rights reserved.
Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.