1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Wildlife Species > Birds > Wildlife Species: Falco peregrinus | Peregrine Falcon
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Falco peregrinus | Peregrine Falcon
ABBREVIATION : FAPE COMMON NAMES : peregrine falcon peregrine duck hawk bullet hawk TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of peregrine falcon is Falco peregrinus Tunstall. There are 22 subspecies of peregrine falcon worldwide. North American infrataxa include [11,17,27]: Falco peregrinus ssp. anatum Bonaparte (peregrine falcon) Falco peregrinus ssp. pealei Ridgway (Pacific northwestern peregrine) Falco peregrinus ssp. tundrius (Arctic peregrine falcon) ORDER : Falconiformes CLASS : Bird FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : See OTHER STATUS OTHER STATUS : Federal listing: Falco p. ssp. anatum is listed as endangered. F. p. ssp. tundrius is listed as threatened, and F. p. ssp. pealei has no listing [34]. State listings: Peregrine falcon is listed as endangered in Illinois [28], South Dakota [30], Nebraska [33], Kansas [31], and Washington [35]. F. p. ssp. anatum and ssp. tundrius are listed as endangered in Oklahoma [32], and and Florida lists F. p. ssp. tundrius as endangered [29]. Canadian listings: F. p. ssp. pealei is listed as vulnerable in British Columbia. Falco p. ssp. tundrius is listed as vulnerable in New Foundland, Northwest Territories, Quebec, and Yukon Territory [36]. COMPILED BY AND DATE : S. A. Snyder, April 1991 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Snyder, S. A. 1991. Falco peregrinus. In: Remainder of Citation

WILDLIFE DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Falco peregrinus | Peregrine Falcon
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : The migratory range of the three North American subspecies of peregrine falcon extends from Greenland south through Canada and Alaska, into the continental United States, through Mexico, and into South America. Their breeding range extends from northern Alaska, northern MacKenzie, Banks, Victoria, southern Melville, Somerset, the northern Baffin Islands, and Labrador to Baja California, the Sonoran Coast, southern Arizona, New Mexico, west and central Texas, and Colorado. Occasionally it breeds in the Sierra Madre of northern Mexico. Formerly the peregrine falcon bred in Kansas, Arkansas, northeastern Louisiana, Tennessee, northern Alabama, and northwestern Georgia. It is rare as a breeder throughout much of continental North America, especially in the East. The peregrine falcon has been reestablished through introduction programs in the eastern United States [2,4]. Falco p. ssp. pealei has a very limited range in coastal Alaska and coastal British Columbia. Falco p. ssp. tundrius is found in the maritime provinces of Canada and in Greenland. Falco p. spp. anatum is found in Canada and the United States, including Alaska [2,11,17]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White-red-jack pine FRES12 Longleaf-slash pine FRES13 Loblolly-shortleaf pine FRES15 Oak-hickory FRES16 Oak-gum-cypress FRES20 Douglas-fir FRES21 Ponderosa pine FRES22 Western white pine FRES24 Hemlock-Sitka spruce FRES25 Larch FRES26 Lodgepole pine FRES27 Redwood FRES28 Western hardwoods FRES29 Sagebrush FRES30 Desert shrub FRES32 Texas savanna FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub FRES35 Pinyon-juniper FRES36 Mountain grasslands FRES37 Mountain meadows FRES39 Prairie FRES40 Desert grasslands FRES41 Wet grasslands FRES42 Annual grasslands STATES :
AL AK AZ CA CO CT DE FL GA HI
ID IL LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MT
NV NJ NM NY NC OH OR PA RI SC
TX UT VA WA WY DC

AB BC MB NB NF NT NS ON PE PQ
SK YK

MEXICO
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 1 Northern Pacific Border 3 Southern Pacific Border 4 Sierra Mountains 5 Columbia Plateau 6 Upper Basin and Range 7 Lower Basin and Range 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 9 Middle Rocky Mountains 10 Wyoming Basin 11 Southern Rocky Mountains 12 Colorado Plateau 13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont 14 Great Plains 16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K001 Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest K006 Redwood forest K008 Lodgepole pine - subalpine forest K009 Pine - cypress forest K010 Ponderosa shrub forest K011 Western ponderosa forest K012 Douglas-fir forest K016 Eastern ponderosa forest K018 Pine - Douglas-fir forest K019 Arizona pine forest K022 Great Basin pine forest K024 Juniper steppe woodland K027 Mesquite bosque K029 California mixed evergreen forest K030 California oakwoods K035 Coastal sagebrush K036 Mosaic of K030 and K035 K038 Great Basin sagebrush K047 Fescue - oatgrass K048 California steppe K049 Tule marshes K050 Fescue - wheatgrass K055 Sagebrush steppe K056 Wheatgrass - needlegrass shrubsteppe K057 Galleta - threeawn shrubsteppe K058 Grama - tobosa shrubsteppe K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna K060 Mesquite savanna K061 Mesquite - acacia savanna K062 Mesquite - live oak savanna K063 Foothills prairie K064 Grama - needlegrass - wheatgrass K066 Wheatgrass - needlegrass K072 Sea oats prairie K073 Northern cordgrass prairie K077 Bluestem - sacahuista prairie K078 Southern cordgrass prairie K079 Palmetto prairie K080 Marl - everglades K084 Cross Timbers K088 Fayette prairie K090 Live oak - sea oats K091 Cypress savanna K092 Everglades K094 Conifer bog K095 Great Lakes pine forest K105 Mangrove K112 Southern mixed forest K113 Southern floodplain forest K114 Pocosin K115 Sand pine scrub K116 Subtropical pine forest SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 15 Red pine 16 Aspen 18 Paper birch 19 Gray birch - red maple 21 Eastern white pine 30 Red spruce - yellow birch 32 Red spruce 35 Paper birch - red spruce - balsam fir 38 Tamarack 61 River birch - sycamore 63 Cottonwood 68 Mesquite 69 Sand pine 70 Longleaf pine 71 Longleaf pine - scrub oak 73 Southern redcedar 74 Cabbage palmetto 75 Shortleaf pine 78 Virginia pine - oak 79 Virginia pine 80 Loblolly pine - shortleaf pine 81 Loblolly pine 82 Loblolly pine - hardwood 83 Longleaf pine - slash pine 84 Slash pine 85 Slash pine - hardwood 87 Sweet gum - yellow poplar 88 Willow oak - water oak - diamondleaf oak 89 Live oak 91 Swamp chestnut oak - cherrybark oak 92 Sweetgum - willow oak 94 Sycamore - sweetgum - American elm 96 Overcup oak - water hickory 97 Atlantic white-cedar 98 Pond pine 100 Pondcypress 101 Baldcypress 102 Baldcypress - tupelo 103 Water tupelo - swamp tupelo 104 Sweetbay - swamp tupelo - redbay 105 Tropical hardwoods 106 Mangrove 107 White spruce 111 South Florida slash pine 202 White spruce - paper birch 203 Balsam poplar 204 Black spruce 210 Interior Douglas-fir 217 Aspen 218 Lodgepole pine 220 Rocky Mountain juniper 221 Red alder 222 Black cottonwood - willow 223 Sitka spruce 224 Western hemlock 225 Western hemlock - Sitka spruce 226 Coastal true fir - hemlock 227 Western redcedar - western hemlock 228 Western redcedar 229 Pacific Douglas-fir 230 Douglas-fir - western hemlock 232 Redwood 233 Oregon white oak 234 Douglas-fir - tanoak - Pacific madrone 235 Cottonwood - willow 237 Interior ponderosa pine 238 Western juniper 241 Western live oak 242 Mesquite 244 Pacific ponderosa pine - Douglas-fir 245 Pacific ponderosa pine 246 California black oak 247 Jeffrey pine 248 Knobcone pine 251 White spruce - aspen 252 Paper birch 253 Black spruce - white spruce 254 Black spruce - paper birch 255 California coast live oak SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY PLANT COMMUNITIES : Peregrine falcons inhabit tundra, moorland, steppe, marshland, mountain meadows, open forests, and seacoasts. They frequent both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts from Greenland through South America. Inland, peregrines inhabit open plant communities, such as grasslands and meadows, usually near rivers or lakes. They are found in the coniferous forests of the West and the mixed deciduous and coniferous forests of the East and Southeast. In the Southwest peregrine falcons inhabit savannas and shrubsteppes. Throughout their range they inhabit the less dense forests, usually near large openings, and can be found along the borders of dense forests near water. Peregrine falcons are also found in some urban centers of the United States and Canada. Cities where peregrine falcons have been introduced include Chicago, Milwaukee, Boston, New York, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Norfolk, Detroit, Baltimore, and Philadelphia. [2,4,5,7,11]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

BIOLOGICAL DATA AND HABITAT REQUIREMENTS

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Falco peregrinus | Peregrine Falcon
TIMING OF MAJOR LIFE HISTORY EVENTS : Courtship - begins in autumn Breeding - March through August, peaking in May or June Reproductive Age - 1 year, although many do not produce until their 2nd year for various reasons Clutch Size - two to five eggs; not all eggs hatch and not all hatchlings fledge Incubation - 28 to 32 days Fledge - 35 to 42 days after hatching Lifespan - 20 years Migration Period - spring and autumn [7,12,19] PREFERRED HABITAT : Peregrine falcons prefer a variety of open habitats near nesting cliffs or mountains. They usually inhabit areas near water, such as lakes, rivers, or oceans [7]. They can be found from sea level to 10,000 feet (0-3,050 m) [11]. COVER REQUIREMENTS : Peregrine falcons most frequently nest on ledges of high cliffs within 1 or 2 miles (2 or 3 km) of water [11]. Nest sites are often used for several years. They tend to choose overhanging cliffs with loose soil, sand, dead vegetation, or gravel, in which they can scrape a depression for their eggs [18]. They occasionally nest in trees. In British Columbia, Campbell and others [6] found peregrine falcons nesting in abandoned bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nests in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) trees. In the Great Plains, they formerly nested on cliffs near rivers and lakes, on low dikes in marshes and mudbanks, and in large trees [15]. FOOD HABITS : Peregrine falcons primarily eat birds. Prey species include, but are not limited to, swallows (Hirundinidae), pigeons and doves (Columbidae), and various ducks, shorebirds, and waders [7,11]. Along the Pacific Coast of North America, peregrines feed on auklets and murrelets (Alcidae), and petrels (Hydrobatidae). Greiman [10] reported that peregrine diets included tree and ground squirrels (Sciuridae), rabbits (Leporidae), various other small mammals, and passerine birds. In cities peregrines prey on pigeons and starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) [5]. PREDATORS : The peregrine falcon's most destructive predator is man. In the past falconers robbed nests of eggs, which has led to the peregrine falcon's decline [18,20]. Amadon [1] reported that red fox (Vulpes vulpes) or wolverine (Gulo luscus) could possibly prey on eggs and that great-horned owl (Bubo virginianus) may prey on adults. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : The deadly effects of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides on peregrine falcon populations are widely documented in the literature [14,16]. These pesticides reduce eggshell thickness, thereby causing the eggs to break during incubation. Although these pesticides are banned in the United States and Canada, Mexico and some Central and South American countries still use them. Because peregrine falcons migrate, they are affected by these pesticides. However, the peregrine falcon has made a dramatic comeback in the past decade [14,16]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

FIRE EFFECTS AND USE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Falco peregrinus | Peregrine Falcon
DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS ON ANIMALS : Nichols and Menke [23] reported that fires near nesting cliffs could disturb peregrine young or nesting pairs. No other direct fire effects on peregrine falcon have been noted. HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS : The effect of fire on peregrine falcon habitat is best defined by how it affects their primary prey, other bird species. The California Department of Forestry [23] concluded that peregrine falcons would benefit by chaparral burning if it resulted in an increase of other birds. Studies conducted on chaparral burning concluded that abundant food was available to raptors immediately following fire because of the vulnerability of prey species due to a cover reduction [21]. Bird species richness and diversity increase in the first few years following fire in chaparral communities [25]. Taylor and Barmore [24] reported that following fire in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks, air-soaring bird species were present by the second year and firmly established by the fifth year. (Peregrine falcons were not included on their species inventory list.) However, as the canopy closed (after 40 years), these species began to drop out and were replaced by other, but fewer, species. Total bird biomass here was at least 70 percent greater between 5 and 29 years following fire than it was after 40 years. They also concluded that canopy closure affected avifauna more than fire did. FIRE USE : In California, Longhurst [22] reported a greater diversity of bird species in young stands of chaparral regrowth (2-3 years old) or in chaparral interspersed with grassy openings than in stands that were older than 5 years. Frequent burning creates a mosaic of habitats and maintains abundant prey for peregrine falcons. Because peregrine falcons require open areas for hunting, fires that create these open areas would probably be beneficial, provided burning led to an increase of prey species. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

References for species: Falco peregrinus


1. Amadon, Dean. 1969. Predation, shooting, and other factors. In: Hickey, Joseph J., ed. Peregrine falcon populations: their biology and decline. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press: 491-495. [13721]
2. Donohoe, Robert W. 1974. American hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana Walt. In: Gill, John D.; Healy, William M., eds. Shrubs and vines for northeastern wildlife. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-9. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: 86-88. [13714]
3. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
4. Bull, John; Farrand, John, Jr. 1988. The Audubon Society field guide to North American birds. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 784 p. [13716]
5. Cade, Tom J.; Bird, David M. 1990. Peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus, nesting in an urban environment: a review. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 104(2): 209-218. [13718]
6. Campbell, R. Wayne; Paul, Marilyn A.; Rodway, Michael S.; Carter, Harry R. 1978. Tree-nesting peregrine falcons in British Columbia. The Condor. 79(4): 500-501. [13724]
7. DuBois, Kristi; Becker, Dale; Thornbrugh, Joe. 1987. Identification of Montana's birds of prey. Montana Outdoors. 18(6): 11-31. [3606]
8. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
9. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
10. Greiman, Harley L. 1975. Nesting observations of peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus annatum), Los Padres National Forest, California. Goleta, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Los Padres NationalForest, Santa Lucia Ranger District. 41 p. [19360]
11. Herman, Margaret; Willard, E. Earl. 1978. Peregrine falcon and its habitat. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Forest System Cooperative Forestry, Forestry Research, Region 1. 23 p. [13730]
12. Hickey, Joseph J.; Anderson, Daniel W. 1969. The peregrine falcon: life history and population literature. In: Hickey, Joseph J., ed. Peregrine falcon populations: their biology and decline. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press: 3-42. [13722]
13. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
14. Murphy, Julia E. 1990. The 1985-1986 Canadian peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus, survey. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 104(2): 182-192. [13717]
15. Nemec, Kathryn. 1984. American peregrine falcon, arctic peregrine falcon. In: Henderson, Robert F., ed. Guidelines for increasing wildlife on farms and ranches. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Press: 241c-243c. [13720]
16. Peakall, David B. 1990. Prospects for the peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus, in the nineties. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 104(2): 168-173. [13715]
17. Peterson, Roger Tory. 1990. A field guide to western birds. 2 ed. The Peterson Field Guide Series No. 2. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. 432 p. [13712]
18. Ratcliff, Derek. 1980. The peregrine falcon. Vermillion, SD: Buteo Books. 416 p. [13713]
19. Verner, Jared; Boss, Allan S., tech. coords. 1980. California wildlife and their habitats: western Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-37. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 439 p. [10237]
20. Zimmerman, David R. 1972. The peregrine, America's most endangered falcon. National Parks and Conservation Magazine. 46(9): 4-9. [13719]
21. Lawrence, George E. 1966. Ecology of vertebrate animals in relation to chaparral fire in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Ecology. 47(2): 276-291. [26766]
22. Longhurst, William M. 1978. Responses of bird and mammal populations to fire in chaparral. California Agriculture. 32(10): 9-12. [7639]
23. Nichols, R.; Menke, J. 1984. Effects of chaparral shrubland fire on terrestrial wildlife. In: DeVries, Johannes J., ed. Shrublands in California: literature review and research needed for management. Contribution No. 191. Davis, CA: University of California, Water Resources Center: 74-97. [5706]
24. Taylor, Dale L.; Barmore, William J., Jr. 1980. Post-fire succession of avifauna in coniferous forests of Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks, Wyoming. In: DeGraaf, Richard M., technical coordinator. Management of western forests and grasslands for nongame birds: Workshop proceedings; 1980 February 11-14; Salt Lake City, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-86. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 130-145. [17902]
25. Wirtz, W. O., II. 1982. Postfire community structure of birds and rodents in southern California chaparral. In: Conrad, C. Eugene; Oechel, Walter C., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the symposium on dynamics and management of Mediterranean-type ecosystems; 1981 June 22-26; San Diego, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-58. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 241-246. [6025]
26. Ambrose, Skip; Ulvi, Steve. 1990. Peregrine falcon research in the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, Alaska. Park Science. 10(4): 18-20. [14464]
27. Donohoe, Robert W. 1974. American hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana Walt. In: Gill, John D.; Healy, William M., eds. Shrubs and vines for northeastern wildlife. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-9. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: 86-88. [13714]
28. Herkert, J. R., ed. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Volume 2--Animals. Springfield, IL: Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. 142 p. [23799]
29. Wood, Don A., compiler. 1994. Official lists of endangered & potentially endangered fauna and flora in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 22 p. [24196]
30. South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks. 1994. Fragile legacy: Endangered, threatened and rare animals of South Dakota. Pierre, SD: South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, Wildlife Division. 55 p. [24341]
31. Clark, F. Bryan. 1976. The central hardwood forest. In: Fralish, James S.; Weaver, George T.; Schlesinger, Richard C., eds. Central hardwood forest conference: Proceeding; 1976 October 17-19; Carbondale, IL. [Place of publication unknown]. [Publisher unknown]. 1-8. [24372]
32. Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Nongame Wildlife Program. [n.d.]. Oklahoma's endangered species. Oklahoma City, OK. [Pamphlet]. [24375]
33. Wingfield, Greg. 1992. Nebraska's vanishing species. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Wildlife Division, [Nebraskaland Magazine]. 15 p. [24344]
34. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. 50 CFR 17.11 & 17.12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 42 p. [24413]
35. Washington Department of Wildlife. 1994. Species of special concern in Washington - state and federal status. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Wildlife. 41 p. [25414]
36. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. 1992. Canadian species at risk. Ottawa, ON. 10 p. [26183]


[26183] Index
FEIS Home Page

Related categories for Wildlife Species: Falco peregrinus | Peregrine Falcon

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.