1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Wildlife Species > Birds > Wildlife Species: Sialia currucoides | Mountain Bluebird
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


FIRE EFFECTS AND USE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Sialia currucoides | Mountain Bluebird
DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS ON ANIMALS : There are no reports of mountain bluebird mortality due to fire. Nests and nestlings are probably vulnerable to severe fire. Nesting cavities may be lost in severe fires including crown fires. HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS : Mountain bluebirds are strongly attracted to early postfire (1-2 years) communities, particularly those with many standing dead trees. Woodpecker activity in these communities provides many nest cavities [32]. Fire initiates a tree-hole nesting cycle in Grand Teton and Yellowstone National Parks. Woodpeckers concentrate in newly burned areas to feed on insects (particularly bark beetles) and to nest in standing dead trees [62], especially those with decay prior to fire [50]. Mountain bluebirds and other secondary cavity nesters use the holes after the woodpeckers abandon them. In northern Wyoming, northern three-toed woodpeckers (Picoides tridactylus) and black-backed three-toed woodpeckers (P. arcticus) begin leaving burned areas about 4 to 5 years after the fire. Hairy woodpeckers (P. villosus) continue to excavate holes for years, until snags finally decay to the point of falling down. At around 50 postfire years, tree-hole nesting species usually leave the area even if a few snags are still present [62]. A 1982 study in the Little Firehole River watershed within Yellowstone National Park indicated that mountain bluebirds were only common in a 222 acre (90 ha) area that burned in 1949. The authors speculated that mountain bluebird numbers were high in the late 1700's and early 1800's because up to 50 percent of the area was covered by early postfire stands; as forests matured into the twentieth century mountain bluebird numbers probably decreased [48]. In other areas of Yellowstone National Park, mountain bluebirds were observed in burned areas in the first postfire year [22]. Mountain bluebirds were associated with postfire plots in severely burned lodgepole pine stands in Yellowstone National Park. By the second postfire year mountain bluebirds were nesting in holes excavated by northern three-toed woodpeckers. Peak mountain bluebird breeding density occurred on 12-postfire year plots with a small peak on 30-year-old plots. There were no mountain bluebirds on 57-year-old and older plots [62]. In Grand Teton National Park, mountain bluebirds were present in the first postfire year on severely burned plots, increasing to 15 pairs per 100 acres (15/40 ha) in the second year. They were not observed on moderately burned or unburned plots, or on 43-year-old burned plots [62]. In Alberta fire-originated forests dominated by quaking aspen, balsam poplar (Populus balsamea), and lodgepole pine, mountain bluebirds were present in 14-year-old stands but not present in stands that had been clearcut, nor in 30-, 60-, or 80-year-old stands [66]. In Montana mountain bluebirds increased from postfire year 2 to postfire year 4 in both burned and burned and logged areas [24]. In California mountain bluebirds were observed in large numbers (15.2 pairs per 100 acres [15.2/40 ha]) in postfire years 5, 6, and 7 in mixed coniferous forest. Woodpecker activity was decreasing by the time of the study [10]. In the Sierra Nevada a severe fire occurred in a Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi)-white fir community in 1960. Birds were censused in 1968 and 1975. Mountain bluebird densities were highest on burned plots with standing dead trees and openings in 1968. They were still present on burned plots in 1975; these plots had developed dense brushfields [11]. Later postfire communities may not be as attractive as early successional stages; Raphael and others [47] noted a decreasing trend for mountain bluebirds in burned habitat in the Sierra Nevada between 1966 and 1985. In Yellowstone National Park mountain bluebirds densities 5 to 25 years after fire depend on the number of standing snags. At 25 to 30 postfire years mountain bluebird numbers may begin to decline depending on the rate of snag loss. From 30 to 50 postfire years mountain bluebirds depart as canopy closure develops [63]. Based on data from Brawn and Balda [13], Hejl [26] hypothesized a mountain bluebird population decrease in southwestern ponderosa pine due to fire exclusion and consequent closure of forests. FIRE USE : Savannas and open stands of mature pine are natural mountain bluebird habitats that require recurrent fire for maintenance. Prescribed fire is usually beneficial to mountain bluebirds, especially if it controls shrubs and understory trees [45]. Mountain bluebird densities 5 to 25 postfire years depend on the number of standing snags with nest cavities [63]. In Wyoming, mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata var. vaseyana) communities, bordered by Douglas-fir and quaking aspen stands, were burned with both spring and fall prescribed fires (not on the same plots). Mountain bluebirds were present as nonbreeders at higher densities on the burned plots than on unburned plots (both treatments) [41]. In Nevada pinyon-juniper woodlands burned with prescribed fire for 3 consecutive years, mountain bluebird populations were the same on burned and unburned plots in the first postfire year, but were higher on burned plots in the second year. Nest cavities were lost to the fire the first year, but by the second season cavity numbers were increasing [38]. Some bird species are eliminated from burned areas, but other species are attracted to them, creating a similar amount of species diversity [17]. Prescribed fire in Wind Cave National Park, South Dakota, temporarily improved foraging habitat for mountain bluebirds by reducing surface cover. There was little change in overall tree and snag density on these sites [12]. Burned areas less than 5 years old, particularly those that had severely burned, are highly valuable for many cavity nesting species including mountain bluebirds [62]. For enhancement of wildlife habitat it is strongly recommended that severely burned areas be allowed to develop naturally rather than be subject to salvage logging. When salvage is considered essential (for sanitary reasons or as a firebreak), it is recommended that a substantial area be left uncut rather than thinning the entire burn [32]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

Related categories for Wildlife Species: Sialia currucoides | Mountain Bluebird

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.