1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Wildlife Species > Mammals > Wildlife Species: Lynx lynx | Lynx
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Lynx lynx | Lynx
ABBREVIATION : LYLY COMMON NAMES : lynx Canada lynx TAXONOMY : The scientific name of lynx is Lynx lynx [22,23]. Lynx canadensis and Felis lynx are synonyms encountered in the literature [3,13]. ORDER : Carnivora CLASS : Mammal FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : Notice of Review, Category 2 OTHER STATUS : The North American lynx is federally listed as threatened. The lynx is listed as threatened in the state of Montana [17]. It is endangered in Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Colorado [21], and Washington [24]. Lynx populations experience volatile swings, becoming very low about every 10 years. Therefore they can be rare in any one given area at these times. COMPILED BY AND DATE : S. A. Snyder, April 1991 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Snyder, S. A. 1991. Lynx lynx. In: Remainder of Citation

WILDLIFE DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Lynx lynx | Lynx
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : The lynx is found in the taiga zone of North America, from British Columbia east to the Atlantic Coast of Canada. It ranges from Alaska south, except for the coastal areas, to isolated parts of Washington, Idaho, and Montana. The lynx is also found in central Utah and in a fraction of Colorado. Small populations may still exist in northern Minnesota, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire [21]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White-red-jack pine FRES11 Spruce-fir FRES18 Maple-beech-birch FRES19 Aspen-birch FRES20 Douglas-fir FRES21 Ponderosa pine FRES22 Western white pine FRES23 Fir-spruce FRES24 Hemlock-Sitka spruce FRES25 Larch FRES26 Lodgepole pine STATES :
AK CO ID ME MI MN MT NH UT VT WA WI

AB BC MB NB NF NT NS ON PQ SK YK
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 2 Cascade Mountains 5 Columbia Plateau 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 9 Middle Rocky Mountains 10 Wyoming Basin 12 Colorado Plateau 15 Black Hills Uplift KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K001 Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest K002 Cedar - hemlock - Douglas-fir forest K004 Fir - hemlock forest K005 Mixed conifer forest K007 Red fir forest K008 Lodgepole pine - subalpine forest K010 Ponderosa shrub forest K011 Western ponderosa forest K012 Douglas-fir forest K013 Cedar - hemlock - pine forest K014 Grand fir - Douglas-fir forest K015 Western spruce - fir forest K018 Pine - Douglas-fir forest K020 Spruce - fir - Douglas-fir forest K021 Southwestern spruce - fir forest K093 Great Lakes spruce - fir forest K094 Conifer bog K095 Great Lakes pine forest K096 Northeastern spruce - fir forest SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 5 Balsam fir 12 Black spruce 13 Black spruce - tamarack 15 Red pine 16 Aspen 18 Paper birch 21 Eastern white pine 22 White pine - hemlock 30 Red spruce - yellow birch 31 Red spruce - sugar maple - beech 32 Red spruce 33 Red spruce - balsam fir 34 Red spruce - Fraser fir 35 Paper birch - red spruce - balsam fir 37 Northern white cedar 38 Tamarack 107 White spruce 201 White spruce 202 White spruce - paper birch 203 Balsam poplar 204 Black spruce 205 Mountain hemlock 206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir 207 Red fir 208 Whitebark pine 209 Bristlecone pine 210 Interior Douglas-fir 211 White fir 212 Western larch 213 Grand fir 215 Western white pine 218 Lodgepole pine 219 Limber pine 223 Sitka spruce 224 Western hemlock 225 Western hemlock - Sitka spruce 227 Western redcedar - western hemlock 228 Western redcedar 230 Douglas-fir - western hemlock 251 White spruce - aspen 253 Black spruce - white spruce 254 Black spruce - paper birch SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY PLANT COMMUNITIES : Lynx are associated with dense climax forests at elevations above 4,000 feet (1,200 m). They also use early seral stage communities bordering dense forests. Because their populations are closely tied to snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) numbers, lynx can also be found in second growth forests when hare are numerous [5,10]. Lynx inhabit hemlock (Tsuga spp.)-spruce (Picea spp.)-fir (Abies spp.) forests in the West and pine (Pinus spp.) and birch (Betula spp.)-spruce (Picea spp.)-fir (Abies spp.) forests in the East. They are also found in the taiga region of North America. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

BIOLOGICAL DATA AND HABITAT REQUIREMENTS

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Lynx lynx | Lynx
TIMING OF MAJOR LIFE HISTORY EVENTS : Breeding age - 1 year Breeding season - January or February, sometimes into April [2,18] Gestation period - 60 days Birthing season - March or April, sometimes May or June Maximum lifespan - 15 to 18 years in captivity Lynx populations usually fluctuate in a cycle with snowshoe hare populations, peaking about every 9 to 10 years [3,7,16,21]. PREFERRED HABITAT : Lynx occur in both dense climax forests and second-growth stands. In Alaska and Canada, they prefer boreal forests, and in the Intermountain West, they prefer spruce (Picea spp.)-subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) forests. In Washington, Idaho, and Montana, lynx occur above 4,000 feet (1,200 m) in elevation; in Wyoming, above 6,500 feet (1,900 m); and in Colorado and Utah, above 8,000 feet (2,400 m) [13]. COVER REQUIREMENTS : Lynx require a mix of early and late seral habitats to meet their food and cover needs. Early seral habitats provide the lynx with a prey base, while mature forests provide denning space and hiding cover. Pockets of dense forest must be interspersed with prey habitat. Lynx den in rotten logs, beneath tree roots, and in rock crevices. Koehler [12] reported that lynx use forests with a high density of downfall logs (>40 logs per 40 yards [46 m] lying 1 to 4 feet [0.3-1.3 m] above the ground). FOOD HABITS : Lynx prey primarily on snowshoe hare. Their diet also includes ducks (Anas spp.), upland game birds, especially grouse (Dendragapus spp.), and various forest rodents, including squirrels (Scuirids, Spermophilids). Lynx also feed on deer, moose, and caribou carcasses. Saunders [19] reported that lynx are able to kill these large mammals. PREDATORS : Predators of lynx include man, mountain lion (Felis concolor), bear (Ursus spp.), and other lynx. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Lynx can be managed by managing for snowshoe hare, their primary prey. Hare populations increase dramatically following disturbance, particularly fire. However, Koehler [13] reported that hare recolonization may not occur until 6 to 7 years following logging, and that hare densities may not reach their maximum for another 20 to 25 years. This depends on site conditions and type of treatment. As stands become older (about 20 to 30 years old), their benefits to snowshoe hare decrease [13]. Because of the cyclic nature of the population, one management strategy to ensure kitten recruitment would be to put a moratorium on trapping for the 3 years following the declining phase of lynx [21]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

FIRE EFFECTS AND USE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Lynx lynx | Lynx
DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS ON ANIMALS : There is no apparent and probably no significant direct fire-related mortality of lynx. HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS : Because lynx populations oscillate with snowshoe hare populations, fires that create snowshoe hare cover and food generally benefit lynx [10,13]. Fire may have negative short-term effects by eliminating cover for snowshoe hare and lynx. However, as succession progresses and snowshoe hares become abundant, lynx will benefit. Lynx usually do not cross openings greater than 300 feet (90 m) and use travel corridors with tree densities of 180 stems per acre (450/ha). Therefore, fires that create large openings without leaving travel corridors between pockets of dense forest may be detrimental to lynx [4,5,9,19]. FIRE USE : Grange [9] reported that snowshoes are associated with plant species that recover well following fire. He also stated that their population explosions are limited to very early seral stages. Thus fire can be used to create early seral habitats that support snowshoe hare, the primary prey for lynx. Pockets of unburned areas, at least 1 to 5 acres (0.4-2 ha), should be left for denning sites. These pockets should border prey habitat. Management units should be designed to provide travel corridors, especially along ridges and saddles, as lynx are more likely to use these areas. A variety of fire types and intensities will create a temporal and spatial pattern of habitat for prey, as well as maintain unburned areas for denning sites [13]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

REFERENCES

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Lynx lynx | Lynx
REFERENCES : 1. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434] 2. Brainerd, Scott M. 1985. Reproductive ecology of bobcat and lynx in western Montana. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. 85 p. Thesis. [13704] 3. Burt, William H.; Grossenheider, Richard P. 1976. A field guide to the mammals. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. 289 p. [13685] 4. Deems, Eugene F.; Pursley, Duane, eds. 1978. North American furbearers, their management, research and harvest status in 1976. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press. 171 p. [13708] 5. DeVos, Antoon; Matel, S. Eugene. 1952. The status of lynx in Canada, 1920-1952. Journal of Forestry. 50: 742-745. [13709] 6. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905] 7. Fox, John F. 1978. Forest fires and the snowshoe hare--Canada lynx cycle. Oecologia. 31: 349-374. [11099] 8. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998] 9. Grange, Wallace. 1965. Fire and tree growth relationships to snowshoe rabbits. In: Proceedings, 4th Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1965 March 18-19; Tallahassee, FL. Tallahasee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 111-123. [13530] 10. Heinselman, Miron L. 1973. Fire in the virgin forests of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Quaternary Research. 3: 329-382. [282] 11. Ingles, L. G. 1965. Mammals of the Pacific States: California, Washington, Oregon. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 506 p. [13686] 12. Koehler, Gary M. 1990. Population and habitat characteristics of lynx and snowshoe hares in north central Washington. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 68: 845-851. [18030] 13. Koehler, Gary M.; Brittell, J. David. 1990. Managing spruce-fir habitat for lynx and snowshoe hares. Journal of Forestry. 88(10): 10-14. [13599] 14. Koehler, Gary M.; Hornocker, Maurice G.; Hash, Howard S. 1979. Lynx movements and habitat use in Montana. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 93(4): 441-442. [13706] 15. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 16. Mech, David L. 1980. Age, sex, reproductional and spatial organization of lynxes colonizing northeastern Minnesota. Journal of Mammalogy. 61(2): 261-267. [13705] 17. Montana Natural Heritage Program. 1990. Animal species of special concern. Helena, MT: Montana Natural Heritage Program. 5 p. [13751] 18. Nellis, Carl H.; Wetmore, Stephen P., Keith, Lloyd B. 1972. Lynx-prey interactions in central Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management. 36(2): 320-328. [13711] 19. Saunders, Jack K. 1963. Food habits of the lynx in Newfoundland. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(3): 384-390. [13710] 20. Warren, Edward Royal. 1942. The mammals of Colorado. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. 330 p. [13687] 21. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; animal candidate review for listing as endangered or threatened species; proposed rule. 50 CFR Part 17. Tuesday, November 15, 1994. Federal Register. 59(219): 58982-59028. [24357] 22. Hall, E. Raymond. 1981. The mammals of North America. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1271 p. [14765] 23. Jones, J. Knox, Jr.; Hoffmann, Robert S.; Rice, Dale W.; [and others]. 1992. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers No. 146. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University, The Museum. 6 p. [22160] 24. Washington Department of Wildlife. 1994. Species of special concern in Washington - state and federal status. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Wildlife. 41 p. [25414]

Index
FEIS Home Page

Related categories for Wildlife Species: Lynx lynx | Lynx

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.