1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Wildlife Species > Mammals > Wildlife Species: Odocoileus virginianus | White-Tailed Deer
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Odocoileus virginianus | White-Tailed Deer
ABBREVIATION : ODVI COMMON NAMES : white-tailed deer whitetail deer Columbian white-tailed deer Key deer Coues deer Texas white-tailed deer sandhill deer common deer jumping deer flag-tailed deer bannertail long-tailed deer Virginia white-tailed deer Virginia deer TAXONOMY : There are 38 subspecies of white-tailed deer in North, Central, and South America. Sixteen of these are found in the United States and Canada. Subspecies are distinguished by geographic location, body size, coloration, antler growth, and physiological, biochemical, and behavioral differences [2,21,24]. The North American subspecies are listed below: Odocoileus virginianus ssp. borealis O. virginianus ssp. clavium (Key deer) O. virginianus ssp. couesi O. virginianus ssp. dakotensis O. virginianus ssp. hiltonensis (Hilton Head white-tailed deer) O. virginianus ssp. leucurus (Columbian white-tailed deer) O. virginianus ssp. macrourus O. virginianus ssp. mcilhennyi O. virginianus ssp. nigribarbis (Blackbeard Island white-tailed deer) O. virginianus ssp. ochrourus O. virginianus ssp. osceola O. virginianus ssp. seminolus O. virginianus ssp. taurinsulae (Bulls Island white-tailed deer) O. virginianus ssp. texanus O. virginianus ssp. venatorius (Hunting Island white-tailed deer) O. virginianus ssp. virginianus ORDER : Artiodactyla CLASS : Mammal FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : See OTHER STATUS OTHER STATUS : Odocoileus virginianus leucurus and O. v. clavium are federally listed as endangered. Odocoileus virginianus hiltonensis, nigribarbis, taurinsulae, and venatoria are federally listed as Category 2 subspecies [61]. O. v. leucurus is endangered in Washington and Oregon, and O. v. clavium is endangered in Florida [55,60,62]. COMPILED BY AND DATE : S. A. Snyder, May 1991 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Snyder, S. A. 1991. Odocoileus virginianus. In: Remainder of Citation

WILDLIFE DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Odocoileus virginianus | White-Tailed Deer
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : The white-tailed deer (whitetail) ranges from coast to coast across North America. However, it is not found along the southwestern coast of the United States or the coast of British Columbia. The whitetail's range also extends from central Canada south through South America, with a small portion possibly extending north into the southern Northwest Territories. The whitetail has been introduced in the Virgin Islands and other parts of the Caribbean. The North American subspecies and their distributions are listed below [2,24]: ssp. borealis - from central Ontario and Quebec south to southern Illinois, and from central Minnesota to the East Coast ssp. clavium - Florida Keys ssp. couesi - central Arizona south through Mexico and southwestern New Mexico ssp. dakotensis - southern Northwest Territories west into central Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and south through Alberta, the Dakotas, eastern Montana, central Wyoming, northern Colorado, and western Minnesota ssp. hiltonensis - Hilton Head Island, South Carolina ssp. leucurus - southwestern Washington and the western quarter of Oregon ssp. macrourus - Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, northern Louisiana, eastern Texas, Kansas, and Nebraska, and southeastern South Dakota ssp. mcilhennyi - southeastern Texas and southern Louisiana ssp. nigribarbis - Blackbeard Island, Georgia ssp. ochrourus - British Columbia to western Alberta, south through western Montana, Idaho, eastern Washington and Oregon, western Wyoming, northern Utah, and possibly a fringe of the border between northern California and Nevada ssp. osceola - midwestern Florida, north into southern Alabama and Mississippi ssp. seminolus - Florida ssp. taurinsulae - Bulls Island, South Carolina ssp. texanus - Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, western New Mexico and Colorado, and southeastern Wyoming ssp. venatorius - Hunting Island, South Carolina ssp. virginianus - Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, Tennesee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, and Alabama ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White-red-jack pine FRES11 Spruce-fir FRES12 Longleaf-slash pine FRES13 Loblolly-shortleaf pine FRES14 Oak-pine FRES15 Oak-hickory FRES16 Oak-gum-cypress FRES17 Elm-ash-cottonwood FRES18 Maple-beech-birch FRES19 Aspen-birch FRES20 Douglas-fir FRES21 Ponderosa pine FRES22 Western white pine FRES23 Fir-spruce FRES24 Hemlock-Sitka spruce FRES25 Larch FRES26 Lodgepole pine FRES31 Shinnery FRES32 Texas savanna FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe FRES34 Chaparral-mountain shrub FRES35 Pinyon-juniper FRES36 Mountain grasslands FRES37 Mountain meadows FRES38 Plains grasslands FRES39 Prairie FRES41 Wet grasslands STATES :
AK AZ AR CO CT DE FL GA ID
IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA
MI MN MS MO MT NE NH NJ NM
NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC
SD TN TX VT VA WA WV WI WY
VI

AB BC MB NB NF NT NS ON PE PQ
SK YK

MEXICO
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 1 Northern Pacific Border 2 Cascade Mountains 5 Columbia Plateau 7 Lower Basin and Range 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 9 Middle Rocky Mountains 10 Wyoming Basin 11 Southern Rocky Mountains 12 Colorado Plateau 13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont 14 Great Plains 15 Black Hills Uplift 16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K001 Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest K002 Cedar - hemlock - Douglas-fir forest K003 Silver fir - Douglas-fir forest K004 Fir - hemlock forest K005 Mixed conifer forest K008 Lodgepole pine - subalpine forest K010 Ponderosa shrub forest K011 Western ponderosa forest K012 Douglas-fir forest K013 Cedar - hemlock - pine forest K014 Grand fir - Douglas-fir forest K015 Western spruce - fir forest K016 Eastern ponderosa forest K017 Black Hills pine forest K018 Pine - Douglas-fir forest K019 Arizona pine forest K020 Spruce - fir - Douglas-fir forest K021 Southwestern spruce - fir forest K022 Great Basin pine forest K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland K025 Alder - ash forest K026 Oregon oakwoods K027 Mesquite bosque K028 Mosaic of K002 and K026 K031 Oak - juniper woodland K037 Mountain-mahogany - oak scrub K040 Saltbush - greasewood K042 Creosotebush - bursage K043 Paloverde - cactus shrub K044 Creosotebush - tarbush K045 Ceniza shrub K050 Fescue - wheatgrass K051 Wheatgrass - bluegrass K055 Sagebrush steppe K056 Wheatgrass - needlegrass shrubsteppe K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna K060 Mesquite savanna K061 Mesquite - acacia savanna K062 Mesquite - live oak savanna K063 Foothills prairie K064 Grama - needlegrass - wheatgrass K065 Grama - buffalograss K066 Wheatgrass - needlegrass K067 Wheatgrass - bluestem - needlegrass K068 Wheatgrass - grama - buffalograss K069 Bluestem - grama prairie K070 Sandsage - bluestem prairie K071 Shinnery K073 Northern cordgrass prairie K074 Bluestem prairie K075 Nebraska Sandhills prairie K076 Blackland prairie K077 Bluestem - sacahuista prairie K078 Southern cordgrass prairie K079 Palmetto prairie K080 Marl - Everglades K081 Oak savanna K082 Mosaic of K074 and K100 K083 Cedar glades K084 Cross Timbers K085 Mesquite - buffalograss K086 Juniper - oak savanna K087 Mesquite - oak savanna K088 Fayette prairie K089 Black Belt K090 Live oak - sea oats K091 Cypress savanna K092 Everglades K093 Great Lakes spruce - fir forest K094 Conifer bog K095 Great Lakes pine forest K096 Northeastern spruce - fir forest K097 Southeastern spruce - fir forest K098 Northern floodplain forest K099 Maple - basswood forest K100 Oak - hickory forest K101 Elm - ash forest K102 Beech - maple forest K103 Mixed mesophytic forest K104 Appalacian oak forest K105 Mangrove K106 Northern hardwoods K107 Northern hardwoods - fir forest K108 Northern hardwoods - spruce forest K109 Transition between K104 and K106 K110 Northeastern oak - pine forest K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest K112 Southern mixed forest K113 Southern floodplain forest K114 Pocosin K115 Sand pine scrub K116 Subtropical pine forest SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 5 Balsam fir 12 Black spruce 13 Black spruce - tamarack 14 Northern pin oak 15 Red pine 16 Aspen 17 Pin cherry 18 Paper birch 19 Gray birch - red maple 20 White pine - northern red oak - red maple 21 Eastern white pine 22 White pine - hemlock 23 Eastern hemlock 24 Hemlock - yellow birch 25 Sugar maple - beech - yellow birch 26 Sugar maple - basswood 27 Sugar maple 28 Black cherry - maple 30 Red spruce - yellow birch 31 Red spruce - sugar maple - beech 32 Red spruce 33 Red spruce - balsam fir 34 Red spruce - Fraser fir 35 Paper birch - red spruce - balsam fir 37 Northern white cedar 39 Black ash - American elm - red maple 40 Post oak - blackjack oak 42 Bur oak 43 Bear oak 44 Chestnut oak 45 Pitch pine 46 Eastern redcedar 50 Black locust 51 White pine - chestnut oak 52 White oak - black oak - northern red oak 53 White oak 55 Northern red oak 57 Yellow poplar 58 Yellow poplar - eastern hemlock 59 Yellow poplar - white oak - northern red oak 60 Beech - sugar maple 61 River birch - sycamore 62 Silver maple - American elm 63 Cottonwood 64 Sassafras - persimmon 65 Pin oak - sweet gum 66 Ashe juniper - redberry (Pinchot) juniper 67 Mohrs ("shin") oak 68 Mesquite 69 Sand pine 70 Longleaf pine 71 Longleaf pine - scrub oak 72 Southern scrub oak 73 Southern redcedar 74 Cabbage palmetto 75 Shortleaf pine 76 Shortleaf pine - oak 78 Virginia pine - oak 79 Virginia pine 80 Loblolly pine - shortleaf pine 81 Loblolly pine 82 Loblolly pine - hardwood 83 Longleaf pine - slash pine 84 Slash pine 85 Slash pine - hardwood 87 Sweet gum - yellow poplar 88 Willow oak - water oak - diamondleaf oak 89 Live oak 91 Swamp chestnut oak - cherrybark oak 92 Sweetgum - willow oak 93 Sugarberry - American elm - green ash 94 Sycamore - sweetgum - American elm 95 Black willow 97 Atlantic white-cedar 98 Pond pine 104 Sweetbay - swamp tupelo - redbay 105 Tropical hardwoods 106 Mangrove 107 White spruce 108 Red maple 109 Hawthorn 110 Black oak 111 South Florida slash pine 201 White spruce 202 White spruce - paper birch 203 Balsam poplar 204 Black spruce 205 Mountain hemlock 206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir 210 Interior Douglas-fir 211 White fir 212 Western larch 213 Grand fir 215 Western white pine 216 Blue spruce 217 Aspen 218 Lodgepole pine 219 Limber pine 220 Rocky Mountain juniper 221 Red alder 222 Black cottonwood - willow 223 Sitka spruce 224 Western hemlock 225 Western hemlock - Sitka spruce 226 Coastal true fir - hemlock 227 Western redcedar - western hemlock 228 Western redcedar 229 Pacific Douglas-fir 230 Douglas-fir - western hemlock 233 Oregon white oak 234 Douglas-fir - tanoak - Pacific madrone 235 Cottonwood - willow 236 Bur oak 237 Interior ponderosa pine 238 Western juniper 239 Pinyon - juniper 240 Arizona cypress 241 Western live oak 242 Mesquite 251 White spruce - aspen 252 Paper birch 253 Black spruce - white spruce 254 Black spruce - paper birch SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY PLANT COMMUNITIES : Whitetails are extremely adaptable animals, inhabiting a variety of plant communities from tropical jungles to hot, dry deserts, to subarctic climates [24]. They are found just about anywhere forested areas are interspersed with open fields, fruit orchards, or agricultural land. In the Northeast whitetails inhabit hardwood, conifer, and mixed forests of pine (Pinus spp.), spruce (Picea spp.), fir (Abies spp.), or maple (Acer spp.) and oak (Quercus spp.). In the Southeast they inhabit the southern pine-oak forests interspersed with swamps and bottomland. In the Northwest whitetails inhabit pine-spruce-fir and western red-cedar (Thuja plicata)-western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) forests. In the Southwest whitetails inhabit mesquite (Prosopis spp.)-oak savannas and shrub/grassland communities. Whitetails also frequent grasslands and agricultural lands of central North America [3,6,7,12,17,18,23,26,39,41,45,47,48,51,54,56,57]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

BIOLOGICAL DATA AND HABITAT REQUIREMENTS

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Odocoileus virginianus | White-Tailed Deer
TIMING OF MAJOR LIFE HISTORY EVENTS : Mating Season - September through November, sometimes into January; breeding dates vary with latitude, occurring in mid to late winter in the South and earlier in the North Gestation - about 6 to 7 months Fawning Season - beginning in April and continuing through June, depending on latitude; twinning occurs Age of Maturity - females capable of reproducing at 6 to 7 months, but usually do not breed until 1 1/2 years; yearling males may not breed due to competition with older bucks Lifespan - can live up to 20 years, but 10 years is considered old Antlers - males only; can be shed as early as mid-December; sometimes not until March or April in young or unhealthy bucks [21,24] PREFERRED HABITAT : Whitetails are most frequently found near streambottoms, draws, swamps, and other riparian areas. They also frequent mixed deciduous and coniferous forests at low to mid elevations with gentle slopes [50]. Elevations can range from sea level to 6,500 feet (1,981 m) [47]. Whitetails prefer to concentrate or "yard" in small to large groups in regions where winter temperatures are cold and snow depth exceeds 18 inches (46 cm) [39]. "Yarding" usually occurs in dense, coniferous stands near riparian areas having a southerly exposure. These same areas are passed down from mother to daughter and used year after year [24]. Whitetails begin to "yard" in midwinter and remain together through April or May, depending on the depth and duration of snow. Deer will use open areas in the winter but usually remain within a quarter mile (0.4 km) of coniferous cover [21]. Whitetails are very adaptable to disturbances, such as agriculture and forestry practices, and prefer these areas if adequate forage and cover is available [24]. In the southwestern United States whitetails tend to choose the pine-oak montane forests at higher elevations [2]. COVER REQUIREMENTS : At northern latitudes whitetails need stands of mixed conifer and deciduous trees with partial openings that provide both forage and protection from cold winds and deep snows. Forests that intercept about 50 percent of the snowfall and contain openings of 1 to 5 acres (0.4-2 ha) comprising 2 percent of the whitetail's forested range are most beneficial [21,39]. In the Northeast, Hout and others [26] listed conifer species in order of decreasing benefit for winter cover: eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), white spruce (Picea glauca), red spruce (Picea rubens), and balsam fir (Abies balsamea). Whitetails rely on subclimax stands to provide hiding cover and adequate forage. At southern latitudes whitetails do not usually migrate and use cover more for hiding than for protection against severe weather [22]. FOOD HABITS : Whitetails are primarily browsers and eat a tremendous variety of plants throughout their range. Forage consumed is regionally specific and usually consists of leaves, twigs, and stems of woody plants, as well as mast, fruits, cultivated crops, and sometimes grasses and forbs. They have also been observed eating marine kelp [24], and eating scavenged salmon in Glacier National Park [personal observation]. In the North evergreens become important browse during winter. Browse consumption is highest when acorn mast is scarce and lowest when acorn mast is abundant [21]. When whitetails can afford to be selective they tend to choose the most nutritious plants [24]. Some of the most commonly browsed plants are listed below: maple, oak, spruce, pine, fir, northern white-cedar (Thuja occidentalis), hazel (Corylus spp.), dogwood (Cornus spp.), sumac (Rhus spp.), honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.), birch (Betula spp.), poplar (Populus spp.), aspen (P. tremuloides), willow (Salix spp.), cherry (Prunus spp.), juniper (Juniperus spp.), apple (Malus spp.), persimmon (Diospyros spp.), hawthorne (Crataegus spp.), common snowberry (Symphorocarpus albus), greenbrier (Smilax spp.), buffaloberry (Shepherdia spp.), bearberry (Arctostaphylus uva-ursi), current (Ribes spp.), rose (Rosa spp.), rhododendron (Rhododendron spp.), mahonia (Mahonia spp.), yaupon (Ilex spp.), low panicum grasses (Panicum spp.), broomweed (Gutierrezia spp.), saltbush (Atriplex spp.), various species of cactus, ceanothus (Ceanothus spp.), and viburnum (Viburnum spp.). Whitetails will also eat fleshy berries of cherry, raspberry (Rubus spp.), elder (Sambucus spp.), and huckleberry and blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) Whitetails also eat cultivated crops, most notably corn, alfalfa, and wheat, and vegetables and flowers in gardens [6,7,12,17,18,21,23,24, 26,39,41,43,45,47,48,51,54,56,57]. PREDATORS : Whitetail predators include humans, coyotes (Canis latrans), domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), wolves (Canis lupus), black bears (Ursus americanus), grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), mountains lions (Felis concolor), lynx (Felis lynx), and bobcats (Felis rufus). Predators having less of an impact on whitetail populations include foxes (Vulpes spp.), fishers (Martes pennanti), golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos), and bald eagles (Haliaetus leucocephalus) [40]. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Lyon and Jensen [37] reported on numerous studies of the effects of clearcutting on deer and concluded that effects are unpredictable because they are highly variable in all locations and habitats. In general they determined that slash over 1.5 feet (0.5 m) deep would hinder deer movement. Whitetails' responses to openings are a function of forage, cover, size, type (natural or cut), and the behavior of a specific population in any one area. Halls [21] reported that cutting units should vary in shape and size but should not be more than 200 yards (181 m) wide. Also, cutting should promote a mix of various age classes. Openings should be maintained by heavy thinning at an early stand age to encourage forage production. In the Swan River Valley, Montana, Freedman and Habeck [15] concluded that 20 to 40 years is needed for recovery before a logged site can become significant winter deer range. This is because deep winter snows make browse unavailable until sufficient snow-intercepting canopy is established. However, preferred browse species will usually become available in clearcut areas only if they were a part of the predisturbance vegetative community [59]. Domestic and feral dogs cause severe mortality in whitetail populations. Fawns and pregnant does are the most vulnerable to dog attacks, especially during the winter when snow is deep or crusty [21,24,40]. Tens of thousands of whitetails are killed annually by vehicles. Deer are also vulnerable to viral, bacterial, and fungal diseases, as well as parasites [21,24,38]. Whitetails are host to a parasitic meningeal worm (Parelaphostrongylus tenuis), which is harmful to other cervids but not to whitetails [2]. Whitetails inflict serious damage on commercial and private crops, as well as on tree seedlings planted for regeneration projects. Deer can entirely destroy or inhibit the regeneration of some tree species through overbrowsing [21,24,38,52]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

FIRE EFFECTS AND USE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Odocoileus virginianus | White-Tailed Deer
DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS ON ANIMALS : Fast-moving fires can confuse, trap, and kill deer [4,8]. HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS : The effects of fire on whitetail habitat have been well documented. Much of the literature reports in detail on the foraging behavior of whitetails following fire. In general, whitetails are seen foraging more frequently on burned sites than adjacent unburned sites [20,29,30,36]. Patchy burns that create a mosaic of browse and cover are usually beneficial to whitetail populations [11,14,29,31,42,46]. Historically, logging followed by fire played a major role in the westward expansion of the whitetail's range [9]. In many areas fire suppression has led to a decrease in forage quality and subsequently quantity as early seral communities are replaced with unpalatable browse or browse that grows out of reach of deer [14,15,19]. Many studies have reported an increase in plant nutrients following fire, most notably potassium, phosphorus, calcium, and potash. Crude fiber and protein also tend to increase, as well as water and fat content [11,20,21,32,35,36,44,49,53]. These nutrient increases tend to be temporary, only lasting a few years before returning to preburn levels. Lay [35,36] conducted several burning studies in the southern pine forests of the United States. He reported that in the South, browse comprises less than half of whitetail diets; therefore, when burning, careful consideration must be given to the fire effects on fruits and mast, which are important whitetail food. Thill and others [53] reported that in the southern Coastal Plain, forage quality is a limiting factor for whitetail populations, due to the heavily leached acid soils. Burning temporarily improves forage quality but reduces foraging efficiency and the availability of fruits within the 1st year after burning. A study in northern Idaho showed that during January, March, and April, whitetails chose to forage in unburned Douglas fir/ninebark (Pseudotsuga menziesii/Physocarpus malvaceous) habitat types where the average distance to cover was 4.5 feet (1.5 m) [29]. Ninebark is relatively unpalatable to whitetails and is eaten more frequently on burned sites. Burning these types may reduce their value to whitetails until cover similar to that of the unburned sites is regenerated (3-4 years). Redstem ceanothus (Ceanothus sanguineus), a highly valued deer forage, increased dramatically after both spring and fall burning, with greater increases after fall burning [46]. Burning jack pine (Pinus banksiana) plantations in Nebraska resulted in a decrease of whitetails in the burned areas due to a reduction in cover [58]. FIRE USE : Prescribed fire is a commonly used tool for whitetail habitat improvement [9]. It can be used to maintain or prevent the development of certain vegetation types and create a diversity of age classes to provide forage and cover [52]. Prescribed fire can also be used to reduce slash, which impedes deer movement, and to reduce duff in areas where quick duff accumulation can prevent growth of understory forage species [10]. Halls [21] recommended burning in late winter or early spring to promote resprouting of vegetation in spring and summer. Summer fires can reduce availability of forage important in fall and winter. He also stated that fires in southern pine forests should be excluded until trees are 15 feet (4.6 m) tall and then burned at 3- to 5-year intervals to keep browse within reach. Burning units should be kept to 74 acres (30 ha) or less [28]. Lay [35] also suggested spring burning in southern pine forests but stated that long-term results of repeated burning are detrimental to forage species. DeByle [10] recommended burning aspen stands at 40- to 80-year intervals for optimum deer habitat. Units should be 10 to 40 acres (4-16 ha) to prevent overbrowsing and should be maintained in varying age classes. Armstrong [1] recommended burning every 7 to 10 years in the Edwards Plateau Region of Texas. He stated that reducing the whitetail population by as much as 50 percent before burning would prevent overbrowsing in postburn areas and would not be detrimental to the deer population. Merrill [42] suggested burning grand fir (Abies grandis)/ pachistima (Pachistima myrsinites) types during spring or fall every 10 years to rejuvenate decadent plants [42]. The Minnesota Department of Conservation listed five burning practices for improving whitetail habitat in northern hardwood forests [9]: (1) Burn slash to remove it as an obstacle and prepare the seedbed. (2) Burn decadent aspen to provide browse for about 5 years. (3) Burn 10 to 20 acre (4-8 ha) patches adjacent to deer yards during dormant season to encourage shrub and hardwood tree sprouts. (4) Reburn small areas to maintain openings in forests. (5) Identify areas where wildfires could be left to burn. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

References for species: Odocoileus virginianus


1. Armstrong, W. E. 1980. Impact of prescribed burning on wildlife. In: White, Larry D., ed. Prescribed range burning in the Edwards Plateau of Texas: Proceedings of a symposium; 1980 October 23; Junction, TX. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Extension Service, The Texas A&M University System: 22-26. [11430]
2. Baker, Rollin A. 1984. Origin, classification, and distribution. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 1-18. [14289]
3. Barber, Harold L. 1984. Eastern mixed forest. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 345-354. [14293]
4. Bendell, J. F. 1974. Effects of fire on birds and mammals. In: Kozlowski, T. T.; Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and ecosystems. New York: Academic Press: 73-138. [16447]
5. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
6. Blouch, Ralph I. 1984. Northern Great Lakes States and Ontario forests. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 391-410. [14297]
7. Cook, Robert L. 1984. Texas. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 457-474. [14302]
8. Cowan, Ian McTaggert. 1956. The black-tailed deer. In: Taylor, Walter P., ed. The deer of North America. Harrisburg, PA: The Telegraph Press: 521-617. [14313]
9. Crawford, Hewlette S. 1984. Habitat management. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 629-646. [14308]
10. DeByle, Norbert V. 1985. Managing wildlife habitat with fire in the aspen ecosystem. In: Lotan, James E.;Brown, James K., compilers. Fire's effects on wildlife habitat- symposium proceedings; 1984 March 21; Missoula, MT. General Technical Report INT-186. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 73-82. [8336]
11. Dills, Gary G. 1970. Effects of prescribed burning on deer browse. Journal of Wildlife Management. 34(3): 540-545. [218]
12. Evans, Wain. 1984. Southern Rocky Mountains. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 505-512. [14306]
13. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
14. Freedman, June D. 1983. The historical relationship between fire and plant succession within the Swan Valley white-tailed deer winter range, western Montana. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. 139 p. Dissertation. [6486]
15. Freedman, June D.; Habeck, James R. 1985. Fire, logging, and white-tailed deer interrelationships in the Swan Valley, northwestern Montana. In: Lotan, James E.; Brown, James K., compilers. Fire's effects on wildlife habitat--symposium proceedings; 1984 March 21; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-186. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 23-35. [8319]
16. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
17. Gavin, Thomas A. 1984. Pacific Northwest. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 487-496. [14304]
18. Gladfelter, H. Lee. 1984. Midwestern agricultural region. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 427-440. [14299]
19. Gruell, George E. 1980. Fire's influence on wildlife habitat on the Bridger-Teton National Forest, Wyoming. Volume II- changes and causes, management implications. Research Paper INT-252. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 33 p. [5175]
20. Hallisey, Dennis M.; Wood, Gene W. 1976. Prescribed fire in scrub oak habitat in central Pennsylvania. Journal of Wildlife Management. 40(3): 507-516. [1066]
21. Halls, Lowell K. 1978. White-tailed deer. In: Schmidt, John L.; Gilbert, Douglas L., eds. Big game of North America. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 43-65. [14311]
22. Halls, Lowell K., ed. 1984. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books. 870 p. [14285]
23. Hardin, James W.; Klimstra, Willard D.; Silvy, Nova J. 1984. Florida Keys. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 381-390. [14296]
24. Hesselton, William T.; Hesselton, RuthAnn Monson. 1982. White-tailed deer. In: Chapman, Joseph A.; Feldhamer, George A., eds. Wild mammals of North America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press: 878-901. [14312]
25. Hoskinson, Reed L.; Mech, L. David. 1976. White-tailed deer migration and its role in wolf predation. Journal of Wildlife Management. 40(3): 429-441. [14314]
26. Hoot, Jean; Potvin, Francois; Belanger, Michel. 1984. Southeastern Canada. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 293-304. [14290]
27. Irwin, Larry L. 1985. Foods of moose, Alces alces, and white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, on a burn in boreal forest. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 99(2): 240-245. [4513]
28. Ivey, T. L.; Causey, M. K. 1984. Response of white-tailed deer to prescribed fire. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 12(2): 138-141. [8393]
29. Keay, Jeffrey A.; Peek, James M. 1980. Relationships between fires and winter habitat of deer in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 44(2): 372-380. [125]
30. Kirsch, Leo M.; Kruse, Arnold D. 1973. Prairie fires and wildlife. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1972 June 8-9; Lubbock, TX. Number 12. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 289-303. [8472]
31. Klukas, Richard W. 1973. Control burn activities in Everglades National Park. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1972 June 8-9; Lubbock, TX. Number 12. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 397-425. [8476]
32. Komarek, E. V. 1971. Effects of fire on wildlife and range habitats. In: Prescribed burning symposium: Proceedings; 1971 April 14-16; Charleston, SC. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: 46-53. [10421]
33. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. United States [Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States]. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 1:3,168,000; colored. [3455]
34. Laramie, Henry A., Jr. 1968. Deer food. In: Siegler, Hilbert R., ed. The white-tailed deer of New Hampshire. Concord, NH: New Hampshire Fish and Game Department: 55-58. [14310]
35. Sinton, Heather M. M. 1980. Effect of burning and mowing on Festuca hallii (Vasey) Piper (Festuca scabrella Torr.) Edmonton, AB: The University of Alberta. 141 p. Dissertation. [14315]
36. Lay, Daniel W. 1967. Browse palatability and the effects of prescribed burning in southern pine forests. Journal of Forestry. 65(11): 826-828. [145]
37. Lyon, L. Jack; Jensen, Chester E. 1980. Management implications of elk and deer use of clear-cuts in Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management. 44(2): 352-362. [14377]
38. Matschke, George H.; DeCalesta, David S.; Harder, John D. 1984. Crop damage and control. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 655-676. [14309]
39. Mattfeld, George F. 1984. Eastern hardwood and spruce-fir forests. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 305-330. [14291]
40. Mech, L. David. 1984. Predators and predation. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 184-200. [14288]
41. Menzel, Karl E. 1984. Central and southern plains. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 449-456. [14301]
42. Merrill, Evelyn H. 1982. Shrub responses after fire in an Idaho ponderosa pine community. Journal of Wildlife Management. 46(2): 496-501. [1641]
43. Murphy, Dean A. 1970. Deer range appraisal in the Midwest. In: White-tailed deer in the Midwest: Proceedings of a symposium, 30th Midwest fish and wildlife conference; 1968 December 9; Columbus, OH. Res. Pap. NC-39. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 2-10. [13667]
44. Nelson, Jack R. 1976. Forest fire and big game in the Pacific Northwest. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology fire ecolgy conference: Pacific Northwest; 1974 October 16-17; Portland, OR. No. 15. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 85-102. [6464]
45. Newsom, John D. 1984. Coastal Plain. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 367-380. [14295]
46. Orme, Mark L.; Leege, Thomas A. 1976. Emergence and survival of redstem (Ceanothus sanguineus) following prescribed burning. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, Montana. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 391-420. [6273]
47. Peek, James M. 1984. Northern Rocky Mountains. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 497-504. [14305]
48. Petersen, Lyle E. 1984. Northern Plains. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 441-448. [14300]
49. Rasmussen, G. A.; Scifres, C. J.; Drawe, D. L. 1983. Huisache growth, browse quality, and use following burning. Journal of Range Management. 36(3): 337-342. [1939]
50. Severson, Kieth E.; Medina, Alvin L. 1983. Deer and elk habitat management in the Southwest. Journal of Range Management Monograph No. 2. Denver: Society for Range Management. 64 p. [2110]
51. Shrauder, Paul A. 1984. Appalachian Mountains. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 331-344. [14292]
52. Smith, Robert L.; Coggin, Joe L. 1984. Basis and role of management. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 571-600. [14307]
53. Thill, Ronald E.; Martin, Alton, Jr.; Morris, Hershel F., Jr.; McCune, E. Donice. 1987. Grazing and burning impacts on deer diets on Louisiana pine-bluestem ran range. Journal of Wildlife Management. 51(4): 873-880. [2931]
54. Torgerson, Oliver; Porath, Wayne R. 1984. Midwestern oak-hickory forests. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 411-426. [14298]
55. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. 50 CFR Pt 17. Endangered & threatened wildlife & plants; review of plant taxa for listing as endangered or threatened species; notice of review. Federal Register. 55(35): 6184-6229. [14528]
56. Whittington, Richard W. 1984. Piedmont Plateau. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 355-366. [14294]
57. Wishart, William D. 1984. Western Canada. In: Halls, Lowell K., ed. White-tailed deer: ecology and management. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books: 475-486. [14303]
58. Wolfe, Carl W. 1973. Effects of fire on a sandhills grassland environment. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1972 June 8-9; Lubbock, TX. Number 12. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 241-255. [8469]
59. Hughes, Jeffery W.; Fahey, Timothy J. 1991. Availability, quality, and selection of browse by white-tailed deer after clearcutting. Forest Science. 37(1): 261-270. [14269]
60. Wood, Don A., compiler. 1994. Official lists of endangered & potentially endangered fauna and flora in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 22 p. [24196]
61. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; animal candidate review for listing as endangered or threatened species; proposed rule. 50 CFR Part 17. Tuesday, November 15, 1994. Federal Register. 59(219): 58982-59028. [24357]
62. Washington Department of Wildlife. 1994. Species of special concern in Washington - state and federal status. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Wildlife. 41 p. [25414]


[25414] Index
FEIS Home Page

Related categories for Wildlife Species: Odocoileus virginianus | White-Tailed Deer

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.