1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Fern or Fern Ally > Species: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
ABBREVIATION : LYCANN SYNONYMS : Lycopodium annotinum ssp. alpestre (Hartman) Love & Love Lycopodium annotinum ssp. pungens (LaPyle) Hulten SCS PLANT CODE : LYAN2 COMMON NAMES : stiff clubmoss bristly clubmoss interrupted clubmoss TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of stiff clubmoss is Lycopodium annotinum L. [14,25,27]. Four varieties are recognized based on morphological and ecological characteristics [3,10,37]: L. annotinum var. annotinum L. annotinum var. acrifolium Fern. (sharp-leaved) L. annotinum var. pungens (LaPyle) Desv. (pungent) L. annotinum var. alpestre Hartman (of high mountains) LIFE FORM : Fern or Fern Ally FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY COMPILED BY AND DATE : Robin F. Matthews, June 1993 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Matthews, Robin F. 1993. Lycopodium annotinum. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Stiff clubmoss is a circumboreal species that is widely distributed from Greenland and Labrador to Alaska, south to the northwestern United States, Wyoming, Colorado, the Great Lakes States, New England, and along the Appalachians [10,14,19,20,37]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White - red - jack pine FRES11 Spruce - fir FRES17 Elm - ash - cottonwood FRES18 Maple - beech - birch FRES19 Aspen - birch FRES20 Douglas-fir FRES23 Fir - spruce FRES24 Hemlock - Sitka spruce FRES26 Lodgepole pine FRES28 Western hardwoods FRES44 Alpine STATES : AK CO CT DE ID ME MD MA MI MN MT NH NJ NY NC OR PA RI TN VT VA WA WV WI WY AB BC MB NB NF NT NS ON PE PQ SK YT ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : ACAD APIS DEWA DENA GLBA GLAC GRTE GRSM ISRO LACL MORA NOCA OLYM PIRO ROMO SARA SLBE VOYA WRST YELL YUCH BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 1 Northern Pacific Border 2 Cascade Mountains 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 9 Middle Rocky Mountains 11 Southern Rocky Mountains 15 Black Hills Uplift KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K001 Spruce - cedar - helmock forest K002 Cedar - hemlock - Douglas-fir forest K003 Silver fir - Douglas-fir forest K004 Fir - hemlock forest K008 Lodgepole pine - subalpine forest K012 Douglas-fir forest K015 Western spruce - fir forest K025 Alder - ash forest K052 Alpine meadows and barren K093 Great Lakes spruce - fir forest K094 Conifer bog K095 Great Lakes pine forest K096 Northeastern spruce - fir forest K099 Maple - basswood forest K101 Elm - ash forest K102 Beech - maple forest K103 Mixed mesophytic forest K106 Northern hardwoods K107 Northern hardwoods - fir forest K108 Northern hardwoods - spruce forest SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 5 Balsam fir 12 Black spruce 13 Black spruce - tamarack 15 Red pine 16 Aspen 17 Pin cherry 18 Paper birch 19 Gray birch - red maple 20 White pine - northern red oak - red maple 21 Eastern white pine 22 White pine - hemlock 23 Eastern hemlock 24 Hemlock - yellow birch 25 Sugar maple - beech - yellow birch 26 Sugar maple - basswood 27 Sugar maple 28 Black cherry - maple 30 Red spruce - yellow birch 31 Red spruce - sugar maple - beech 32 Red spruce 33 Red spruce - balsam fir 35 Paper birch - red spruce - balsam fir 37 Northern white-cedar 38 Tamarack 39 Black ash - American elm - red maple 60 Beech - sugar maple 107 White spruce 108 Red maple 201 White spruce 202 White spruce - paper birch 203 Balsam poplar 204 Black spruce 205 Mountain hemlock 206 Engelmann spruce - subalpinefir 208 Whitebark pine 210 Interior Douglas-fir 217 Aspen 218 Lodgepole pine 223 Sitka spruce 224 Western hemlock 225 Western hemlock - Sitka spruce 226 Coastal true fir - hemlock 227 Western redcedar - western hemlock 228 Western redcedar 229 Pacific Douglas-fir 230 Douglas-fir - western hemlock 251 White spruce - aspen 252 Paper birch 253 Black spruce - white spruce 254 Black spruce - paper birch SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Stiff clubmoss most often grows in coniferous, northern hardwoods, and mixed hardwoods habitats [25,35,43]. It may also occur in grass-sedge-heath associations [35]. Stiff clubmoss is characteristic of boreal coniferous forests [23]. It is also an indicator of white spruce (Picea glauca)-balsam fir (Abies balsamea) forest types in the Great Lakes States [36]. Stiff clubmoss is listed as a codominant species in the following published classification: Field guide to forest ecosystem classification for the Clay Belt, site region 3e [22]. Common shrub associates of stiff clubmoss include bog Labrador tea (Ledum groenlandicum), cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus), prickly rose (Rosa acicularis), white spiraea (Spirea betulifolia), blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), twinflower (Linnaea borealis), alder (Alnus spp.), Canada yew (Taxus canadensis), mooseberry viburnum (Viburnum pauciflorum), and highbush cranberry (V. edule) [5,6,22,26]. Other associated vegetation includes heartleaf arnica (Arnica cordifolia), bunchberry (Cornus canadensis), wild sarsaparilla (Aralia nudicaulis), one-sided wintergreen (Pyrola secunda), sidebells shinleaf (P. uniflora), queencup beadlily (Clintonia uniflora), orchids (Corallorhiza spp., Calypso spp., Habenaria spp.), twisted stalk (Streptopus amplexifolius), meadowrue (Thalictrum spp.), baneberry (Actaea rubra), devil's club (Oplopanax horridus), miterwort (Mitella spp.), lady fern (Athyrium felix-femina), woodfern (Dryopteris spp.) sedges (Carex spp.), horsetails (Equisetum spp.), mosses (Mnium spp., Rhytdiadelphus spp., Polytrichum spp.), and lichens (Cladonia spp., Stereocaulon spp., Peltigera spp.) [5,6,22,26].

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Stiff clubmoss is occasionally eaten by moose from May through October on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska [29]. PALATABILITY : NO-ENTRY NUTRITIONAL VALUE : NO-ENTRY COVER VALUE : NO-ENTRY VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : NO-ENTRY OTHER USES AND VALUES : Spores of the genus Lycopodium have been used as baby powder and as an inflammable powder for flash photography [43]. Native Americans used the spores to stop nosebleeds and bleeding from wounds. Some clubmosses (Lycopodium spp.) contain poisonous alkaloids that can cause pain in the mouth, vomiting, and diarrhea when ingested [34]. Stiff clubmoss makes an attractive ground cover throughout the year but is rarely transplanted successfully [21]. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Stiff clubmoss in open white spruce/alder/cloudberry/feathermoss (Pleurozium spp.) communities in Alaska had the following cover (c) and frequency (f) percentages after three silvicultural treatments [7]: pre- clearcut(no burn) shelterwood shelterwood treatment 14m spacing 9m spacing c/f c/f c/f c/f _______________________________________________________________________ year 1 0.1/4.0 +/2.0 -- -- year 2 0.1/3.0 -- 0.9/10.0 (+ designates present; -- designates not present) Stiff clubmoss declined in cover and constancy after logging and site preparation in the sub-boreal spruce zone of British Columbia [17].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Stiff clubmoss is a native, perennial, evergreen clubmoss. The aboveground horizontal stem of stiff clubmoss is long, creeping, and forked with ascending or erect branches. The main stem is generally 40 inches (100 cm) long, and branches are typically 0.8 to 16 inches (2-40 cm) tall. Vegetative leaves are whorled, and fertile leaves form a sessile strobilus at the end of a branch [10,14,19,27,37]. Roots are adventitious and arise from the underside of the prostrate stem [44]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Hemicryptophyte Geophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Stiff clubmoss is a clonal species, reproducing primarily by sprouting from rhizomes [8,38]. It also produces spores and a subterranean, mycorrhizal gametophyte [32,40]. Stiff clubmoss is homosporous but usually cross-fertilizes [38]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Stiff clubmoss most commonly inhabits moist woods, thickets, bogs, and meadows [10,19,20,21]. Sites are typically cool and shaded but occasionally may be dry, exposed, and rocky [3,5,27,35]. Soils are acidic, well to poorly drained, and have mesic to subhygric moisture regimes [6,14,25]. Stiff clubmoss occurs from sea level to alpine zones and has been found at 11,000 feet (3,300 m) in Colorado [19,34]. Occurrence of stiff clubmoss increases with increasing latitude [23]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Facultative Seral Species Stiff clubmoss is shade tolerant [25]. It occurs in mature forests throughout its range [5,15,28,30,42]. In Isle Royale National Park, Michigan, occurrence of stiff clubmoss is largely related to forest communities undisturbed for 100 or more years [18]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Stiff clubmoss spores develop from late July to early October [10].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Stiff clubmoss regenerates by sprouting from surface rhizomes [8,38]. These surficial rhizomes are likely to be damaged by fire but may survive a light fire. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Surface rhizome/chamaephytic root crown

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Stiff clubmoss is most likely killed by all but very quick, light fires. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : After fires on mesic black spruce (Picea mariana) sites in interior Alaska, stiff clubmoss was not present in abundance in the newly burned stage (0 to 1 year after fire) and did not reach its greatest cover until 90 to 200 years later. However, in white spruce stands, stiff clubmoss was present from the newly burned stage through the hardwood stage (stand age 46 to 150 years) [11]. Dyrness [7] reported that stiff clubmoss did not sprout in white spruce/bog Labrador tea/mountain cranberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) communities within 2 years after clearcutting and burning. The number of stems present after clearcutting and burning balsam fir-red spruce (Picea rubra) woodlots in southwestern New Brunswick were reported as follows [16]: preburn 151 after clearcutting 33 after burning 0 1 year after burning 0 Stiff clubmoss was not present in burns less than 7 years old in mixed-hardwood stands in New Brunswick [31]. However, in black spruce-feathermoss stands in Labrador, it attained prefire frequencies in about 5 years [12]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : NO-ENTRY

REFERENCES

SPECIES: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss
REFERENCES : 1. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434] 2. Blackwell, B.; Feller, M. C.; Trowbridge, R. 1992. Conversion of dense lodgepole pine stands in west-central British Columbia into young lodgepole pine plantations using prescribed fire. 1. Biomass consumption durning burning treatments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 22(4): 572-581. [19658] 3. Cody, William J.; Britton, Donald M. 1989. Ferns and fern allies of Canada. Ottawa, ON: Agriculture Canada, Research Branch. 430 p. [13078] 4. Cooper, William S. 1928. Seventeen years of successional change upon Isle Royale, Lake Superior. Ecology. 9(1): 1-5. [7297] 5. Cormack, R. G. H. 1953. A survey of coniferous forest succession in the eastern Rockies. Forestry Chronicle. 29: 218-232. [16458] 6. Corns, I. G. W.; Annas, R. M. 1986. Field guide to forest ecosystems of west-central Alberta. Edmonton, AB: Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forestry Centre. 251 p. [8998] 7. Dyrness, C. T.; Viereck, L. A.; Foote, M. J.; Zasada, J. C. 1988. The effect on vegetation and soil temperature of logging flood-plain white spruce. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-392. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 45 p. [7471] 8. Eriksson, O. 1989. Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants. Oikos. 55: 231-238. [10322] 9. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905] 10. Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. [Corrections supplied by R. C. Rollins]. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press. 1632 p. (Dudley, Theodore R., gen. ed.; Biosystematics, Floristic & Phylogeny Series; vol. 2). [14935] 11. Foote, M. Joan. 1983. Classification, description, and dynamics of plant communities after fire in the taiga of interior Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-307. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 108 p. [7080] 12. Foster, David R. 1985. Vegetation development following fire in Picea mariana (black spruce) - Pleurozium forests of south-eastern Labrador, Canada. Journal of Ecology. 73: 517-534. [7222] 13. Gaines, Edward M.; Kallander, Harry R.; Wagner, Joe A. 1958. Controlled burning in southwestern ponderosa pine: results from the Blue Mountain plots, Fort Apache Indian Reservation. Journal of Forestry. 56: 323-327. [988] 14. Gleason, H. A.; Cronquist, A. 1963. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. 810 p. [7065] 15. Habeck, James R. 1963. The composition of several climax forest communities in the Lake McDonald area of Glacier National Park. Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences. 23: 37-44. [6532] 16. Hall, I. V. 1955. Floristic changes following the cutting and burning of a woodlot for blueberry production. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Science. 35: 143-152. [9012] 17. Hamilton, Evelyn H.; Yearsley, H. Karen. 1988. Vegetation development after clearcutting and site preparation in the SBS zone. Economic and Regional Development Agreement: FRDA Report 018. Victoria, BC: Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forestry Centre; British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Lands. 66 p. [8760] 18. Hansen, H. L.; Krefting, L. W.; Kurmis, V. 1973. The forest of Isle Royale in relation to fire history and wildlife. Tech. Bull. 294; Forestry Series 13. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station. 44 p. [8120] 19. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press Inc. 666 p. [6851] 20. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168] 21. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur; Ownbey, Marion. 1969. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 1: Vascular cryptograms, gymnosperms, and monocotyledons. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 914 p. [1169] 22. Jones, R. Keith; Pierpoint, Geoffrey; Wickware, Gregory M.; [and others]. 1983. Field guide to forest ecosystem classification for the Clay Belt, site region 3e. Maple, Ontario: Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forest Research Institute. 160 p. [16163] 23. Klinka, K.; Krajina, V. J.; Ceska, A.; Scagel, A. M. 1989. Indicator plants of coastal British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press. 288 p. [10703] 24. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 25. Kudish, Michael. 1992. Adirondack upland flora: an ecological perspective. Saranac, NY: The Chauncy Press. 320 p. [19376] 26. Kurmis, Vilis; Webb, Sara L.; Merriam, Lawrence C., Jr. 1986. Plant communities of Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Botany. 64: 531-540. [16088] 27. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 648 p. [13798] 28. Layser, Earle F. 1978. Grizzly bears in the southern Selkirk Mountains. Northwest Science. 52(2): 77-91. [14275] 29. LeResche, Robert E.; Davis, James L. 1973. Importance of nonbrowse foods to moose on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management. 37(3): 279-287. [13123] 30. Lutz, H. J. 1953. The effects of forest fires on the vegetation of interior Alaska. Juneau, AK: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 36 p. [7076] 31. MacLean, David A.; Wein, Ross W. 1977. Changes in understory vegetation with increasing stand age in New Brunswick forests: species composition, cover, biomass, and nutrients. Canadian Journal of Botany. 55: 2818-2831. [10106] 32. Malloch, D.; Malloch, B. 1982. The mycorrhizal status of boreal plants: additional species from northeastern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany. 60: 1035-1040. [17718] 33. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843] 34. Robuck, O. Wayne. 1989. Common alpine plants of southeast Alaska. Misc. Publ. ---. Juneau, AK: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory. 207 p. [17693] 35. Roland, A. E.; Smith, E. C. 1969. The flora of Nova Scotia. Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Museum. 746 p. [13158] 36. Rudolf, Paul O. 1950. Forest plantations in the Lake States. Tech. Bull. 1010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 171 p. [13463] 37. Seymour, Frank Conkling. 1982. The flora of New England. 2d ed. Phytologia Memoirs 5. Plainfield, NJ: Harold N. Moldenke and Alma L. Moldenke. 611 p. [7604] 38. Soltis, Pamela S.; Soltis, Douglas E. 1988. Estimated rates of intragametophytic selfing in lycopods. American Journal of Botany. 75(2): 248-256. [20441] 39. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090] 40. Svensson, Brita M.; Callaghan, Terry V. 1988. Apical dominance and the simulation of metapopulation dynamics in Lycopodium annotinum. Oikos. 51(3): 331-342. [17740] 41. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573] 42. Viereck, Leslie A. 1970. Forest succession and soil development adjacent to the Chena River in interior Alaska. Arctic and Alpine Research. 2(1): 1-26. [12466] 43. Weber, William A. 1987. Colorado flora: western slope. Boulder, CO: Colorado Associated University Press. 530 p. [7706] 44. Wilson, C. L.; Loomis, W. E.; Steeves, T. A. 1971. Botany. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 752 p. [21163]

Index

Related categories for Species: Lycopodium annotinum | Stiff Clubmoss

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.