1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Fern or Fern Ally > Species: Selaginella densa | Little Clubmoss
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Selaginella densa | Little Clubmoss
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Little clubmoss is a minor part of elk diets but is not a valuable elk browse [36]. During a Montana study domestic animals were never observed grazing on little clubmoss [57]. Bighorn sheep may eat some clubmoss (Selaginella spp.) in New Mexico [40]. PALATABILITY : The relish and degree of use shown by livestock and wildlife species for little clubmoss (var. densa) in several western states is rated as follows [16]: UT WY MT ND Cattle poor poor poor poor Sheep poor poor poor poor Horses poor poor poor poor Elk fair poor poor ---- Mule deer fair poor poor fair White-tailed deer ---- poor ---- fair Antelope fair poor poor fair Upland game birds fair fair ---- poor Waterfowl fair ---- ---- ---- Small nongame birds fair ---- ---- ---- Small Mammals fair fair ---- ---- NUTRITIONAL VALUE : The energy and protein value of little clubmoss forage is poor [16]. Aboveground parts of little clubmoss have a high ash content (19.7%). Most of this is silica which comprises about 16.5 percent of plant dry weight. Other results of this analysis are given below [59]: Percent of dry weight of aboveground portions of plant Calcium 0.20 Potassium 0.30 Iron 0.038 Zinc 0.023 Sodium 0.29 Phosphorus 0.11 Protein 8.50 COVER VALUE : Little clubmoss provides poor cover for small animals [16]. VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : Little clubmoss has poor short-term or long-term revegetation potential [16]. It does grow well on gentle and moderate slopes and it has low to moderate erosion control potential. However, its potential biomass production is low and establishment requirements may be exacting [16]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : While little clubmoss does not provide forage, it does protect the soil from erosion by wind or water and reduces the effects of tramping [7]. With care, little clubmoss can be transplanted into gardens where it is an attractive ground cover that grows on rocks and in other dry situations [34]. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : The role of little clubmoss in mixed prairie is not well understood, although its influence on other vegetation and the habitat has been thought to be slight because its requirements for water and nutrients are low [9,10,60]. During light showers, its dense mats and extensive, shallow roots may intercept and soak up all the available water [55,57]. During high intensity storms, the mats of little clubmoss act to increase infiltration and decrease runoff and surface erosion [57]. Its shallow root system also limits clubmoss growth to periods of the year when moisture is available at shallow depths [59]. Grazing effects: The effect of grazing on little clubmoss seems to be confounded by drought. In Canadian and Montana mixed prairie, little clubmoss is able to increase during periods of drought [10,18,58]. Also, little clubmoss increases when protected from grazing and decreases with grazing due to trampling of grazing animals [10]. Little clubmoss is relatively weakly rooted and easily damaged by trampling [37]. Decreases in response to grazing may also be explained by the exposure and drying of the surface soil when cover is removed by grazing [18]. In the short-grass prairie of southeastern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan, grasses can easily establish in areas with high cover of little clubmoss during years with above normal precipitation, but they are rarely able to establish during dry years [7]. A 4-year Montana study done during a period of normal rainfall compared ungrazed mixed prairie with mixed prairie moderately grazed by sheep. Cover of little clubmoss decreased from 21 to 17.6 percent on the ungrazed site but it decreased from 15.1 to 7.1 percent on the grazed area [58]. The strong decrease on grazed prairie was attributed to trampling, competition, and manure [57]. A 7-year study of three levels of grazing intensity on the short-grass prairie in southeastern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan was done during dry and drought years [9]. Little clubmoss increased under all levels of grazing, with the greatest increase in the most lightly grazed area. On ungrazed land little clubmoss increased in basal area from 11 percent to 16 percent. Results of a second 10-year study showed the basal area of little clubmoss increased by 37 percent on ungrazed and 27 percent on grazed land, while grass cover generally decreased. Looking at total vegetation cover the authors concluded that "climate rather than moderate grazing use was the principal factor affecting plant cover" between 1928 and 1939. During a third 5-year study, little clubmoss increased more under a medium level of grazing than under severe grazing intensity [9]. Little clubmoss increases more under rotational grazing than under continuous grazing [9,65]. A 3-year North Dakota mixed prairie study compared exclosures established 38 to 41 years previously with cattle-grazed range. Little clubmoss cover did not vary significantly despite major differences in species composition of grasses and silver sagebrush (Artemisia cana) [5,6]. Site differences were more important than grazing pressure [6]. Ross and Hunter [50] list clubmoss as increasing under grazing pressure in Montana. However, little clubmoss increases very slowly when taller, competing vegetation is partly or wholly removed [52]. Treatment with fertilizer: The primary effect of manure or fertilizer applications is to increase the competitiveness of taller grasses, thus decreasing little clubmoss [18]. However, in the northern plains response depends upon precipitation [54]. There is no evidence that nitrogen application alone kills little clubmoss [52]. When fertilizers containing nitrogen and phosphorus were added to grassland plots in each of 2 successive years, the cover of live little clubmoss decreased significantly. It was not determined whether this was due to the nutrients themselves or because of increased competition from other vegetation [57]. Manuring alone increased all plant cover the first season of a Montana study, but little clubmoss was subordinated to the more vigorous native grasses and decreased the second season [18]. After more than 30 years with normal weather, little clubmoss was still reduced in plots treated by annual applications of manure for 1 to 11 years [19]. Mulching, with or without added fertilizer, can nearly eliminate little clubmoss [66]. Mechanical treatment: Mechanical treatments reduced little clubmoss cover between 25 and 70 percent in northern Montana mixed prairie [52]. The effects of various combinations of manure treatment, disking, and harrowing over a 10-year period along with seeding of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) and yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis) have been studied [18,19]. Most treatments resulted in long-term decreases in little clubmoss, and combination treatments seemed most successful. When the treated area was resurveyed over 30 years later, little clubmoss cover was still so decreased that researchers concluded that little clubmoss does not easily reestablish on northern mixed prairie following mechanical treatment [19]. Little clubmoss cover and the cover of either other vegetation or litter were significantly and negatively correlated [19]. Chemical control: The most effective chemicals for control of little clubmoss while increasing the yield of desirable grasses are AMS (ammate) and atrazine [59]. Spring treatment is most effective. Monuron, paraquat, and bromacil control little clubmoss but also reduce the yield of or kill other vegetation [59]. Further range tests indicate that ammate, atrazine, and monuron are the best treatments [52]. Their effectiveness is increased with the use of a surfactant [52].

Related categories for Species: Selaginella densa | Little Clubmoss

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.