1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Forb > Species: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
ABBREVIATION : PHLHOO SYNONYMS : NO-ENTRY SCS PLANT CODE : PHHO COMMON NAMES : Hood's phlox moss phlox dwarf phlox carpet phlox wooly phlox TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of Hood's phlox is Phlox hoodii Richards [22,25,28,29,37]. Differentiation of subspecies is based upon degree of pubescensce of leaves and calyces; corolla tube lengths; and number and length of stems. Recognized subspecies are as follows: P. h. spp. canescens (Torr. & Gray) Wherry [25,28,29,37] P. h. spp. genuina Wherry [25] P. h. spp. glabrata (E. Nels.) Wherry [22,25,28] P. h. spp. hoodii (E. Nels.) Wherry [22,28] P. h. spp. lanata (Piper) Munz [28,37] P. h. spp. muscoides (Nutt.) Wherry [22,25,28] P. h. spp. viscidula (Wherry) Wherry [22,28] LIFE FORM : Forb FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY COMPILED BY AND DATE : Janet L. Howard, October 1992 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Howard, Janet L. 1992. Phlox hoodii. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Hood's phlox is distributed from Alaska east to Saskatchewan and the Dakotas south to southern California and northwestern New Mexico [22,25,27,31,37]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES29 Sagebrush FRES30 Desert shrub FRES35 Pinyon - juniper FRES38 Plains grasslands STATES : AK AZ CA CO ID MT NE NV NM ND OR SD UT WA WY AB BC SK YT ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : AGFO BADL BICA BLCA CANY CARE COLM CRMO DETO DINO FOBU LABE MEVE NABR SCBL THRO TICA WICA YELL BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 2 Cascade Mountains 4 Sierra Mountains 5 Columbia Plateau 6 Upper Basin and Range 7 Lower Basin and Range 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 9 Middle Rocky Mountains 10 Wyoming Basin 11 Southern Rocky Mountains 12 Colorado Plateau 15 Black Hills Uplift 16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland K024 Juniper steppe woodland K038 Great Basin sagebrush K039 Blackbrush K040 Saltbush - greasewood K041 Creosotebush K042 Creosotebush - bursage K043 Paloverde - cactus shrub K051 Wheatgrass - bluegrass K053 Grama - galleta steppe K055 Sagebrush steppe K056 Wheatgrass - needlegrass shrubsteppe K057 Galleta - three-awn shrubsteppe K063 Foothills prairie K064 Grama - needlegrass - wheatgrass K065 Grama - buffalograss K066 Wheatgrass - needlegrass K067 Wheatgrass - bluestem - needlegrass K068 Wheatgrass - grama - buffalograss K069 Bluestem - grama prairie K070 Sandsage - bluestem prairie SAF COVER TYPES : 68 Mesquite 220 Rocky Mountain juniper 238 Western juniper 239 Pinyon - juniper SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Hood's phlox occurs in many plant communities within its wide geographic range. It is a prominent member of short- and mixed-grass prairie, desert scrub, and pinyon (Pinus spp.)-juniper (Juniperus spp.) communities. Typically, it is the first or second most abundant forb in most of these communities [4,20,36]. In climax blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis)-needle-and-thread (Stipa comata)-wheatgrass (Agropyron spp.) shortgrass prairie in Alberta, for example, it provides approximately 5 percent of total plant cover [10]. Hood's phlox does not normally attain dominant status in any plant community, and is not listed as indicator of habitat types. Classifications of the plant communities of Alaska and Yukon Territory in which it occurs were not found.

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Hood's phlox is difficult for cattle to graze due to its short height [7]. It is generally unpalatable to all classes of livestock [12,42], although sheep will graze it lightly [17,33]. It is also lightly grazed by pronghorn and deer. In south-central Saskatchewan, it provides 1 percent of the summer diet of pronghorn [16]. PALATABILITY : The palatability of Hood's phlox is several western states has been rated as follows [17]: CO MT ND UT WY cattle poor poor poor poor poor sheep fair poor poor fair poor horses poor poor poor poor poor pronghorn ---- ---- poor ---- good elk ---- poor ---- poor fair mule deer ---- poor poor fair good white-tailed deer ---- poor poor ---- good small game mammals ---- ---- ---- fair fair upland game birds ---- ---- ---- poor fair waterfowl ---- ---- ---- poor poor NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Hood's phlox is poor in energy and protein value [17]. COVER VALUE : Hood's phlox provides poor cover for waterfowl and small nongame birds and mammals [17]. VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : The low, creeping growth form of Hood's phlox aids in protection of eroding soils [12]. It is not planted on disturbed rangelands, however, due to low palatability. OTHER USES AND VALUES : NO-ENTRY MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Hood's phlox is sometimes described as an increaser during drought and under regimes of moderate to heavy grazing [10,45]. Severe overgrazing of shortgrass prairie in southeastern Alberta has regressed some communities to seral stages codominated by Hood's phlox, fringed sagewort (Artemesia frigida), plains pricklypear (Opuntia polycantha), and broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) [10]. In Sweetwater County, Wyoming, percentage frequency of Hood's phlox varied from 54 percent in a relict big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata)-mutton bluegrass (Poa fendleriana) community inaccessible to livestock to 76 percent in adjacent grazed rangeland [35]. Grazing response of Hood's phlox, however, is difficult to typify. Mueggler and Stewart [36] found its response was widely inconsistent on Montana rangelands. Additionally, response varies accoring to management regime. Laycock [33] found that Hood's phlox increased in Idaho under moderate levels of both continuous and spring grazing by sheep but decreased with heavy fall grazing. In southeastern Alberta, it increased with light rotational cattle grazing but decreased under light continuous grazing [10]. Recovering rangelands usually exhibit a temporary increase of Hood's phlox as a normal course of plant succession. Thirty years following relief from grazing, populations were doubled on a severely overgrazed northern Nevada rangeland [40]. Similarly, Hood's phlox increased over a 5-year period in Meagher County, Montana, when a former sheep range was protected from grazing [45]. Hood's phlox also increases on rangelands undergoing active rehabilitation. An overgrazed pinyon-juniper woodland near Ephriam, Utah, with an understory dominated by cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), was planted with crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum), intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium ssp. intermedium), and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata). Hood's phlox increased from average densities of 31 plants per plot to 37 plants per plot 2 years following grass seeding [15]. Recovery rate of the degraded rangeland depends upon the degree of degradation and the ecosystem involved, but populations of Hood's phlox will eventually decline as rangeland trend moves upward. In southeastern Idaho a big sagebrush-bottlebrush squirreltail (Elymus elymoides) rangeland in poor condition showed a gradual decline in Hood's phlox over a 10-year study period when left ungrazed [24]. Pitting treatment may result in rapid lowering of populations. A degraded needle-and-thread community in northern Montana underwent a reduction in Hood's phlox the first year following pitting [42].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Hood's phlox is a compact, pulvinate to cespitose, perennial native forb growing from 0.8 to 3.1 inches (2-8 cm) tall [22]. The seeds are miniscule (0.08 to 0.12 inch [2-3 mm] long) [25]. Taproots branch from a pluricipital caudex and are from 12 to 37 inches (30-95 cm) deep. Roots near the surface are woody, and vary from 0.4 to 2.0 inches (1-5 cm) in diameter [2,13,46]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Chamaephyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Hood's phlox reproduces from seed. Lepidoptera are the principal pollinators of the small flowers [14]. Studies of seed germination requirements and viability are scant. One study [18] conducted in a singleleaf pinyon (Pinus monophylla)-Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) community in Utah showed that germinants were unable to establish in heavy duff. Hood's phlox will sprout from spreading rootstocks following damage to aboveground portions of the plant [1]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Hood's phlox occurs on xeric sites. In the more mesic locations, it is found on dry microsites such as south slopes and windward exposures [6,8]. Climates vary but are characterized by seasonal periods of low precipitation and extremes of temperature [9,26]. Soils are moderately acidic to moderately alkaline [26]. In North Park, Colorado, soil pH at sites where Hood's phlox occurred ranged from 6.2 to 8.1 [4]. Structure and texture of soils vary. In southwestern Saskatchewan, Hood's phlox is found in many types of soil but is most common in heavy clay [26]. Hood's phlox also grows in a variety of soils in the Great Basin but is most common in loamy-skeletal and silty-coarse soils [38]. Elevational ranges of Hood's phlox in several western states are as follows: feet meters California 4,000 - 8,000 1,219 - 2,438 [37] Colorado 5,000 - 9,000 1,524 - 2,743 [25] Utah 4,672 - 10,448 1,460 - 3,265 [46] In Arizona, Hood's phlox has a very limited distribution and occurs at approximately the 4,000-foot (1,219 m) level [29]. Associated overstory species not listed in Distribution and Occurrence include Utah juniper, California juniper (Juniperus californica), true pinyon (Pinus edulis), singleleaf pinyon (P. monophylla), Mormon-tea (Ephedra viridis), gray rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus), low rabbitbrush (C. viscidiflorus), silver sagebrush (Artemisia cana), shadscale (A. confertifolia), and winterfat (Ceratoides lanata) [4,20,32,47]. Some associated groundcover species are bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), thickspike wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolatus), Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), mutton bluegrass (P. fendleriana), needle-and-thread (Stipa comata), stonyhills muhly (Muhlenbergia cuspidata), junegrass (Koeleria cristata), needleleaf sedge (Carex eleocharis), threadleaf sedge (C. filifolia), oblongleaf bluebell (Mertensia oblongifolia), Hooker balsamroot (Balsamorhiza hookeri var. hispiduala), pulse poison vetch (Astragalus tenellus), stemless goldenweed (Haplopappus acaulis), fringed sagebrush (Artemisia frigida), pussytoes (Antennaria spp.), plains pricklypear, and clubmoss (Selaginella densa) [4,12,20,26,42]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Facultative Seral Series Hood's phlox is a seral species, generally most frequent in early seral stages but persisting through climax [15]. It is abundant, for example, in seral stages of wheatgrass-muhly mixed grass prairie communities in Saskatchewan [12]. A study of plant community composition in a true pinyon-Utah juniper community in northeastern Utah showed that Hood's phlox populations were greatly reduced from previous levels in the climax woodland [3]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : In Saskatchewan and Alberta, growth begins in early April. Plants flower in late April and again in August if soil moisture is sufficient. Seeds resulting from the first flowering ripen in mid-June [12]. The period of seed maturation following the second flowering is unreported. Hood's phlox flowers from May to July in California [37], depending upon elevation.

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Hood's phlox sprouts from the caudex and roots following top-kill by fire [1,48]. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Caudex, growing points in soil

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Fire top-kills Phlox spp. [48]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : In comparison to prefire levels, Hood's phlox cover may be slightly decreased, increased, or stable at postfire year 1. From approximately postfire years 2 to 4, cover increases. Following a prescribed fire in Laidlaw Park, Idaho, Hood's phlox frequency in a big sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass community decreased at postfire year 1 and increased to slightly above prebrun frequency at postfire year 2 [49]. Similar results were obtained following experimental prescribed burning on grazed and ungrazed plots in big sagebrush-dominated rangeland in Wyoming. Hood's phlox cover increased above prefire levels by postfire year 2, with frequencies on grazed plots higher than those of ungrazed plots [43]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : Hood's phlox appears to be sensitive to hot, spring fires. Forb frequencies, including that of Hood's phlox, were reduced for several years following a hot, late-May wildfire on mesic mixed-grass prairie in North Dakota. A fall prescribed fire in an adjacent area had no effect on Hood's phlox frequency [47]. FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Prescribed fire alone is not effective in reducing Hood's phlox cover on degraded rangelands. Burning followed by reseeding with forage species has, however, proven effective in reducing Hood's phlox in the Canyon Mountains of central Utah. Two July wildfires burned through separate areas of a big sagebrush community in that area. In the fall, plots were established on the two burn areas. The plots were selectively chained or drilled, followed by aerial reseeding with desirable herbaceous species. At postfire year 3, Hood's phlox was sparse in the plots of one burn (0.4 percent total cover) and absent from the other burn. Drilling resulted in better establishment of planted seeds than did chaining treatment [11]. Information on prescribed burning regimes to increase forage production in big sagebrush communities is available [43].

REFERENCES

SPECIES: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox
REFERENCES : 1. Akinsoji, Aderopo. 1988. Postfire vegetation dynamics in a sagebrush steppe in southeastern Idaho, USA. Vegetatio. 78: 151-155. [6944] 2. Anderson, J. P. 1959. Flora of Alaska and adjacent parts of Canada. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. 543 p. [9928] 3. Austin, Dennis D. 1987. Plant community changes within a mature pinyon-juniper woodland. Great Basin Naturalist. 47(1): 96-99. [362] 4. Baker, William L.; Kennedy, Susan C. 1985. Presettlement vegetation of part of northwestern Moffat County, Colorado, described from remnants. Great Basin Naturalist. 45(4): 747-783. [384] 5. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434] 6. Blinn, Dean W.; Habeck, James R. 1967. An analysis of morainal vegetation in the upper Blackfoot Valley, Montana. Northwest Science. 41(3): 126-140. [4008] 7. Brand, M. D.; Goetz, H. 1978. Secondary succession of a mixed grass community in southwestern North Dakota. Annual Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Science. 32(2): 67-78. [7512] 8. Burke, Ingrid C. 1989. Control of nitrogen mineralization in a sagebrush steppe landscape. Ecology. 70(4): 1115-1126. [7974] 9. Campbell, J. B.; Lodge, R. W.; Johnston, A.; Smoliak, S. 1962. Range management of grasslands and adjacent parklands in the prairie provinces. Publ. 1133. Ottawa, ON: Canada Department of Agriculture, Research Branch. 32 p. [595] 10. Clarke, S. E.; Tisdale, E. W.; Skoglund, N. A. 1943. The effects of climate and grazing practices on short-grass prairie vegetation in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan. Technical Bulletin No. 46. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Dominion, Department of Agriculture. 53 p. [635] 11. Clary, Warren P. 1988. Plant density and cover response to several seeding techniques following wildfire. Res. Note INT-384. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 6 p. [5609] 12. Coupland, Robert T. 1950. Ecology of mixed prairie in Canada. Ecological Monographs. 20(4): 271-315. [700] 13. Coupland, Robert T.; Johnson, R. E. 1965. Rooting characteristics of native grassland species of Saskatchewan. Journal of Ecology. 53: 475-507. [702] 14. Cronquist, Arthur; Holmgren, Arthur H.; Holmgren, Noel H.; [and others]. 1984. Intermountain flora: Vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 4. Subclass Asteridae, (except Asteraceae). New York: The New York Botanical Garden. 573 p. [718] 15. Davis, James N.; Harper, Kimball T. 1990. Weedy annuals and establishment of seeded species on a chained juniper-pinyon woodland in central Utah. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 72-79. [12872] 16. Dirschl, Herman J. 1963. Food habits of the pronghorn in Saskatchewan. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(1): 81-93. [5939] 17. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806] 18. Everett, Richard L.; Sharrow, Steven H.; Meeuwig, Richard O. 1983. Pinyon-juniper woodland understory distribution patterns and species associations. Torrey Botanical Club. 110(4): 454-463. [899] 19. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905] 20. Fisser, Herbert G. 1986. Biology and ecology of sagebrush in Wyoming: I. Soil characterization and research methods. In: McArthur, E. Durant; Welch, Bruce L., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on the biology of Artemisia and Chrysothamnus; 1984 July 9-13; Provo, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-200. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 292-302. [927] 21. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998] 22. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603] 23. Groves, Craig R.; Steenhof, Karen. 1988. Responses of small mammals and vegetation to wildfire in shadscale communities of southwestern Idaho. Northwest Science. 62(5): 205-210. [6584] 24. Harniss, Roy O.; West, Neil E. 1973. Changes in Artemisia tridentata/Sitanion hystrix vegetation on the National Reactor Testing Station, southeastern Idaho, 1950-1965. Utah Academy Proceedings. 50(1): 10-16. [1087] 25. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press Inc. 666 p. [6851] 26. Hubbard, William A. 1950. The climate, soils, and soil-plant relationships of an area in southwestern Saskatchewan. Scientific Agriculture. 30(8): 327-342. [6263] 27. Hulten, Eric. 1968. Flora of Alaska and neighboring territories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1008 p. [13403] 28. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954] 29. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock, Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1085 p. [6563] 30. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 31. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 648 p. [13798] 32. Lauer, Jerry L.; Peek, James M. 1976. Big game-livestock relationships on the bighorn sheep winter range, East Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Bulletin No. 12. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station. 44 p. [1417] 33. Laycock, William A. 1967. How heavy grazing and protection affect sagebrush-grass ranges. Journal of Range Management. 20: 206-213. [1421] 34. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496] 35. Marquiss, Robert; Lang, Robert. 1959. Vegetational composition and ground cover of two natural relict areas and their associated grazed areas in the Red Desert of Wyoming. Journal of Range Management. 12: 104-109. [1529] 36. Mueggler, W. F.; Stewart, W. L. 1980. Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-66. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 154 p. [1717] 37. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155] 38. Passey, H. B.; Hugie, Vern K.; Williams, E. W.; Ball, D. E. 1982. Relationships between soil, plant community, and climate on rangelands of the Intermountain West. Tech. Bull. 1669. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 123 p. [1834] 39. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843] 40. Robertson, J. H. 1971. Changes on a sagebrush-grass range in Nevada ungrazed for 30 years. Journal of Range Management. 24: 397-400. [2009] 41. Robertson, D. R.; Nielsen, J. L.; Bare, N. H. 1966. Vegetation and soils of alkali sagebrush and adjacent big sagebrush ranges in North Park, Colorado. Journal of Range Management. 19: 17-20; 1966. [2004] 42. Taylor, John Edgar. 1967. Range pitting and nitrogen fertilization on mixed prairie rangeland in northern Montana. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University. 71 p. Thesis. [12328] 43. Smith, Michael A. 1985. Prescribed burning of big sagebrush in Wyoming. In: Fisser, Herbert G., ed. Wyoming shrublands: Proceedings of the 14th Wyoming shrub ecology workshop; 1985 May 29-30; Rock Springs, WY. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, Department of Range Management, Wyoming Shrub Ecology Workshop: 41-45. [13910] 44. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573] 45. Vogel, W. G.; Van Dyne, G. M. 1966. Vegetation responses to grazing management on a foothill sheep range. Journal of Range Management. 19: 80-85. [12263] 46. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944] 47. Loranger, Andre J.; Bailey, Theodore N.; Larned, William W. 1991. Effects of forest succession after fire in moose wintering habitats on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Alces. 27: 100-110. [18423] 48. Wright, Henry A.; Neuenschwander, Leon F.; Britton, Carlton M. 1979. The role and use of fire in sagebrush-grass and pinyon-juniper plant communities: A state-of-the-art review. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-58. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Statio. 48 p. [2625] 49. Bushey, Charles L.; Kilgore, Bruce M. 1985. Sagebrush-grass vegetative, fuel, & fire behav. parameters: (prelim. results from the demonstr. of prescr. burning on selected BLM dists). Missoula, MT: Systems for Environmental Management. 97 p. [569] 50. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]

Index

Related categories for Species: Phlox hoodii | Hood's Phlox

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.