1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Graminoid > Species: Bromus japonicus | Japanese Brome
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Bromus japonicus | Japanese Brome
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Fire kills Japanese brome. Some of the seeds retained in panicles are also killed [28,29,69,73,78]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Whisenant [71] suggested that Japanese brome postfire response is best explained as a function of level of litter reduction by fire and the amount of fall precipitation following fire. Since litter accumulations are more critical for seed germination and seedling establishment in dry than wet years, populations are reduced when burning is followed by below-average precipitation. During wet years, fire has little impact on subsequent generations. A 1973 to 1975 South Dakota study showed that spring, summer, or fall burning reduced Japanese brome for two postfire growing seasons. During the study, prescribed burning was followed by 2 years of drought [28]. In another South Dakota study where prescribed fire was followed by 2 years of above average precipitation, Japanese brome densities at postfire years 1 and 2 were similar to prefire densities [72]. Whisenant and others [73] reported that Japanese brome frequency was not significantly changed in postfire year 1 by fires in September 1979, January 1980, or March 1980. In eastern Montana, spring burning reduced Japanese brome for one postfire growing season. Subsequent years were not evaluated [76]. Prescribed fire was used on a western wheatgrass-green needlegrass (Pascopyrum smithii-Stipa viridula) prairie in Wind Cave National Park, South Dakota, to test Japanese brome response to fire. Treatments were fall (Sept. 18, 1973), winter (Feb. 13, 1974), and spring (April 10, 1974) burning. Japanese brome density (stems/sq ft) on May 24, 1974, was as follows [27]: Treatment | fall burn control | winter burn control | spring burn control | unburned | | 0.8 80.0 | 33.8 57.3 | 15.7 56.1 | 56.9 | Only one study was found describing Japanese brome postfire response in palouse prairie. A July 1961 wildfire in a bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg bluegrass stand in southeastern Washington reduced Japanese brome and cheatgrass populations for at least 2 years. Japanese brome percentage frequency was as follows [16]: unburned burned postfire yr 2 42 10 postfire yr 4 30 50 postfire yr 12 32 18 Two accounts of Japanese brome postfire response in the Southwest were found. In Mesa Verde, Colorado, Japanese brome was a component of an initial (postfire yrs 1 & 2) annual sunflower-pigweed community following a July 15 to August 7, 1959, wildfire in a true pinyon-Utah juniper (Pinus edulis-Juniperus osteosperma) woodland [19]. The spring following prescribed winter fire in a honey mesquite/Texas wintergrass woodland in Coleman County, Texas, cool-season annuals including Japanese brome were reduced by 74 percent. At postfire year 2 there was a trend toward more annual grasses on burned than unburned sites [62,6]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Whisenant [72] stated that fire exclusion in northern mixed-grass prairie has improved conditions for Japanese brome establishment at the expense of native grasses. In the absence of intensive grazing, litter accumulations in northern mixed-grass prairie stabilize after 5 to 6 postfire years [1,18]. Whisenent [74] has recommended burning every 5 years or less to reduce litter accumulations. This reduces Japanese brome populations, particularly when fall precipitation is low. However, he cautions managers to balance the benefits of litter against need to reduce Japanese brome when preparing fire management plans. Benefits of litter include soil stabilization and insulation, moisture retention, and promotion of perennials [80]. Gartner and others [28] recommended burning Japanese brome in the ripe seed stage in order to maximize kill of seeds in panicles. Whisenant [70] has developed regression equations modelling Japanese brome density and seed production as affected by fire.

Related categories for Species: Bromus japonicus | Japanese Brome

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.