|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
Introductory
SPECIES: Bromus pumpellianus | Pumpelly Brome
ABBREVIATION :
BROPUM
SYNONYMS :
Bromus inermis Leyss. ssp. pumpellianus (Scribn.) Wagnon [2,16,22]
SCS PLANT CODE :
BRINP2
COMMON NAMES :
Pumpelly brome
arctic brome
Rocky Mountain brome
TAXONOMY :
The currently accepted scientific name of Pumpelly brome is Bromus
pumpellianus Scribn. [14,17,31]. It is in the family Poaceae.
Recognized subspecies and varieties are as follows:
B. p. ssp. dicksonii Mitchell & Wilton (a tetraploid) [3]
B. p. ssp. pumpellianus (an octoploid) [3]
B. p. var. arcticus (Shear) Pors. [7,17]
B. p. var. villosissimus Hult. [17]
Pumpelly brome hybridizes readily with smooth brome (Bromus inermis)
where their ranges overlap [14,16,17].
LIFE FORM :
Graminoid
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
COMPILED BY AND DATE :
Roberta A. Walsh, May 1994
LAST REVISED BY AND DATE :
NO-ENTRY
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Walsh, Roberta A. 1994. Bromus pumpellianus. In: Remainder of Citation
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Bromus pumpellianus | Pumpelly Brome
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Pumpelly brome occurs from Alaska and northwestern Canada south through
the Rocky Mountains to Colorado and east to the Black Hills of South
Dakota [1,14,15,16]. There are disjunct populations in southern Ontario
and in Michigan at the northern end of Lake Michigan [16,31].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES18 Maple - beech - birch
FRES20 Douglas-fir
FRES21 Ponderosa pine
FRES23 Fir - spruce
FRES29 Sagebrush
FRES36 Mountain grasslands
FRES37 Mountain meadows
FRES44 Alpine
STATES :
AK CO ID MI MT SD WY AB ON YT
ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS :
BIHO DETO FLFO GLAC SLBE YUCH
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
8 Northern Rocky Mountains
9 Middle Rocky Mountains
10 Wyoming Basin
11 Southern Rocky Mountains
15 Black Hills Uplift
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K012 Douglas-fir forest
K015 Western spruce - fir forest
K017 Black Hills pine forest
K050 Fescue - wheatgrass
K051 Wheatgrass - bluegrass
K052 Alpine meadows and barren
K055 Sagebrush steppe
K106 Northern hardwoods
SAF COVER TYPES :
25 Sugar maple - beech - yellow birch
201 White spruce
202 White spruce - paper birch
210 Interior Douglas-fir
237 Interior ponderosa pine
251 White spruce - aspen
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Pumpelly brome is listed as a stand type in the following published
description of plant communities:
Steppe vegetation on south-facing slopes of pingos, central arctic
Coastal Plain, Alaska, U.S.A. [32]
Species associated with Pumpelly brome are listed for arctic alluvial
fan tundra in the central Brooks Range of Alaska [8], for steppe
communities on bluffs within the boreal forest of east-central Alaska
[10], and for forest vegetation in young, mixed stands in uplands near
Fairbanks, Alaska [33]. Associates are listed for the northwestern
Northwest Territories on the coast of Amundsen Gulf [7] and on the
MacKenzie River Delta [6]. Associates are also listed for relatively
undisturbed mountain grasslands in Wyoming [28], for an undisturbed dry
butte site in southeastern Montana [25], and for a prairie in
northwestern Montana that reflects past agricultural use and the present
effects of grazing disturbance [20].
VALUE AND USE
SPECIES: Bromus pumpellianus | Pumpelly Brome
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
The native perennial species of brome (Bromus spp.) form a considerable
portion of the forage in open woods of the mountain regions of the
western United States. Pumpelly brome is abundant, good forage for all
classes of livestock [15].
Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep in Jasper National Park, Alberta, ate
Pumpelly brome during July and early August 1968-70. However, its
utilization was less than its availability. Though available, it was
not recorded as being utilized in Waterton Lakes or Banff national parks
[26].
Pumpelly brome has been crossed with smooth brome to produce the
cultivar "Polar" bromegrass. It is a long-lived and productive forage
crop in south-central Alaska [18].
PALATABILITY :
NO-ENTRY
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
Pumpelly brome had a higher mean Nutritive Value Index for five tested
stages of growth than did any of the other 20 native and cultivated
grasses studied at Lethbridge, Alberta. Pumpelly brome had 12.7 percent
protein in the leaf stage of growth. Protein, phosphorus, and carotene
decreased with advancing maturity; calcium and crude fiber increased [5].
Pumpelly brome, native to the Matanuska Valley near Palmer, Alaska, was
1 of 17 indigenous and introduced grass species evaluated for forage
yield and quality in that area . It was grown over a 3-year period, and
harvested twice each year. Of the two Pumpelly brome accessions, one
ranked fourteenth out of 38 accessions in 3-year average yield; the
other was not as successful. Pumpelly brome had good nutritional
quality, with sufficient percentages of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium,
calcium, and magnesium to produce moderate gain on a growing 440-pound
(200-kg) steer [23].
COVER VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
Pumpelly brome was evaluated for revegetation potential in the
Richardson Mountains of the northeastern Yukon Territory. Seeding was
done June 7, 1979. Seedling emergence was 96.7 percent in that year.
In 1980 survival was 63.3 percent, in 1981 it was 40.0 percent, and by
1985 there were no surviving plants. There was no seed production by
Pumpelly brome in any year. The Pumpelly brome selection was a northern
type, but it was apparently not adapted for survival at this severe
northern Yukon site [30].
Pumpelly brome did not establish on scarified arctic tundra sites of a
construction-disturbed alluvial fan in the central Brooks Range. Some
sites were planted with grasses (other than Pumpelly brome) and others
were not; 4 and 11 years after treatments Pumpelly brome occurred only
on undisturbed control plots [8].
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
NO-ENTRY
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
In Wyoming Pumpelly brome decreases with grazing pressure [28].
Pumpelly brome seed should be planted at shallow depth. It grows best
on moderately moist soil [12].
At the Matanuska Research Farm in south-central Alaska, Pumpelly brome
planted May 24, 1984, and harvested in 1984, 1985, and 1986, produced a
3-year total of 7.69 tons of forage per acre. Seeding rate was 22
pounds per acre; commercial fertilizer was applied. Pumpelly brome
compared favorably with 29 other strains of grasses tested for forage
production. It also showed excellent winter survival and spring vigor [19].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Bromus pumpellianus | Pumpelly Brome
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Pumpelly brome is a native, perennial graminoid [15]. Culms are 20 to
47 inches (50 to 120 cm) tall [1,15]. Leaves are 0.16 to 0.39 inches
(4-10 mm) wide [1,17] and 4 to 8 inches (10-20 cm) long [1]. There are
generally two to four culm leaves [16]. The inflorescence is a narrow
panicle 2 to 8 inches (5-20 cm) long [14,15,16]. Spikelets are seven to
eleven flowered [1,15]. The lemma is 0.39 to 0.47 inches (10-12 mm)
long [14] and is generally short-awned [1,17]. The fruit is a caryopsis
[12]. Pumpelly brome has well-developed creeping rhizomes [15,16] and
forms colonies [16].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Hemicryptophyte
Geophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Pumpelly brome sprouts from perennating buds at the base of the culms
[16] and from rhizomes [15]. It also reproduces by seed [17].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Pumpelly brome occurs on moist to dry sites. It is found in woods [9],
meadows, and on grassy slopes [14,15]. In interior Alaska it occurs on
warm, dry sites on steep, south-facing slopes in young mixed hardwood
and white spruce (Picea glauca) stands [33]. In Michigan it grows on
sandy shores and dunes at the northern edge of Lake Michigan [31]. In
western Montana it occurs in moist montane or subalpine meadows [20,22].
In Colorado it is found on dry rocky slopes [14].
Pumpelly brome grows on a variety of soil types. It occurs on gravelly
sandy clay loam on arctic alluvial fan tundra in the central Brooks
Range [8]. It is found on rocky, shallow, poorly developed soil on
bluffs in the upper Yukon valley in east-central Alaska [10]. It occurs
on deep, well-drained mineral loess soils that are rich in organics and
are underlain by permafrost on pingos near Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Pingo
permafrost thaws more deeply in summer than that of surrounding land
[32]. Pumpelly brome grows on marine deltas and eroding sandy seashores
of Amundsen Gulf [7]. It occurs on shallow, well-drained sandy loam
soil on a wind-disturbed butte top in southeastern Montana [25] and on
sandy loam on the Palliser winter range in Banff National Park, Alberta
[26].
Pumpelly brome occurs on soils with pH 7.0 to 8.0 in north-central
Alaska. These soils are wind-deposited from calcareous sediments [32].
It was grown successfully on silty loam soil with pH 6.2 near Palmer,
Alaska [23].
In the Rocky Mountains Pumpelly brome is abundant up to about 11,000
feet (3,353 m) elevation, depending on latitude and other conditions
[15]. In Banff National Park it occurs from 6,204 to 7,205 feet
(1,891-2,196 m). It was found at 3,700 feet (1,128 m) in northwestern
Montana [20]. In east-central Alaska it was recorded at 2,297 feet (700
m) elevation [10], and in the Northwest Territories it was found at sea
level [7].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Facultative Seral Species
Pumpelly brome occurs on some recently disturbed sites, and is also
present in seral and undisturbed stands. Pumpelly brome is occasionally
found in disturbed sites and on sandy banks in the Caribou Hills, near
Eskimo Lakes, and on the Arctic coast in the McKenzie River Delta region
of the northwestern Northwest Territories [6].
In the central Brooks Range, pumpelly brome did not appear 4 or 11 years
after disturbance on tundra alluvial fans. It was present on undisturbed
sites [8].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
In Colorado Pumpelly brome seeds mature from August 10 to September 10
at higher elevations and somewhat earlier at lower elevations [12].
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Bromus pumpellianus | Pumpelly Brome
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Since Pumpelly brome can reproduce vegetatively [15,17], it probably
sprouts from rhizomes after aerial portions are burned.
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
Rhizomatous herb, rhizome in soil
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Bromus pumpellianus | Pumpelly Brome
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Pumpelly brome culms are probably killed by fire during the growing
season.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
NO-ENTRY
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
NO-ENTRY
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
NO-ENTRY
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Bromus pumpellianus | Pumpelly Brome
REFERENCES :
1. Anderson, J. P. 1959. Flora of Alaska and adjacent parts of Canada.
Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. 543 p. [9928]
2. Armstrong, K. C. 1981. The evolution of Bromus inermis and related
species of Bromus sect. Pnigma. Botanische Jahrbucher Syst. 102(1-4):
427-443. [2933]
3. Armstrong, K. C. 1982. Hybrids between the tetraploids of Bromus inermis
and B. pumpellianus. Canadian Journal of Botany. 60(4): 476-482.
[22833]
4. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
5. Bezeau, L. M.; Johnston, A. 1962. In vitro digestibility of range forage
plants of the Festuca scabrella association. Canadian Journal of Plant
Science. 42: 692-697. [441]
6. Cody, W. J. 1965. Plants of the Mackenzie River Delta and Reindeer
Grazing Preserve. Ottawa, ON: Canada Department of Agriculture, Research
Branch, Plant Research Institute. 56 p. [13122]
7. Cody, William J.; Scotter, George W.; Zoltai, Steve C. 1992. Vascular
plant flora of the Melville Hills region, Northwest Territories.
Canadian Field-Naturalist. 106(2): 87-99. [21180]
8. Densmore, Roseann V. 1992. Succession on an Alaskan tundra disturbance
with and without assisted revegetation with grass. Arctic and Alpine
Research. 24(3): 238-243. [20199]
9. Dorn, Robert D. 1984. Vascular plants of Montana. Cheyenne, WY: Mountain
West Publishing. 276 p. [819]
10. Edwards, M. E.; Armbruster, W. S. 1989. A tundra-steppe transition on
Kathul Mountain, Alaska, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research. 21(3):
296-304. [9673]
11. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
12. Fulbright, Timothy E.; Redente, Edward F.; Hargis, Norman E. 1982.
Growing Colorado plants from seed: a state of the art: Volume II:
Grasses and grasslike plants. FWS/OBS-82/29. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 113 p. [3709]
13. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
14. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed.
Chicago: The Swallow Press Inc. 666 p. [6851]
15. Hitchcock, A. S. 1951. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Misc.
Publ. No. 200. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Administration. 1051 p. [2nd edition revised by
Agnes Chase in two volumes. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.]. [1165]
16. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific
Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
17. Hulten, Eric. 1968. Flora of Alaska and neighboring territories.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1008 p. [13403]
18. Klebesadel, Leslie J. 1991. Performance of indigenous and introduced
slender wheatgrass in Alaska, and presumed evidence of ecotypic
evolution. Bulletin 85. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska Fairbanks,
School of Agriculture and Land Resources Management, Agricultural and
Forestry Experiment Station. 20 p. [18384]
19. Klebesadel, Leslie J.; Dofing, Stephen M. 1992. Reed canarygrass in
Alaska: influence of latitude-of-adaptation on winter survival and
forage productivity, and obser. on seed productivity. Bulletin 84.
Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, School of Agriculture and Land
Resources Management, Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. 24
p. [19473]
20. Koterba, Wayne D.; Habeck, James R. 1971. Grasslands of the North Fork
Valley, Glacier National Park, Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany. 49:
1627-1636. [6401]
21. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
22. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central
Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research
Station. 648 p. [13798]
23. Mitchell, W. W. 1982. Forage yield and quality of indigenous and
introduced grasses at Palmer, Alaska. Agronomy Journal. 74: 899-905.
[16172]
24. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
25. Ross, Robert L.; Murray, Earl P.; Haigh, June G. 1973. Soil and
vegetation inventory of near-pristine sites in Montana. Bozeman, MT:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 55 p. [2029]
26. Stelfox, John G. 1976. Range ecology of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep in
Canadian national parks. Report Series Number 39. Ottawa, ON: Canadian
Wildlife Service. 50 p. [13851]
27. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
28. Turner, George T.; Paulsen, Harold A., Jr. 1976. Management of mountain
grasslands in the Central Rockies: the status of our knowledge. Res.
Pap. RM-161. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 24 p.
[2372]
29. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
30. Vaartnou, Manivalde. 1988. The potential of native populations of
grasses in northern revegetation. In: Kershaw, Peter, ed. Northern
environmental disturbances. Occas. Publ. No. 24. Edmonton, AB:
University of Alberta, Boreal Institute for Northern Studies: 31-41.
[14418]
31. Voss, Edward G. 1972. Michigan flora. Part I. Gymnosperms and monocots.
Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science; Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan Herbarium. 488 p. [11471]
32. Walker, Marilyn D.; Walker, Donald A.; Everett, Kaye R.; Short, Susan K.
1991. Steppe vegetation on south-facing slopes of pingos, central arctic
coastal plain, Alaska, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research. 23(2):
170-188. [14954]
33. Youngblood, Andrew. 1993. Community type classification of forest
vegetation in young, mixed stands, interior Alaska. Res. Pap.
PNW-RP-458. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 42 p. [22029]
Index
Related categories for Species: Bromus pumpellianus
| Pumpelly Brome
|
 |
