1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Graminoid > Species: Schizachyrium tenerum | Slender Bluestem
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Schizachyrium tenerum | Slender Bluestem
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Slender bluestem culms and leaves are killed by fire [19]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Aboveground parts of slender bluestem are killed by fire, but the underground portions usually survive and produce new topgrowth as soon as conditions are favorable [19]. Slender bluestem in Georgia had higher seedstalk production on recently burned than on unburned sites. Unburned plants produced 35 seed stalks per square foot of vegetation; burned plants produced 112 stalks. At anthesis slender bluestem had a higher percentage of nitrogen on burned than on unburned sites [38]. Slender bluestem is suppressed by accumulating litter in unburned areas [36]. There is reduction in number of plants and plant vigor as slender bluestem is forced to grow through mulch to reach light [14]. Slender bluestem tends to increase slightly in relative abundance when burned annually or every 2 to 3 years. It may decrease slightly if burned sites are moderately grazed. Slender bluestem decreases under grazing alone. Under both grazing and fire protection, slender bluestem relative abundance decreases considerably [20,36]. However, severe fire can almost completely remove slender bluestem [36] (see DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE). DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : With biennial burning slender bluestem on longleaf pine/bluestem sites in central Louisiana was dominant in the herbaceous layer; woody plants had reduced growth. On an unburned control unit a dense overstory of shrubs and trees with resulting heavy litter restricted slender bluestem growth to scattered canopy openings [6]. Productivity of slender bluestem often increases with burn treatment. South-central Mississippi longleaf pine savanna pasture which included slender bluestem was burned every January or February from 1924 to 1933. A similar pasture was not burned. Half of each pasture was grazed from approximately April 5 to November 8 each year. Percent total herbage values of slender bluestem for the first and last years reported were: unburned grazed burned grazed ungrazed unburned ungrazed burned 1924 39 35 39 25 1933 12 17 43 21 A plot that had been protected from fire and grazing for 8 years was burned with a very hot fire in October. Slender bluestem was almost completely killed. A similar plot was burned in January when fire temperature was less. Some bunches of slender bluestem were killed, but most survived [36]. In south-central Mississippi longleaf pine savanna, slender bluestem produced 1,206 pounds per acre per year green plant weight on land which had not been burned or grazed for 8 years; on a similar plot burned annually during winter or early spring but not grazed slender bluestem produced 6,957 pounds per acre [14]. Plots in longleaf pine-slash pine/bluestem range in southwestern Louisiana were burned annually, biennially, or triennially in March or May, or were unburned. Cattle were excluded from the plots. After 8 years of treatment slender bluestem herbage, measured in October, was highest on plots burned annually in May and lowest on unburned plots. Slender bluestem percent of total herbage yield was as follows [16]: Fire Treatment Slender Bluestem Percent Control 9 March Annual 39 March Biennial 22 March Triennial 11 May Annual 47 May Biennial 31 May Triennial 33 FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : The longleaf pine-bluestem savanna of the southeastern United States Coastal Plain, where slender bluegrass is a dominant, is a fire subclimax community which requires fire at relatively frequent intervals to be maintained. When fire is excluded, loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), slash pine, hardwood trees, and shrubs invade; slender bluestem is shaded out [24]. In the absence of fire in dense stands of longleaf pine on the southeastern Coastal Plain, slender bluestem is eliminated by pine needle litter [20,36]. Burning increases slender bluestem nutrient content and palatability. Increases do not last more than a few months after spring burning. However, this is usually the time when livestock and wildlife need extra protein and minerals [24]. Rotational winter burning at 3-year intervals in longleaf pine/bluestem range, combined with periodic tree thinning (to maintain 12 to 20 sq m/ha longleaf pine basal area), can maintain productive forage (including slender bluestem) and provide concurrent production of wood fiber [37]. Three major studies on the effect of fire on slender bluestem forage have been done in south-central Louisiana: A 6-year test of rotation burning to increase forage value during summer and fall and to improve distribution of grazing by cattle was conducted in south-central Louisiana. Slender bluestem and pinehill bluestem were the principal grasses. A system of rotational burning was recommended for longleaf pine/bluestem range for both cutover and timbered lands. One-third of each area was burned in winter or early spring each year. Low-intensity early March backfires were used in subunits with regenerated pines to minimize damage to trees. Free-running early May headfires were used on cutover land to destroy herbage after palatability of normal spring growth started to decline. Wildfire hazard in the forest was reduced, range vegetation and grazing distribution were improved, litter was removed, undesired scrub hardwoods were top-killed, and unpalatable perennials were curtailed. Both types of sites were grazed by cattle. The heavy grazing of slender bluestem during the growing season following fire, when cattle concentrated on freshly burned range, improved forage palatability and nutritive content by retarding maturation. Cattle began concentrating on newly burned range within 1 to 4 weeks of burning [9]. The ensuing 2 years of lighter use restored slender bluestem vigor [9,19]. Dry cows and cows with calves gained weight throughout the growing season on rotation-burned ranges; forage values on unburned ranges during summer and fall were too low to sustain body weight [9,23]. In south-central Louisiana longleaf pine-bluestem range was subjected to alternate burning rotations from 1967 to 1970. Dominant grasses were slender bluestem and pinehill bluestem. One range was treated with a single fire in late winter or early spring each year. The other range was burned a third at a time during each year, one fire in winter (March 1), one in spring (May 1), and one in summer (July 1). Cattle grazed the burned area of the annual winter-only fire almost continuously, which maintained a supply of new palatable and nutritious growth as well as if later burning had been done. A single winter fire, being simpler and less expensive than spring and summer fires, is recommended for forage management on forested or clearcut native range in longleaf pine-bluegrass range [18]. Longleaf pine-bluestem range in south-central Louisiana was subjected to burning or mowing and raking treatments. Dominant groundcover was slender bluestem and pinehill bluestem. In 1962, four plots were burned by headfire; four others were mowed to near ground level and residue was raked and removed. The treatments were reapplied in 1963. Fire did not stimulate early growth or increase nutrient content of slender bluestem more than did mowing and raking. Removal of litter by either treatment appeared to be the major cause of improvement in the status of slender bluestem [17].

Related categories for Species: Schizachyrium tenerum | Slender Bluestem

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.