1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Graminoid > Species: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
ABBREVIATION : SPOASP SYNONYMS : Sporobolus asper var. drummondii (Trin.) Vasey Sporobolus canovirens Nash Sporobolus clandestinus (Biehler) Hitchc. Sporobolus drummondii (Trin.) Vasey Sporobolus pilosus Vasey SCS PLANT CODE : SPAS COMMON NAMES : rough dropseed meadow dropseed tall droopseed TAXONOMY : The accepted scientific name for rough dropseed is Sporobolus asper (Michx.) Kunth [6,8,14]. There are four commonly recognized varieties: Sporobolus asper var. asper Sporobolus asper var. clandestinus (Biehler) Shinners Sporobolus asper var. hookeri (Trin.) Vasey Sporobolus asper var. pilosus (Vasey) Hitchc. LIFE FORM : Graminoid FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY COMPILED BY AND DATE : Kathy Ahlenslager, May 1988 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Ahlenslager, Kathleen E. 1988. Sporobolus asper. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Rough dropseed is distributed from eastern Washington and Oregon across the United States to Vermont, and south to Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas [6,8]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES29 Sagebrush FRES32 Texas savanna FRES34 Chaparral - mountain shrub FRES38 Plains grasslands FRES39 Prairie STATES : AZ AR CO CT DE IL IN IA KS KY LA MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WI WY AB MB SK ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : AMIS BADL BITH CUVA GWCA NERI PIPE BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 14 Great Plains KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K069 Bluestem - grama prairie K076 Blackland prairie K084 Cross Timbers SAF COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Rough dropseed is a component of sagebrush and tallgrass prairie communities [4].

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Rough dropseed makes up a minor part of the vegetation in most areas where it grows and is not a particularly valuable forage species [13]. It increases in response to grazing [7]. PALATABILITY : Rough dropseed is most palatable when young and green. Its palatability at maturity is low [13]. NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Compared to other grasses, rough dropseed is fair in forage value for livestock annd poor for wildlife [12,13]. COVER VALUE : NO-ENTRY VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : In Nebraska, rough dropseed is not recommended for use in seedings [13]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : NO-ENTRY MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : NO-ENTRY

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Rough dropseed is a solitary or tufted, rhizomatous, perennial, warm-season grass up to 4 feet (13 dm) in height [6,8]. It is more drought tolerant than many grasses of the bluestem prairie but is not nearly as drought hardy as sand dropseed (Sporobolus cryptandrus) [14]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Hemicryptophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Rough dropseed reproduces by seeds, tillers, and rhizomes [13]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Rough dropseed occurs throughout the United States on clayey to silty soils of prairies and sandy meadows. In the Great Basin, it grows on dry, often sandy sites in juniper communities and in fallow fields below 2,100 feet (1,530 m) [13]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : NO-ENTRY SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Growth begins in late spring; flowering occurs from August to October [6,8,12,14].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Fires usually consume dry vegetation to ground level. Burning of rough dropseed usually results in rapid combustion and little downward transfer of heat into belowground plant parts. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : NO-ENTRY

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Rough dropseed is characterized by loosely clustered, coarse culms (stems). During a fire these culms usually burn rapidly with little heat transfered downward into meristematic tissue. Plants spread via seeds, tillers, and occasionally by short rhizomes. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Early spring burning favors warm-season rough dropseed, whereas late spring burning favors cool-season species [1]. Yields of rough dropseed increased after spring burns during both wet and dry years in an ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei) community in southeastern Texas [15]. Fall burns also favor the growth of rough dropseed, as shown by a study on the influence of fire on southern Texas chaparral communities [3]. In an Oklahoma tallgrass prairie with rough dropseed, big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii var. gerardii), and little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), the interaction between disturbances, such as grazing and fire, on plant community structure was studied. It was found that species richness increased with increasing disturbance intensity. In addition, species diversity decreased after burning on the ungrazed treatments, but increased in response to grazing on the burned treatments [4]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : NO-ENTRY

REFERENCES

SPECIES: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed
REFERENCES : 1. Anderson, Kling L.; Smith, Ed F.; Owensby, Clenton E. 1970. Burning bluestem range. Journal of Range Management. 23: 81-92. [323] 2. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434] 3. Box, Thadis W.; Powell, Jeff; Drawe, D. Lynn. 1967. Influence of fire on south Texas chaparral communities. Ecology. 48(6): 955-961. [499] 4. Collins, Scott L. 1987. Interaction of disturbances in tallgrass prairie: a field experiment. Ecology. 68(5): 1243-1250. [2708] 5. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998] 6. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603] 7. Herbel, Carlton H.; Anderson, Kling L. 1959. Response of true prairie vegetation on major Flint Hills range sites to grazing treatment. Ecological Monographs. 29(2): 171-186. [19] 8. Hitchcock, A. S. 1951. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Misc. Publ. No. 200. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Administration. 1051 p. [2nd edition revised by Agnes Chase in two volumes. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.]. [1165] 9. Johnston, Barry C. 1987. Plant associations of Region Two: Potential plant communities of Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Colorado, and Kansas. 4th ed. R2-ECOL-87-2. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. 429 p. [3519] 10. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 11. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496] 12. Stubbendieck, J.; Hatch, Stephan L.; Hirsch, Kathie J. 1986. North American range plants. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 465 p. [2270] 13. Stubbendieck, J.; Nichols, James T.; Roberts, Kelly K. 1985. Nebraska range and pasture grasses (including grass-like plants). E.C. 85-170. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service. 75 p. [2269] 14. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944] 15. Wink, Robert L.; Wright, Henry A. 1973. Effects of fire on an ashe juniper community. Journal of Range Management. 26(5): 326-329. [2582]

Index

Related categories for Species: Sporobolus asper | Rough Dropseed

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.