1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Graminoid > Species: Sporobolus wrightii | Big Sacaton
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Sporobolus wrightii | Big Sacaton
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : In southeastern Arizona a February 1985 wildfire "consumed" all available big sacaton forage [12]. At the Research Ranch in southeastern Arizona, Bock and Bock [2] studied the impact of fire on an ungrazed sacaton grassland community. Height and percent cover of big sacaton were reduced until postfire year 2 on sites burned in summer or winter. "Hot" early summer fires may kill big sacaton plants [2]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Big sacaton sprouts after top-kill by fire [53]. Big sacaton may recover to prefire coverage in 2 to 3 years on ungrazed sites [4]. Postfire recovery is influenced by fire severity [2] and season of burning [14]. In southeastern Arizona in 1975 and 1976 three wildfires occurred in an ungrazed big sacaton grassland community [2]. The first two fires occurred in mid-May and mid-June 1975, and the third in February 1976. Permanent study sites were established on the two summer burns and on adjacent unburned (control) areas in August 1975. In February 1976 a wildfire occurred on one of the control sites which then became the winter burn study site. The summer burns occurred during hot, dry weather and were probably more severe than the winter burn [2]. Big sacaton postfire percent cover on the four study sites is listed below; prefire cover was not reported. summer burns winter burn control first year second year first year sacaton 74 35 70 50 In postfire year 1, big sacaton percent cover was less on burned than unburned sites, and less on the summer than winter burns. It was similar to prefire cover in the second year [2]. In southeastern Arizona the impacts of burning on big sacaton forage quality and quantity were studied [14,15]. Plots were burned with a headfire in winter (Feb. 6), summer (July 10), and fall (Oct. 2) 1980, 1981, and 1982. Plots had been lightly grazed for 5 years prior to burning. The time from ignition to total forage consumption by fire was recorded by plot. Fuel moistures and weather conditions were as follows [14]: fine fuel-moisture wind speed air temperature % oven-dry weight mi/hr (km/hr) deg F (deg C) winter 10-30 10 (16) 50-64 (10-18) summer 20-25 8-15 (13-24) 84-86 (29-30) fall 45-55 8-10 (13-16) 66-77 (19-25) Big sacaton green forage at the peak of the summer growing season (Aug. 21) 1,2, and 3 years after treatment was as follows: number of growing seasons after treatment 1 2 3 kg/ha winter 400-735 690-850 595-695 summer 700-865 850-935 1,375-1,590 fall 260-725 575-805 745-890 untreated 1,695-1,900 1,365-1,720 1,650-2,000 Green forage availability for the 3 treatment years was consistently greater on untreated plots than on burned plots. In postfire years 1 and 2, big sacaton green forage was greater on summer than on winter- or fall-burned plots. By postfire year 3 green forage on summer-burned plots was nearly equivalent to that on unburned plots [14]. At postfire year 1, standing crops were 60 percent less on spring- and fall-burned plots. At postfire year 2, live biomass on spring-burned plots was 30 percent less than on control plots. On fall-burned plots, 50 percent of plants failed to produce leaves the following spring. Removing hte standing dead biomass which insulates against cold temperatures may have killed the plants [56]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Land managers have traditionally recommended burning big sacaton grassland in either fall or winter [7,14]. According to Cox [14], winter and fall burns have a detrimental effect on big sacaton plant production for at least three summer growing seasons [14]. Loss of summer-formed leaves inhibits formation of winter leaves, and root crowns may be damaged by frost. Winter burning may reduce plant litter, making green foliage more available to livestock but reducing the long-term viability of big sacaton plants [17]. In Arizona seed-eating rodents are abundant on burned big sacaton sites. Bock and Bock [2] propose that ideal wildlife habitat would be mosaic of big sacaton stands in various stages of postfire succession.

Related categories for Species: Sporobolus wrightii | Big Sacaton

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.