|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
Introductory
SPECIES: Cercidium floridum | Blue Paloverde
ABBREVIATION :
CERFLO
SYNONYMS :
Cercidium torreyanum (S. Wats.) Sarg. [30]
Parkinsonia florida (Benth.) S. Wats. [62]
SCS PLANT CODE :
CEFL2
COMMON NAMES :
blue paloverde
TAXONOMY :
The currently accepted scientific name of blue paloverde is Cercidium
floridum Benth ex Gray. It is a member of the bird-of-paradise family
(Caesalpinaceae) [5,27,39,55]. Besides the typical subspecies that is
recognized throughout most of the species range, C. f. ssp. peninsulare
(Rose) Carter occurs in Baja California [76].
Occasionally, blue paloverde hybridizes with yellow paloverde (Cercidium
microphyllum) [39].
LIFE FORM :
Tree
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
COMPILED BY AND DATE :
Diane S. Pavek, May 1994
LAST REVISED BY AND DATE :
NO-ENTRY
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Pavek, Diane S. 1994. Cercidium floridum. In: Remainder of Citation
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Cercidium floridum | Blue Paloverde
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Blue paloverde is distributed through the Sonoran Desert. Its range
extends from central and southwestern Arizona into southeastern
California [15,25,35,39,62,68]. Blue paloverde continues southward
through western Sonora, Mexico [5,21,47]. Disjunct populations of blue
paloverde are located in northern Sinaloa and Baja California Sur
[27,31,39,55,76].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES30 Desert shrub
FRES40 Desert grasslands
STATES :
AZ CA MEXICO
ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS :
JOTR LAME ORPI SAGU
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
7 Lower Basin and Range
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K027 Mesquite bosque
K041 Creosotebush
K042 Creosotebush - bursage
K043 Paloverde - cactus shrub
SAF COVER TYPES :
68 Mesquite
242 Mesquite
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Blue paloverde is a characteristic member of the Sonoran Desert
floristic region [38,79]. It is a member of desert scrub communities.
Blue paloverde is a major component in creosotebush (Larrea tridentata)
and white bursage (Ambrosia dumosa) climax communities on lower bajadas
[8,12,22,38,74].
Blue paloverde is a facultative desert riparian species that may be
restricted to washes or arroyos in parts of its range but also occurs in
upland communities. It primarily occurs in communities irregularly
scattered along arroyos [68]. These communities with intermittent water
are variously classified as desert riparian associations [33],
pseudo-riparian communities [11], desert wash woodlands [7,13,53,71],
Colorado River riparian forests [49], and desert microphyll associations
[61]. Codominants in all of these classifications are honey mesquite
(Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa), smoketree (Psorothamnus
spinosus), ironwood (Olneya tesota), desert willow (Chilopsis linearis),
and catclaw acacia (Acacia greggii) [52,58,71].
Blue paloverde is a dominant member of the mixed scrub series with
ironwood and jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) [68]. Within the broadleaf
woodland subformation, the paloverde series is dominated by either blue
paloverde or yellow paloverde; the understory is sparse in this series
[43].
Blue paloverde is listed as a dominant or indicator species in the
following publications:
(1) A vegetation classification system applied to southern California [43]
(2) The vascular plant communities of California [61]
(3) Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: a gradient
analysis of the south slope [74].
Species associated with blue paloverde but not previously mentioned in
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE include desert hackberry (Celtis pallida),
desert lavender (Hyptis emoryi), big saltbrush (Atriplex lentiformis),
Torrey seepweed (Suaeda torreyana), spidergrass (Aristida ternipes), and
Rothrock grama (Bouteloua rothrockii) [23,47,49,68].
VALUE AND USE
SPECIES: Cercidium floridum | Blue Paloverde
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE :
The wood of blue paloverde is light to heavy, soft, and close-grained
[30,70]. Blue paloverde is used for fuel [49].
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
Blue paloverde fruits, twigs, and leaves are used as livestock forage
thoughout the year [60]. Mule deer, bighorn sheep, and burros browse
its twigs and leaves [15,80]. Small mammals consume blue paloverde
seeds during summer and fall [15].
In southern Arizona, blue paloverde taller than 6.7 feet (2 m) is used
for nesting [65]. With a large canopy, blue paloverde offers many sites
for bird perching, nesting, and foraging. The blue paloverde-ironwood
vegetation type supports a high density and diversity of breeding birds
[7,16,20]. In south central Arizona, 19 species of breeding birds were
present in mesquite (Prosopis spp.) bosques where blue paloverde
occurred [56].
Blue paloverde leaves and stems contain cyanogenic glycosides,
alkaloids, and cinnamic phenolic acid which may deter herbivory [77].
PALATABILITY :
NO-ENTRY
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
Blue paloverde aboveground biomass is about 22 percent nitrogen, 50 to
80 percent dry matter, and 17 percent crude protein [4,63,64,80].
Equations are available to predict amounts of dry matter, nitrogen, and
carbon based on blue paloverde height and crown measurements [4].
COVER VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
Blue paloverde has successfully established by artificial seeding
following highway construction [9].
Blue paloverde naturally established following removal of invasive
populations of saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima) [2]. Soil preparation,
planting, and irrigation methods for blue paloverde are discussed in the
literature [3,71].
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
Blue paloverde fruits have been used by Native Americans for food [5].
The Pima and Papago in Arizona cooked young blue paloverde fruits and
seeds and ground the seeds for porridge [15].
The Pima carved blue paloverde into large serving spoons [46].
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Blue paloverde and other species were tested for biomass production for
use in fuelwood and erosion control programs. Blue paloverde and
ironwood ranked lowest of the tested species for biomass production [18].
Young blue paloverde can tolerate moderate grazing. In greenhouse
tests, blue paloverde sprouted following top removal. At a transplant
site near Travertine Point, California, severely gnawed blue paloverde
transplants survived only when irrigated [3].
Seed predation by invertebrates such as bruchid beetles can lead to
logarithmic increases in seed mortality of blue paloverde [28].
Blue paloverde has decreased in some areas of Arizona partly due to the
erosion of broad flat washes into narrow, steep-sided channels [67]. In
the microphyll woodlands of the desert washes, disturbance by offroad
vehicles decreases density and biomass of perennial plants such as blue
paloverde [7].
Natural recovery following disturbance is slow in wash woodlands in
which blue paloverde occurs. Optimal conditions for reestablishment
occur infrequently. It may take up to 60 years for these woodlands to
reach predisturbance levels of biomass, and 180 years to reach
predisturbance levels of species diversity [71].
In southeastern Califonia, blue paloverde is a nurse plant for saguaro
(Carnegiea gigantea) [13]. Saguaro eventually outlive or contribute to
the death of paloverde species [35].
Blue paloverde does not have mycorrhizal nodules [72]. The presence of
other mycorrhizal associations was not discussed.
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Cercidium floridum | Blue Paloverde
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Blue paloverde is a native, spiny, small tree or subtree [30,35,39,78].
It has multiple stems [4]. Blue paloverde grows to 32.8 feet (10 m)
tall with a trunk diameter of 1.5 feet (0.5 m) and a crown spread of
163.4 square feet (15.2 sq m) [4,5,30,39]. Blue paloverde has
thin-barked, photosynthetic stems [3,66]. Age influences photosynthetic
rate of stems; younger stems have higher photosynthetic rates [41]. Its
pinnately compound leaves are about 1 inch (2.5 cm) long and
drought-deciduous [3,30,54,66,78]. Inflorescences of blue paloverde are
1.5 to 4.7 inches (4-12 cm) long with one or more flowers [55,62,70].
The fruits are flat legumes, 1.5 to 4 inches (4-10 cm) long [39,62,70].
Each legume holds one to eight flat seeds [36,39,70].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Phanerophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Blue paloverde reproduces sexually and probably asexually. In a
greenhouse study, young blue paloverde sprouted after plants were
clipped to less than one-half of their total height [3]. A close
relative, yellow paloverde, sprouts following top-kill [32].
Photoperiod controls blue paloverde flower and fruit initiation and stem
growth; however, moisture and temperature determine actual organ
production [13,66].
Abiotic and biotic agents aid in seed dispersal. The flat seeds of blue
paloverde prevent air loft and allow downward dispersal into washes.
Fruits and seeds do not float. Occasionally, blue paloverde fruits
disperse unopened. Some seed dispersal occurs via animals. Blue
paloverde has been found occasionally in ant formicaries below the soil
surface. Seeds will germinate in these caches. Birds probably move
seed upstream [36].
Large seedbanks of blue paloverde may be present. Scarification from
flash floods or other abrasive processes facilitates germination
[36,43,71,73]. Blue paloverde germinates well on sandy deposits [67].
Shade and litter beneath mature blue paloverde alters seed microsites
and makes germination more likely [54].
Blue paloverde establishment is limited by climate extremes, low
moisture availability, poor soil characteristics, and herbivory. Rapid,
deep root development is important for blue paloverde establishment. In
greenhouse trials, blue paloverde roots grew an average of 0.3 inch per
day (0.9 cm/day) [3]. Mature blue paloverde has deep root systems that
reach ground water and make blue paloverde less vulnerable to drought
[42]. A herbivory experiment was conducted on blue paloverde at
Travertine Point, California. Seven months after blue paloverde
germinated, rabbits and other rodents grazed 86 percent of the
seedlings. Ninety percent of these grazed blue paloverde seedlings
appeared unlikely to survive [3].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Blue paloverde occurs in arid and semiarid climates characterized by
high summer temperatures and highly variable rainfall. Precipitation
predominantly falls bimodally, in winter and in summer [40,52,53,66].
Blue paloverde is found at elevations from sea level to 4,000 feet
(0-1,220 m) [4,15,26,34,74]. It occurs on almost level (less than 5%)
to steep slopes [4].
Blue paloverde predominantly grows in washes, but is also found in
upland habitats. Blue paloverde occurs in moderate to large watersheds
from 1 to 50 square miles (2.6-130 sq km) [81]. It grows on terraces,
high flood plains, arroyos or dry washes, and intermittent streambeds
more than 4 to 5 feet (1.2-1.5 m) wide with deep soil [8,54,79,81]. In
the northern Sonoran Desert at moderately high elevations, blue
paloverde grows in upland positions [66]. Blue paloverde occupies
hills, mountain slopes, and middle to lower bajadas [4,54,65].
Blue paloverde grows in soils with low levels of nutrients, especially
nitrogen and phosphorus [3]. Soil textures it occurs on may be sandy to
gravelly, coarse loamy to fine sand overlain with fine gravel [4,54,65].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Facultative Seral Species
Blue paloverde occurs from pioneer to climax communities, depending on
site characteristics. In fact, classical succession may not occur in
the desert ecosystems where blue paloverde occurs. In the xeroriparian
systems to which blue paloverde belongs, community development is
influenced by catastrophic floods and long recovery periods [26]. After
disturbance of the desert scrub communities, former dominants such as
blue paloverde are the first to appear and replace themselves [48].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
Flower and leaf production of blue paloverde vary according to the
amounts of precipitation received [66]. Blue paloverde remains leafless
throughout most of the year [30]. Leaves are produced between mid-July
and late November, depending on the summer rains [66]. Leaves drop
during drought and are not replaced until the following spring [13].
Blue paloverde typically flowers sporadically after rains from late
March to May, but flowering may extend into July [5,15,30,66,70].
Populations of blue paloverde also may bloom August to October [30].
Fruits mature about 1 month after flowering, typically from May to July
[66,70].
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Cercidium floridum | Blue Paloverde
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Blue paloverde is susceptible to fire; its photosynthetic stems are
probably easily killed by fire. It may sprout from the root crown if
its postfire response is similar to its response to clipping.
The historical fire regime of the Sonoran Desert is mostly unknown [24].
Thomas [59] mentioned that fire free periods in the Sonoran Desert are
greater than 250 years. However, Loftin [32] stated that fires were
relatively common in the Sonoran Desert under appropriate conditions,
especially during summer. Fires that do occur are usually low-severity
due to small fuel loads [37].
Grazing and vegetation change have probably altered the fire regime from
historic patterns. On the Santa Rita Experimental Range in southern
Arizona, frequent fires were common until 1916 because dense stands of
grass were present. Fires were frequent at the turn of the century in
desert grasslands that border the desert scrub communities where blue
paloverde occurs. By the 1960's, fire frequencies had declined due to
grazing and fire suppression [24]. In south-central Arizona, understory
vegetation beneath paloverde species, ironwood, mesquite, and saguaro
associations changed from grasses to low shrubs due to grazing
pressures. This has altered the fire regime, resulting in less frequent
fires [50]. However, where introduced annual grasses now predominate,
fire frequency may have increased.
The Sonoran savanna grasslands are subtropical, fire-climax communities.
Blue paloverde occurs infrequently in these communities at their
northern limits [10].
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
Tree with adventitious-bud root crown/soboliferous species root sucker
Secondary colonizer - off-site seed
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Cercidium floridum | Blue Paloverde
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Blue paloverde with its thin photosynthetic bark is probably top-killed
by fire. Surviving rootstocks may sprout if the response of blue
paloverde is similar to yellow paloverde [32]. If plants are heat
damaged, they may die several months after burning [14]. Seeds are
probably killed by fire unless protected by insulating layers of soil.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
In desert plant communities where blue paloverde occurs, 20 years may be
necessary for plant densities to recover to prefire levels [14,32,51].
Four years after a February 1964 fire in a southeastern California
desert scrub community, soils beneath burned and unburned woody plants
were surveyed. Soil beneath burned blue paloverde had a strongly
hydrophobic layer overlain by a slightly hydrophobic layer. Burned soil
had a slightly higher degree of water repellancy than unburned soil.
This water-repellent burned soil causes a reduction of available water
moisture and inhibits germination of species such as annuals beneath
blue paloverde [1]. This may protect blue paloverde from some fires.
Native annual plants probably did not create the same large fuel load
that introduced annual species currently provide [32].
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
NO-ENTRY
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
It is difficult to control shrubs and trees with fire on arid habitats
due to lack of fuel. Two consecutive wet winters are probably necessary
to develop adequate fuel to sustain a fire in the desert scrub [37].
Prescribed fires once every 10 years would keep blue paloverde in check [23].
Depending upon the season of burning, soil nutrients may be quickly
translocated following fire on the desert soils where blue paloverde
occurs. Available nitrogen in the soil drops below prefire levels for
several years due to removal of nitrogen-containing ash by run-off[75].
Dry matter levels are useful for predicting flammability of fuels. Near
Tucson, Arizona, aboveground biomass of blue paloverde was 80.3 percent
dry matter [4].
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Cercidium floridum | Blue Paloverde
REFERENCES :
1. Adams, Susan; Strain, B. R.; Adams, M. S. 1970. Water-repellent soils,
fire, and annual plant cover in a desert scrub community of southeastern
California. Ecology. 51(4): 696-700. [5407]
2. Anderson, Bertin W.; Ohmart, Robert D.; Disano, John. 1979. Revegetating
the riparian floodplain for wildlife. In: Johnson, R. Roy; McCormick, J.
Frank, technical coordinators. Strategies for protection and management
of floodplain wetlands & other riparian ecosystems: Proc. of the
symposium; 1978 December 11-13; Callaway Gardens, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep.
WO-12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service:
318-331. [4367]
3. Bainbridge, David A.; Virginia, Ross A. 1990. Restoration in the Sonoran
Desert of California. Restoration and Management Notes. 8(1): 3-14.
[14975]
4. Barth, R. C.; Klemmedson, J. O. 1982. Amount and distribution of dry
matter, nitrogen, and organic carbon in soil-plant systems of mesquite
and palo verde. Journal of Range Management. 35(4): 412-418. [2980]
5. Benson, Lyman; Darrow, Robert A. 1981. The trees and shrubs of the
Southwestern deserts. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
[18066]
6. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
7. Berry, Kristin H. 1980. A review of the effects of off-road vehicles on
birds and other vertebrates. In: DeGraaf, Richard M., technical
coordinator. Management of western forests and grasslands for nongame
birds: Workshop proceedings; 1980 February 11-14; Salt Lake City, UT.
Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-86. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station:
451-467. [17918]
8. Bowers, Michael A. 1988. Plant associations on a Sonoran Desert bajada:
geographical correlates and evolutionary source pools. Vegetatio. 74:
107-112. [4408]
9. Brady, E. LeRoy. 1991. Use of native plants for roadside revegetation.
In: Rangeland Technology Equipment Council, 1991 annual report.
9222-2808-MTDC. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Technology and Development Program: 15-16. [17081]
10. Brown, David E. 1982. Sonoran savanna grassland. In: Brown, David E.,
ed. Biotic communities of the American Southwest--United States and
Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 137-141. [8897]
11. Brown, David E.; Lowe, Charles H.; Hausler, Janet F. 1977. Southwestern
riparian communities: their biotic importance and management in Arizona.
In: Johnson, R. Roy; Jones, Dale A., tech. coords. Importance,
preservation and management of riparian habitat: a symposium:
Proceedings; 1977 July 9; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-43. Fort
Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment 201-211. [5348]
12. Burgess, Tony L.; Bowers, Janice E.; Turner, Raymond M. 1991. Exotic
plants at the Desert Laboratory, Tucson, Arizona. Madrono. 38(2):
96-114. [15362]
13. Burk, Jack H. 1977. Sonoran Desert. In: Barbour, M. G.; Major, J., eds.
Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley and Sons:
869-899. [3731]
14. Cave, George Harold, III. 1982. Ecological effects of fire in the upper
Sonoran Desert. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. 124 p. Thesis.
[12295]
15. Elias, Thomas S. 1980. The complete trees of North America: field guide
and natural history. New York: Times Mirror Magazines, Inc. 948 p.
[21987]
16. England, A. Sidney; Foreman, Larry D.; Laudenslayer, William F., Jr.
1984. Composition and abundance of bird populations in riparian systems
of the California deserts. In: Warner, Richard E.; Hendrix, Kathleen M.,
eds. California riparian systems: Ecology, conservation, and productive
management. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 694-705.
[5870]
17. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
18. Felker, Peter; Cannell, G. H.; Clark, Peter R.; [and others]. 1983.
Biomass production of Prosopis species (mesquite), Leucaena, and other
leguminous trees grown under heat/drought stress. Forest Science. 29(3):
592-606. [4765]
19. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
20. Goodwin, John G., Jr.; Hungerford, C. Roger. 1977. Habitat use by native
Gambel's and scaled quail and released masked bobwhite quail in southern
Arizona. Res. Pap. RM-197. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 8 p. [14970]
21. Hastings, James R.; Turner, Raymond M.; Warren, Douglas K. 1972. An
atlas of some plant distributions in the Sonoran Desert. Technical
Reports on the Meteorology and Climatology of Arid Regions No. 21.
Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona, Institute of Atmospheric Physics. 255
p. [10534]
22. Herbel, Carlton H. 1979. Utilization of grass- and shrublands of the
south-western United States. In: Walker, B. H., ed. Management of
semi-arid ecosystems. Volume 7. Developments in agriculture and
managed-forest ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing
Company: 161-203. [1134]
23. Humphrey, R. R. 1949. Fire as a means of controlling velvet mesquite,
burroweed, and cholla on southern Arizona ranges. Journal of Range
Management. 2: 175-182. [5050]
24. Humphrey, Robert R. 1963. The role of fire in the desert and desert
grassland areas of Arizona. In: Proceedings, 2nd annual Tall Timbers
fire ecology conference; 1963 March 14-15; Tallahassee, FL. Tallahassee,
FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 45-61. [19000]
25. Johnson, Hyrum B. 1976. Vegetation and plant communities of southern
California deserts--a functional view. In: Latting, June, ed. Symposium
proceedings: plant communities of southern California; 1974 May 4;
Fullerton, CA. Special Publication No. 2. Berkeley, CA: California
Native Plant Society: 125-164. [1278]
26. Johnson, R. Roy; Bennett, Peter S.; Haight, Lois T. 1989. Southwestern
woody riparian vegetation and succession: an evolutionary approach. In:
Abell, Dana L., technical coordinator. Proceedings of the California
riparian systems conference: Protection, management, and restoration for
the 1990's; 1988 September 22-24; Davis, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 135-139. [13515]
27. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock,
Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
28. Kingsolver, J. M.; Johnson, C. D.; Swier, S. R.; Teran, A. 1977.
Prosopis fruits as a resource for invertebrates. In: Simpson, B. B., ed.
Mesquite: Its biology in two desert ecosystems. US/IBP Synthesis 4.
Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc: 108-122. [5193]
29. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
30. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1950. Southwestern trees: A guide to the native
species of New Mexico and Arizona. Agriculture Handbook No. 9.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 109 p.
[20330]
31. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1976. Atlas of United States trees. Volume 3.
Minor western hardwoods. Misc. Publ. 1314. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 13 p. 290 maps. [10430]
32. Loftin, Samuel Robert. 1987. Postfire dynamics of a Sonoran Desert
ecosystem. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. 97 p. Thesis. [12296]
33. Lowe, Charles H., Jr. 1961. Biotic communities in the sub-Mogollon
region of the inland Southwest. Arizona Academy of Science Journal. 2:
40-49. [20379]
34. Lowe, Charles H.; Holm, Peter A. 1991. The amphibians and reptiles at
Saguaro National Monument, Arizona. Technical Report No. 37. Tucson, AZ:
University of Arizona, School of Renewable Natural Resources,
Cooperative National Park Resources Study Unit. 20 p. [18335]
35. MacMahon, James A. 1988. Warm deserts. In: Barbour, Michael G.;
Billings, William Dwight, eds. North American terrestrial vegetation.
Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press: 231-264. [19547]
36. Maddox, Jay C.; Carlquist, Sherwin. 1985. Wind dispersal in Californian
desert plants: experimental studies and conceptual considerations.
Aliso. 11(1): 77-96. [3256]
37. McLaughlin, Steven P.; Bowers, Janice E. 1982. Effects of wildfire on a
Sonoran Desert plant community. Ecology. 63(1): 246-248. [1619]
38. Minckley, W. L.; Clark, Thomas O. 1981. Vegetation of the Gila River
Resource Area, eastern Arizona. Desert Plants. 3(3): 124-140. [10863]
39. Munz, Philip A. 1974. A flora of southern California. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. 1086 p. [4924]
40. Niering, William A.; Lowe, Charles H. 1984. Vegetation of the Santa
Catalina Mountains: community types and dynamics. Vegetatio. 58: 3-28.
[12037]
41. Nilsen, Erik T.; Meinzer, F. C.; Rundel, P. W. 1989. Stem photosynthesis
in Psorothamnus spinosus (smoke tree) in the Sonoran desert of
California. Oecologia. 79: 193-197. [8731]
42. Odening, Walter R.; Strain, B. R.; Oechel, W. C. 1974. The effect of
decreasing water potential on net CO2 exchange of intact desert shrubs.
Ecology. 55: 1086-1095. [17775]
43. Paysen, Timothy E.; Derby, Jeanine A.; Black, Hugh, Jr.; [and others].
1980. A vegetation classification system applied to southern California.
Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-45. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
33 p. [1849]
44. Pemberton, Robert W. 1988. The abundance of plants bearing extrafloral
nectaries in Colorado and Mojave Desert communities of southern
California. Madrono. 35(3): 238-246. [6163]
45. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
46. Rea, Amadeo. 1979. Velvet mesquite. Environment Southwest. 486: 3-7.
[2977]
47. Rea, Amadeo M. 1983. Sonoran desert oases: plants, birds and native
people. Environment Southwest. 503: 5-9. [2967]
48. Reynolds, Hudson G. 1962. Some characteristics and uses of Arizona's
major plant communities. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. 2:
62-71. [1959]
49. Roberts, Warren G.; Howe, J. Greg; Major, Jack. 1980. A survey of
riparian forest flora and fauna in California. In: Sands, Anne, editor.
Riparian forests in California: Their ecology and conservation:
Symposium proceedings. Davis, CA: University of California, Division of
Agricultural Sciences: 3-19. [5271]
50. Robinett, Dan. 1990. Tohono O'odham range history. Rangelands. 12(6):
296-300. [14968]
51. Thomas, Renee L.; Anderson, Roger C. 1993. Influence of topography on
stand composition in a midwestern ravine forest. American Midland
Naturalist. 130(1): 1-12. [1742]
52. Sharifi, M. R.; Meinzer, F. C.; Nilsen, E. T.; [and others]. 1988.
Effect of manipulation of water & nitrogen supplies on the quantitative
phenology of Larrea tridentata (creosote bush) in the Sonoran Desert.
American Journal of Botany. 75(8): 1163-1174. [5476]
53. Sharifi, M. R.; Meinzer, F. C.; Rundel, P. W.; Nilsen, E. T. 1990.
Effect of manipulating soil water and nitrogen regimes on clipping
production and water relations of creosote bush. In: McArthur, E.
Durant; Romney, Evan M.; Smith, Stanley D.; Tueller, Paul T., compilers.
Proceedings--symposium on cheatgrass invasion, shrub die-off, and other
aspects of shrub biology and management; 1989 April 5-7; Las Vegas, NV.
Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 245-249. [12857]
54. Shreve, Forrest. 1942. The desert vegetation of North America. Botanical
Review. 8(4): 195-246. [5051]
55. Shreve, F.; Wiggins, I. L. 1964. Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran
Desert. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 2 vols. [21016]
56. Stamp, Nancy E. 1978. Breeding birds of riparian woodland in
south-central Arizona. Condor. 80: 64-71. [8079]
57. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
58. Swank, Wendell G. 1958. The mule deer in Arizona chaparral. Wildlife
Bulletin No. 3. Phoenix, AZ: State of Arizona, Game and Fish Department.
109 p. [12327]
59. Thomas, P. A. 1991. Response of succulents to fire: a review.
International Journal of Wildland Fire. 1(1): 11-22. [14991]
60. Thornber, J. J. 1910. The grazing ranges of Arizona. Bull. No. 65.
Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station. 360
p. [4555]
61. Thorne, Robert F. 1976. The vascular plant communities of California.
In: Latting, June, ed. Symposium proceedings: plant communities of
southern California; 1974 May 4; Fullerton, CA. Special Publication No.
2. Berkeley, CA: California Native Plant Society: 1-31. [3289]
62. Tidestrom, I.; Kittell, T. 1941. A flora of Arizona and New Mexico.
Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press. 897 p.
[18145]
63. Tiedemann, Arthur R. 1981. Stream chemistry, nutrient economy, and site
productivity consequences of wildland management and wildfire. In:
Baumgartner, David M., ed. Interior West watershed management:
Proceedings; 1980 April 8-10; Spokane, Wa. Pullman, WA: Washington State
University, Cooperative Extension: 183-201. [8591]
64. Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Clary, Warren P. 1985. Nitrogen distribution in
northcentral Utah Gambel oak stands. In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed.
Proceedings, 3rd Utah shrub ecology workshop; 1983 August 30-31; Provo,
UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, College of Natural Resources:
13-18. [3081]
65. Tomoff, Carl S. 1974. Avian species diversity in desert scrub. Ecology.
55: 396-403. [19307]
66. Turner, Raymond M. 1963. Growth in four species of Sonoran Desert trees.
Ecology. 44: 760-765. [9883]
67. Turner, Raymond M.; Bowers, Janice E. 1988. Long-term changes in
populations of Carnegiea gigantea, exotic plant spp. & Cercidium
floridum at the Desert Lab, Tumamoc, Tucson, Arizona. In: Whitehead, E.
E.; [and others], eds. Arid lands: Proceedings of the conference; 1985;
Tucson, AZ. [Place of publication unknown]: Westview Press: 445-455.
[15007]
68. Turner, Raymond M.; Brown, David E. 1982. Sonoran desertscrub. In:
Brown, David E., ed. Biotic communities of the American
Southwest--United States and Mexico. Desert Plants. 4(1-4): 181-221.
[2375]
69. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
70. Vines, Robert A. 1960. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest.
Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1104 p. [7707]
71. Virginia, Ross A.; Bainbridge, David A. 1988. Revegetation in the
Colorado Desert: lessons from the study of natural systems. In: Rieger,
John P.; Williams, Bradford K., eds. Proceedings, 2nd native plant
revegetation symposium; 1987 April 15-18; San Diego, CA. Madison, WI:
University of Wisconsin - Arboretum, Society of Ecological Restoration
and Management: 52-63. [4095]
72. Waldon, Hollis B. 1987. Sonoran Desert rhizobia found to nodulate Acacia
constricta. Desert Plants. 8(3): 106-110. [10877]
73. Went, F. W. 1948. Ecology of desert plants. I. Observations on
germination in the Joshua Tree National Monument, California. Ecology.
29(3): 242-253. [12915]
74. Whittaker, R. H.; Niering, W. A. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina
Mountains, Arizona: a gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology. 46:
429-452. [9637]
75. Whysong, Gary L.; Heisler, Michael H. 1978. Nitrogen levels of soil and
vegetation in the upper Sonoran Desert as affected by fire. In: Hyder,
Donald N., ed. Proceedings, 1st international rangeland congress; 1978
August 14-18; Denver, CO. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management:
697-699. [3990]
76. Wiggins, Ira L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press. 1025 p. [21993]
77. Wisdom, Charles S.; Gonzalez-Coloma, Azucena; Rundel, Philip W. 1987.
Phytochemical constituents in a Sonoran Desert plant community. In:
Provenza, Frederick D.; Flinders, Jerran T.; McArthur, E. Durant,
compilers. Proceedings--symposium on plant-herbivore interactions; 1985
August 7-9; Snowbird, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-222. Ogden, UT: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research
Station: 84-87. [7401]
78. Young, James A.; Young, Cheryl G. 1986. Collecting, processing and
germinating seeds of wildland plants. Portland, OR: Timber Press. 236 p.
[12232]
79. Zimmermann, Robert C. 1969. Plant ecology of an arid basin: Tres
Alamos-Redington Area, southeastern Arizona. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 485-D. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the
Interior, Geological Survey. 51 p. [4287]
80. Rautenstrauch, Kurt R.; Krausman, Paul R.; Whiting, Frank M.; Brown,
William H. 1988. Nutritional quality of desert mule deer forage in King
Valley, Arizona. Desert Plants. 8(4): 172-174. [2768]
81. Warren, Peter L.; Anderson, L. Susan. 1985. Gradient analysis of a
Sonoran Desert wash. In: Johnson, R. Roy; [and others], technical
coordinators. Riparian ecosystems & their mgmt: reconciling conflicting
issues: Proceedings, 1st North American riparian conference; 1985 April
16-18; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-120. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and
Range Experiment Station: 150-155. [17158]
Index
Related categories for Species: Cercidium floridum
| Blue Paloverde
|
 |
