1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Tree > Species: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
ABBREVIATION : JUNSIL SYNONYMS : Juniperus virginiana var. silicicola (Small) Bailey J. v. var bermudiana Vassey J. lacayana Britt. J. bermudiana L. J. barbadensis L. Sabina silicicola Small SCS PLANT CODE : JUSI COMMON NAMES : southern redcedar redcedar sand cedar coast juniper eastern redcedar TAXONOMY : The accepted scientific name for southern redcedar is Juniperus silicicola (Small) Bailey [13,14,34]. However, a number of authors of recent publications [1,4,5,6,12,17] contend that this entity is better treated as J. virginiana var. silicicola. Adams [1], who did a multivariate analysis of morphological and chemical characteristics, found that such analysis failed to separate the coastal populations (silicicola) on the basis of scale leaf length, pollen cone length, ovulate cone size, and twig size (characters used to distinguish silicicola from virginiana). Furthermore, although multivariate analysis of terpenoid profiles gives discrete status to adjoining inland and coastal groups, these groups are very close. The coastal populations tend to have cinnamon-colored rather than brownish bark, and a rounded rather than pyramidal crown. Also, eastern redcedar will naturally hybridize with southern redcedar [15] LIFE FORM : Tree FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : COMPILED BY AND DATE : Janet Sullivan, January 1993 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Sullivan, Janet. 1993. Juniperus silicicola. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Southern redcedar is restricted to the outer coastal plain and barrier islands of the southeastern United States and the Gulf of Mexico; it ranges from North Carolina south to central Florida, across the Florida peninsula and west along the Gulf coast to eastern Texas [24,31]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES13 Loblolly - shortleaf pine FRES14 Oak - pine FRES16 Oak - gum - cypress FRES41 Wet grasslands STATES : AL FL GA LA MS NC SC ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : CUIS FOCA BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : NO-ENTRY KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K080 Marl - everglades K090 Live oak - sea oats K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest K112 Southern mixed forest SAF COVER TYPES : 73 Southern redcedar 74 Cabbage palmetto 81 Loblolly pine 84 Slash pine 104 Sweetbay - swamp tupelo - redbay SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : NO-ENTRY

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : The wood of southern redcedar is close grained, light, soft, fragrant, and very durable. The wood is used for chests, wardrobes, closet linings, flooring, and scientific instruments. The decay-resistant heartwood is valued for fenceposts. Young trees are used as Christmas trees [39]. Southern redcedar is commercially important but the supply of timber is limited [36]. Southern redcedar was in great demand for pencil production in Florida in the nineteenth century; the majority of the wood used by two large pencil factories in the town of Cedar Key. A hurricane in 1896 destroyed these factories and terminated a major portion of such use [37]. IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Southern redcedar "berries" are used for food by birds (particularly cedar waxwings, grosbeaks, and finches) and mammals (including the armadillo, black bear, gray fox and opossum). The twigs and foliage are browsed by cottontail rabbits and by hoofed browsers [27,33]. Johnsen and Alexander [18] list southern redcedar as useful for wildlife habitat and for environmental forestry. Junipers (Juniperus spp.) provide important protective and nesting cover. They are preferred nest sites for chipping sparrows, robins, song sparrows and mockingbirds [27]. The cover types that southern redcedar occurs in are important as nesting habitat for many birds that feed in aquatic habitats. Many migratory birds occur in this habitat in winter [16]. PALATABILITY : Southern redcedar "berries" are highly palatable to many species of birds and mammals [27]. NUTRITIONAL VALUE : NO-ENTRY COVER VALUE : NO-ENTRY VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : NO-ENTRY OTHER USES AND VALUES : Southern redcedar is valued as an ornamental, both for residential uses and along roads [18,39]. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Selective harvesting of southern redcedar in the nineteenth century for pencil manufacturing essentially eliminated it as an overstory species. Leaving the live oak (Quercus virginiana) overstory in place probably prevented regeneration of southern redcedar, reducing its abundance in coastal and inland forests [39]. Seeds of southern redcedar can either be sown in fall or spring, but spring-sown seeds should be cold stratified [19,39]. Germination of seeds takes from 4 to 5 weeks. The seedlings are sensitive to overheating and should be placed under light shade [39]. Southern redcedar can be propagated by cuttings or grafting [39]. Southern redcedar can be infested by cedar-apple rust (Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae) and consequently should not be planted near apple orchards [27]. Bagworms (Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis) have been observed feeding on the foliage [28]. Eastern redcedar can be heavily damaged by cedar blight (Phormopsis juniperovora); presumably the blight can also attack southern redcedar [39]. Junipers are also susceptible to various wood rots [39].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Southern redcedar is a native, dioecious evergreen tree. The average height in secondary forests is 30 to 50 feet (9-15 m) [31,36,39]. The Texas champion tree is 75 feet tall [31]. Some of the virgin redcedar stands along the Apalachee Bay in Florida may have been over 100 feet tall (30 m). It is possible that second-growth forests of this slow-growing, long-lived species have not yet reached mature height [36,39]. When southern redcedar is grown in the open, the branches spread to form a broad irregular crown, with the upper branches erect and the lower branches pendulous. In more crowded stands, southern redcedar tends to have a more symmetrical, narrow, pointed crown [36]. As are other junipers, southern redcedar is aromatic [36]. The bark of southern redcedar is thin and shreddy [36,39]. The mature ovulate cones are berrylike and bright blue [29]. The root system is shallow [31]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Phanerophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Sexual reproduction: The seeds of southern redcedar have dormant embryos; germination may be delayed until the second or third spring after seeds are mature [3]. Cold stratification hastens germination; it is also likely that scarification by passage through animal digestive tracts is also effective [39]. Data on frequency of good seed crops are lacking. Eastern redcedar is known to produce some seeds every year, with irregular heavy seed crops; it is likely that southern redcedar behaves in a similar fashion. Seed dispersal is usually by birds. Cleaned seeds average from 37,000 to 55,000 per pound (81,600-121,300/kg) [18,39]. Eastern redcedar is reported as a nonsprouting species; southern redcedar is probably similar, although Godfrey [12] mentions sprouting of young trees after injury. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Southern redcedar almost always occurs within 30 miles (50 km) of seawater or in areas with shallow water tables [31,39]. Although it usually occurs on sandy, moist but not saturated soils, it occasionally occurs on acidic clay soils in Texas [31,39]. Southern redcedar may be found on soil types that include Alfisols, Entisols, Inceptisols, Spodosols, and Ultisols [39]. Southern redcedar occurs on calcareous hammocks, coastal hammocks, brackish flats, shell middens, dunes, bluffs, and secondary woods, and will colonize dredge spoil islands [4,5,6,39]. Southern redcedar is found inland in river swamps and along stream and creek margins in low woods [36]. Southern redcedar is abundant in hydric hammock communities in Florida, most often occurring with cabbage palmetto (Sabal palmetto) and live oak in areas between pine flatwoods and freshwater marshes [35]. Southern redcedar occurs in oak (Quercus virginiana, Q. marilandica) scrub and in live oak forests that are established on the backdunes of barrier islands off the east coast of the Florida peninsula [19]. Overstory associates not listed in Distribution and Occurrence include spruce pine (Pinus glabra), live oak, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), American holly (Ilex opaca) [21,39]. Understory associates include yaupon (Ilex vomitoris), southern bayberry (Myrica cerifera), devilwood (Osmanthus americanus), Carolina laurelcherry (Prunus caroliniana), beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), bumelia (Bumelia spp.), tree sparkleberry (Vaccinium arboreum), muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), and greenbriers (Smilax spp.) [39]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Facultative Seral Species Southern redcedar is classified as intolerant to very intolerant of shade, although it can become established in partial shade. The dense shade of hardwoods may retard reestablishment of cedar-dominated maritime forests [39]. Southern redcedar tends to occur in open forests or on sand dunes where light is not limiting. Southern redcedar is not an early colonizer of sand dunes; it is usually found in established dune communities such as oak scrub or live oak, inland of the foredunes [19]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Southern redcedar pollen is shed from staminate cones in January and February; ovulate conelets are pollinated at this time and mature slowly through the spring and summer. Ovulate conelets are mature by October to November of their first year; conelets persist into winter, but most are eaten by birds [5,6,12,39]. Seeds are dormant and germination of seeds occurs in the spring, although it may be delayed 2 to 3 years [39].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Southern redcedar occurs on outer coastal sites that rarely burn. Fire is considered the worst natural enemy of eastern redcedar; southern redcedar is similar to eastern redcedar in that it has thin bark and shallow roots which are easily damaged by fire. It is probable that southern redcedar is equally susceptible to fire damage and mortality [23,40]. On inland sites where it is a minor species and fires are more frequent, southern redcedar suffers damage and mortality due to fire. However, at current levels of fire suppression, fire damage may be less prevalent now then in the past [39]. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Tree without adventitious-bud root crown Secondary colonizer - off-site seed

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Southern redcedar seedlings and saplings are killed by light-severity fire [23,39]. Mature trees are also easily damaged or killed by fire [39,40]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Southern redcedar is probably a nonsprouting species, since the closely related eastern redcedar is nonsprouting [23]. Godfrey [12], however, mentions the existence of sprouts of damaged saplings or seedlings. Further information is lacking. As a result of fire suppression, eastern redcedar has colonized areas where it has not existed for a long time, and it is probable that southern redcedar would do the same if hardwood invaders are controlled [34]. Southern redcedar seeds are dispersed by birds and could colonize opened areas. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : NO-ENTRY

REFERENCES

SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
REFERENCES : 1. Adams, R. P. 1975. Statistical character weighing and similarity, stability [in numerical taxonomy tested on Juniperus]. Brittonia. 27: 305-316. [19790] 2. Adams, Robert P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola & J. virginiana of the southeastern U.S.: multivariate analyses of morphology & terpenoids. Taxon. 35(1): 61-75. [19792] 3. Bush, C. S.; Martin, J. F. 1968. Native trees and plants for Florida landscaping. Agric. Bull. 193. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Agriculture. 133 p. [19798] 4. Clewell, Andre F. 1985. Guide to the vascular plants of the Florida Panhandle. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press. 605 p. [13124] 5. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1987. The Smithsonian guide to seaside plants of the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts from Louisiana to Massachusetts, exclusive of lower peninsular Florida. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 409 p. [12906] 6. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1988. Trees of the southeastern United States. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 322 p. [12764] 7. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905] 8. Ferguson, E. R.; Lawson, E. R.; Maple, W. R.; Mesavage, C. 1968. Managing eastern redcedar. Res. Pap. SO-37. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 14 p. [19813] 9. Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. [Corrections supplied by R. C. Rollins]. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press. 1632 p. (Dudley, Theodore R., gen. ed.; Biosystematics, Floristic & Phylogeny Series; vol. 2). [14935] 10. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998] 11. Gill, T. G.; Phelps, R. B. 1969. Wood used in manufacturing industries. Statistical Bulletin 440. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. [pages unknown]. [19794] 12. Godfrey, Robert K. 1988. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of northern Florida and adjacent Georgia and Alabama. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 734 p. [10239] 13. Hall, M. T. 1952. A hybrid swarm in Juniperus. Evolution. 6: 347-366. [19793] 14. Hall, Marion T. 1952. Variation and hybridization in Juniperus. Missouri Botanical Gardens Annual. 39: 1-64. [19795] 15. Hall, Marion T. 1961. Notes on cultivated junipers. Butler University Botanical Studies. 14: 73-90. [19796] 16. Hamel, Paul B.; LeGrand, Harry E., Jr.; Lennartz, Michael R.; Gauthreaux, Sidney A., Jr. 1982. Bird-habitat relationships on southeastern forest lands. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-22. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 417 p. [15423] 17. Hart, Jeffrey A.; Price, Robert A. 1990. The genera of Cupressaceae (including Taxodiaceae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. 71(3): 275-322. [14597] 18. Johnsen, Thomas N., Jr.; Alexander, Robert A. 1974. Juniperus L. juniper. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., tech. coord. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 460-469. [1268] 19. Johnson, Ann F.; Barbour, Michael G. 1990. Dunes and maritime forests. In: Myers, Ronald L.; Ewel, John J., eds. Ecosystems of Florida. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida Press: 430-480. [17394] 20. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954] 21. Kossuth, Susan V.; Michael, J. L. 1990. Pinus glabra Walt. spruce pine. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654.. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 355-358. [13195] 22. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 23. Lawson, Edwin R. 1990. Juniperus virginiana L. eastern redcedar. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 131-140. [13378] 24. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1971. Atlas of the United States trees. Volume 1. Conifers and important hardwoods. Misc. Publ. 1146. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 320 p. [1462] 25. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952] 26. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496] 27. Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. 1951. American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 500 p. [4021] 28. Poe, S. L.; Reinart, James A. 1980. Arthropods associated with topical urban landscape plants. VI. Southern redcedar, Juniperus silicicola (Small) Bailey. In: Proceedings, Southern Nurseryman's Association research conference; [Date of conference unknown]; Nashville, TN. [Place of publication unknown]. [Publisher unknown]. 121-122. [19791] 29. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606] 30. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843] 31. Simpson, Benny J. 1988. A field guide to Texas trees. Austin, TX: Texas Monthly Press. 372 p. [11708] 32. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573] 33. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States, their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240] 34. Van Haverbeke, David F.; Read, Ralph A. 1976. Genetics of eastern redcedar. Res. Pap. WO-32. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 17 p. [9220] 35. Vince, Susan W.; Humphrey, Stephen R.; Simons, Robert W. 1989. The ecology of hydric hammocks: A community profile. Biological Rep. 85(7.26). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Research and Development. 82 p. [17976] 36. Vines, Robert A. 1960. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1104 p. [7707] 37. Ward, Daniel B. 1989. Commercial utilization of Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides, Cupressaceae). Economic Botany. 43(3): 386-415. [9674] 38. Webb, R. S. 1990. Growing redcedar in Florida. Circular of the Florida cooperative extension service. The Service. GainesvilleGainesville, FL. [19797] 39. Wilhite, L. P. 1990. Juniperus silicicola (Small) Bailey southern redcedar. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 127-130. [13377] 40. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620] 41. Silba, J. 1984. A new combination in Juniperus barbadensis L. Phytologia. 56: 339-341. [19814]

Index

Related categories for Species: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.