|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
Introductory
SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
ABBREVIATION :
JUNSIL
SYNONYMS :
Juniperus virginiana var. silicicola (Small) Bailey
J. v. var bermudiana Vassey
J. lacayana Britt.
J. bermudiana L.
J. barbadensis L.
Sabina silicicola Small
SCS PLANT CODE :
JUSI
COMMON NAMES :
southern redcedar
redcedar
sand cedar
coast juniper
eastern redcedar
TAXONOMY :
The accepted scientific name for southern redcedar is Juniperus
silicicola (Small) Bailey [13,14,34]. However, a number of authors of
recent publications [1,4,5,6,12,17] contend that this entity is better
treated as J. virginiana var. silicicola. Adams [1], who did a
multivariate analysis of morphological and chemical characteristics,
found that such analysis failed to separate the coastal populations
(silicicola) on the basis of scale leaf length, pollen cone length,
ovulate cone size, and twig size (characters used to distinguish
silicicola from virginiana). Furthermore, although multivariate
analysis of terpenoid profiles gives discrete status to adjoining inland
and coastal groups, these groups are very close. The coastal
populations tend to have cinnamon-colored rather than brownish bark, and
a rounded rather than pyramidal crown. Also, eastern redcedar will
naturally hybridize with southern redcedar [15]
LIFE FORM :
Tree
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
COMPILED BY AND DATE :
Janet Sullivan, January 1993
LAST REVISED BY AND DATE :
NO-ENTRY
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Sullivan, Janet. 1993. Juniperus silicicola. In: Remainder of Citation
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Southern redcedar is restricted to the outer coastal plain and barrier
islands of the southeastern United States and the Gulf of Mexico; it
ranges from North Carolina south to central Florida, across the Florida
peninsula and west along the Gulf coast to eastern Texas [24,31].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES13 Loblolly - shortleaf pine
FRES14 Oak - pine
FRES16 Oak - gum - cypress
FRES41 Wet grasslands
STATES :
AL FL GA LA MS NC SC
ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS :
CUIS FOCA
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
NO-ENTRY
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K080 Marl - everglades
K090 Live oak - sea oats
K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest
K112 Southern mixed forest
SAF COVER TYPES :
73 Southern redcedar
74 Cabbage palmetto
81 Loblolly pine
84 Slash pine
104 Sweetbay - swamp tupelo - redbay
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE AND USE
SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE :
The wood of southern redcedar is close grained, light, soft, fragrant,
and very durable. The wood is used for chests, wardrobes, closet
linings, flooring, and scientific instruments. The decay-resistant
heartwood is valued for fenceposts. Young trees are used as Christmas
trees [39]. Southern redcedar is commercially important but the supply
of timber is limited [36].
Southern redcedar was in great demand for pencil production in Florida
in the nineteenth century; the majority of the wood used by two large
pencil factories in the town of Cedar Key. A hurricane in 1896 destroyed
these factories and terminated a major portion of such use [37].
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
Southern redcedar "berries" are used for food by birds (particularly
cedar waxwings, grosbeaks, and finches) and mammals (including the
armadillo, black bear, gray fox and opossum). The twigs and foliage are
browsed by cottontail rabbits and by hoofed browsers [27,33]. Johnsen
and Alexander [18] list southern redcedar as useful for wildlife habitat
and for environmental forestry. Junipers (Juniperus spp.) provide
important protective and nesting cover. They are preferred nest sites
for chipping sparrows, robins, song sparrows and mockingbirds [27]. The
cover types that southern redcedar occurs in are important as nesting
habitat for many birds that feed in aquatic habitats. Many migratory
birds occur in this habitat in winter [16].
PALATABILITY :
Southern redcedar "berries" are highly palatable to many species of
birds and mammals [27].
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
COVER VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
NO-ENTRY
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
Southern redcedar is valued as an ornamental, both for residential uses
and along roads [18,39].
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Selective harvesting of southern redcedar in the nineteenth century for
pencil manufacturing essentially eliminated it as an overstory species.
Leaving the live oak (Quercus virginiana) overstory in place probably
prevented regeneration of southern redcedar, reducing its abundance in
coastal and inland forests [39].
Seeds of southern redcedar can either be sown in fall or spring, but
spring-sown seeds should be cold stratified [19,39]. Germination of
seeds takes from 4 to 5 weeks. The seedlings are sensitive to
overheating and should be placed under light shade [39].
Southern redcedar can be propagated by cuttings or grafting [39].
Southern redcedar can be infested by cedar-apple rust (Gymnosporangium
juniperi-virginianae) and consequently should not be planted near apple
orchards [27]. Bagworms (Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis) have been
observed feeding on the foliage [28]. Eastern redcedar can be heavily
damaged by cedar blight (Phormopsis juniperovora); presumably the blight
can also attack southern redcedar [39]. Junipers are also susceptible
to various wood rots [39].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Southern redcedar is a native, dioecious evergreen tree. The average
height in secondary forests is 30 to 50 feet (9-15 m) [31,36,39]. The
Texas champion tree is 75 feet tall [31]. Some of the virgin redcedar
stands along the Apalachee Bay in Florida may have been over 100 feet
tall (30 m). It is possible that second-growth forests of this
slow-growing, long-lived species have not yet reached mature height
[36,39]. When southern redcedar is grown in the open, the branches
spread to form a broad irregular crown, with the upper branches erect
and the lower branches pendulous. In more crowded stands, southern
redcedar tends to have a more symmetrical, narrow, pointed crown [36].
As are other junipers, southern redcedar is aromatic [36]. The bark of
southern redcedar is thin and shreddy [36,39]. The mature ovulate cones
are berrylike and bright blue [29]. The root system is shallow [31].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Phanerophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Sexual reproduction: The seeds of southern redcedar have dormant
embryos; germination may be delayed until the second or third spring
after seeds are mature [3]. Cold stratification hastens germination; it
is also likely that scarification by passage through animal digestive
tracts is also effective [39]. Data on frequency of good seed crops are
lacking. Eastern redcedar is known to produce some seeds every year,
with irregular heavy seed crops; it is likely that southern redcedar
behaves in a similar fashion. Seed dispersal is usually by birds.
Cleaned seeds average from 37,000 to 55,000 per pound
(81,600-121,300/kg) [18,39].
Eastern redcedar is reported as a nonsprouting species; southern
redcedar is probably similar, although Godfrey [12] mentions sprouting
of young trees after injury.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Southern redcedar almost always occurs within 30 miles (50 km) of
seawater or in areas with shallow water tables [31,39]. Although it
usually occurs on sandy, moist but not saturated soils, it occasionally
occurs on acidic clay soils in Texas [31,39]. Southern redcedar may be
found on soil types that include Alfisols, Entisols, Inceptisols,
Spodosols, and Ultisols [39]. Southern redcedar occurs on calcareous
hammocks, coastal hammocks, brackish flats, shell middens, dunes,
bluffs, and secondary woods, and will colonize dredge spoil islands
[4,5,6,39]. Southern redcedar is found inland in river swamps and along
stream and creek margins in low woods [36].
Southern redcedar is abundant in hydric hammock communities in Florida,
most often occurring with cabbage palmetto (Sabal palmetto) and live oak
in areas between pine flatwoods and freshwater marshes [35].
Southern redcedar occurs in oak (Quercus virginiana, Q. marilandica)
scrub and in live oak forests that are established on the backdunes of
barrier islands off the east coast of the Florida peninsula [19].
Overstory associates not listed in Distribution and Occurrence include
spruce pine (Pinus glabra), live oak, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia),
southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), American holly (Ilex opaca)
[21,39]. Understory associates include yaupon (Ilex vomitoris),
southern bayberry (Myrica cerifera), devilwood (Osmanthus americanus),
Carolina laurelcherry (Prunus caroliniana), beautyberry (Callicarpa
americana), bumelia (Bumelia spp.), tree sparkleberry (Vaccinium
arboreum), muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), and greenbriers (Smilax
spp.) [39].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Facultative Seral Species
Southern redcedar is classified as intolerant to very intolerant of
shade, although it can become established in partial shade. The dense
shade of hardwoods may retard reestablishment of cedar-dominated
maritime forests [39]. Southern redcedar tends to occur in open forests
or on sand dunes where light is not limiting.
Southern redcedar is not an early colonizer of sand dunes; it is usually
found in established dune communities such as oak scrub or live oak,
inland of the foredunes [19].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
Southern redcedar pollen is shed from staminate cones in January and
February; ovulate conelets are pollinated at this time and mature slowly
through the spring and summer. Ovulate conelets are mature by October
to November of their first year; conelets persist into winter, but most
are eaten by birds [5,6,12,39]. Seeds are dormant and germination of
seeds occurs in the spring, although it may be delayed 2 to 3 years
[39].
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Southern redcedar occurs on outer coastal sites that rarely burn. Fire
is considered the worst natural enemy of eastern redcedar; southern
redcedar is similar to eastern redcedar in that it has thin bark and
shallow roots which are easily damaged by fire. It is probable that
southern redcedar is equally susceptible to fire damage and mortality
[23,40]. On inland sites where it is a minor species and fires are more
frequent, southern redcedar suffers damage and mortality due to fire.
However, at current levels of fire suppression, fire damage may be less
prevalent now then in the past [39].
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
Tree without adventitious-bud root crown
Secondary colonizer - off-site seed
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Southern redcedar seedlings and saplings are killed by light-severity
fire [23,39]. Mature trees are also easily damaged or killed by fire
[39,40].
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
Southern redcedar is probably a nonsprouting species, since the closely
related eastern redcedar is nonsprouting [23]. Godfrey [12], however,
mentions the existence of sprouts of damaged saplings or seedlings.
Further information is lacking.
As a result of fire suppression, eastern redcedar has colonized areas
where it has not existed for a long time, and it is probable that
southern redcedar would do the same if hardwood invaders are controlled
[34]. Southern redcedar seeds are dispersed by birds and could colonize
opened areas.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
NO-ENTRY
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
NO-ENTRY
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Juniperus silicicola | Southern Redcedar
REFERENCES :
1. Adams, R. P. 1975. Statistical character weighing and similarity,
stability [in numerical taxonomy tested on Juniperus]. Brittonia. 27:
305-316. [19790]
2. Adams, Robert P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola & J.
virginiana of the southeastern U.S.: multivariate analyses of morphology
& terpenoids. Taxon. 35(1): 61-75. [19792]
3. Bush, C. S.; Martin, J. F. 1968. Native trees and plants for Florida
landscaping. Agric. Bull. 193. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of
Agriculture. 133 p. [19798]
4. Clewell, Andre F. 1985. Guide to the vascular plants of the Florida
Panhandle. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press. 605 p.
[13124]
5. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1987. The Smithsonian guide to
seaside plants of the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts from Louisiana to
Massachusetts, exclusive of lower peninsular Florida. Washington, DC:
Smithsonian Institution Press. 409 p. [12906]
6. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1988. Trees of the southeastern
United States. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 322 p.
[12764]
7. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
8. Ferguson, E. R.; Lawson, E. R.; Maple, W. R.; Mesavage, C. 1968.
Managing eastern redcedar. Res. Pap. SO-37. New Orleans, LA: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment
Station. 14 p. [19813]
9. Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. [Corrections
supplied by R. C. Rollins]. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press. 1632 p.
(Dudley, Theodore R., gen. ed.; Biosystematics, Floristic & Phylogeny
Series; vol. 2). [14935]
10. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
11. Gill, T. G.; Phelps, R. B. 1969. Wood used in manufacturing industries.
Statistical Bulletin 440. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. [pages unknown]. [19794]
12. Godfrey, Robert K. 1988. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of northern
Florida and adjacent Georgia and Alabama. Athens, GA: The University of
Georgia Press. 734 p. [10239]
13. Hall, M. T. 1952. A hybrid swarm in Juniperus. Evolution. 6: 347-366.
[19793]
14. Hall, Marion T. 1952. Variation and hybridization in Juniperus. Missouri
Botanical Gardens Annual. 39: 1-64. [19795]
15. Hall, Marion T. 1961. Notes on cultivated junipers. Butler University
Botanical Studies. 14: 73-90. [19796]
16. Hamel, Paul B.; LeGrand, Harry E., Jr.; Lennartz, Michael R.;
Gauthreaux, Sidney A., Jr. 1982. Bird-habitat relationships on
southeastern forest lands. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-22. Asheville, NC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest
Experiment Station. 417 p. [15423]
17. Hart, Jeffrey A.; Price, Robert A. 1990. The genera of Cupressaceae
(including Taxodiaceae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of
the Arnold Arboretum. 71(3): 275-322. [14597]
18. Johnsen, Thomas N., Jr.; Alexander, Robert A. 1974. Juniperus L.
juniper. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., tech. coord. Seeds of woody plants in
the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service: 460-469. [1268]
19. Johnson, Ann F.; Barbour, Michael G. 1990. Dunes and maritime forests.
In: Myers, Ronald L.; Ewel, John J., eds. Ecosystems of Florida.
Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida Press: 430-480. [17394]
20. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of
the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume
II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North
Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie
Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954]
21. Kossuth, Susan V.; Michael, J. L. 1990. Pinus glabra Walt. spruce pine.
In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators.
Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654..
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 355-358.
[13195]
22. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
23. Lawson, Edwin R. 1990. Juniperus virginiana L. eastern redcedar. In:
Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics
of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 131-140. [13378]
24. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1971. Atlas of the United States trees. Volume 1.
Conifers and important hardwoods. Misc. Publ. 1146. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 320 p. [1462]
25. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native
and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]
26. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession
following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall
Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council
fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No.
14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
27. Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. 1951. American
wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 500 p.
[4021]
28. Poe, S. L.; Reinart, James A. 1980. Arthropods associated with topical
urban landscape plants. VI. Southern redcedar, Juniperus silicicola
(Small) Bailey. In: Proceedings, Southern Nurseryman's Association
research conference; [Date of conference unknown]; Nashville, TN. [Place
of publication unknown]. [Publisher unknown]. 121-122. [19791]
29. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of
the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of
North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
30. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
31. Simpson, Benny J. 1988. A field guide to Texas trees. Austin, TX: Texas
Monthly Press. 372 p. [11708]
32. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
33. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States,
their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240]
34. Van Haverbeke, David F.; Read, Ralph A. 1976. Genetics of eastern
redcedar. Res. Pap. WO-32. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 17 p. [9220]
35. Vince, Susan W.; Humphrey, Stephen R.; Simons, Robert W. 1989. The
ecology of hydric hammocks: A community profile. Biological Rep.
85(7.26). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and
Wildlife Service, Research and Development. 82 p. [17976]
36. Vines, Robert A. 1960. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest.
Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1104 p. [7707]
37. Ward, Daniel B. 1989. Commercial utilization of Atlantic white cedar
(Chamaecyparis thyoides, Cupressaceae). Economic Botany. 43(3): 386-415.
[9674]
38. Webb, R. S. 1990. Growing redcedar in Florida. Circular of the Florida
cooperative extension service. The Service. GainesvilleGainesville, FL.
[19797]
39. Wilhite, L. P. 1990. Juniperus silicicola (Small) Bailey southern
redcedar. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical
coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric.
Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service: 127-130. [13377]
40. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States
and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
41. Silba, J. 1984. A new combination in Juniperus barbadensis L.
Phytologia. 56: 339-341. [19814]
Index
Related categories for Species: Juniperus silicicola
| Southern Redcedar
|
 |