1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Tree > Species: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
ABBREVIATION : LAROCC SYNONYMS : Pinus nuttallii Parl. SCS PLANT CODE : LAOC COMMON NAMES : western larch Montana larch mountain larch hackmatack tamarack western tamarack TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of western larch is Larix occidentalis Nutt. [59]. All ten species of larch (Larix spp.) are found in cool areas of the Northern Hemisphere [40]. Where the ranges of western larch and alpine larch (L. lyallii) overlap, alpine larch grows at higher elevations. Wherever these two larch species are sympatric, natural hybrids occur [58,72,118]. Western larch has been successfully crossed with Japanese larch (L. leptolepus) [118]. Western larch has much genetic flexibility or variability within populations and relatively little variation or differentiation between populations [98,99]. LIFE FORM : Tree FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY COMPILED BY AND DATE : M. F. Crane, January 1991 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Crane, M. F. 1990. Larix occidentalis. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Western larch grows in the Upper Columbia River Basin from southeastern British Columbia to northwestern Montana, northern and west-central Idaho, and northeastern Washington. Its range includes the Blue and Wallowa mountains of southeastern Washington and northeastern Oregon and the east slopes of the Cascade Mountains in Washington and northern Oregon [58,116]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES20 Douglas-fir FRES21 Ponderosa pine FRES22 Western white pine FRES23 Fir - spruce FRES24 Hemlock - Sitka spruce FRES25 Larch FRES26 Lodgepole pine STATES : ID MT OR WA BC ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : CODA GLAC NOCA BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 2 Cascade Mountains 8 Northern Rocky Mountains KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K001 Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest K008 Lodgepole pine - subalpine forest K011 Western ponderosa forest K012 Douglas-fir forest K013 Cedar - hemlock - pine forest K014 Grand fir - Douglas-fir forest K015 Western spruce - fir forest SAF COVER TYPES : 205 Mountain hemlock 206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir 210 Interior Douglas-fir 212 Western Larch 213 Grand fir 215 Western white pine 218 Lodgepole pine 220 Rocky Mountain juniper 224 Western hemlock 227 Western redcedar - western hemlock 228 Western redcedar 237 Interior ponderosa pine SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Since western larch is primarily a seral species on sites where western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), mountain hemlock (T. mertensiana), Pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis), subalpine fir (A. lasiocarpa), grand fir (A. grandis), western redcedar (Thuja plicata), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), or Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) are potential climax dominants, it is not used as an indicator of climax vegetation in habitat type classifications. It is a seral species in 13 habitat types in eastern Washington and northern Idaho and a major seral species in 12 habitat types in Montana [117]. In the Pacific Northwest, western larch serves as an indicator of previous severe fires on fairly good to good sites [45]. Habitat type indicators can be used to make a general determination of western larch productivity [104]. Published classification schemes listing western larch as an indicator or dominant in community types (cts) or dominance types (dts) are presented below: Area Classification Authority MT riparian dts Hansen and others 1988 WA, OR; Blue Mountains general veg. cts Hall 1973

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : Western larch is primarily used for construction lumber because of its strength and hardness. It makes excellent utility poles because of its length, form, and strength. It is also used in plywood manufacture and to make fine veneer [118]. In lower montane forests of Montana, western larch is the preferred timber species because it grows larger and yields more clear timber than Douglas-fir [96]. Wood anatomy has been examined in detail [83,148]. Two other wood products obtained from western larch are arabinogalactan, a water-soluble gum used industrially, and oleoresin, used to produce turpentine and related products [118]. The wood is excellent fuel. Wood from western larch snags can be made into shakes [4]. IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Deer, elk, moose, black bear, grizzly bear, and many species of birds and small mammals occur in seral western larch forests. Western larch stands frequently occur in areas of heavy snowpack that are unsuitable for critical winter range for big game animals [116,118]. When western larch stands are thinned, they have good potential for livestock forage production [150]. Western larch needles are a major food source for the blue grouse and spruce grouse [4]. The red crossbill eats some western larch seed [75]. Seed-eating small rodents prefer larger Douglas-fir and pine seed but consume some western larch seed [9,132]. Squirrels cut and cache western larch cones in years when other conifers have poor crops [116,118]. Western larch is browsed sparingly by elk, deer, and moose during winter when other food is scarce [35,116,118]. Bears or porcupines may eat the inner bark of western larch saplings and poles in the spring [116,118]. PALATABILITY : Western larch appears to be unpalatable to most big game animals, but it is eaten as emergency food [116,118]. Its seeds are palatable to small birds and mammals, although larger seeds are preferred [9,132,116]. NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Western larch needles at two locations in eastern Washington contained 2.0 percent and 1.7 percent nitrogen, respectively [40]. Nutrient values for western larch needles, twigs, and other tree parts have been reported from two sites in western Montana [137]. Whole tree values have also been published [136]. Green needles from Lubrecht Experimental Forest, Montana had a mean ash content of 5.8 percent and a range of 3.47 to 8.16 percent, while green needles from Coram Experimental Forest, Montana had a mean ash content of 5.3 percent and a range of 4.9 to 8.9 percent. Nutrient values for needles are summarized below [137]: Lubrecht Forest Coram Forest - - - - - - - - micrograms per gram - - - - - - - - Mean Range Mean Range Calcium 3,031 2,000-4,800 2,213 1,980-2,390 Copper 8.3 5.0-15.2 15.5 10.7-35.2 Iron 86.8 41-173 126 109-218 Potassium 6,405 2,800-9,760 4,958 4,390-5,388 Magnesium 1,098 692-1,592 1,083 1,005-1,113 Manganese 216 81-405 181 160-239 Nitrogen 13,518 9,730-15,540 23,320 17,920-28,923 Sodium 61.4 24.4-123.0 56 45-125 Phosphorus 2,343 1,678-3,186 2,960 1,894-3,269 Zinc 15.8 6.0-35.6 24.6 21.1-27.7 COVER VALUE : Western larch snags provide nesting areas for cavity-nesting songbirds, woodpeckers, and owls [4,116,118]. Around 25 percent of the birds that nest in the northern Rocky Mountains make or use tree cavities. Western larch, with its decay-resistant sapwood, is a preferred species [77,78]. The holes are also used for protection during storms and as roosting sites [78]. Both snags and live western larch are used by cavity nesters [77]. Flying squirrels may nest in holes in western larch snags. The osprey, bald eagle, and occasionally the Canada goose build platformlike nests on top of western larch snags [4]. VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : Western larch's rapid early growth, fire resistance, and the litter layer produced by its deciduous needles make it useful for rehabilitation on well-drained moist sites within its range [145]. However, it does not compete well with grasses and shrubs [112]. Seed collection, stratification treatments, germination tests, and seed handling have been described in detail [71,106,125]. Spot seeding has been discussed [118,132]. Direct seeding rates for British Columbia are given [84]. Detailed information is available on the production and handling of seedlings [15]. Container-grown seedlings have been inoculated and successfully formed mycorrhizal root systems with two fungi, Laccaria laccata and Cenococcum geophilum [86]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : Northern Rocky Mountain Native Americans enjoyed a sweet syrup made by allowing western larch sap to evaporate and concentrate. They also ate the cambium layer under the bark in spring and chewed solidified pitch for gum [51]. Tea made from the bark was used for colds, coughs, and tuberculosis. Western larch sap was used for sore throat and gum was applied to cuts and bruises [51]. In British Columbia decoctions made from western larch boughs or bark were used as a general tonic, for respiratory ailments, as a poultice or wash for wounds, as a contraceptive, to wash babies, and was both drunk and used as a wash for breast cancer [143]. Boughs were dried for winter use, and western larch pitch was used on the chest for respiratory ailments and on wounds [143]. Western larch wood was used to make bowls, as a fuel, and the rotten wood was used to smoke buckskin. Kootenai Indians used larch for the center pole during the religious Sundance [51]. Western larch is easily grown in gardens and parks, although it may become too large for home gardens. Seedlings are easy to transplant in the fall after an early rain and may be treated as bonsai [68]. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Management systems: The ecological requirements of western larch are best met by even-aged silviculture systems. It is particularly well adapted to seed tree cuts and clearcuts [113,116,146]. Clearcutting is most effective where the overstory trees are infected with dwarf mistletoe and root rots and may be most practical if western larch regeneration is desired in a stand with few old larch left [113]. In British Columbia, western larch is favored by short-rotations because of its rapid growth on favorable sites [65]. It is a poor option for high-elevation sites where its reliability is low, productivity is variable, and it is subject to severe stem sweep [111]. Vegetative and reproductive buds can be distinguished by early fall, allowing prediction of the following year's cone crop. Descriptions of the different types of buds and sampling procedures have been published [25,93,103]. In British Columbia, cone collection is best in mid-September [25]. In western Montana, the best time for cone collection is late August to early September. The collection period may be extended by storing the cones and extracting seeds in October [125]. Cone production may be increased by girdling the tree. Seeds produced after girdling and/or fertilizing are heavier, although there may be fewer per cone [41]. Mineral soil seedbeds may be prepared by prescribed burning or scarification. These treatments also reduce or delay competition [112,116,117,118]. Seedling growth is best on north slopes under either an open canopy or no canopy [96]. On sites with snowbrush (Ceanothus spp.), seedlings planted in the first or second year were able to grow as fast as the snowbrush, while natural regeneration was overtopped by the snowbrush before it became established [128]. Western larch seedlings survive planting better when they are dormant or close to dormancy [129]. Overstocking is common in young stands and affects both height and diameter growth [116]. Thinning allows trees to grow to a larger size earlier in young, even-aged stands of western larch [121]. Thinning from below between 10 and 15 years of age is best; thinning does not appreciably increase growth of crop trees after 50 years of age [14,105,120]. Removing competition by slashing increased 25-year-old western larch height and diameter growth [42]. Thinning western larch creates favorable conditions for shade-tolerant conifers and further cleaning will maintain a vigorous stand [112,121]. Tables showing average site indices for several habitat types and relationships between height, potential d.b.h., volume, spacings, site index, and age or habitat type are given [116]. Snow damage is normally not a problem for this deciduous tree, as young western larch are supple and able to recover rapidly if a late, heavy snow does occur [115]. Habitat for cavity-nesting species: Management recommendations for maintaining populations of cavity-nesting birds while utilizing timber include retaining a significant number of well-scattered, old-growth western larch, ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), or black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) trees [77,78]. Optimum habitat for pileated woodpeckers seems to be a midsuccessional forest with large overstory western larch or ponderosa pine and snags housing carpenter ants for winter food [46]. Insects and Disease: Larch casebearer (Coleophora laricella) and western spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) are the most destructive defoliating insects that feed on western larch [21,118]. While mortality due to larch casebearer is low, repeated defoliations slow growth and may leave trees unable to maintain the dominance needed to compete in a mixed stand. Defoliation also increases susceptibility to other insects and diseases [116,118,121]. The biology of and biological controls for larch casebearer have been studied in detail [21,22]. Biological controls and adverse weather appear to be reducing larch casebearer populations [116]. Western spruce budworm damages cone-bearing twigs, cones, and seeds on western larch [12,106,126]. It also reduces height growth and damages the form of young trees by severing terminal and lateral shoots [27,118]. Because western larch is not a preferred species, it may gain a competitive edge during severe spruce budworm outbreaks [79]. A number of other insects cause lesser amounts of damage to western larch foliage and seed crops [116,118,130]. Quinine fungus (Fomitopsis officinalis) and red ring rot (Phellinus pini) frequently cause rot in western larch [4,116,118]. Annosus root disease (Heterobasidion annosum) is rare on western larch but has been observed in Idaho [151]. In British Columbia, western larch is very susceptible to laminated root rot (Phellinus weirii var. pseudotsugae) and a shoot blight disease (Encoeliopsis laricina). It is somewhat susceptible to Armillaria root rot (Armillaria ostoyae) [141]. Larch needle cast (Hypodermella laricis) and larch needle blight (Meria laricis) both infect western larch in spring but apparently are most severe in nurseries [36]. Many less common fungi infect western larch [116,118]. Mistletoe: Western larch is susceptible to larch dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium laricis) but immune to other dwarf mistletoes [56,56]. This mistletoe can cause serious problems, and in eastern Oregon and eastern Washington, 84 percent of trees are infested with dwarf mistletoe [10,116,118]. Dwarf mistletoe increases susceptibility to other diseases [28]. Infested trees may die following thinning [28]. The use of thinning to control dwarf mistletoe in stands with western larch has been described [28,107]. Herbicides: Use of mixtures of Esteron Brush Killer and diesel to control shrubs causes t0p-kill in western larch [81]. Western larch is susceptible to bromacil. It is resistant to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T when applied as a foliar spray but susceptible to both herbicides when applied as a basal spray [11]. Procedures for the use of maleic hydrazide and picloram to control larch are available [49].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Western larch is a rapidly growing, deciduous, coniferous tree which may live for more than 700 years [34]. Evidence provided by stumps in Montana indicates that early cutting included western larch older than 900 years [30,66]. Trees may reach 260 feet (80 m) in height [58]. In the Pacific Northwest a typical mature western larch is 164 feet (50 m) tall and 55 inches (140 cm) d.b.h. [34]. Western larch has a deep and extensive root system that provides moderate to high resistance to windthrow [118]. Short roots are ectomycorrhizal [55]. The ectomycorrhizal root tips are found in mineral soil more often than those of other conifers, although some are also found in decayed wood and humus [52,53,54]. The thick bark of western larch is furrowed into large plates from which cinnamon-colored scales may flake off [58]. The crown is relatively short, narrow, and less dense than most conifers [82]. Young twigs are glabrous or pubescent rather than tomentose like alpine larch [4,58]. The thin, light green, deciduous needles occur at the tips of short lateral spur shoots in a whorl of 15 to 30 needles on a spur. Needles on seedlings and leaders of older plants are decurrent and arranged in spirals along the stem [4,58]. The deciduous habit allows larches to avoid winter desiccation. Western larch can withstand defoliation by insects or disease better than evergreen conifers and competes well with them because its needles require less carbon to construct; it efficiently relocates nitrogen before needlefall. Its photosynthetic capacity is high, and its needles receive ample light through the open crown [4,40]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Undisturbed State: Megaphanerophyte Disturbed State: Megaphanerophyte Disturbed State: Therophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Cones: Although trees may produce some cones when 8 or 10 years old, cone production is infrequent before the age of 25, and abundant production does not begin until trees are 40 to 50 years old [116]. Good cone crops are produced irregularly but average 1 every 5 years [116,118,131]. Cones are born on short spur branches; more female cones occur the upper crown and more male cones in the central and lower crown [25,58,106,116]. Since cones are produced throughout the crown, larger trees produce most of the cone crop [116,131]. Details of pollination and early seed development within western larch cones have been described [92,93]. When mature, the reddish-brown to brown cones are between 1 and 1.5 inches (2.5-4 cm) long and have thin, papery scales and small, pointed bracts extending beyond each scale [4]. Seed: Western larch seeds are small, averaging 137,000 per pound (302,000/kg), and light with a large wing [106]. It requires more filled seed to establish a seedling when the seeds are light than when they are heavy, as are the seeds of some other conifers [127]. In one study it took an average of 53 filled seeds to produce a live western larch seedling [127]. Western larch may form normal appearing but inviable seeds if pollination does not occur or the embryo aborts [93]. Seeds are stratified naturally over winter and should be stratified for prompt germination in nursery planting [71,106,133]. Seed treatments are discussed by various authorities [132,133]. Seed dispersal: Cones open when they have dried to a moisture content of 35 to 40 percent [91,116,125]. Generally over 80 percent of the cones open by mid-October, although seed dispersal may extend into winter [48,116]. The light seeds are dispersed by wind. Frequently, they are carried 800 feet (250 m) and sometimes over 984 feet (300 m) [33,76]. Patterns of dispersal in clearcuts show the amount of seed decreases rapidly for the first 400 feet (122 m), then remains at a low level. Thermal upslope winds aid dispersal at mid to low elevations, but on upper slopes, where seed fall is later, storm fronts aid dispersal [76]. Seedling establishment: Western larch seed germinates about the time of snowmelt [116,133]. Normal first year growth is about 2 inches (5 cm), but seedlings may grow to 5 inches (13 cm) in the Blue Mountains of Oregon [85,116]. Germination is good on a variety of materials, including duff, rotten wood, and mineral soil [31,73]. However, survival is poor on undisturbed litter, humus, sod, and in areas with heavy root competition. Survival is usually best in mineral soil. Seedling roots are not able to penetrate layers of duff rapidly enough to obtain sufficient water [126,127]. In central Idaho, the best growth of 3- to 5-year-old western larch seedlings occurred on moss mats and next best on bare mineral soil [38]. During early development, seedling mortality is often caused by fungi, rodents, birds, and insects [116]. In the summer, most seedling mortality is caused by the physical factors of excess heat (from insolation) or drought and is highest on south- and west-facing slopes [122,132]. Vegetative reproduction: Western larch does not sprout. Researchers have rooted cuttings and grafted western larch [116]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Western larch is not as tolerant of summer drought as many other conifers and is generally found on north- or east-facing slopes and other relatively moist sites [2,33,82]. On drier sites at western larch's lower elevation or southern range limits, it is frequently unable to establish seedlings on south- or west-facing slopes, but in moist areas in the middle and northern portion of its range, it grows on all exposures [116]. Height growth is most rapid in valley bottoms and on lower north and east slopes and poor on upper south- and west-facing slopes [116]. Western larch in southwestern British Columbia is common in the interior Douglas-fir zone, frequent in the interior cedar-hemlock and montane spruce zones, and less frequent in the ponderosa pine zone [65,67]. In mountain hemlock stands in northern Idaho and western Montana, it does best below 5,600 feet (1,707 m) [43]. In the same region, it grows in western redcedar, western hemlock, grand fir, moist subalpine fir, and Douglas-fir habitat types [30,44,95]. In the Cascade Mountains of northern Oregon, western larch is very frost tolerant and grows with Pacific silver fir, mountain hemlock, fool's huckleberry (Menziesia ferruginea), beargrass (Xerophyllum tenax), blue huckleberry (Vaccinium membranaceum), grouse whortleberry (V. scoparium), bunchberry dogwood (Cornus canadensis), and dwarf Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa) [57]. Soil and soil nutrients: Usually western larch grows on soils classified as Inceptisols and Alfisols and occasionally on Spodosols [116]. Most of the soils supporting western larch developed in glacial till or colluvium containing argillite, quartzite, and limestone bedrock, and are deep and well drained [116]. Results of one study indicate that trees growing on sites with compacted subsoil and thus slow drainage grow well as juveniles, but growth slows when root growth becomes restricted and nutrients in the rooting zone are depleted. In contrast, trees on rapidly draining sites grow slower initially, but subsequent productivity is higher [134]. In British Columbia, western larch grows on moderately dry to moist, medium-nutrient-rich to very-nutrient-rich soils [65]. It needs high levels of calcium and magnesium in the soil [67]. In many areas, including western Montana, western larch is associated with moist soils containing volcanic ash [87,116]. Western larch retranslocates 87 percent of foliage nitrogen before needle fall, possibly due to poor soil availability and uptake of nitrogen [40,39]. Elevation: Elevational ranges in some western regions are [4,23]: Minimum Maximum feet meters feet meters British Columbia 2,000 610 5,500 1,676 Montana 3,200 975 8,100 2,469 Oregon 3,000 930 7,000 2,134 Washington 2,000 610 5,500 1,676 SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Western larch is a long-lived and highly shade-intolerant seral species [116]. It can tolerate partial shading only as a seedling. If it is overtopped later, its crown deteriorates and it loses vigor and dies [116,117]. For the first 100 years of life, larch grows faster in height than any other conifer in the northern Rocky Mountains [116,118]. Since it is shade intolerant, it grows in even-aged stands, although other tree species may appear younger because they are smaller. As these stands mature, shade-tolerant conifers continue to establish and form younger understories [116]. In the western redcedar-western hemlock zone of northern Idaho and western Montana, western larch is frequently a close associate of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) in pioneer communities. It may be a minor element in these communities initially, but fire recurrence during early succession can greatly increase the proportion of western larch [44]. In the Garnet Mountains of western Montana, western larch seems less able than lodgepole pine to establish under an open canopy, and thus less shade tolerant [142]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Leaves of western larch begin to develop early in spring before the cambium becomes active. Spring growth appears to be controlled by photoperiod rather than temperature [16]. The buds of western larch flowers (conelets) are initiated in early spring, develop during the summer, and remain dormant during fall and winter [91]. The following spring, pollen and seed cones open before leaf buds, usually between mid-April and mid-May. Pollination occurs in late May and early June [116]. Cones ripen in August and seeds are dispersed in September and October. At high elevations ripening and dispersal may occur 2 to 4 weeks later [76]. In October the needles turn from green to a golden yellow before falling [2]. Results of an Idaho study indicate that the time of leaf fall may be correlated with soil moisture [24]. Phenological observations of western larch made over a 10-year period in northern Idaho and western Montana are summarized below [114]: Earliest Average Latest Date Date Date Buds burst March 20 April 30 June 11 Terminal shoot growth begins April 10 May 14 July 2 Pollen begins April 26 May 20 June 29 Pollen ends May 10 June 3 July 14 Shoot growth ends June 18 Aug. 1 Sept. 6 Winter buds formed July 11 Aug. 22 Oct. 11 Cones full size July 2 Aug. 6 Sep. 11 Cones open July 31 Sep. 4 Sep. 30

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Adaptations to Fire: Western larch is the most fire-resistant tree species in the northern Rocky Mountains and interior Pacific Northwest. It has very thick bark containing little resin, a high and open branching habit, deep roots, and low-flammability foliage [32,33,82,139]. At ground level the bark is often 6 inches (15.2 cm) thick on mature trees [4]. The tendency of western larch to self-prune lower branches and its tolerance of defoliation add to its fire tolerance [30,19]. Fire favors the establishment of western larch because it quickly invades openings, grows rapidly, and needs full sunlight [152,113]. Western larch is very long-lived and able to survive until fire creates a suitable seedbed [5,30]. Fire Regimes: In the northern Rocky Mountains, the results of a number of studies suggest two distinct fire regimes for stands with western larch as a seral dominant [6]. On relatively dry sites, usually with Douglas-fir or Engelmann spruce as potential climax dominants, the natural fire regime was one of fairly short mean fire intervals of 20 to 75 years. These intervals were shortened by recurring low- to medium-intensity surface fires. On moist sites that included grand fir, western hemlock, and western redcedar as potential climax species, fires were severe stand-replacing burns at 120- to 350-year intervals [2,3,6,18]. The interval between stand-replacing fires was over 100 years under both of these fire regimes [6]. In lower and drier mixed conifer communities in the Blue Mountains of Oregon, the mean fire frequency of low surface fires before protection was about every 10 years [46]. In the same area in drier Douglas-fir and grand fir habitat types, the mean fire frequency of underburns was 20 to 30 years [116]. In higher elevation communities in this region, severe crown fires occurred at 100- to 300-year intervals, allowing western larch, lodgepole pine, and western white pine (Pinus monticola) to dominate large stands [121]. Fuels: In the larch-Douglas-fir type of western Montana, fuel loading ranges from 1.4 tons per acre (3.1 MT/ha) to 73.9 tons per acre (165.7 MT/ha) [29]. The following mean fuel loads were described for a study in the western larch cover type in western Montana [119]: Tons per Acre Metric Tons per Hectare Total fuels 22.5 50.4 Small fuels (0.25-3 3.6 8.1 inches [0.6-7.6 cm]) Large fuels (>3 inches 17.7 39.7 [.7.6 cm]) Duff 1.2 2.7 POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : crown-stored residual colonizer; short-viability seed in on-site cones off-site colonizer; seed carried by wind; postfire years one and two

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Mature western larch are able to withstand most fires; poles may survive low to moderate fires [30,116]. Although young trees may survive high temperatures for a short time, thin-barked seedlings and saplings are readily killed by fire [19,33,116,117,118]. Bark thickness, crown function, and tree vigor, as well as the characteristics of the fire, are major factors that determine tree damage or death [110]. Trees that are damaged by fire frequently succumb to insect attack or disease later [110]. Mature western larch are most likely to be killed by fire after long fire-free intervals in moist habitat types where true firs, western hemlock, or western redcedar are potential climax. These dense stands include low-branching conifers and tall shrubs or ladder fuels that can carry fire into the crowns of western larch [19]. When ground fires smolder in deep, dry duff, they can girdle even thick-barked trees [110]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : Several factors are considered when predicting and modeling mortality of western larch [110]. Cambial mortality depends on the duration of the fire and thickness of the bark, which can be estimated by an equation using tree diameter [108,109]. Crown damage depends on the amount of bud kill, which may be observed with binoculars. Another indication of crown kill is that a dead branch tends to retain the scorched needles until they are removed by weather, while a live branch will drop the dead needles promptly [109]. Nomograms have been developed that predict mortality based on the bark thickness and crown scorch. These nomograms and others showing scorch height, flame length, and fire intensity can be used to help plan prescribed fires [100,102]. PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Even after large severe fires, scattered mature western larch survive [147]. These survivers become seed trees for rapid restocking [2,70]. Fires that precede a good cone crop tend to favor western larch [63]. Western larch initiates new foliage growth shortly after being scorched [110]. Western larch seedlings grow best on burned seedbeds [117,118]. Results of a Montana study show numerous 3-year-old western larch seedlings following a hot fire but very few on lightly burned areas [138]. Western larch seedlings and saplings have been found to grow one-third faster on burned seedbeds than on bare mineral soil or duff-covered soil [116]. This height increase might be due to changes in nutrients, water infiltration, or competing vegetation. Increases in manganese, magnesium, nitrogen, phosphorus, and calcium in upper soil layers have been observed after fire [116]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : When prescribed fire is used, western larch makes a good shelterwood candidate in the Blue Mountains of Oregon [85]. Prescribed fire is practical under a western larch shelterwood since the trees can withstand normal prescribed fire intensities [113]. Planning such fires is described in detail [64,85]. Such planning should recognize that western larch needles have few surface deposits to slow moisture movement and thus fuel moisture response times are shorter than those for other conifer needles [1]. Near its southern limit in central Idaho, western larch stands reflect past severe disturbance from wildfire. At present, however, it is not regenerating well following broadcast burns or scarification. Reasons for this may include insufficient seed trees and marginal conditions for seedling establishment [140]. Several researchers have modeled forest succession following fire, including the life history and response of western larch [13,30,62]. Such information can be useful in setting management objectives. The response of western larch and other conifers following repeated fires at 10-, 20-, and 50-year intervals, a simulated natural fire frequency, or fire supression has been described by a computer model [60].

FIRE CASE STUDIES

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
1. Lubrecht Experimental Forest: larch/Douglas-fir prescribed fire 2. Miller Creek-Newman Ridge: larch/Douglas-fir prescribed- and wildfire 1st CASE NAME : Lubrecht Experimental Forest: larch/Douglas-fir prescribed fire REFERENCES : Norum, R. A. 1975 [88] Norum, R. A. 1976 [89] Norum, R. A. 1977 [90] Reinhardt, E. D.; Ryan, K. C. 1988 [100] Stark, N. 1977 [135] Stark, N.; Steele, R. 1977 [138] SEASON/SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION : Spring and fall/low to moderate severity STUDY LOCATION : The study site is on the University of Montana Lubrecht Experimental Forest located 41 miles (66 km) east of Missoula in the Garnet Mountains (north half of Section 3, T. 13 N, R. 15 W, Principal Meridian, Montana). PREFIRE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITY : Study plots were in a Douglas-fir/globe huckleberry (Pseudotsuga menziesii/Vaccinium globulare) habitat type, bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) phase as described by Pfister and others [95]. Overstory trees ranged in age from 50 to 300 years with an average diameter of about 8.6 inches (22 cm). This stand was not vigorous and was composed primarily of Douglas-fir and western larch (Larix occidentalis) with small amounts of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa). The largest and best trees had been selectively logged about 50 years earlier. Subsequently, an uneven understory of dense Douglas-fir had developed. There were a large number of widely spaced, large-diameter western larch stumps to indicate preharvest conditions. In addition to conifers and bearberry, huckleberries (Vaccinium spp.), birchleaf spirea (Spiraea betulifolia), and heartleaf arnica (Arnica cordifolia) were common in the understory. TARGET SPECIES PHENOLOGICAL STATE : NO-ENTRY SITE DESCRIPTION : The site is located at about 4,800 feet (1,464 m) with east to northeast exposures and slopes of 20 to 50 percent. The area has warm summers and cold winters with annual precipitation of about 18 inches (47 cm), most of which falls as winter snow. Soils in the area are thin, poorly developed sandy loams in the Holloway Series. They formed in residuum weathered from quartzite, argillite and, on these sites, contain sufficient rock to be considered talus slopes. Calcium and phosphate are limited in these soils. The site had a substantial complex fuel load including many dead small trees in understory thickets. Total dead fuel loadings ranged from 5.5 to 50 tons per acre (12.3-112.1 metric tons/ha). Over 100 parameters were measured in connection with these fires. FIRE DESCRIPTION : Out of the 20 test plots broadcast burned during 1973, nine were burned from early May to the first of July. The rest were burned from early September to mid-October. The average dead fuel moisture contents ranged from 8.5 to 35 percent and windspeeds were from 0 to 15 miles per hour (0-24 km/hr). Strip ignition horizontally across plots was used for most plots, and fire intensity on each strip was allowed to drop before the next strip was ignited. FIRE EFFECTS ON TARGET SPECIES : Three years after the fires the average cover of western larch seedlings on lightly burned plots was 0.27 percent; on moderately burned plots was 0.23 percent; on hotly burned sites was 2.4 percent; and no western larch seedlings had established on control plots. Nutrient analyses were done on prefire and postfire soil, soil water and plants. Results of comparison of nutrients from aboveground samples of western larch seedlings from burned and control plots were: micrograms/gram Control Hot burn Calcium 4,805 3,000 Copper 37 18 Iron 162 280a Potassium 6,864 16,000a Magnesium 967 1,300a Manganese 343 198 Sodium 114 95 Phosphorus 4,457 7,190a Zinc 28 37a (a) indicates a significant difference at the 5 percent level. Eight years after the fires a tree growth analysis was performed limited to radial and basal area growth. Western larch's relative radial increment on burned plots was less than on unburned plots in the first year and greater on burned plots thereafter. The difference in growth of trees on burned plots compared to trees on control plots increased each year for the first 4 years. Western larch's response was more positive than that of Douglas-fir and from the fourth to the eighth year the average relative radial increment was 60 to 80 percent greater on burned plots than on unburned plots. The average unadjusted radial growth increment of trees on burned and unburned plots for the first 8 years after treatment is given below: Year Burned Unburned inches cm inches cm 1 0.044 .114 0.048 .121 2 0.059 .150 0.054 .136 3 0.076 .193 0.055 .139 4 0.069 .175 0.036 .091 5 0.068 .173 0.037 .093 6 0.056 .143 0.034 .087 7 0.067 .171 0.037 .093 8 0.071 .181 0.042 .106 FIRE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS : Underburning in similar western larch/Douglas-fir forests is feasible. An average of 15 percent of the overstory trees were killed in the plots. Within the range of fuel loadings in this study, fires were most manageable and still effective when the moisture content of 0 to 1 inch (0-2.5 cm) dead fuels was around 15 percent. Strip ignition helped overcome control and ignition problems caused by discontinuous concentrations of heavy fuels. Underburning requires attention to the form, moisture status, and amount of living vegetation. Detailed prescriptions for underburning are given in Norum [1976 and 1977]. Western larch seedlings established best on sites burned by the hottest fires. Prescribed underburns in western larch stands can result in an increase in individual tree relative radial increment. However, growth of western larch in these poorly growing stands continued to be slow. Growth, even in trees with fire damage, was not reduced by the fire, and fire may be a useful tool for fuel reduction or other purposes in such stands.

FIRE CASE STUDIES

SPECIES: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch
2nd CASE NAME : Miller Creek-Newman Ridge: larch/Douglas-fir prescribed- and wildfire REFERENCES : Beaufait, W. R.; Hardy, C. E.; Fischer, W. C. 1977 [7] DeByle, N. V. 1981 [20] Shearer, R. C. 1975 [123] Shearer, R. C. 1976 [124] Shearer, R. C. 1982 [128] Shearer, R. C. 1984 [129] Shearer, R. C. 1989 [153] SEASON/SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION : May through October/low to very severe STUDY LOCATION : Two study locations were used. The first contained 641 acres in the Miller Creek and Martin Creek drainages of the Flathead National Forest of northwestern Montana. This is referred to as the Miller Creek area. The second location consisted of 526 acres on Newman Ridge located between Two Mile Creek and Ward Creek on the Lolo National Forest near the border of western Montana and Idaho. PREFIRE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITY : Most of Miller Creek was considered to be in one of three phases of the subalpine fir/queencup beadlily (Abies lasiocarpa/Clintonia uniflora) habitat type. The fool's huckleberry (Menziesia ferruginea) phase was found on higher middle and upper north- and east-facing slopes. The beargrass (Xerophyllum tenax) phase was on drier south and west aspects and the queencup beadlily phase on most other sites. Stream bottoms belonged to the western redcedar(Thuja plicata)/queencup beadlily habitat type. The dominant conifers were western larch (Larix occidentalis), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii), with some lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), grand fir (Abies grandis), and subalpine fir. The larch/Douglas-fir cover type occupied over 50 percent of the area. On Newman Ridge seven habitat types were identified. The warmest and driest was the Douglas-fir/ninebark (Physocarpus malvaceus) habitat type on convex southwest slopes. Other habitat types included grand fir/queencup beadlily on concave east, northwest, and protected south-facing slopes; grand fir/beargrass on upper west-facing slopes; western redcedar/queencup beadlily h.t., fool's huckleberry phase on concave north- and northeast-facing slopes; Douglas-fir/globe huckleberry (Vaccinium globulare) h.t. beargrass phase on upper south-facing slopes; subalpine fir/queencup beadlily h.t., fool's huckleberry phase on north slopes along the ridge; and subalpine fir/beargrass h.t., globe huckleberry phase on south slopes near the ridge. Dominant conifers were Douglas-fir, larch and lodgepole pine with some ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), grand fir, subalpine fir, western white pine (Pinus monticola), Engelmann spruce and western redcedar. Prefire stands at Newman Ridge were 26 percent western larch. TARGET SPECIES PHENOLOGICAL STATE : NO-ENTRY SITE DESCRIPTION : Elevation at Miller Creek ranges from 4,200 to 5,000 feet (1,280-1,524 m) with slopes averaging 24 percent and ranging from 9 to 35 percent. Soils are Andic Cryoboralfs that developed in glacial till from the argillites and quartzites of the Wallace (Belt) formation. Average precipitation is about 25 inches (64 cm) annually; approximately two-thirds falls as snow during the long cool winter. Elevation at Newman Ridge ranges from 4,400 to 5,400 feet (1,341-1,646 m) with slopes averaging 55 percent and ranging from 44 to 76 percent. Soils are Andic Cryochrepts that have developed in place or in colluvium from argillites and quartzites of the Belt formation. There is a surface loess deposit containing ash from the Mt. Mazama and Glacier Peak volcanic eruptions at both sites which is 0.5 to 2.5 inches (1-6 cm) thick at Miller Creek and 2 to 3 inches (5-8 cm) thick at Newman Ridge. Average precipitation is nearly 40 inches (102 cm) at Newman Ridge of which two-thirds falls as snow. Sixty 10-acre (4-ha) treatment units were established at Miller Creek and 16 units, ranging in size from 20 to 58 acres (8-24 ha), were established at Newman Ridge. One-fourth of the units at each site generally faced each of the four cardinal directions. The units were clearcut, slashed and burned. Fuel loads after clearcutting and before fire, excluding duff, ranged from 60 to 165 tons per acre (135-370 metric tons/ha). Average fuel loads are described below: Average Miller Creek Newman Ridge Weight tons/acre kg/square m tons/acre kg/square m Duff 26.3 59.1 22.9 51.3 Needles 1.5 3.5 1.4 3.1 0 to 1 cm 1.3 2.9 1.1 2.5 1 to 10 cm 9.8 22.1 10.7 24.0 > 10 cm 101.3 227.0 90.5 202.8 Total 140.3 314.5 126.5 283.7 FIRE DESCRIPTION : Slash fuels were allowed to cure for an average of 9 months before burning (2 to 18 months range). Fuel moisture of 0 to 0.4 inch (0-1 cm) branchwood ranged from 5 to 21 percent. Burning patterns and fire severity varied among the plots burned. After broadcast burns at Miller Creek, 75 percent of the fuels less than 3.9 inches (10 cm) burned and 60 percent of the larger fuels burned. At Newman Ridge 89 percent of the fuels less than 3.9 inches (10 cm) burned and 55 percent of the larger fuels burned. Greater surface soil heating occurred at Newman Ridge than at Miller Creek because the duff layer was shallower and water content of both duff and soil was lower. The average duff reduction ranged from 36 to 70 percent at Miller Creek and 44 to 99 percent at Newman Ridge. In 1967 a wildfire burned five units that had been clearcut and four units that were uncut forest at Miller Creek. Average duff reduction from the wildfire was 93 percent with a range of 84 to 100 percent. FIRE EFFECTS ON TARGET SPECIES : Seedbeds were varied. Early 1967 and most 1968 fires did not completely burn litter and duff or expose much mineral soil. The 1967 wildfire consumed most of the duff and killed most roots of sprouting species. Other fires were spotty and exposed some mineral soil. Very few western larch seedlings established on unburned duff. Unburned duff continued to decrease for several years exposing bare soil on areas where the fire had left charred duff. The reasons for this decrease may include: increased decomposition stimulated by warmer surface temperature during May and June where adequate moisture was present; redistribution by precipitation, runoff or wind; and oxidation. However, since western larch needs to establish quickly and become dominant, this may benefit other conifer species more. In addition to natural seeding, seeds were sown in 1967 on test plots, and bareroot seedlings were planted on Newman Ridge from 1970 through 1975 and on four clearcuts at Miller Creek from 1970 through 1973. Postfire seed dispersal into the clearcuts from western larch in the timber around clearcut areas was good. The best seed year for all conifers was 1971; however, heavy frost in May of that year decreased the potential western larch seed crop. The cumulative average number of sound seed of western larch from 1969 through 1974 on eight clearcuts on Newman Ridge by distance from the source is listed below: Within Distance from timber edge within clearcut Timber 0-200 ft 200-400 ft 400-600 ft 600-800 ft (0-61 m) (61-122 m) (122-183 m) (183-244 m) /acre 53,200 7,500 3,700 2,000 800 /ha 131,500 18,600 9,200 4,900 1,900 Germination of western larch began before the snow completely melted and was greater on mineral soil than on unburned duff more than 0.5 inch (13 mm). Seed and seedling losses were caused by rodents, drought, frost heaving, high temperatures at the soil surface, and migrating juncos that ate emerging seedlings in 1968. Drought was the leading cause of death on south-facing slopes and second highest on other aspects. Natural regeneration was lowest on south-facing slopes. In 1978 at Miller Creek, stocking of western larch seedlings averaged 54 percent on burned units and 5 percent on unburned clearcuts. By 1984 at Miller Creek, stocking of established seedlings of western larch averaged 71 percent on burned units and 1 percent on unburned clearcuts. In 1979 at Newman Ridge, stocking of established western larch seedlings averaged 10 percent (6%-16%) on burned clearcuts. The average number of established (>1 foot (30.5 cm) in height) western larch seedlings per acre (hectare) in 1979 and 1984 and the range in 1984 on 37 burned units at Miller Creek and 7 burned clearcuts at Newman Ridge are given below: 1979 1984 1984 Average Average Range Miller Creek /acre 610 931 92-4,003 /hectare 1,507 2,301 227-9,892 Newman Ridge /acre 30 91 10-228 /hectare 74 225 25-563 At Miller Creek in 1978, the tallest western larch seedlings averaged 8.5 feet (2.6 m) on uncut plots burned by the wildfire, 5.3 feet (1.6 m) on clearcuts that were burned by the wildfire, and 3.7 feet (1.1 m) on clearcuts that were burned by prescribed fire in 1967. This sequence may be because a greater proportion of the western larch were older on the uncut units burned by wildfire or because the evapotranspiration was lower and the number of growing days greater on those units. Height was also related to habitat type and phase with the tallest trees on the warmer and drier beargrass phase of the subalpine fir/queencup beadlily habitat type and shorter trees on the cooler and moister fool's huckleberry phase. Evidently, soil moisture is not as limiting in early stand development as it is later; also, trees on the warmer sites began growth earlier in the spring and may have benefited from extra nitrogen contributed by snowbrush ceanothus (Ceanothus velutinus). At Newman Ridge in 1979, the tallest western larch seedlings averaged 3.0 feet (0.9 m). Natural regeneration of western larch at Newman Ridge was lower than at Miller Creek due to harsh site conditions, larger clearcuts, and poor seed production which resulted in less stocking than expected from the previous stand composition. FIRE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS : During late spring and early summer, duff is usually wet and fires do not expose much mineral soil. Late summer or early fall fires are more effective at removing duff and exposing mineral soil for western larch regeneration. However, if precipitation occurs, fuels and duff need to dry for several days. At Newman Ridge, moderate intensity fires removed most of the duff and prepared an adequate seedbed. At Miller Creek, the same intensity fire exposed less mineral soil because the duff was thicker and wetter. Habitat type and site conditions alter the amount of duff removal needed. On mesic habitat types hot fires that expose a high proportion of mineral soil, followed by good seed years, lead to overstocking. On steeper slopes with drier conditions, such as at Newman Ridge, residual duff layers have more adverse impact on the survival of seedlings. Seed dispersal should be taken into account when deciding the time of fall fires. In a good seed year, dispersed seed could be destroyed by fires after early September at lower elevations and a few weeks later at higher elevations. The light seeds of western larch enable it to establish a high proportion of the seedlings in the center of larger clearcuts such as those on Newman Ridge. Planting may be necessary on steep, harsher sites. Expected survival for planted western larch on such sites at Newman Ridge was high in the western redcedar/queencup beadlily habitat type; moderate in the grand fir/queencup beadlily, grand fir/beargrass, and Douglas-fir/globe huckleberry habitat types; and low in the Douglas-fir/ninebark habitat type. Actual survival by 1979 was lower than expected, only 38 percent for western larch overall.

References for species: Larix occidentalis


1. Anderson, Hal E. 1990. Moisture diffusivity and response time in fine forest fuels. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research. 20: 315-325. [11075]
2. Arno, Stephen F.; Hammerly, Ramona P. 1977. Northwest trees. Seattle, WA: The Mountaineers. 222 p. [4208]
3. Arno, Stephen F. 1980. Forest fire history in the northern Rockies. Journal of Forestry. 78(8): 460-465. [11990]
4. Arno, Stephen F.; Davis, Dan H. 1980. Fire history of western redcedar/hemlock forests in northern Idaho. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 21-26. [12809]
5. Barrett, Stephen W. 1986. Fire history of Glacier National Park: Middle Fork Flathead River drainage. Final Report Cooperative Agreement Suplement Numbers 22-C-4-INT-32 and 22-C-5-INT-034. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory. 32 p. [9828]
6. Barrett, Stephen W.; Arno, Stephen F.; Key, Carl H. 1991. Fire regimes of western larch - lodgepole pine forests in Glacier National Park, Montana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 21: 1711-1720. [17290]
7. Beaufait, William R.; Hardy, Charles E.; Fischer, William C. 1977. Broadcast burning in larch-fir clearcuts: The Miller Creek-Newman Ridge study. Res. Pap. INT-175, (rev.). Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 53 p. [11114]
8. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
9. Black, Hugh C. 1969. Fate of sown or naturally seeded coniferous seeds. In: Black, Hugh C., ed. Wildlife and reforestation in the Pacific Northwest: Proceedings of a symposium; 1968 September 12-13; Corvallis, OR. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, School of Forestry: 42-51. [7946]
10. Bolsinger, Charles L. 1978. The extent of dwarf mistletoe in six principal softwoods in California, Oregon, and Washington, as determined from forest survey records. In: Scharpf, Robert F.; Parmeter, John R., Jr., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the symposium on dwarf mistletoe control through forest management; 1978 April 11-13; Berkeley, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-31. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 45-54. [8747]
11. Bovey, Rodney W. 1977. Response of selected woody plants in the United States to herbicides. Agric. Handb. 493. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 101 p. [8899]
12. Carlson, Clinton E.; Fellin, David G.; Schmidt, Wyman C. 1983. The western spruce budworm in northern Rocky Mountain forests: a review of ecology, past insecticidal treatments and silvicultural practices. In: O'Loughlin, Jennifer; Pfister, Robert D., eds. Management of second-growth forests: The state of knowledge and research needs: Proceedings of a symposium; 1982 May 14; Missoula, MT. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station: 76-103. [7097]
13. Cattelino, Peter J.; Noble, Ian R.; Slatyer, Ralph O.; Kessell, Stephen R. 1979. Predicting the multiple pathways of plant succession. Environmental Management. 3(1): 41-50. [7854]
14. Cole, Dennis M. 1984. Crop-tree thinning a 50-year-old western larch stand: 25-year results. Res. Pap. INT-328. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 9 p. [12811]
15. Daniels, T. G.; Simpson, D. G. 1990. Seedling production and processing: bareroot. In: Lavender, D. P.; Parish, R.; Johnson, C. M.; [and others], eds. Regenerating British Columbia's forests. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press: 206-225. [10717]
16. Daubenmire, R. F. 1949. Relation of temperature and daylength to the inception of tree growth in spring. Botanical Gazette. 110: 464-475. [12757]
17. Daubenmire, Rexford. 1978. Plant geography--with special reference to North America. Physiological Ecology. New York: Academic Press. 338 p. [8949]
18. Davis, Kathleen M. 1980. Fire history of a western larch/Douglas-fir forest type in northwestern Montana. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 69-74. [12813]
19. Davis, Kathleen M.; Clayton, Bruce D.; Fischer, William C. 1980. Fire ecology of Lolo National Forest habitat types. INT-79. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 77 p. [5296]
20. DeByle, Norbert V. 1981. Clearcutting and fire in the larch/Douglas-fir forests of western Montana--a multifaceted research summary. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-99. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 73 p. [7270]
21. Denton, Robert E. 1979. Larch casebearer in western larch forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-55. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 62 p. [12812]
22. Denton, Robert E.; Theroux, Leon J. 1979. An annotated bibliography of the larch casebearer (Coleophora laricella [Hubner]). Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-52. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 29 p. [12814]
23. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
24. Drew, Larry Albert. 1967. Comparative phenology of seral shrub communities in the cedar/hemlock zone. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. 108 p. Thesis. [9654]
25. Eis, S.; Craigdallie, D. 1981. Reproduction of conifers: A handbook for cone crops assessment. Victoria, BC: Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forest Research Centre. 24 p. [4767]
26. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
27. Fellin, David G.; Schmidt, Wyman C. 1973. How does western spruce budworm feeding affect western larch? Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-7. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest & Range Experiment Station. 25 p. [12815]
28. Filip, Gregory M.; Colbert, J. J.; Parks, Catherine A.; Seidel, Kenneth W. 1989. Effects of thinning on volume growth of western larch infected with dwarf mistletoe in northeastern Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry. 4(4): 143-145. [9268]
29. Fischer, William C. 1981. Photo guide for appraising downed woody fuels in Montana forests: Interior ponderosa pine, ponderosa pine-larch-Douglas-fir, larch-Douglas-fir, and interior Douglas-fir cover types. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-97. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 133 p. [12795]
30. Fischer, William C.; Bradley, Anne F. 1987. Fire ecology of western Montana forest habitat types. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-223. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 95 p. [633]
31. Fisher, George M. 1935. Comparative germination of tree species on various kinds of surface-soil material in the western white pine type. Ecology. 16(4): 606-611. [12816]
32. Flint, Howard R. 1925. Fire resistance of northern Rocky Mountain conifers. Idaho Forester. 7: 7-10, 41-43. [4700]
33. Forsythe, Warren Louis. 1975. Site influence on the post-fire composition of a Rocky Mountain forest. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. 173 p. Dissertation. [6723]
34. Franklin, Jerry F. 1979. Vegetation of the Douglas-fir region. In: Heilman, Paul E.; Anderson, Harry W.; Baumgartner, David M., eds. Forest soils of the Douglas-fir region. Pullman, Wa: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension Service: 93-112. [8207]
35. Gaffney, William S. 1941. The effects of winter elk browsing, south fork of the Flathead River, Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management. 5(4): 427-453. [5028]
36. Garbutt, R. W. 1984. Foliage diseases of western larch in British Columbia. FPL-71. Victoria, BC: Agriculture Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forest Research Centre. 4 p. [7257]
37. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
38. Geier-Hayes, Kathleen. 1987. Occurrence of conifer seedlings and their microenvironments on disturbed sites in central Idaho. Res. Pap. INT-383. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 12 p. [3554]
39. Gower, Stith T.; Grier, Charles C.; Vogt, Kristina A. 1989. Aboveground production and N and P use by Larix occidentalis and Pinus contorta in the Washington Cascades, USA. Tree Physiology. 5: 1-11. [7231]
40. Gower, Stith T.; Richards, James H. 1990. Larches: deciduous conifers in an evergreen world. Bioscience. 40(11): 818-826. [12745]
41. Graham, Russell T. 1986. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and girdling on cone and seed production of western larch. In: Shearer, Raymond C., compiler. Proceedings--conifer tree seed in the Inland Mountain West symposium; 1985 August 5-6; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-203. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 166-170. [1039]
42. Graham, Russell T.; Harvey, Alan E.; Jurgensen, Martin F. 1989. Site preparation strategies for artificial regeneration: can prescribed burning fill the bill? In: Baumgartner, David M.; Breuer, David W.; Zamora, Benjamin A.; [and others], compilers. Prescribed fire in the Intermountain region: Symposium proceedings; 1986 March 3-5; Spokane, WA. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: 83-89. [11251]
43. Habeck, James R. 1967. Mountain hemlock communities in western Montana. Northwest Science. 41(4): 169-177. [7258]
44. Habeck, James R. 1968. Forest succession in the Glacier Park cedar-hemlock forests. Ecology. 49(5): 872-880. [6479]
45. Hall, Frederick C. 1973. Plant communities of the Blue Mountains in eastern Oregon and southeastern Washington. R6-Area Guide 3-1. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 82 p. [1059]
46. Hall, Frederick C. 1980. Fire history--Blue Mountains, Oregon. In: Stokes, Marvin A.; Dieterich, John H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the fire history workshop; 1980 October 20-24; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-81. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 75-81. [12817]
47. Hall, Frederick C. 1998. Pacific Northwest ecoclass codes for seral and potential natural communities. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-418. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 290 p. [7650]
48. Halvorson, Curtis H. 1986. Influence of vertebrates on conifer seed production. In: Shearer, Raymond C., compiler. Proceedings--conifer tree seed in the Inland Mountain West symposium; 1985 August 5-6; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-203. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 201-222. [12789]
49. Hamel, Dennis R. 1981. Forest management chemicals: A guide to use when considering pesticides for forest management. Agric. Handb. 585. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 512 p. [7847]
50. Hansen, Paul L.; Chadde, Steve W.; Pfister, Robert D. 1988. Riparian dominance types of Montana. Misc. Publ. No. 49. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 411 p. [5660]
51. Hart, J. 1976. Montana--native plants and early peoples. Helena, MT: Montana Historical Society. 75 p. [9979]
52. Harvey, Alan E. 1982. The importance of residual organic debris in a site preparation and amelioration for reforestation. In: Baumgartner, David M., ed. Site preparation and fuels management on steep terrain; 1982 February 15-17; Spokane, WA. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: 75-85. [8502]
53. Harvey, A. E.; Jurgensen, M. F.; Larsen, M. J. 1983. Effects of soil organic matter on regeneration in northern Rocky Mountain forests. In: Ballard, Russell; Gessel, Stanley P., ed. International Union of Forestry Research Organizations Symposium; [Date of conference unknown]; Seattle, WA. General Technical Report PNW-163. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 239-242. [8619]
54. Harvey, Alan E.; Jurgensen, Martin F.; Larsen, Michael J.; Schlieter, Joyce A. 1986. Distribution of active ectomychrrhizal short roots in forest soils of the Inland Northwest: effects of site and disturbance. Res. Pap. INT-374. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 8 p. [4534]
55. Harvey, A. E.; Larsen, M. J.; Jurgensen, M. F. 1980. Partial cut harvesting and ectomycorrhizae: early effects in Douglas-fir -larch forests of western Montana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 10: 436-440. [8497]
56. Hawksworth, Frank G.; Johnson, David W. 1989. Biology and management of dwarf mistletoe in lodgepole pine in the Rocky Mountains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-169. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 38 p. [8651]
57. Hemstrom, Miles A.; Emmingham, W. H.; Halverson, Nancy M.; [and others]. 1982. Plant association and management guide for the Pacific silver fir zone, Mt. Hood and Willamette National Forests. R6-Ecol 100-1982a. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 104 p. [5784]
58. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur; Ownbey, Marion. 1969. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 1: Vascular cryptograms, gymnosperms, and monocotyledons. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 914 p. [1169]
59. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954]
60. Keane, Robert E.; Arno, Stephen F.; Brown, James K. 1990. Simulating cumulative fire effects in ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests. Ecology. 71(1): 189-203. [11517]
61. Kessell, Stephen R. 1976. Wildland inventories and fire modeling by gradient analysis in Glacier National Park. In: Proceedings, Montana Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and IntermountainFire Research Council fire & land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 115-162. [6480]
62. Kidd, Frank. 1982. The role of mycorrhizae in regeneration and young stand growth. Forestry Technical Paper TP-82-4. Lewiston, ID: Potlatch Corporation, Wood Products, Western Division. 24 p. [8214]
63. Kilgore, Bruce M. 1981. Fire in ecosystem distribution and structure: western forests and scrublands. In: Mooney, H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; [and others], technical coordinators. Proceedings of the conference: Fire regimes and ecosystem properties; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 58-89. [4388]
64. Kilgore, Bruce M.; Curtis, George A. 1987. Guide to understory burning in ponderosa pine-larch-fir forests in the Intermountain West. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-233. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 39 p. [3623]
65. Klinka, K.; Feller, M. C.; Green, R. N.; [and others]. 1990. Ecological principles: applications. In: Lavender, D. P.; Parish, R.; Johnson, C. M.; [and others], eds. Regenerating British Columbia's forests. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press: 55-72. [10710]
66. Koch, Elers. 1945. The Seely Lake tamaracks. American Forests. 51(1): 21,48. [7260]
67. Krajina, V. J.; Klinka, K.; Worrall, J. 1982. Distribution and ecological characteristics of trees and shrubs of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia, Department of Botany and Faculty of Forestry. 131 p. [6728]
68. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1982. Gardening with native plants of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 252 p. [9980]
69. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
70. Larsen, J. A. 1929. Fires and forest succession in the Bitterroot Mountains of northern Idaho. Ecology. 10: 67-76. [6990]
71. Leadem, C. L.; Eremko, R. D.; Davis, I. H. 1990. Seed biology, collection and post-harvest handling. In: Lavender, D. P.; Parish, R.; Johnson, C. M.; [and others], eds. Regenerating British Columbia's forests. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press: 193-205. [10716]
72. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]
73. Lotan, James E. 1986. Silvicultural management of competing vegetation. In: Baumgartner, David M.; Boyd, Raymond J.; Breuer, David W.; Miller, Daniel L., compilers and eds. Weed control for forest productivity in the Interior West: Symposium proceedings; 1985 February 5-7; Spokane, WA. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: 9-16. [1474]
74. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
75. Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. 1951. American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 500 p. [4021]
76. McCaughey, Ward W.; Schmidt, Wyman C.; Shearer, Raymond C. 1986. Seed-dispersal characteristics of conifers. In: Shearer, Raymond C., compiler. Proceedings--conifer tree seed in the Inland Mountain West symposium; 1985 August 5-6; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-203. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 50-62. [12593]
77. McClelland, B. Riley. 1980. Influences of harvesting and residue management on cavity-nesting birds. In: Environmental consequences of timber harvesting in Rocky Mountain coniferous forests: Symposium proceedings; 1979 September 11-13; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-90. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 469-514. [10315]
78. McClelland, B. Riley; Frissell, Sidney S.; Fischer, William C.; Halvorson, Curtis H. 1979. Habitat management for hole-nesting birds in forests of western larch and Douglas-fir. Journal of Forestry. August: 480-483. [9491]
79. McCune, Bruce. 1982. Site, history and forest dynamics in the Bitterroot canyons, Montana. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. 166 p. Thesis. [7232]
80. McCune, Bruce. 1983. Fire frequency reduced two orders of magnitude in the Bitterroot Canyons Montana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 13: 212-218. [12712]
81. Mayeux, H. S., Jr.; Hamilton, W. T. 1983. Response of common goldenweed (Isocoma coronopifolia) and buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) to fire and soil-applied herbicides. Weed Science. 31(3): 355-360. [3391]
82. Minore, Don. 1979. Comparative autecological characteristics of northwestern tree species--a literature review. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-87. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 72 p. [1659]
83. Mitchell, Harold L. 1965. Patterns of specific gravity variation in North American conifers. In: Proceedings, Society of American Foresters meeting: "Forestry at the top of the nation"; 1964 September 27 - October 1; Denver, CO. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters: 169-179. [10541]
84. Mitchell, W. K.; Dunsworth, G.; Simpson, D. G.; Vyse, A. 1990. Planting and seeding. In: Lavender, D. P.; Parish, R.; Johnson, C. M.; [and others], eds. Regenerating British Columbia's forests. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press: 235-253. [10718]
85. Mohr, Francis; Petersen, Gary J. 1984. Underburning on white fir sites to induce natural regeneration and sanitation. Fire Management Notes. 45(2): 17-20. [10734]
86. Molina, Randy. 1980. Ectomycorrhizal inoculation of containerized western conifer seedlings. Res. Note PNW-375. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 10 p. [12709]
87. Nimlos, Thomas J. 1981. Volcanic ash soils in Montana. Bulletin 45. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 21 p. [8193]
88. Norum, Rodney A. 1975. Characteristics and effects of understory fires in western larch/Douglas-fir stands. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. 155 p. Dissertation. [10016]
89. Norum, Rodney A. 1976. Fire intensity-fuel reduction relationships associated with understory burning in larch/Douglas-fir stands. In: Proceedings: Montana Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 559-572. [12087]
90. Norum, Rodney A. 1977. Preliminary guidelines for prescribed burning under standing timber in western larch/Douglas-fir forests. Res. Note INT-229. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 15 p. [11112]
91. Owens, John N. 1986. Cone and seed biology. In: Shearer, Raymond C., compiler. Proceedings--conifer tree seed in the Inland Mountain West symposium; 1985 August 5-6; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-203. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 14-31. [12782]
92. Owens, John N.; Molder, Marje. 1979. Bud development in Larix occidentalis. II. Cone differentiation and early development. Canadian Journal of Botany. 57: 1557-1572. [12713]
93. Owens, John N.; Molder, Marje. 1979. Sexual reproduction of Larix occidentalis. Canadian Journal of Botany. 57: 2673-2690. [12714]
94. Peck, Morton E. 1941. A manual of the higher plants of Oregon. Portland, OR: Binfords & Mort. 800 p. [12444]
95. Pfister, Robert D.; Kovalchik, Bernard L.; Arno, Stephen F.; Presby, Richard C. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-34. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 174 p. [1878]
96. Polk, R. Brooks; Boe, Kenneth N. 1951. Succession of trees in cut-over larch-Douglas-fir stands. Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences. 10: 31-37. [7262]
97. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
98. Rehfeldt, G. E. 1982. Differentation of Larix occidentalis populations from the northern Rocky Mountains. Silvae Genetica. 31(1): 13-19. [12719]
99. Rehfeldt, Jerry. 1984. Microevolution of conifers in northern Rocky Mountains: a view from common gardens. In: Lanner, Ronald M., ed. Proceedings, 8th North American forest biology workshop; [Date of conference unknown]; Logan, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, Department of Forest Resources: 132-146. [4417]
100. Reinhardt, Elizabeth D.; Ryan, Kevin C. 1988. How to estimate tree mortality resulting from underburning. Fire Management Notes. 49(4): 30-36. [6145]
101. Reinhardt, Elizabeth D.; Ryan, Kevin C. 1988. Eight-year tree growth following prescribed underburning in western Montana Douglas-fir/western larch stand. Res. Note INT-387. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 6 p. [6473]
102. Reinhardt, Elizabeth D.; Ryan, Kevin C. 1989. Estimating tree mortality resulting from prescribed fire. In: Baumgartner, David M.; Breuer, David W.; Zamora, Benjamin A.; [and others], compilers. Prescribed fire in the Intermountain region: Forest site preparation & range improvement: Symposium proceedings; 1986 March 3-5; Spokane, WA. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: 41-44. [11068]
103. Roe, Arthur L. 1966. A procedure for forecasting western larch seed crops. Res. Note INT-49. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest & Range Experiment Station. 7 p. [12601]
104. Roe, Arthur L. 1967. Productivity indicators in western larch forests. Res. Note INT-59. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 4 p. [12708]
105. Roe, Arthur L.; Schmidt, Wyman C. 1965. Thinning western larch. Res. Pap. INT-16. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 10 p. [12810]
106. Rudolf, Paul O. 1974. Larix Mill. larch. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., ed. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 478-485. [7689]
107. Russell, Kenelm W. 1971. Precommercial thinning in dwarfmistletoe control. In: Baumgartner, David M., ed. Proceedings, Precommercial thinning of coastal and intermountain forests in the Pacific Northwest; 1971 February 3-4; Pullman, WA. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension Service: 23-40. [8359]
108. Ryan, Kevin C. 1982. Techniques for assessing fire damage to trees. In: Lotan, James E., ed. Proceedings of the symposium: Fire--its field effects; 1982 October 19-21; Jackson, WY. Missoula, MT: The Intermountain Fire Council; Pierre, SD: The Rocky Mountain Fire Council: 1-11. [10986]
109. Ryan, Kevin C. 1982. Evaluating potential tree mortality from prescribed burning. In: Baumgartner, David M., ed. Site preparation and fuels management on steep terrain: Proceedings of a symposium; 1982 February 15-17; Spokane, WA. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: 167-179. [5616]
110. Ryan, Kevin C.; Reinhardt, Elizabeth D. 1988. Predicting postfire mortality of seven western conifers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 18: 1291-1297. [6670]
111. Scagel, Rob; Green, Bob; Von Hahn, Helmar; Evans, Richard. 1989. Exploratory high elevation regeneration trials in the Vancouver forest region: 10-year species performance of planted stock. FRDA Report 098. Victoria, BC: BC Ministry of Forests, Research Branch. 40 p. [1477]
112. Schmidt, Wyman C. 1969. Seedbed treatments influence seedling development in western larch forests. Res. Note INT-93. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 7 p. [7266]
113. Schmidt, Wyman C.; Larson, Milo. 1989. Silviculture of western inland conifers. In: Burns, Russell M., compiler. The scientific basis for silvicultural and management decisions in the National Forest System. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-55. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 40-58. [10245]
114. Schmidt, Wyman C.; Lotan, James E. 1980. Establishment and initial development of lodgepole pine in response to residue management. In: Environmental consequences of timber harvesting in Rocky Mountain coniferous forests: Symposium proceedings; 1979 September 11-13; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-90. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 271-286. [10307]
115. Schmidt, Wyman C.; Schmidt, Jack A. 1979. Recovery of snow-bent young western larch. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-54. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 13 p. [12281]
116. Schmidt, Wyman C.; Shearer, Raymond C. 1990. Larix occidentalis Nutt. western larch. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 160-172. [13381]
117. Schmidt, Wyman C.; Shearer, Raymond C.; Naumann, John R. 1983. Western larch. In: Burns, Russell M., compiler. Silvicultural systems for the major forest types of the United States. Agric. Handb. 445. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 56-58. [7267]
118. Schmidt, Wyman C.; Shearer, Raymond C.; Roe, Arthur L. 1976. Ecology and silviculture of western larch forests. Tech. Bull. 1520. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foresture, Service. 96 p. [6996]
119. See, Thomas E.; Brown, James K. 1980. Downed woody fuel accumulations in northern region forests. In: Proceedings, 6th conference on fire and forest meteorology; 1980 April 22-24; Seattle,. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters: 132-136. [8165]
120. Stage, A. R. 1957. Some runoff characteristics of a small forested watershed in northern Idaho. Northwest Science. 31(1): 14-27. [12285]
121. Seidel, K. W.; Cochran, P. H. 1981. Silviculture of mixed conifer forests in eastern Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-121. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 70 p. [12710]
122. Shearer, Raymond C. 1967. Isolation limits initial establishment of western larch seedlings. Res. Note INT-64. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 8 p. [7464]
123. Shearer, Raymond C. 1975. Seedbed characteristics in western larch forests after prescribed burning. Res. Pap. INT-167. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 26 p. [12342]
124. Shearer, Raymond C. 1976. Early establishment of conifers following prescribed broadcast burning in western larch/Douglas-fir forests. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL:Tall Timbers Research Station: 481-500. [12499]
125. Shearer, Raymond C. 1977. Maturation of western larch cones and seeds. INT-189. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 15 p. [12550]
126. Shearer, Raymond C. 1980. Regeneration establishement in response to harvesting and residue management in a western larch--Douglas-fir forest. In: Environmental consequences of timber harvesting in Rocky Mountain coniferous forests: Symposium proceedings; 1979 September 11-13; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-90. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 249-269. [10306]
127. Shearer, Raymond C. 1981. Silviculture. In: DeByle, Norbert V., ed. Clearcutting and fire in the larch/Douglas-fir forests of western Montana--a multifaceted research summary. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-99. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 27-31. [12819]
128. Shearer, Raymond C. 1982. Establishment and growth of natural and planted conifers 10 years after clearcutting and burning in a Montana larch forest. In: Baumgartner, David M., ed. Site preparation and fuels management of steep terrain: Proceedings of a symposium; 1982 February 16-16; Spokane, WA. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: 149-157. [12818]
129. Shearer, Raymond C. 1984. Effects of prescribed burning and wildfire on regeneration in a larch forest in northwest Montana. In: New forests for a changing world; Proceedings, Society of American Foresters convention; 1983; Portland, OR. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters: 266-270. [6730]
130. Shearer, Raymond C. 1984. Influence of insects on Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franconc and western larch, Larix occidentalis, Nutt., cone and seed production in western Montana. In: Yates, Harry O., III, ed. Proceedings of the cone and seed insects working party conference; 1983 July 31 - August 6; Athens, GA. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: 112-121. [12707]
131. Shearer, Raymond C. 1986. Cone production on Douglas-fir and western larch in Montana. In: Shearer, Raymond C., compiler. Proceedings--conifer tree seed in the Inland Mountain West symposium; 1985 August 5-6; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-203. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 63-67. [2127]
132. Shearer, Raymond C.; Halvorson, Curtis H. 1967. Establishment of western larch by spring spot seeding. Journal of Forestry. 65: 188-193. [12501]
133. Sorensen, Frank C. 1990. Stratification requirements for germination of western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) seed. Res. Note PNW-RN-493. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 11 p. [11844]
134. Spitzner, C.; Stark, N. 1982. Productivity of western larch and subsoil percolation rates in poor andic soils. Soil Science. 134(6): 395-400. [7268]
135. Stark, Nellie M. 1977. Fire and nutrient cycling in a Douglas-fir/larch forest. Ecology. 58: 16-30. [8618]
136. Stark, N. 1982. Soil fertility after logging in the northern Rocky Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 12: 679-686. [8510]
137. Stark, N. 1983. The nutrient content of Rocky Mountain vegetation: a handbook for estimating nutrients lost through harvest and burning. Misc. Publ. 14. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 81 p. [8617]
138. Stark, N.; Steele, R. 1977. Nutrient content of forest shrubs following burning. American Journal of Botany. 64(10): 1218-1224. [2224]
139. Starker, T. J. 1934. Fire resistance in the forest. Journal of Forestry. 32: 462-467. [82]
140. Steele, Robert; Geier-Hayes, Kathleen. 1987. The grand fir/blue huckleberry habitat type in central Idaho: succession and management. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-228. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 66 p. [8133]
141. Sutherland, J. R.; Hunt, R. S. 1990. Diseases in reforestation. In: Lavender, D. P.; Parish, R.; Johnson, C. M.; [and others], eds. Regenerating British Columbia's forests. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press: 267-278. [10720]
142. Tesch, S. D. 1981. Comparative stand development in an old-growth Dougls-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca) forest in western Montana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 11: 82-89. [7274]
143. Turner, Nancy J. 1988. Ethnobotany of coniferous trees in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish of British Columbia. Economic Botany. 42(2): 177-194. [4542]
144. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
145. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States, their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240]
146. Weetman, G.; Vyse, A. 1990. Natural regeneration. In: Lavender, D. P.; Parish, R.; Johnson, C. M.; [and others], eds. Regenerating British Columbia's forests. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press: 118-129. [10711]
147. Wellner, Charles A. 1970. Fire history in the northern Rocky Mountains. In: The role of fire in the Intermountain West: Symposium proceedings; 1970 October 27-29; Missoula, MT. Missoula, MT: Intermountain Fire Research Council. In cooperation with: University of Montana, School of Forestry: 42-64. [10548]
148. Wenger, Karl F., editor. 1984. Forestry handbook. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1335 p. [8996]
149. Wicker, Ed F.; Wells, James M. 1983. Intensification and lateral spread of Arceuthobium laricis in a young stand of western larch with stocking control. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 13: 314-319. [12288]
150. Willard, E. Earl; Bedunah, Donald J.; Hann, Wendell. 1983. Forage and livestock in western Montana. In: O'Loughlin, Jennifer; Pfister, Robert D., eds. Management of second-growth forests, the state of knowledge and research needs: Proceedings of a symposium; 1982 May 14; Missoula, MT. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station: 187-208. [7101]
151. Williams, Ralph E. 1989. Distribution and impacts of annosus root disease in forests of the northern Rocky Mountains. In: Otrosina, William J.; Scharpf, Robert F., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the symposium on research and management of annosus root disease (Heterobasidion annosum) in western North America; 1989 April 18-21; Monterey, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-116. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 51-56. [11322]
152. Arno, Stephen F. 1985. Ecological effects and management implications of Indian fires. In: Lotan, James E.; Kilgore, Bruce M.; Fisher, William C.; Mutch, Robert W., technical coordinators. Proceedings--Symposium and workshop on wilderness fire; 1983 November 15-18; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-182. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 81-86. [7357]


[7357] Index

Related categories for Species: Larix occidentalis | Western Larch

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.