1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Fern or Fern Ally > Species: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine
ABBREVIATION : LYCOBS SYNONYMS : SCS PLANT CODE : LYOB COMMON NAMES : ground pine groundpine clubmoss TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of ground pine is Lycopodium obscurum L. There are two recognized varieties: Lycopodium obscurum var. isophyllum and Lycopodium obscurum var. obscurum [11]. LIFE FORM : Fern or Fern Ally FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : Ground pine is rare in northwestern Montana. It is at the southern periphery of its range in this area. In Montana, ground pine occurs only in the vicinity of Glacier National Park near Lake McDonald in Flathead County [15,22]. COMPILED BY AND DATE : Tara Y. Williams, May 1990 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Williams, T. Y. 1990. Lycopodium obscurum. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : The distribution of ground pine is circumpolar and transcontinental in boreal North America. It is distributed south to Washington, northern Idaho, northwest Montana, Indiana, Alabama, and North Carolina [13]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White - red - jack pine FRES11 Spruce - fir FRES15 Oak - hickory FRES18 Maple - beech - birch FRES22 Western white pine FRES23 Fir - spruce STATES : AK AL CT ID IN KY MA ME MI MN MT NC NH NJ NY OH PA RI TN VA VT WA WI AB BC MB NB ON PQ SK ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : ACAD APIS BISO BLRI CACO CUGA CUVA DEWA GATE GLAC GRSM INDU ISRO JOFL MORR NOCA OBRI PIRO RICH SARA SHEN SLBE VOYA YUCH BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 1 Northern Pacific Border 2 Cascade Mountains 5 Columbia Plateau 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K013 Cedar - hemlock - pine forest K015 Western spruce - fir forest K095 Great Lakes pine forest K096 Northeastern spruce - fir forest K099 Maple - basswood forest K100 Oak - hickory forest K102 Beech - maple forest K106 Northern hardwoods SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 5 Balsam fir 12 Black spruce 15 Red pine 21 Eastern white pine 22 White pine - hemlock 23 Eastern hemlock 24 Hemlock - yellow birch 25 Sugar maple - beech - yellow birch 26 Sugar maple - basswood 60 Beech - sugar maple 215 Western white pine SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Ground pine occurs in cool, boreal forests. It has not been listed as a community dominant. It is listed as an indicator of cool temperature climates, fresh and very moist soils, nitrogen-poor soils, and Mor humus (compacted forest floors) [13].

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Ground pine contains poisonous alkaloids and livestock should be kept away from sites where it is common [10]. PALATABILITY : NO-ENTRY NUTRITIONAL VALUE : NO-ENTRY COVER VALUE : NO-ENTRY VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : There is low evaporation from soils with a good Lycopodium cover, so it may provide a good microclimate for other seedlings to develop [18]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : Clubmosses can make attractive ground covers, but they do not transplant well. Many Lycopodium species have been collected for commercial purposes and are subsequently becoming rare. They are best left undisturbed in the wild [9]. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Rare populations should be located and potential threats, such as trampling by human visitors, should be determined [15]. In general, if temperatures become warmer and the forest becomes drier, this species would be expected to decrease. However, in one case, the species increased shortly after logging [20].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Ground pine is a native, perennial, evergreen clubmoss. It has long rhizomes which give rise to scattered aerial stems. Branches may grow 1 to 8 inches (2-20 cm) long. Leaves are 2.5 to 5 mm long and up to 1 mm wide [9,21]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Undisturbed State: Hemicryptophyte Burned or Clipped State: Hemicryptophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Ground pine reproduces primarily vegetatively by sprouting from rhizomes. It also produces spores and a subterranean, mycorrhizal gametophyte [9]. The main colonization period is June through September [7], but it tends to decrease toward the drier part of the season [20]. Spores are produced in August [22]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Ground pine grows mainly on moist forest floors, often with maple-basswood (Acer spp.-Tilia spp.) or mixed pine-hardwoods. It grows at cool temperatures, will tolerate low nutrients, and can withstand a wide range of light conditions [1,13]. It grows on well-drained organic soils, often on sandy loams [17,18,20]. In Kentucky, the species was found only in the vicinity of the highest peaks, which were as high as 2,800 feet (854 m) [23]. Ground pine can comprise a significant part of the understory. More commonly, it accounts for less than one percent ground cover. It may grow in small groups or patches [4,12,17]. Species commonly associated with ground pine include blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), raspberry (Rubus spp.), oakferns (Dryopteris spp.), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), bunchberry (Cornus canadensis), and glacier lily (Erythronium grandiflorum) [3,4,7,12,18,20]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Ground pine is considered a mid-seral species. It occurs in forest stands 10 to 30 years old [17] and will decline in very old stands [20]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : NO-ENTRY

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Ground pine regenerates by sprouting from rhizomes [9]. Rhizomes present in the litter layer are likely to be damaged by fire. However, if underground rhizomes survive, the plant may recover after a burn [3]. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : survivor species; on-site surviving rhizomes

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : The aboveground portion of ground pine is killed by fire. Rhizomes present in the litter layer are also killed, but deeper rhizomes will survive [3]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Ground pine sprouts from rhizomes following fire [3]. In one case, it was observed in the fifth growing month after a burn, which was actually about a year later. The fire was categorized as one of low severity; soil was moist, but fine fuels were dry enough to burn. The area was sprinkled after burning to prevent burning of organic matter in the rhizome and root zone [7]. The presence of ground pine has been recorded in stands 10 to 30 years after fire [17]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Since ground pine declines in very old forest stands, it may be advisable to maintain stands where it is found at a younger stage. In areas where the species is very rare, reestablishment after a fire may be difficult.

References for species: Lycopodium obscurum


1. Bakuzis, E. V.; Hansen, H. L. 1962. Ecographs of shrubs and other undergrowth species of Minnesota forest communities. Minnesota Forestry Notes. 117: 1-2. [10316]
2. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
3. Chapman, Rachel Ross; Crow, Garrett E. 1981. Application of Raunkiaer's life form system to plant species survival after fire. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 198(4): 472-478. [617]
4. Collins, B. S.; Pickett, S. T. A. 1982. Vegetation composition and relation to environment in an Allegheny hardwoods forest. The American Midland Naturalist. 108(1): 117-123. [9044]
5. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
6. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
7. Flinn, Marguerite A.; Wein, Ross W. 1988. Regrowth of forest understory species following seasonal burning. Canadian Journal of Botany. 66: 150-155. [3014]
8. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
9. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur; Ownbey, Marion. 1969. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 1: Vascular cryptograms, gymnosperms, and monocotyledons. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 914 p. [1169]
10. Hu, Tingmo; Chandler, R. F. 1987. Obscurinine: a new lycopodium alkaloid. Tetrahedron Letters. 28(48): 5993-5996. [12768]
11. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954]
12. Kittredge, J., Jr. 1934. Evidence of the rate of forest succession on Star Island, Minnesota. Ecology. 15(1): 24-35. [10102]
13. Klinka, K.; Krajina, V. J.; Ceska, A.; Scagel, A. M. 1989. Indicator plants of coastal British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press. 288 p. [10703]
14. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
15. Lesica, Peter. 1984. Rare vascular plants of Glacier National Park, Montana. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, Department of Botany. 27 p. [12049]
16. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
17. MacLean, David A.; Wein, Ross W. 1977. Changes in understory vegetation with increasing stand age in New Brunswick forests: species composition, cover, biomass, and nutrients. Canadian Journal of Botany. 55: 2818-2831. [10106]
18. Maguire, D. A.; Forman, R. T. 1983. Herb cover effects on tree seedling patterns in a mature hemlock-hardwood forest. Ecology. 64(6): 1367-1380. [9620]
19. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
20. Sidhu, S. S. 1973. Early effects of burning and logging in pine-mixedwoods. II. Recovery in numbers of species and ground cover of minor vegetation. Inf. Rep. PS-X-47. Chalk River, ON: Canadian Forestry Service, Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. 23 p. [8227]
21. Standley, Paul C. 1921. Flora of Glacier National Park, Montana. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium. Vol. 22, Part 5. Washington, DC: United States National Museum, Smithsonian Institution: 235-438. [12318]
22. Lesica, P.; Moore, G.; Peterson, K. M.; Rumely, J. H. 1984. Vascular plants of limited distribution in Montana. Monograph No. 2. Proceedings, Montana Academy of Sciences. 43(Supplement): 1-61. [11656]
23. Levy, Foster; King, Veda; Ousley, Clara; [and others]. 1983. The ferns and fern allies of Pike County, Kentucky. Transactions of the Kentucky Academy of Science. 44(1-2): 14-16. [11498]
24. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Plants of the U.S.--alphabetical listing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 954 p. [23104]


[23104] Index

Related categories for Species: Lycopodium obscurum | Ground Pine

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.