|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Adenostoma sparsifolium | Red Shank
REFERENCES :
1. Barro, S. C.; Conard, S. G. 1991. Fire effects on California chaparral
systems: an overview. Environmental International. 17(2-3): 135-149.
[15760]
2. Beatty, Susan W. 1987. Spatial distributions of Adenostoma species in
southern California chaparral: an analysis of niche separation. Annals
of the Association of American Geographers. 77(2): 255-264. [6646]
3. Beatty, Susan W. 1987. Origin and role of soil variability in southern
California chaparral. Physical Geography. 8(1): 1-17. [11998]
4. Beatty, Susan W. 1989. Fire effects on soil heterogeneity beneath
chamise and redshanks chaparral. Physical Geography. 10(1): 44-52.
[15758]
5. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
6. Bullock, Stephen H. 1991. Herbivory and the demography of the chaparral
shrub Ceanothus greggii (Rhamnaceae). Madrono. 38(2): 63-72. [15765]
7. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated
ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest
and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
8. Dale, Nancy. 1986. Flowering plants: The Santa Monica Mountains, coastal
and chaparral regions of southern California. Santa Barbara, CA: Capra
Press. In coooperation with: The California Native Plant Society. 239 p.
[7605]
9. DeBano, L. F.; Conrad, C. E. 1978. The effect of fire on nutrients in a
chaparral ecosystem. Ecology. 59(3): 489-497. [4630]
10. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
11. Everett, Percy C. 1957. A summary of the culture of California plants at
the Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1927-1950. Claremont, CA: The Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic Garden. 223 p. [7191]
12. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
13. Green, Lisle R. 1981. Burning by prescription in chaparral. Gen. Tech.
Rep. PSW-51. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 36 p.
[19800]
14. Green, Lisle R. 1982. Prescribed burning in the California Mediterranean
ecosystem. In: Conrad, C. Eugene; Oechel, Walter C., technical
coordinators. Proceedings of the symposium on dynamics and management of
Mediterranean-type ecosystems; 1981 June 22-26; San Diego, CA. Gen.
Tech. Rep. PSW-58. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 464-471.
[6052]
15. Hanes, Ted L. 1965. Ecological studies on two closely related chaparral
shrubs in southern California. Ecological Monograph. 35(2): 213-235.
[10325]
16. Hanes, Ted L. 1977. California chaparral. In: Barbour, Michael G.;
Major, Jack, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John
Wiley and Sons: 417-469. [7216]
17. Hanes, Ted L. 1981. California chaparral. In: Di Castri, F.; Goodall, D.
W.; Specht, R. L., eds. Mediterranean-type shrublands. Amsterdam:
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V: 139-174. [13576]
18. Hawksworth, Frank G.; Wiens, Delbert. 1966. Observations on
witches'-broom formation, autoparasitism, and new hosts in Phoradendron.
Madrono. 18: 218-244. [18653]
19. Holland, Robert F. 1986. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial
natural communities of California. Sacramento, CA: California Department
of Fish and Game. 156 p. [12756]
20. Holt, J. S.; Radosevich, S. R.; Graves, W. L. 1985. Long-term effects on
vegetation of herbicide treatments in chaparral. Weed Science. 33(3):
353-357. [4126]
21. Horton, Jerome S. 1949. Trees and shrubs for erosion control of southern
California mountains. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, California [Pacific Southwest] Forest and Range
Experiment Station; California Department of Natural Resources, Division
of Forestry. 72 p. [10689]
22. James, Susanne Marie. 1983. Lignotubers and vegetative regeneration of
Arctostaphylos in the California chaparral--anatomy , morphology and
ecological significance. Riverside, CA: University of California. 133 p.
Dissertation. [12197]
23. James, Susanne. 1984. Lignotubers and burls--their structure, function
and ecological significance in Mediterranean ecosystems. Botanical
Review. 50(3): 225-266. [5590]
24. Keeley, Jon E. 1992. Demographic structure of California chaparral in
the long-term absence of fire. Vegetation Science. 3(1): 79-90. [18345]
25. Keeley, Jon E. 1992. Recruitment of seedlings and vegetative sprouts in
unburned chaparral. Ecology. 73(4): 1194-1208. [19085]
26. Keeley, Jon E.; Keeley, Sterling C. 1988. Chaparral. In: Barbour,
Michael G.; Billings, William Dwight, eds. North American terrestrial
vegetation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press: 165-207.
[19545]
27. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
28. Kummerow, Jocken; Borth, Wayne. 1986. Mycorrhizal associations in
chaparral. Fremontia. 14(3): 11-13. [18649]
29. Marion, G. M.; Moreno, J. M.; Oechel, W. C. 1991. Fire serverity, ash
deposition, and clipping effects on soil nutrients in chaparral. Soil
Science Society of American Journal. 55: 235-240. [15757]
30. Marion, Lois H. 1943. The distribution of Adenostoma sparsifolium.
American Midland Naturalist. 29(1): 206-116. [19953]
31. Mills, James N. 1986. Herbivores and early postfire succession in
southern California chaparral. Ecology. 67(6): 1637-1649. [5405]
32. Drivas, Evan P.; Everett, Richard L. 1987. Xylem water potentials of
singleleaf pinyon seedlings and sagebrush nurse plants. In: Everett,
Richard L., compiler. Proceedings--pinyon-juniper conference; 1986
January 13-16; Reno, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-215. Ogden, UT: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research
Station: 423-428. [4990]
33. Munz, Philip A. 1974. A flora of southern California. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. 1086 p. [4924]
34. Lillywhite, Harvey B.; North, F. 1974. Perching behavior of Sceloporus
occidentalis in recently burned chaparral. Copeia. 1974(1): 256-257.
[13568]
35. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession
following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall
Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council
fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No.
14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
36. Paysen, Timothy E.; Derby, Jeanine A.; Black, Hugh, Jr.; [and others].
1980. A vegetation classification system applied to southern California.
Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-45. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
33 p. [1849]
37. Pinto, John D.; Velten, Robert K. 1986. The plant bugs (Hemiptera:
Miridae) associated with Adenostoma (Rosaceae) in southern California.
Journal of the New York Entomological Society. 94(4): 542-551. [19839]
38. Philpot, Charles W. 1977. Vegetative features as determinants of fire
frequency and intensity. In: Mooney, Harold A.; Conrad, C. Eugene,
technical coordinators. Proceedings of the symposium on the
environmental consequences of fire and fuel management in Mediterreanean
ecosystems; 1977 August 1-5; Palo Alto, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-3.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 12-16.
[17403]
39. Proksch, Margareta; Weissenbock, Gottfried,; Rodriguez, Eloy. 1985.
Flavonoids and phenolic acids in Adenostoma, a dominant genus of the
California chaparral. Phytochemistry. [Oxford England: Pergamon Press];
24(12): 2889-2891. [19903]
40. Radosevich, S. R.; Graves, W. L.; Agamalian, H. A. 1977. Response of two
Adenostoma species to several herbicides. Weed Science. 25(2): 188-192.
[19954]
41. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
42. Stone, Edward C.; Juhren, Gustaf. 1953. Fire stimulated germination:
effect of burning on germination of brush seed investigated in
physiological study of chamise. California Agriculture. 7(9): 13-14.
[9688]
43. Sweet, M.. 1962. Common edible and useful plants of the West.
Healdsburg, CA: Naturegraph Co.. 62 p. [20333]
44. Thorne, Robert F. 1976. The vascular plant communities of California.
In: Latting, June, ed. Symposium proceedings: plant communities of
southern California; 1974 May 4; Fullerton, CA. Special Publication No.
2. Berkeley, CA: California Native Plant Society: 1-31. [3289]
45. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Plants
of the U.S.--alphabetical listing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 954 p. [23104]
46. Wakimoto, Ronald H. 1978. Responses of southern California brushland
vegetation to fuel manipulation. Berkely, CA: University of California.
264 p. Dissertation. [10993]
47. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
48. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey. [n.d.]. NP
Flora [Data base]. Davis, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National
Biological Survey. [23119]
Related categories for Species: Adenostoma sparsifolium
| Red Shank
|
 |
