|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Ceanothus cuneatus | Wedgeleaf Ceanothus
REFERENCES :
1. Adams, Lowell. 1962. Planting depths for seeds of three speceis of
Ceanothus. Res. Note PSW-194. Berekeley, CA: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range
Experiment Station. 3 p. [6356]
2. Atzet, Thomas; Wheeler, David L. 1982. Historical and ecological
perspectives on fire activity in the Klamath Geological Province of the
Rogue River and Siskiyou National Forests. Portland, OR: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 16 p. [6252]
3. Baker, G. A.; Rundel, P. W.; Parsons, D. J. 1982. Comparative phenology
and growth in three chaparral shrubs. Botanical Gazette. 143(1): 94-100.
[6533]
4. Barro, S. C. 1986 [pers. comm.]
5. Barro, Susan C.; Conard, Susan G. 1987. Use of ryegrass seeding as an
emergency revegetation measure in chaparral ecosystems. Gen. Tech. Rep.
PSW-102. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 12 p. [4257]
6. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
7. Biswell, H. H. 1959. Prescribed burning and other methods of deer range
improvement in ponderosa pine in California. In: Proceedings, Society of
American Foresters; 1959; San Francisco, CA. Bethesda, MD: Society of
American Foresters: 102-105. [5269]
8. Biswell, H. H. 1961. Manipulation of chamise brush for deer range
improvement. California Fish and Game. 47(2): 125-144. [6366]
9. Biswell, H. H.; Gilman, J. H. 1961. Brush management in relation to fire
and other environmental factors on the Tehama deer winter range.
California Fish and Game. 47(4): 357-389. [6275]
10. Burcham, L. T. 1957. California range land: An historico-ecological
study of the range resource of California. Sacramento, CA: State of
California, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. 247
p. [186]
11. Burcham, L. T. 1974. Fire and chaparral before European settlement. In:
Rosenthal, Murray, ed. Symposium on living with the chaparral:
Proceedings; 1973 March 30-31; Riverside, CA. San Francisco, CA: The
Sierra Club: 101-120. [4669]
12. Burma, George D. 1968. Controlled burning on the public domain in
California. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1967
November 9-10; Hoberg, California. No. 7. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers
Research Station: 235-243. [6269]
13. Conard, Susan G.; Jaramillo, Annabelle E.; Cromack, Kermit, Jr.; Rose,
Sharon, compilers. 1985. The role of the genus Ceanothus in western
forest ecosystems. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-182. Portland, OR: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and
Range Experiment Station. 72 p. [668]
14. Conrad, C. Eugene. 1987. Common shrubs of chaparral and associated
ecosystems of southern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-99. Berkeley, CA:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest
and Range Experiment Station. 86 p. [4209]
15. Detling, LeRoy E. 1961. The chaparral formation of southwestern Oregon,
with considerations of its postglacial history. Ecology. 42(2): 348-357.
[6360]
16. Duncan, Don A.; McDougald, Neil K.; Westfall, Stanley E. 1987. Long-term
changes from different uses of foothill hardwood rangelands. In: Plumb,
Timothy R.; Pillsbury, Norman H., technical coordinators. Proceedings of
the symposium on multiple-use management of California's hardwood
resources; 1986 November 12-14; San Luis Obispo, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep.
PSW-100. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 367-372. [5389]
17. Evans, Raymond A.; Biswell, Harold H.; Palmquist, Debra E. 1987. Seed
dispersal in Cenothus cuneatus and C. leucodermis in a Sierran
oak-woodland savanna. Madrono. 34(4): 283-293. [6149]
18. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
19. Fessenden, R. J. 1979. Use of actinorhizal plants for land reclamation
and amenity planting in the U.S.A. and Canada. In: Gordon, J. C.;
Wheeler, C. T.; Perry, D. A., eds. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the
management of temperate forests: Proceedings of a workshop; 1979 April
2-5; Corvallis, OR. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, Forest
Research Laboratory: 403-419. [4308]
20. Florence, Melanie. 1987. Plant succession on prescribed burn sites in
chamise chaparral. Rangelands. 9(3): 119-122. [6143]
21. Florence, Melanie; Florence, Scott. 1987. Prescribed burns of chaparral
on BLM lands. Fremontia. 15(2): 7-10. [6153]
22. Franklin, Jerry F.; Dyrness, C. T. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon
and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-8. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range
Experiment Station. 417 p. [961]
23. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
24. Gibbens, R. P.; Pieper, R. D. 1962. The response of browse plants to
fertilization. California Fish and Game. 48(4): 268-281. [6358]
25. Gibbens, R. P.; Schultz, A. M. 1963. Brush manipulation on a deer winter
range. California Fish and Game. 49(2): 95-118. [5976]
26. Gordon, Aaron; Sampson, Arthur W. 1939. Composition of common California
foothill plants as a factor in range management. Bull. 627. Berkeley,
CA: University of California, College of Agriculture, Agricultural
Experiment Station. 95 p. [3864]
27. Greiman, Harley L. 1988. Sheep grazing in conifer plantations.
Rangelands. 10(3): 99-101. [5411]
28. Hall, Frederick C. 1984. Ecoclass coding system for the Pacific
Northwest plant associations. R6 Ecol 173-1984. Portland, OR: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 83
p. [7650]
29. Hanes, Ted L. 1971. Succession after fire in the chaparral of southern
California. Ecological Monographs. 41(1): 27-52. [11405]
30. Heit, C. E. 1967. Propagation from seed. Part 7: Germinating six
hardseeded groups. American Nurseryman. 125(12): 10-12; 37-41; 44-45.
[1120]
31. Hickman, James C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of
California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p.
[21992]
32. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of
the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume
II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North
Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie
Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954]
33. Keeley, Jon E. 1975. Longevity of nonsprouting Ceanothus. American
Midland Naturalist. 93(2): 504-507. [6357]
34. Keeley, Jon E. 1981. Reproductive cycles and fire regimes. In: Mooney,
H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; [and others], technical
coordinators. Fire regimes and ecosystem properties: Proceedings of the
conference; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 231-277.
[4395]
35. Keeley, Jon E. 1987. Role of fire in seed germination of woody taxa in
California chaparral. Ecology. 68(2): 434-443. [5403]
36. Kotok, E. I. 1933. Fire, a major ecological factor in the pine region of
California. In: Pacific Science Congress Proceedings. 5: 4017-4022.
[4723]
37. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
38. Kummerow, Jochen; Ellis, Barbara A.; Mills, James N. 1985. Post-fire
seedling establishment of Adenostoma fasciculatum and Ceanothus greggii
in southern California chaparral. Madrono. 32(3): 148-157. [4911]
39. Lawrence, George E. 1966. Ecology of vertebrate animals in relation to
chaparral fire in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Ecology. 47(2): 278-291.
[147]
40. McDonald, Philip M. 1981. Adapatations of woody shrubs. In: Hobbs, S.
D.; Helgerson, O. T., eds. Reforestation of skeletal soils: Proceedings
of a workshop; 1981 November 17-19; Medford, OR. Corvallis, OR: Oregon
State University, Forest Research Laboratory: 21-29. [4979]
41. Menke, John W.; Villasenor, Ricardo. 1977. The California Mediterranean
ecosystem and its management. In: Mooney, Harold A.; Conrad, C. Eugene,
technical coordinators. Proc. of the symp. on the environmental
consequences of fire and fuel management in Mediterranean ecosystems;
1977 August 1-5; Palo Alto, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-3. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 257-270. [4847]
42. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
43. Munz, Philip A. 1974. A flora of southern California. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. 1086 p. [4924]
44. Neuenschwander, L. F. [n.d.]. The fire induced autecology of selected
shrubs of the cold desert and surrounding forests:
A-state-of-the-art-review. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, College of
Forestry, Wildlife and Range Sciences. In cooperation with: Fire in
Multiple Use Management, Research, Development, and Applications
Program, Northern Forest Fire Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 30 p.
Unpublished manuscript on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT.
[1747]
45. Noble, I. R.; Slatyer, R. O. 1977. Post-fire succession of plants in
Mediterranean ecosystems. In: Mooney, Harold A.; Conrad, C. Eugene, tech
coords. Proc. of the symp. on the environmental consequences of fire
and fuel management in Mediterranean ecosystems; 1977 August 1-5; Palo
Alto, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service: 27-36. [1766]
46. Orme, Mark L.; Leege, Thomas A. 1976. Emergence and survival of redstem
(Ceanothus sanguineus) following prescribed burning. In: Proceedings,
annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1974 October 8-10;
Misssoula, Montana. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research
Station: 391-420. [6273]
47. Parsons, David J.; Stohlgren, Thomas J. 1986. Long term chaparral
research in Sequoia National Park. In: DeVries, Johannes J., ed.
Proceedings of the chaparral ecosystems research conference; 1985 May
16-17; Santa Barbara, CA. Report No. 2. Davis, CA: University of
California, California Water Resources Center: 107-114. [4830]
48. Peck, Morton E. 1941. A manual of the higher plants of Oregon. Portland,
OR: Binfords & Mort. 800 p. [12444]
49. Quick, Clarence R. 1935. Notes on the germination of ceanothus seeds.
Madrono. 3: 135-140. [4135]
50. Quick, Clarence R.; Quick, Alice S. 1961. Germination of ceanothus
seeds. Madrono. 16: 23-30. [4134]
51. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
52. Reed, Merton J. 1974. Ceanothus L. ceanothus. In: Schopmeyer, C. S.,
technical coordinator. Seeds of woody plants in the United States.
Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service: 284-290. [7576]
53. Rundel, Philip W. 1982. Successional dynamics of chamise chaparral: the
interface of basic research and management. In: Conrad, C. Eugene;
Oechel, Walter C., technical coordinators. Proceedings of the symposium
on dynamics and management of Mediterranean-type ecosystems; 1981 June
22-26; San Diego, CA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-58. Berkeley, CA: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and
Range Experiment Station: 86-90. [6012]
54. Sampson, Arthur W. 1944. Plant succession on burned chaparral lands in
northern California. Bull. 65. Berkeley, CA: University of California,
College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station. 144 p. [2050]
55. Sampson, Arthur W.; Jespersen, Beryl S. 1963. California range
brushlands and browse plants. Berkeley, CA: University of California,
Division of Agricultural Sciences, California Agricultural Experiment
Station, Extension Service. 162 p. [3240]
56. Schlesinger, William H.; Gray, John T.; Gill, David S.; Mahall, Bruce E.
1982. Ceanothus megacarpus chaparral: a synthesis of ecosystem processes
during development and annual growth. Botanical Review. 48(1): 71-117.
[4941]
57. Scrivner, Jerry H.; Vaughn, Charles E.; Jones, Milton B. 1988. Mineral
concentrations of black-tailed deer diets in California chaparral.
Journal of Wildlife Management. 52(1): 37-40. [3055]
58. Sidahmed, Ahmed E.; Morris, James G.; Radosevich, Steven; Koong, Ling J.
1982. Seasonal changes in chaparral composition and intake by Spanish
goats. In: Conrad, C. Eugene; Oechel, Walter C., technical coordinators.
Proceedings of the symposium on dynamics and management of
Mediterranean-type ecosystems; 1981 June 22-26; San Diego, CA. Gen.
Tech. Rep. PSW-58. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: 258-263.
[6027]
59. Slayback, Robert D.; Clary, Raimond F., Jr. 1988. Vegetative solutions
to erosion control in the Tahoe Basin. In: Rieger, John P.; Williams,
Bradford K., eds. Proceedings of the second native plant revegetation
symposium; 1987 April 15-18; San Diego, CA. Madison, WI: University of
Wisconsin - Arboretum, Society of Ecological Restoration & Management:
66-69. [4097]
60. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
61. Stubbendieck, J.; Hatch, Stephan L.; Hirsch, Kathie J. 1986. North
American range plants. 3rd ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska
Press. 465 p. [2270]
62. Sweeney, James R. 1956. Responses of vegetation to fire: A study of the
herbaceous vegetation following chaparral fires. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. 249 p. [3776]
63. Thorne, Robert F. 1976. The vascular plant communities of California.
In: Latting, June, ed. Symposium proceedings: plant communities of
southern California; 1974 May 4; Fullerton, CA. Special Publication No.
2. Berkeley, CA: California Native Plant Society: 1-31. [3289]
64. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1937. Range plant
handbook. Washington, DC. 532 p. [2387]
65. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
66. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States,
their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240]
67. White, C. David. 1967. Absence of nodule formation on Ceanothus cuneatus
in serpentine soils. Nature. 215: 875. [6352]
68. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. 50 CFR
Part 17: Plant taxa for listing as endangered or threatened species;
notice of review--September 30, 1993. Federal Register. 58(188):
51144-51190. [23816]
Related categories for Species: Ceanothus cuneatus
| Wedgeleaf Ceanothus
|
 |
