Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Cercocarpus montanus | True Mountain-Mahogany
REFERENCES :
1. Alexander, Robert R. 1987. Classification of the forest vegetation of
Colorado by habitat type and community type. Res. Note RM-478. Fort
Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 14 p. [9092]
2. Allison, Chris. 1988. Seeding New Mexico rangeland. Circular 525. Las
Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University, College of Agriculture and Home
Economics, Cooperative Extension Service. 15 p. [11830]
3. Anderson, David Lee. 1974. Ecological aspects of Cercocarpus montanus
Raf. communities in central Utah. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
84 p. Thesis. [313]
4. Arnold, Joseph F. 1963. Uses of fire in the management of Arizona
watersheds. In: Proceedings, 2nd annual Tall Timbers fire ecology
conference; 1963 March 14-15; Tallahassee, FL. Tallahassee, FL: Tall
Timbers Research Station: 99-111. [13528]
5. Berndt, Herbert W.; Gibbons, Robert D. 1958. Root distribution of some
native trees and understory plants growing on three sites within
ponderosa pine watersheds in Colorado. Station Paper No. 37. Fort
Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 14 p. [16337]
6. Blauer, A. Clyde; Plummer, A. Perry; McArthur, E. Durant; [and others].
1975. Characteristics and hybridization of important Intermountain
shrubs. I. Rose family. Res. Pap. INT-169. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 36 p. [472]
7. Bradley, Anne F.; Noste, Nonan V.; Fischer, William C. 1991. Fire
ecology of forests and woodlands in Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-287.
Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain
Research Station. 128 p. [18211]
8. Brock, John H.; DeBano, Leonard F. 1990. Wettability of an Arizona
chaparral soil influenced by prescribed burning. In: Krammes, J. S.,
technical coordinator. Effects of fire management of Southwestern
natural resources: Proceedings of the symposium; 1988 November 15-17;
Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech, Rep. RM-191. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station: 206-209. [11291]
9. Brooks, Asa C. 1962. An ecological study of Cercocarpus montanus and
adjacent communities in part of the Laramie Basin. Laramie, WY:
University of Wyoming. 53 p. M.S. thesis. [526]
10. Brotherson, Jack D.; Osayande, Solomon T. 1980. Mineral concentrations
in true mountain mahogany and Utah juniper, and in associated soils.
Journal of Range Management. 33(3): 182-185. [531]
11. Carmichael, R. S.; Knipe, O. D.; Pase, C. P.; Brady, W. W. 1978. Arizona
chaparral: plant associations and ecology. Res. Pap. RM-202. Fort
Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 16 p. [3038]
12. Costello, David F.; Price, Raymond. 1939. Weather and plant-development
data as determinants of grazing periods on mountain range. Tech. Bull.
686. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 31 p. [694]
13. Crane, Marilyn F. 1982. Fire ecology of Rocky Mountain Region forest
habitat types. Final Report Contract No. 43-83X9-1-884. Missoula, MT:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Region 1. 272 p. On file
with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain
Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [5292]
14. Cully, Anne C.; Cully, Jack F., Jr. 1989. Spatial and temporal
variability in perennial and annual vegetation at Chaco Canyon, New
Mexico. Great Basin Naturalist. 49(1): 113-122. [6742]
15. Davis, James N. 1990. General ecology, wildlife use, and management of
the mountain mahoganies in the Intermountain West. In: Johnson, Kendall
L., ed. Proceedings, 5th Utah shrub ecology workshop: The genus
Cercocarpus; 1988 July 13-14; Logan, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State
University, College of Natural Resources: 1-13. [16092]
16. Deitschman, Glenn H.; Jorgensen, Kent R.; Plummer, A. Perry. 1974.
Cercocarpus H.B.K. cercocarpus (mountain-mahogany). In: Schopmeyer, C.
S., technical coordinator. Seeds of woody plants in the United States.
Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service: 309-312. [7583]
17. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information
network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and
Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
18. Donart, Gary B.; Sylvester, Donell; Hickey, Wayne. 1978. A vegetation
classification system for New Mexico, U.S.A. In: Hyder, Donald N., ed.
Proceedings, 1st international rangeland congress; 1978 August 14-18;
Denver, CO. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management: 488-490. [4094]
19. Ferguson, Robert B. 1983. Use of rosaceous shrubs for wildland plantings
in the Intermountain West. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy,
compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and
wildlife habitats; Proceedings of symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin
Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden,
UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest
and Range Experiment Station: 136-149. [915]
20. Gutknecht, Kurt W. 1989. Xeriscaping: an alternative to thirsty
landscapes. Utah Science. 50(4): 142-146. [10166]
21. Henrickson, James. 1987. Two new species of Cercocarpus (Rosaceae) from
Mexico. Systematic Botany. 12(2): 293-298. [1129]
22. Hess, Karl; Alexander, Robert R. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho
and Roosevelt National Forests in central Colorado: a habitat type
classification. Res. Pap. RM-266. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 48 p. [1141]
23. Hoffman, George R.; Alexander, Robert R. 1987. Forest vegetation of the
Black Hills National Forest of South Dakota and Wyoming: a habitat type
classification. Res. Pap. RM-276. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 48 p. [1181]
24. Horton, Jerome S. 1960. Vegetation types of the San Bernardino
Mountains. Tech. Rep. PSW-44. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range
Experiment Station. 29 p. [10687]
25. Kartesz, John T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of
the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II--thesaurus. 2nd ed.
Portland, OR: Timber Press. 816 p. [23878]
26. Kearney, Thomas H.; Peebles, Robert H.; Howell, John Thomas; McClintock,
Elizabeth. 1960. Arizona flora. 2d ed. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press. 1085 p. [6563]
27. Kitchen, Stanley G.; Meyer, Susan E. 1990. Seed dormancy in two species
of mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius and Cercocarpus montanus).
In: Johnson, Kendall L., ed. Proceedings, 5th Utah shrub ecology
workshop: The genus Cercocarpus; 1988 July 13-14; Logan, UT. Logan, UT:
Utah State University, College of Natural Resources: 27-41. [16094]
28. Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr.; Glendening, G. E. 1962. Controlled burning of
Arizona chaparral: A 1962 progress report. Proceedings, Annual Arizona
Watershed Symposium. 6: 23-24. [10490]
29. Martin, Floyd L. 1950. A revision of Cercocarpus. Brittonia. 7(2):
91-111. [12586]
30. Medina, Alvin L. 1987. Woodland communities and soils of Fort Bayard,
southwestern New Mexico. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of
Science. 21: 99-112. [3978]
31. Monsen, Stephen B. 1987. Shrub selections for pinyon-juniper plantings.
In: Everett, Richard L., compiler. Proceedings--pinyon-juniper
conference; 1986 January 13-16; Reno, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-215.
Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain
Research Station: 316-329. [4925]
32. Monsen, Stephen B.; Christensen, Donald R. 1975. Woody plants for
rehabilitating rangelands in the Intermountain Region. In: Stutz, Howard
C., ed. Wildland shrubs: Proceedings--symposium and workshop; 1975
November 5-7; Provo, UT. Provo, UT: Brigham Young Univeristy: 72-119.
[1680]
33. Monsen, Stephen B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1985. Factors influencing
establishment of seeded broadleaf herbs and shrubs following fire. In:
Sanders, Ken; Durham, Jack, eds. Rangeland fire effects: a symposium:
Proceedings of the symposium; 1984 November 27-29; Boise, ID. Boise, ID:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State
Office: 112-124. [1682]
34. Neuenschwander, L. F. [n.d.]. The fire induced autecology of selected
shrubs of the cold desert and surrounding forests:
A-state-of-the-art-review. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, College of
Forestry, Wildlife and Range Sciences. In cooperation with: Fire in
Multiple Use Management, Research, Development, and Applications
Program, Northern Forest Fire Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 30 p.
Unpublished manuscript on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT.
[1747]
35. Nord, Eamor C.; Countryman, Clive M. 1972. Fire relations. In: McKell,
Cyrus M.; Blaisdell, James P.; Goodin, Joe R., eds. Wildland
shrubs--their biology and utilization: Proceedings of the symposium;
1971 July; Logan, UT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range
Experiment Station: 88-97. [1773]
36. Pase, Charles P.; Lindenmuth, A. W., Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed
fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral.
Journal of Forestry. 69: 800-805. [1829]
37. Piatt, J. R. 1973. Seed size affects germination of true
mountainmahogany. Journal of Range Management. 26(3): 231-232. [13566]
38. Plummer, A. Perry; Christensen, Donald R.; Monsen, Stephen B. 1968.
Restoring big-game range in Utah. Publ. No. 68-3. Ephraim, UT: Utah
Division of Fish and Game. 183 p. [4554]
39. Potter, Loren D.; Foxx, Teralene. 1979. Recovery and delayed mortality
of ponderosa pine after wildfire. Final Report (Part I), Contract No.
16-608-GR, EC-291. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico, Biology
Department. 33 p. [11748]
40. Powell, A. Michael. 1988. Trees & shrubs of Trans-Pecos Texas including
Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks. Big Bend National Park,
TX: Big Bend Natural History Association. 536 p. [6130]
41. Ralphs, Michael H.; Schen, David C.; Busby, Fee. 1975. Prescribed
burning--effective control of sagebrush and open juniper. Utah Science.
36(3): 94-98. [1931]
42. Ream, Robert Ray. 1964. The vegetation of the Wasatch Mountains, Utah
and Idaho. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. 178 p. Ph.D. thesis.
[5506]
43. Riegel, Gregg M.; Smith, Bradley G.; Franklin, Jerry F. 1992. Foothill
oak woodlands of the interior valleys of southwestern Oregon. Northwest
Science. 66(2): 66-76. [18470]
44. Rominger, Eric M.; Dale, Alan R.; Bailey, James A. 1988. Shrubs in the
summer diet of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Journal of Wildlife
Management. 52(1): 47-50. [3885]
45. Shepherd, Harold R. 1971. Effects of clipping on key browse species in
southwestern Colorado. Technical Publication Number 28. [Place of
publication unknown]: Colorado Division of Game, Fish and Parks. 104 p.
[4064]
46. Smith, Dwight Raymond. 1971. Growth responses of true mountain mahogany
(Cercocarpus montanus) on four soil types within the Front Range of
Colorado. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 206 p. Dissertation. [5721]
47. Springfield, H. W. 1973. Cliffrose and mountainmahogany seeds retain
viability 6 years in cold storage. Res. Note RM-236. Fort Collins, CO:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest
and Range Experiment Station. 2 p. [43]
48. Stanton, Frank. 1974. Wildlife guidelines for range fire rehabilitation.
Tech. Note 6712. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management. 90 p. [2221]
49. Steger, Robert E.; Beck, Reldon F. 1973. Range plants as ornamentals.
Journal of Range Management. 26: 72-74. [12038]
50. Stevens, Richard. 1983. Species adapted for seeding mountain brush, big,
black, and low sagebrush, and pinyon-juniper communities. In: Monsen,
Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain
rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings;
1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen.
Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 78-82.
[2240]
51. Stevens, Richard; Jorgensen, Kent R.; Davis, James N. 1981. Viability of
seed from thirty-two shrub and forb species through fifteen years of
warehouse storage. Great Basin Naturalist. 41(3): 274-277. [2244]
52. Texas Natural Heritage Program. 1993. Plant communities of Texas (Series
level). Unpublished report. Austin, TX: Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department. 26 p. [23810]
53. Thilenius, John F. 1972. Classification of deer habitat in the ponderosa
pine forest of the Black Hills, South Dakota. Res. Pap. RM-91. Fort
Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 28 p.
[2317]
54. Warren, Peter L.; Hoy, Marina S.; Hoy, Wilton E. 1992. Vegetation and
flora of Fort Bowie National Historic Site, Arizona. Tech. Rep.
NPS/WRUA/NRTR-92/43. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona, School of
Renewable Natural Resources, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies
Unit. 78 p. [19871]
55. Waugh, William J. 1990. Stagnation and decadence of Cercocarpus montanus
in a southeastern Wyoming big game exclosure. In: Johnson, Kendall L.,
ed. Proceedings, 5th Utah shrub ecology workshop: The genus Cercocarpus;
1988 July 13-14; Logan, UT. Logan, UT: Utah State University, College of
Natural Resources: 89-95. [16099]
56. Williams, Stephen E.; Aldon, Earl F. 1976. Endomycorrhizal (vesicular
arbuscular) associations of some arid zone shrubs. Southwestern
Naturalist. 20(4): 437-444. [5517]
57. Young, D. Lewis; Bailey, James A. 1975. Effects of fire and mechanical
treatment on Cercocarpus montanus and Ribes cereum. Journal of Range
Management. 28(6): 495-497. [6935]
58. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
59. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
60. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
61. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
62. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
63. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
64. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Plants
of the U.S.--alphabetical listing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 954 p. [23104]
65. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey. [n.d.]. NP
Flora [Data base]. Davis, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National
Biological Survey. [23119]
66. Greenwood, Larry R.; Brotherson, Jack D. 1978. Ecological relationships
between pinyon-juniper and true mountain mahogany stands in the Uintah
Basin, Utah. Journal of Range Management. 31(3): 164-167. [15654]
67. Foxx, Teralene S.; Tierney, Gail D. 1987. Rooting patterns in the
pinyon-juniper woodland. In: Everett, Richard L., compiler.
Proceedings--pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16; Reno, NV.
Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-215. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 69-79. [4790]
68. Shiflet, Thomas N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United
States. Denver, CO: Society for Range Management. 152 p. [23362]
69. Nixon, E. S. 1977. A mountain cercocarpus population--revisited. Great
Basin Naturalist. 37(1): 97-99. [24497]
70. Brotherson, Jack D.; Anderson, D. L.; Szyska, L. A. 1984. Habitat
relations of Cercocarpus montanus (true mountain mahogany) in central
Utah. Journal of Range Management. 37(4): 321-324. [529]
71. Woodmansee, Robert G. 1969. Natural reproduction of Eurotia lanata,
Atriplex canescens, Cercocarpus montanus, and Cowania mexicana in New
Mexico. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. M.S. thesis. [2597]
Related categories for Species: Cercocarpus montanus
| True Mountain-Mahogany
|
|