|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
Introductory
SPECIES: Menziesia ferruginea | Menziesia
ABBREVIATION :
MENFER
SYNONYMS :
Menziesia glabella (Gray) Peck
SCS PLANT CODE :
MEFE
COMMON NAMES :
menziesia
false huckleberry
fool's huckleberry
false azalea
mock azalea
rusty menziesia
smooth menziesia
Pacific menziesia
skunkbrush
rustyleaf
TAXONOMY :
The currently accepted scientific name of menziesia is Menziesia
ferruginea (Smith) [26]. In existence are two varieties distinguished
by morphological variations and geographic location [25,26,32,33]:
M. ferruginea var. ferruginea
M. ferruginea var. glabella (Gray) Peck
LIFE FORM :
Shrub
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
COMPILED BY AND DATE :
R. J. Habeck, January 1992
LAST REVISED BY AND DATE :
NO-ENTRY
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Habeck, R. J. 1992. Menziesia ferruginea. In: Remainder of Citation
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Menziesia ferruginea | Menziesia
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
M. ferruginea var. ferruginea is found north along the Alaskan Coast,
and south along the Pacific Coast to northern California, inland across
the Cascades and Rocky Mountains to Wyoming [25,33].
M. ferruginea var. glabella is distributed from British Columbia to
Alberta, south to Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, eastern Washington, and
Oregon; down the Columbia River to Mt. Hood and Mt. Adams, where the two
varieties freely interbreed [25,27].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES20 Douglas-fir
FRES22 Western white pine
FRES23 Fir - spruce
FRES24 Hemlock - Sitka spruce
FRES25 Larch
STATES :
AK CA ID MT OR WA WY AB BC
ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS :
BIHO DENA GLBA GLAC GRTE LACL
MORA NOCA OLYM REDW
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
1 Northern Pacific Border
2 Cascade Mountains
4 Sierra Mountains
5 Columbia Plateau
8 Northern Rocky Mountains
9 Middle Rocky Mountains
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K001 Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest
K002 Cedar - hemlock - Douglas-fir forest
K003 Silver fir - Douglas-fir forest
K004 Fir - hemlock forest
K012 Douglas-fir forest
K013 Cedar - hemlock - pine forest
K014 Grand fir - Douglas-fir forest
K015 Western spruce - fir forest
SAF COVER TYPES :
205 Mountain hemlock
206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir
210 Interior Douglas-fir
212 Western larch
213 Grand fir
215 Western white pine
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Menziesia is an understory dominant on moist, wooded north- and
east-facing slopes of the montane to upper subalpine zones. Overstory
components mostly include subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), Pacific
silver fir (A. amabilis), western redcedar (Thuja plicata), mountain
hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana), western hemlock (T. heterophylla), and
Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) [25]. Menziesia's associates
generally include blue huckleberry (Vaccinium globulare), smooth
woodrush (Luzula hitchcockii), and on higher sites, white rhododendron
(Rhododendron albiflorum) [33]. In Alaska, menziesia is a common
understory shrub in the coastal spruce-hemlock forest, often under a
dense canopy. It also grows in the southern part of the boreal forest
in white spruce (Picea glauca) and white spruce-paper birch (Betula
papyrifera) stands [53].
Publications listing menziesia as an indicator or dominant species in
habitat types (hts), community types (cts), or plant associations (pas)
are presented below:
Area Classification Authority
AK forest (cts) Reynolds 1990
c ID forest (hts) Steele & others 1981
n ID forest (hts) Cooper & others 1991
e ID and w WY forest (hts) Steele & others 1983
MT forest (hts) Pfister & others 1977
OR: Mt. Hood &
Willamette N.F. forest (pas) Hemstrom & others 1982
OR: Wallowa-Whitman
National Forest forest (pas) Johnson & Simon 1987
WA: Mount Rainier N.P. forest (pas) Franklin & others 1988
WA: Gifford Pinchot
National Forest forest (pas) Brockway & others 1983
VALUE AND USE
SPECIES: Menziesia ferruginea | Menziesia
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
Menziesia's value to wildlife is primarily as food. In Idaho and
Montana, elk used menziesia in considerable amounts in July, and to a
lesser extent in October. Elk rarely eat menziesia when it occurs with
more palatable browse species. Menziesia filled a browse requirement
during July when elk were primarily on an herbaceous diet in western
Montana and Idaho [14,54]. Mule deer use menziesia moderately in summer
and fall in the western states [31]. Menziesia accounted for over 15
percent of the summer moose diet in the spruce-fir cover types of
Jackson Hole, Wyoming [28]. Alaskan spruce grouse use small amounts of
menziesia capsules in their October diet [15]. Following a burn
treatment in western Montana, menziesia came back as an important source
of fruits and seeds used by rodents such as deer mice, chipmunks, and
voles [21].
PALATABILITY :
The palatability of menziesia is generally rated poor. This shrub
provides fair summer browse for deer and elk [35]. Menziesia's
palatability was considered very low for moose in Jackson Hole, Wyoming
[23].
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
Nutrient value of menziesia is considered poor to medium [20].
Menziesia contains toxic resinoids that are known to cause livestock
losses when leaves and roots are eaten [43].
Mean values of percent composition of macro- and micronutrients for
menziesia are as follows [22]:
MACRO MICRO
(percent dry weight) (ppm dry weight)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
N P K Ca Mg Na Cu Mn Fe Zn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Leaves 2.48 0.24 1.19 0.62 0.40 0.47 10.0 16,656 62.0 86.6
Stems 1.18 0.15 0.85 0.35 0.17 0.09 11.8 7139.2 22.8 40.5
COVER VALUE :
Menziesia provides shelter and cover for a variety of wildlife species.
Dense thickets provide good cover for many small birds and mammals.
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
NO-ENTRY
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
Menziesia is a desirable ornamental due its crimson-orange autumn
foliage [26].
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Menziesia is mostly threatened by logging activities. Following
clearcutting of Pacific silver fir and mountain hemlock, menziesia
exhibits a difficult time regenerating [6]. In northwestern Montana,
menziesia decreased considerably from its high abundance following a
clearcut in an old-growth stand [2]. Soil layers restricting root
growth and high water tables are common enough that compaction or
erosion-causing activities should be carefully controlled [6].
There appears to be little destruction of mature menziesia plants in
spruce-fir forests when selective logging is done during the winter [9].
If menziesia is a major component of the mature forest understory, it
will continue to dominate the postharvest plant community [10].
Mechanical site preparation: Coates [8] found that recovery of
menziesia on Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir sites after clipping and
mechanical scarification was very limited and confined to the production
of new shoots from buds on old stems rather than from basal sprouts or
suckers. Two seasons after cutting, new shoots had not reached the
height of precut stems, and did not overtop spruce or pine seedlings
planted at the time of cutting.
Menziesia control by Esteron brush killer was best achieved when this
herbicide was mixed with diesel and sprayed by helicopter from 150 to
200 feet (46-61 m) high [40]. After 2 years, Tordon 101 and Banvel 720
killed 100 percent of menziesia when sprayed on leaf foliage [39].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Menziesia ferruginea | Menziesia
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Menziesia is an erect, decidous shrub 3.3 to 6.6 feet (1-2 m) tall.
Ovate-elliptic to elliptic-obovate leaves are 1.5 to 2.5 inches (4-6 cm)
long and exude a skunky oder when crushed. Menziesia has scaly bark on
older branches, while the young twigs are covered with fine hair [20].
The fruits are oval capsules containing many seeds 0.20 to 0.28 inch
(5-7 mm) long. The leaves and stems of this shrub are sticky to the
touch [25,26,44].
Menziesia decreases in height with increasing elevation. This would
imply that menziesia's height is generally at its maximum on western
hemlock sites, and at its minimum on mountain hemlock and subalpine fir
sites [34].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Phanerophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Seed production and dispersal: Numerous small seeds are produced in
capsules which dehisce naturally at maturity. Seeds are wind or gravity
dispersed.
Vegetative Reproduction: Menziesia resprouts from root crowns and
adventitious stem buds after destruction of aboveground parts. When
covered with ash from Mt. St. Helen's, menziesia produced adventitious
roots [3]. This plant also appears to be capable of layering. Layering
is an effective means of growth and expansion at high elevations where
heavy snowpacks press menziesia branches close to the ground [10]. On
steep slopes, menziesia tends to grow downhill with the tips of its
branches ascending [35].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Menziesia is a common shade-tolerant shrub, found predominantly on
steep, northerly exposures with abundant moisture [17,20,25,26].
Menziesia generally occurs from 3,300 to 7,500 feet (1,000-2,300 m) in
elevation on 15 to 60 percent slopes [11,29,50]. Absence from extreme
northern distributions may imply a limitation to cold temperatures.
Menziesia may be restricted to areas with adequate snow cover, which
protects plants from winter desiccation [25]. In Oregon, menziesia is
typically found on high-elevation sites where frequent frost, heavy
snowpacks, and short growing seasons are common [6].
The presence of menziesia has been reported as being a particularly good
indicator of site potential [13]. Menziesia often grows under dense
canopies, in openings, and on cut-over forest land, especially on
well-drained slopes [53]. Mueggler [42] found the distribution of
menziesia in cedar-hemlock stands to be positively associated with low
soil potassium content, and high organic matter content (5.6 to 8.0
percent).
Soils: Soil depth usually ranges from 17 to 70 inches (43-178 cm).
Soils are generally derived from loam to sandy-loam pumice layers to a
depth of 15 to 30 inches (38-76 cm) [6,11,24]. In central Idaho, soil
acidity ranges from pH 5.1 to 6.2; litter depth can average at least 3.5
inches (9 cm) [6,11]. Effective rooting depth in Oregon is
approximately 46 inches (117 cm) [6].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Menziesia is most always associated with cold, wet habitat types.
Menziesia is very shade tolerant. It can persist in heavily shaded
forests where light levels are typically 5 percent of full sunlight.
Alaback [1] reported that menziesia decreased in biomass productivity in
Alaskan spruce-hemlock forests over 30 years of age. Menziesia biomass
was lowest in stands 31 to 130 years old, but after this period
increased. In western Montana, burning increased menziesia fourfold
from immature stands (less than 90 years) to old stands (greater than
150 years) [2].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
Phenology: Menziesia flowers from late May through July; capsules
mature in July and August [53]. Leaves expand rapidly in early June at
the time flowers open and begin to senesce in mid-August and September
at high elevations in southern British Columbia [10]. Menziesia has
been found to live at least 30 years in northern forests [1].
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Menziesia ferruginea | Menziesia
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Menziesia is a fire-sensitive species [51]. It responds to fire by
sprouting from the root crown [38]. Since menziesia is indicative of
cool, moist sites, fire plays a minor role in its development. Barrett
and Arno [4] found that the subalpine fir/menziesia cover type in the
Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, Idaho, had a mean fire interval of 174 to
181 years, achieving lethal/nonuniform fire behavior.
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
survivor species; on-site surviving root crown or caudex
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Menziesia ferruginea | Menziesia
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Menziesia is very susceptible to fire-kill. Moderate to severe fires
reduce survival and slow redevelopment [44]. Wildfires apparently
removed menziesia totally from experimental plots in Washington and
Oregon for up to 16 years [58].
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
In western Montana, Stickney [51] found that postburn survival of
menziesia was poor; menziesia was very slow to redevelop after fire,
especially in areas that had been intensley burned. The average percent
cover of menziesia doubled from unburned plots to lightly burned plots,
and tripled from moderately burned plots in western Montana [48].
Another study found menziesia to increase its density of aboveground
parts the first year after burning [37]. Model projections predict that
menziesia will reach a height of 2.4 feet (.73 m) 2 years after a burn,
and that the average height of menziesia will peak at 5.1 to 5.6 feet
(1.5-1.7 m) 20 to 25 years after burning [34]. Mueggler [42], however,
found no significant difference in cover and frequency between burned
and unburned sites in northern Idaho.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
NO-ENTRY
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
NO-ENTRY
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Menziesia ferruginea | Menziesia
REFERENCES :
1. Alaback, Paul B. 1982. Dynamics of understory biomass in Sitka
spruce-western hemlock forests of southeast Alaska. Ecology. 63(6):
1932-1948. [7305]
2. Antos, J. A.; Habeck, J. R. 1981. Successional development in Abies
grandis (Dougl.) Forbes forests in the Swan Valley, western Montana.
Northwest Science. 55(1): 26-39. [12445]
3. Antos, Joseph A.; Zobel, Donald B. 1985. Plant form, developmental
plasticity and survival following burial by volcanic tephra. Canadian
Journal of Botany. 63: 2083-2090. [12553]
4. Barrett, Stephen W.; Arno, Stephen F. 1991. Classifying fire regimes and
defining their topographic controls in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness.
In: Andrews, Patricia L.; Potts, Donald F., eds. Proceedings, 11th
annual conference on fire and forest meteorology; 1991 April 16-19;
Missoula, MT. SAF Publication 91-04. Bethesda, MD: Society of American
Foresters: 299-307. [16179]
5. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
6. Brockway, Dale G.; Topik, Christopher; Hemstrom, Miles A.; Emmingham,
William H. 1985. Plant association and management guide for the Pacific
silver fir zone: Gifford Pinchot National Forest. R6-Ecol-130a.
Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Northwest Region. 122 p. [525]
7. Cates, Rex G.; Orians, Gordon H. 1975. Successional status and the
palatability of plants to generalized herbivores. Ecology. 56: 410-418.
[15989]
8. Coates, K. David. 1987. Effects of shrubs and herbs on conifer
regeneration and microclimate in the Rhododendron-Vaccinium-Menziesia
community of south-central BC. Vancouver, BC: University of British
Columbia. Thesis. Abstract. [17445]
9. Coates, D.; Haeussler, S. 1986. A preliminary guide to the response of
major species of competing vegetation to silvicultural treatments.
Victoria, BC: Ministry of Forests, Information Services Branch; Land
Management Handbook Number 9. 88 p. [17453]
10. Comeau, Philip G.; Watts, Susan B.; Caza, Caroline L.; [and others].
1989. Autecology, biology, competetive status and response to treatment
of seven southern interior weed species. FRDA Report 093; ISSN 0835
0572. Victoria, BC: BC Ministry of Forests, Research Branch. 46 p.
[9471]
11. Cooper, Stephen V.; Neiman, Kenneth E.; Roberts, David W. 1991. (Rev.)
Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: a second approximation. Gen.
Tech. Rep. INT-236. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Intermountain Research Station. 143 p. [14792]
12. Crane, M. F.; Fischer, William C. 1986. Fire ecology of the forest
habitat types of central Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-218. Ogden, UT: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research
Station. 85 p. [5297]
13. Daubenmire, Rexford F.; Daubenmire, Jean B. 1968. Forest vegetation of
eastern Washington and northern Idaho. Technical Bulletin 60. Pullman,
WA: Washington State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 104 p.
[749]
14. Edge, W. Daniel; Marcum, C. Les; Olson-Edge, Sally L. 1988. Summer
forage and feeding site selection by elk. Journal of Wildlife
Management. 52(4): 573-577. [6778]
15. Ellison, Laurence. 1966. Seasonal foods and chemical analysis of winter
diet of Alaskan spruce grouse. Journal of Wildlife Management. 30(4):
729-735. [9735]
16. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
17. Forsythe, Warren Louis. 1975. Site influence on the post-fire
composition of a Rocky Mountain forest. Missoula, MT: University of
Montana. 173 p. Dissertation. [6723]
18. Franklin, Jerry F.; Moir, William H.; Hemstrom, Miles A.; [and others].
1988. The forest communities of Mount Rainier National Park. Scientific
Monograph Series No 19. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior,
National Park Service. 194 p. [12392]
19. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
20. Green, R. N.; Courtin, P. J.; Klinka, K.; [and others]. 1984. Site
diagnosis, tree species selection, and slashburning guidelines for the
Vancouver Forest Region. Land Management Handbook Number 8. Abridged
version. Burnaby, BC: Ministry of Forests, Vancouver Forest Region. 143
p. [9475]
21. Halvorson, Curtis H. 1982. Rodent occurrence, habitat disturbance, and
seed fall in a larch-fir forest. Ecology. 63(2): 423-433. [8522]
22. Hanley, Thomas A.; McKendrick, Jay D. 1983. Seasonal changes in chemical
composition and nutritive values of native forages in a spruce-hemlock
forests, southeastern Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-312. Portland, OR: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and
Range Experiment Station. 41 p. [8770]
23. Harry, G. Bryan. 1957. Winter food habits of moose in Jackson Hole,
Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Management. 21(1): 53-57. [8429]
24. Hemstrom, Miles A.; Emmingham, W. H.; Halverson, Nancy M.; [and others].
1982. Plant association and management guide for the Pacific silver fir
zone, Mt. Hood and Willamette National Forests. R6-Ecol 100-1982a.
Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Northwest Region. 104 p. [5784]
25. Hickman, James C.; Johnson, Michael P. 1969. An analysis of geographical
variation in western North American Menziesia (Ericaceae). Madrono.
20(1): 1-32. [17109]
26. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific
Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
27. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur; Ownbey, Marion. 1959. Vascular
plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 4: Ericaceae through
Campanulaceae. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 510 p.
[1170]
28. Houston, Douglas B. 1968. The Shiras Moose in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
Tech. Bull. No. 1. [Place of publication unknown]: The Grand Teton
Natural History Association. 110 p. [7824]
29. Johnson, Charles G., Jr.; Simon, Steven A. 1987. Plant associations of
the Wallowa-Snake Province: Wallowa-Whitman National Forest.
R6-ECOL-TP-255A-86. Baker, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 399
p. [9600]
30. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
31. Kufeld, Roland C.; Wallmo, O. C.; Feddema, Charles. 1973. Foods of the
Rocky Mountain mule deer. Res. Pap. RM-111. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and
Range Experiment Station. 31 p. [1387]
32. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1986. Plants of west-central
Montana--identification and ecology: annotated checklist. Gen. Tech.
Rep. INT-217. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Intermountain Research Station. 128 p. [2955]
33. Lackschewitz, Klaus. 1991. Vascular plants of west-central
Montana--identification guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-227. Ogden, UT:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research
Station. 648 p. [13798]
34. Laursen, Steven B. 1984. Predicting shrub community composition and
structure following management disturbance in forest ecosystems of the
Intermountain West. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. 261 p.
Dissertation. [6717]
35. Lee, Lyndon C.; Pfister, Robert D. 1978. A training manual for Montana
forest habitat types. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, School of
Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station. 142 p.
[1434]
36. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession
following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall
Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council
fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No.
14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
37. Miller, Melanie. 1976. Shrub sprouting response to fire in a
Douglas-fir/western larch ecosystem. Missoula, MT: University of
Montana. 124 p. Thesis. [8945]
38. Miller, Melanie. 1977. Response of blue huckleberry to prescribed fires
in a western Montana larch-fir forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-188. Ogden,
UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest
and Range Experiment Station. 33 p. [6334]
39. Miller, Daniel L.; Kidd, Frank A. 1983. Shrub control in the Inland
Northwest--a summary of herbicide test results. Forestry Research Note
RN-83-4. Lewiston, ID: Potlatch Corporation. 49 p. [7861]
40. Miller, Daniel L.; Robinson, Vernon S. 1983. The influence of spray
altitude on shrub control. Forestry Research Note RN-83-1. Lewiston, ID:
Potlach Corporation, Wood Products, Western Division. 6 p. [3399]
41. Morris, William G. 1970. Effects of slash burning in overmature stands
of the Douglas-fir region. Forest Science. 16(3): 258-270. [4810]
42. French, N. R. 1978. Reexamination of permanent vegetation plots on the
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Site. In: Markham, O. D., ed.
Ecological studies on the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Site:
1978 Progress Report. IDO-12087. Idaho Falls, ID: U.S.Dept. of Energy,
Environ. Sciences Branch, Radiological and Environmental Sciences
Lab:167-170. [969]
43. Mueggler, W. F. 1970. Objectionable characteristics of range plants. In:
Range and wildlife habitat evaluation--a research symposium:
Proceedings; 1968 May; Flagstaff; Tempe, AZ. Misc. Publ. 1147.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 63-70.
[12986]
44. Patterson, Patricia A.; Neiman, Kenneth E.; Tonn, Jonalea. 1985. Field
guide to forest plants of northern Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-180.
Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain
Research Station. 246 p. [1839]
45. Pfister, Robert D.; Kovalchik, Bernard L.; Arno, Stephen F.; Presby,
Richard C. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana. Gen. Tech. Rep.
INT-34. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 174 p. [1878]
46. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
47. Reynolds, Keith M. 1990. Preliminary classification of forest vegetation
of the Kenai Penninsula, Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-424. Portland, OR:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Research Station. 67 p. [14581]
48. Stark, N.; Steele, R. 1977. Nutrient content of forest shrubs following
burning. American Journal of Botany. 64(10): 1218-1224. [2224]
49. Steele, Robert; Cooper, Stephen V.; Ondov, David M.; [and others]. 1983.
Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho-western Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep.
INT-144. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 122 p. [2230]
50. Steele, Robert; Pfister, Robert D.; Ryker, Russell A.; Kittams, Jay A.
1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-114.
Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain
Forest and Range Experiment Station. 138 p. [2231]
51. Stickney, Peter F. 1980. Data base for post-fire succession, first 6 to
9 years, in Montana larch-fir forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-62. Ogden,
UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest
and Range Experiment Station. 133 p. [6583]
52. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
53. Viereck, Leslie A.; Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1972. Alaska trees and
shrubs. Agric. Handb. 410. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 265 p. [6884]
54. Young, Vernon A.; Robinette, W. Leslie. 1939. A study of the range
habits of elk on the Selway Game Preserve. Bull. No. 9. Moscow, ID:
University of Idaho, School of Forestry. 47 p. [6831]
55. Zager, Peter Edward. 1980. The influence of logging and wildfire on
grizzly bear habitat in northwestern Montana. Missoula, MT: University
of Montana. 131 p. Dissertation. [5032]
Index
Related categories for Species: Menziesia ferruginea
| Menziesia
|
 |
