1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Shrub > SPECIES: Prosopis glandulosa | Honey Mesquite
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Prosopis glandulosa | Honey Mesquite

IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT:


Fire mortality is usually low in honey mesquite. Following most range fires, honey mesquite is top-killed and then resprouts. Near Vernon, Texas winter fires top-killed 72% of honey mesquite and reduced their canopy by 95% but did not cause any whole-plant mortality. Honey mesquite in a honey mesquite/ tobosagrass savanna in western Texas was 90% top-killed and had 10% whole-plant mortality. Honey mesquite in silver bluestem, red threeawn (Aristida longiseta), buffalograss, vine mesquite, plains bristle grass, and sand dropseed grassland in western Texas experienced 76% top-kill and 11% mortality. In southern Texas, in an acacia (Acacia spp.), buffalograss, plains bristle grass community, honey mesquite had 72% top-kill and 10% mortality after a late summer fire. Of the herbaceous vegetation on burned and unburned sites, there was little difference in basal density, species composition, or number of dead plants [29].

There are conflicting findings regarding the relative impacts of fuels and weather conditions on honey mesquite damage by fire. At the Wagoner Estate near Vernon, Texas, Ansley and Lucia [6] compared 2 plots: plot 1 had 4,085 lbs/ac of fine fuel and plot 2 had 1,861 lbs/ac of fine fuel. On plot 1, 72% of honey mesquite was top-killed and there was a 95% reduction in total canopy; on plot 2, honey mesquite was 15% top-killed and its total canopy cover was reduced 42%.

The influence of mesquite size and fuel loading on fire mortality of velvet mesquite, a closely related species, has been thoroughly studied [41,69,141]. Following a June fire on the Santa Rita Experimental Range in Arizona, velvet mesquite suffered 25% mortality in an area with 4,480 pounds per acre of herbaceous fuel dominated by the exotic Lehman lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana), but in areas with 2,200 pounds per acre of herbaceous fuel dominated by black grama, velvet mesquite suffered only 8% mortality [41]. Prescribed burning on the Santa Rita Experimental Range generally resulted in about 50% mortality of young velvet mesquite that were less than 0.5 inch (1.25 cm) in basal stem diameter, but only 8% to 15% mortality of plants that were greater than 0.5 inch (1.25 cm) in basal diameter [69]. One experimental burn on the Wagoner Estate near Vernon, Texas showed that honey mesquite top-kill was more correlated with relative humidity and air temperature than with amounts of total or fine fuel [11]. Another detailed fire study was undertaken on the Welder Wildlife Refuge of southern Texas. Fire peak temperature and temperature duration at canopy level were found to influence mesquite top-kill more than extreme temperatures at the ground level [10].

Using a propane burner and temperature control to simulate natural fire, Wright and others [190] found that young honey mesquite plants are very susceptible to "moderate- severity" fires until they reach 1.5 years of age, moderately susceptible at 2.5 years, and very tolerant after 3.5 years. In the study, the percent mortality (after 15 months) of various ages of individually burned young honey mesquite plants was observed after 15 months after exposure; results are summarized below :

Age  Temperature (°F)
220 435 780 1,115 control
(years) Mortality (%)
0.5 43 91 100 100 14
1.5 60 100 100 100 0
2.5 20 40 64 72 0
3.5 8 8 8 8 4
10 (approx.) 0 0 4 8 0

DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT:


No entry

PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE:


The response of honey mesquite following fire depends on the amount of damage the fire inflicted on the plant. Plants may initiate new growth from either buds within the crown or from underground buds on the taproot or lateral roots [73] following fire. Following low-severity fires which only partially top-kill plants, mesquites often sprout from axillary buds on branches [41]. In a low fuel load (1160 lbs/ac) fire near Encinal, Texas honey mesquite had recovered to 106% of preburn canopy cover in 2 years, but still had 14% less canopy cover than honey mesquite in the unburned control plot [78]. Following fires that result in complete top-kill, plants may survive by producing numerous basal stem sprouts, by establishing from seed, or by sprouting from lateral roots or the upper part of the taproot [47,62,64]. 

Winter burns often allow regrowth from buds in the crown because fire severity is not great enough to cause complete top-kill. Though percent canopy cover of honey mesquite recovers quickly following these low-severity fires, stand structure becomes more like a savanna than a thicket, which is the most common structure following a disturbance that causes a high rate of complete top-kill [7].

DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE:


No entry

FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:


Prescribed burning has not been effective in controlling honey mesquite because of the species' fire survival strategies. However, plants that have been recently top-killed by fire, drought, or herbicides are more susceptible to fire mortality [187]. Fire has been used to kill up to 27% of large mesquite trees previously top-killed with herbicide [30,31]. Fire has also been used to fell standing dead stems of herbicide-treated mesquites [30]. On grasslands in good condition with low densities of honey mesquite, repeated prescribed fires may keep honey mesquite low in stature but will probably kill only a few seedlings [121].

On some sites honey mesquite has reduced the native grass cover to the extent that there is now insufficient fuel to carry anything more than a "spotty" or "cool" fire [61]. In general, fire will not carry in southwestern grasslands unless there is a minimum of 600 pounds per acre (654 kg/ha) of herbaceous fuels. When there is less than 892 pounds per acre (1,000 kg/ha), a wind speed of 8 miles per hour (12.8 km/hr) is needed to carry the fire [189].

Once honey mesquite stands are established, use of stand- replacement fires can cause only minimal reduction in honey mesquite density; regrowth is both rapid and of a thicket-like structure, that is commonly more detrimental to forage production than the pre-burn stand structure [7]. Paysen and others [135] recommend that managers use low-severity fires so that apical dominance is maintained and sprouting is minimized. Ansley and others [7] also support this strategy and recommend winter fires instead of summer fires except when fuel loads are low. The Texas Extension Service recommends the following conditions for prescribed burning (in intervals of 5 to 10 years) in honey mesquite-tobosagrass communities: wind of 6 to 15 mph (10-25 kph), relative humidity between 20% and 60%, temperature between 45 and 70 degrees Fahrenheit (7.2- 21 °C), during late January, February, or early March [2].

It is well-documented that fire can be used as a management tool in tobosagrass and other mesic honey mesquite habitats [2,7,135]. In shortgrass communities, according to Wright [186], fire cannot be "recommended as a tool to control shrubs or increase grass production." In these communities fire, particularly in dry years, can harm black grama and other grasses, thereby increasing the competitive ability of western honey mesquite [37,61,186]. 

Interactions of fire and herbicide effects: Britton and Wright [30] observed 24% mortality in a stand of honey mesquite (20 miles south of Colorado City, Texas) that had been top-killed by herbicides 4 years prior to burning. On the Rolling Plains of Texas, 32% of honey mesquite were killed by fires occurring in March or April soon after a 2,4,5-T herbicide treatment. These mortality rates were unusually high and were attributed to dead foliage and stems that increased fire severity locally. Repeated winter or summer fires did not achieve root-kill greater than 4%. Though there had been an herbicide (2,4,5-T) treatment 17 to 26 years prior to the fire, there were not many dead stems to increase fire intensity and whole-plant mortality [190]. Three to six foot tall (1-2 m) honey mesquite plants, which had survived herbicide (2,4,5-T) spraying 7 years earlier, were top-killed by a late March prescribed fire in western Texas. Most plants survived by sprouting from belowground buds. Resprouts ranged from a few inches to over 4 feet (1.2 m) tall 6 months after the fire [80].

Following controlled spring burning of honey mesquite plants in southwestern Texas that had survived application of 2,4,5-T 4 years earlier, honey mesquite plants were top-killed. Resprouts grew 17 inches (43.2 cm) tall within 4 months [132]. Six years of postfire growth is summarized below; data are means of 15 replicates:

Postfire year Height of resprouts (inches) Resprouts per plant
1 17.0 14.0
2 29.1 8.4
3 30.5  9.0
4 41.6 6.1
5 36.1  4.8
6 53.7  5.5

Another study of fire effects on honey mesquite was undertaken in the High Plains of Texas near Colorado City. Fire was prescribed on upland and riparian areas. The season during which fire occurred was not specified but honey mesquite were physiologically active at the time. On bottom lands there was no mortality of large honey mesquite even though they had been sprayed with herbicides (2,4,5-T); well-developed root systems allowed resprouting the following growing season.  On upland sites mortality was up to 50%. Percent mortality was measured up to 5 years after burning, showing that fire-induced mortality is sometimes not immediate. Insect and rodent damage following fire damage causes indirect fire morality. Results and burning conditions were as follows [190].

Year of burn Number of trees surveyed

Mortality

Tobosa fuel Fuel moisture Air temperature  Relative humidity Wind speed
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year (lbs/acre) (%) (°F) (%) (mph)
1968 50 32 32 32 32 32 7,000 19.8 80 25 10
1969 250 8 13 18 20 22 5,000 19.2 67 45 45
1969 950 11 19 24 27 28 5,700 15.8 72 38 13
1970 50 12 12 18 ---- ---- 4,000 15.0 70 23 12
1971 60 12 15 15 ---- ---- 4,800 19.5 60 54 5
1971 60 45 50 50 ---- ---- 4,200 14.7 80 32 10

Related categories for SPECIES: Prosopis glandulosa | Honey Mesquite

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.