|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
Introductory
SPECIES: Asarum caudatum | Wild Ginger
ABBREVIATION :
ASACAU
SYNONYMS :
Asarum caudatum var. viridifolum M.E. Peck
SCS PLANT CODE :
ASCA2
COMMON NAMES :
wild ginger
British Columbia wild ginger
TAXONOMY :
The currently accepted scientific name for wild ginger is Asarum
caudatum Lindley [20]. It is a member of the Birthwort family,
Aristolochiaceae [14].
LIFE FORM :
Forb
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
COMPILED BY AND DATE :
Mary Lou Zimmerman, May 1991
LAST REVISED BY AND DATE :
Griffith, Randy Scott, June 1991.
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Zimmerman, Mary Lou; Griffith, Randy Scott. June 1991. Asarum caudatum.
In: Remainder of Citation
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Asarum caudatum | Wild Ginger
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Wild ginger occurs in California, Oregon, Washington, British Columbia,
Idaho, and Montana [9]. In California it occurs in the Coast Ranges
from the Santa Cruz Mountains northward [14]. In Oregon, Washington,
and British Columbia, it is commonly found from the Pacific Coast east
to the Cascades and is found less frequently on the east side of the
Cascades. Wild ginger is also found in northern Idaho and western
Montana [9].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES20 Douglas-fir
FRES22 Western white pine
FRES23 Fir - spruce
FRES24 Hemlock - Sitka spruce
FRES25 Larch
FRES27 Redwood
FRES28 Western hardwoods
STATES :
CA ID MT OR WA BC
ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS :
CRLA MORA NOCA OLYM PORE REDW
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
1 Northern Pacific Border
2 Cascade Mountains
3 Southern Pacific Border
8 Northern Rocky Mountains
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K001 Spruce - cedar - hemlock forest
K002 Cedar - hemlock - Douglas-fir forest
K003 Silver fir - Douglas-fir forest
K004 Fir - hemlock - Douglas-fir forest
K005 Mixed conifer forest
K006 Redwood forest
K007 Red fir forest
K012 Douglas-fir forest
K013 Cedar - hemlock - pine forest
K014 Grand fir - Douglas-fir forest
K015 Western spruce - fir forest
SAF COVER TYPES :
201 White spruce
206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir
210 Interior Douglas-fir
212 Western larch
213 Grand fir
215 Western white pine
221 Red alder
223 Sitka spruce
224 Western hemlock
225 Western hemlock - Sitka spruce
226 Coastal true fir - hemlock
227 Western redcedar - western hemlock
228 Western redcedar
229 Pacific Douglas-fir
230 Douglas-fir - western hemlock
232 Redwood
234 Douglas-fir - tanoak - Pacific madrone
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Wild ginger is commonly found in the understory of grand fir (Abies
grandis), western white pine (Pinus monticola), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga
menziesii), western redcedar (Thuja plicata), and western hemlock (Tsuga
heterophylla). In the understory community, wild ginger is commonly
associated with trail plant (Adenocaulon bicolor), queencup beadlily
(Clintonia uniflora), and western goldthread (Coptis occidentalis) [2].
Wild ginger is listed as an indicator or dominant in the following
habitat type (hts) and community type (cts) classifications:
Location Classification Authority
n-c ID forest cts Pierce and Peek 1984
n ID forest hts,cts Cooper et al 1987
VALUE AND USE
SPECIES: Asarum caudatum | Wild Ginger
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
PALATABILITY :
NO-ENTRY
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
COVER VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
NO-ENTRY
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
Food: The roots and new shoots can be baked or roasted, then eaten.
The leaves can be used to cover various foods while baking. The roots
can be dried and used for seasoning [5].
Landscaping: Wild ginger is a favorite of native plant gardeners in the
Pacific Northwest. It is considered high garden quality due to its
characteristic showy heart-shaped leaves, aroma, ease of growth, and
ability to form a dense carpet [9].
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Wild ginger will disappear from sites in the more xeric portions of its
range that have been opened up by clearcutting. Large openings made in
the forest canopy by clearcutting cause an increase in air and soil
temperatures, evaporation rates, and moisture deficits, which present
unfavorable conditions for reestablishment of moisture-loving plants,
such as wild ginger [11].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Asarum caudatum | Wild Ginger
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Wild ginger is a low, trailing, perennial, evergreen, prostrate herb
which is often found in localized patches on the forest floor. Its
leaves are softly hairy, borne two per node, alternate, simple,
appearing basal, long petioled, heart shaped, persistent, prominently
veined, entire edged, aromatic, dark to bright green, and sometimes
mottled. Its large, solitary, thimblelike flowers grow close to the
ground and are often concealed by the leaves. They are brownish-purple
to green and have three broad lobes which taper into long linear tails. The
fruit is a large, fleshy capsule containing small seeds. The seeds are
angled or compressed, smooth or wrinkled, and have a minute embryo in a
fleshy endosperm. They are widely distributed. The roots of wild
ginger are rhizomatous. They are extensive, slender, elongate,
aromatic, and can become matted. [5,6,9,14].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Chamaephyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Sexual: Wild ginger reproduces sexually by seed [9].
Vegetative: Wild ginger spreads by a system of extensive rhizomes. It
may form localized patches [9].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Wild ginger is an indicator of moist, shady, lowland to midmontane
forests in Oregon, Washington, and coastal British Columbia [5,8].
Soil: Wild ginger is characteristic of Moder and Mull humus soil forms
[8].
Climate: Wild ginger is found in areas with cool temperate and cool
mesothermal climates [8]. In northern Idaho and British Columbia the
climate is an inland expression of the Pacific Maritime influence [15].
This plant prefers locations with moist weather in the fall, winter, and
spring with dry summers [15].
Elevation: Wild ginger generally occurs below 5,000 feet (1,524 m)
[2,14].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Wild ginger is shade tolerant [8].
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
Wild ginger flowers from May through July in California [14], and from
April through July in Oregon and Washington [5].
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Asarum caudatum | Wild Ginger
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
In Moder and Mull soil types the organic layers (L,F, and H) are
typically shallow [7]. Therefore, a fire of light to moderate intensity
would remove the organic layers and the vegetative propagules of wild
ginger, thus requiring it to be seeded on the site from an off-site
source [18].
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
Secondary colonizer - off-site seed
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Asarum caudatum | Wild Ginger
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Wild ginger is very susceptible to fire-kill. Above and belowground
parts can be killed by fires of even light to moderate intensity.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
Wild ginger is removed from the understory until it can be seeded onto
the site from an off-site source after fires of light to moderate
intensity. Studies in Idaho and Oregon found that wild ginger presence
was significantly higher in plots that were clearcut and not burned than
in those plots that were clearcut and then broadcast burned [13,19].
Steen [19] found that wild ginger was absent from the burned stands for
up to 16 years after slash fires of moderate intensity.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
NO-ENTRY
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Wild ginger did not occur on clearcut and burned plots but did occur on
clearcut and unburned plots in an Oregon study [19].
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Asarum caudatum | Wild Ginger
REFERENCES :
1. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
2. Cooper, Stephen V.; Neiman, Kenneth E.; Steele, Robert; Roberts, David
W. 1987. Forest habitat types of northern Idaho: a second approximation.
Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-236. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 135 p. [867]
3. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
4. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
5. Halverson, Nancy M., compiler. 1986. Major indicator shrubs and herbs on
National Forests of western Oregon and southwestern Washington.
R6-TM-229. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Pacific Northwest Region. 180 p. [3233]
6. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific
Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
7. Kimmins, J. P. 1987. Forest ecology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
531 p. [14184]
8. Klinka, K.; Krajina, V. J.; Ceska, A.; Scagel, A. M. 1989. Indicator
plants of coastal British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: University of British
Columbia Press. 288 p. [10703]
9. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1982. Gardening with native plants of the Pacific
Northwest. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 252 p. [9980]
10. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
11. Larsen, J. A. 1924. Some factors affecting reproduction after logging in
northern Idaho. Journal of Agricultural Research. 28(11): 1149-1157.
[12934]
12. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
13. Mueggler, W. F. 1961. Ecology of seral shrub communities in the
cedar-hemlock zone of northern Idaho. Durham, NC: Duke University. 126
p. Thesis. [9981]
14. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
15. Neiman, K. E., Jr. 1988. Synecology of western redcedar in the northern
rocky mountains. In: Smith, N. J., ed. Western red cedar--does it have a
future?; [Date of conference unknown]; [Location of conference unknown].
Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry:
114-121. [6704]
16. Pierce, D. John; Peek, James M. 1984. Moose habitat use and selection
patterns in north-central Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 48(4):
1334-1343. [12516]
17. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
18. Ryan, Kevin C.; Noste, Nonan V. 1985. Evaluating prescribed fires. In:
Lotan, James E.; Kilgore, Bruce M.; Fischer, William C.; Mutch, Robert
W., technical coordinators. Proceedings--symposium and workshop on
wilderness fire; 1983 November 15-18; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep.
INT-182. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 230-238. [12456]
20. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
Index
Related categories for Species: Asarum caudatum
| Wild Ginger
|
 |