1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Shrub > SPECIES : Amelanchier alnifolia | Saskatoon Serviceberry
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES : Amelanchier alnifolia | Saskatoon Serviceberry
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Saskatoon serviceberry is top-killed by moderate to severe fire. Larger branches may survive light-severity fire [19,80,95]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Saskatoon serviceberry sprouts after top-kill by fire [9,19,95]. Bradley [19] found that on burn sites in western Montana, Saskatoon serviceberry sprouted mostly from upper portions of the root crown. When the root crown was killed by fire, Saskatoon serviceberry sprouted from rhizomes further beneath the soil surface. Seed production may resume soon after fire: Saskatoon serviceberry sprouts produced fruits the second summer after a July 1977 wildfire in Pattee Canyon near Missoula, Montana [56]. Saskatoon serviceberry cover usually increases [9] or is unaffected [9,97] by fire. Even when there is little change between pre- and postfire cover, fire usually makes Saskatoon serviceberry more accessible as wildlife browse by lowering shrub height [97]. Arno and others [9] found that in western Montana, Saskatoon serviceberry cover generally increased after wildland or prescribed fires in Douglas-fir/ninebark habitat types. It sometimes took 10 or more years before the increase occurred, however. The authors suggested that slow recovery in some areas may be due to big game browsing pressure after fire. Current-year annual twig production is usually greater after fire in the absence of heavy browsing pressure [9,24]. In a mountain brush community in Wyoming, Saskatoon serviceberry mortality was 12 percent, 15 percent, and 15 percent, 1, 2, and 3 years after fall wildfire, respectively. Mortality after spring prescribed burning a nearby site was one, two, and two percent at postfire years 1, 2, and 3. Postfire browsing pressure was not heavy, but wildfire- and prescription-burned areas were browsed more than unburned areas. Despite this, current-year twig production was significantly greater on burned sites than on unburned sites in postfire years 1 to 3. Current-year annual twig production was greater on the wildfire-burned site than on the spring prescribed-burned site (37 vs. 15 g/plant) [24]. Fire season: In a western Montana study contrasting the ability of spring vs. fall prescribed fire to improve wildlife habitat, severe fall fire killed 15 percent of Saskatoon serviceberry plants on the site, while a less severe spring treatment killed only 5 percent. Sprouting response in the first 2 postfire years was greater on the spring burn [79]. Fire in various habitat/plant community types: In a western redcedar (Thuja plicata)/ninebark habitat type of central Idaho, Saskatoon serviceberry sprouted from the root crown and grew rapidly after prescribed burning. Height growth of sprouts follows [11]. (Prefire height not available.) Height (m) __________________________ Avery Site Lochsa Site postfire year 1 0.9 1.2 postfire year 2 1.5 1.3 postfire year 3 1.2 3.0 unburned control 2.3 3.2 In Douglas-fir/blue huckleberry (Vaccinium membranaceum) habitat types of western Montana, prescribed fire had little effect on Saskatoon serviceberry cover [11]. Near Ketchum, Idaho, a prescribed fire was conducted on August 1, 1963, to reduce dwarf-mistletoe (Arceuthobium douglasii) infestation in Douglas-fir and to promote sprouting of browse, which was above browseline. The fire was successful in both respects. Saskatoon serviceberry recovered from the fire as follows [68,69]: Plants*/1,000 sq ft Percent Canopy Cover ___________________ ____________________ prefire 0.2 0.25 postfire yr 1 0.1 0.03 postfire yr 2 0.1 0.05 postfire yr 3 0.2 0.06 postfire yr 4 0.1 0.06 postfire yr 5 0.1 0.09 postfire yr 6 0.3 0.12 postfire yr 7 0.2 0.12 ___________________________________________________________________________ *only plants over 18 inches in height were included in density measurements After prescribed fire in Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana) woodlands in western Washington, Saskatoon serviceberry sprouts were most common on sites that were treated with low-severity fire and had no prefire mechanical disturbance. Saskatoon serviceberry sprouts usually co-occurred with Oregon white oak sprouts on such sites. Neither Saskatoon serviceberry sprouts, Saskatoon serviceberry seedlings, nor Oregon white oak sprouts occurred on microsites that were heavily disturbed before fire. After prescribed fire, those microsites were colonized by herbs, especially exotic herbs, and Oregon white oak seedlings [1]. Saskatoon serviceberry appears to be slow to recover from prescribed burning in the sub-boreal spruce-fir (Picea-Abies spp.) zone in British Columbia [45]. Response to very frequent fire: Saskatoon serviceberry response to repeated burning is unclear. In a quaking aspen-rough fescue (Festuca scabrella) ecotone in Alberta, Saskatoon serviceberry was one of the few woody shrubs that was not harmed by low-severity annual spring prescribed fire. Frequency was 8 percent on unburned sites and 16 percent on annually burned sites. Canopy cover was not significantly different between the two areas (4 and 1.4 percent, respectively) [5]. In the Willamette Valley of Oregon, Kalapuyan Indians apparently controlled Saskatoon serviceberry with frequent fire in order to promote acorn production by Oregon white oak. Open oak savannas were noted by early travellers, but in the absence of aboriginal burning, Saskatoon serviceberry has formed a closed subcanopy in Oregon white oak woodlands [18]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Saskatoon serviceberry is most vigorous in seral plant communities [9,48,51], and prescribed fire can be used to maintain and/or promote seral communities. On big game rangelands, prescribed fire can improve condition of Saskatoon serviceberry and other shrubs by reducing shrub height, promoting growth of new twigs, and increasing nutritional content of browse [9,68,73]. Sites where prescribed burning may harm Saskatoon serviceberry in the long term include harsh (especially very dry) sites with low Saskatoon serviceberry density [48], and very cold sites where postfire growth would be limited by temperature [45]. Fire stimulates production of Saskatoon serviceberry by killing understory conifers, removing old Saskatoon serviceberry topgrowth, and promoting sprouting [9,73]. On Douglas-fir/ninebark winter elk range on the Lolo National Forest, Montana, Makela [71] found that after spring prescribed fire, biomass production of new Saskatoon serviceberry twigs was significantly greater (p < 0.1) on burned sites than on unburned sites the first two growing seasons after fire. Ponderosa pine: Saskatoon serviceberry usually occurs in the moister, cooler ponderosa pine habitat types. Average loading of downed and dead woody fuels is slightly higher than in drier ponderosa pine types. Fire hazard is further increased by the tendency of this type to form subcanopies and dog-hair thickets of conifer saplings. Wildfire hazard is particularly high in this type during drought. Common management objectives are to eliminate large areas of overstocking and create a two-storied stand rather than a multilayered one. Periodic prescribed surface fire in early spring or late fall is recommended. Fuels management includes treatment of slash following logging and thinning, and controlling stocking levels. Scattered thickets of Saskatoon serviceberry and other shrubs can be left for wildlife [34]. Quaking aspen: Light fuels and grazing can inhibit fire spread in quaking aspen. Brown and Simmerman [22] assigned probabilities of successful prescribed burning in quaking aspen/Saskatoon serviceberry habitat types as follows: Fuel Type _____________________________________________________ Grazing Woody Fuel Aspen/serviceberry Mixed aspen-conifer/serviceberry _____________________________________________________________________________ ungrazed light high high ungrazed heavy high high grazed light moderate moderate grazed heavy high high

Related categories for SPECIES : Amelanchier alnifolia | Saskatoon Serviceberry

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.