1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Shrub > Species: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
ABBREVIATION : CHACAL SYNONYMS : Cassandra calyculata (L.) D. Don. SCS PLANT CODE : CHCA2 COMMON NAMES : leatherleaf Cassandra TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of leatherleaf is Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench. It is in the heather family (Ericaceae) [25,36,44]. Recognized varieties are [25]: C. c. var. calyculata C. c. var. angustifolia (Ait.) Rehd. C. c. var. latifolia (Ait.) Fern. LIFE FORM : Shrub FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : Leatherleaf was listed as threatened in Illinois in 1989 by the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board [77]. COMPILED BY AND DATE : Diane S. Pavek, June 1993 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Pavek, Diane S. 1993. Chamaedaphne calyculata. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Leatherleaf is circumboreal and is found throughout Alaska and Canada [36]. Its distribution extends southward through the Lake States and the northeastern United States [25,70]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White - red - jack pine FRES11 Spruce - fir FRES19 Aspen - birch STATES : AK CT IL IN IA ME MA MI MN NH NJ NY NC ND OH RI VT WI AB BC MB NB NF NT NS ON PE PQ SK YT ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : ACAD APIS CACO CUVA DENA FIIS INDU ISRO LACL PIRO SLBE VOYA WRST YUCH BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : NO-ENTRY KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K093 Great Lakes spruce - fir forest K094 Conifer bog K095 Great Lakes pine forest K096 Northeastern spruce - fir forest K106 Northern hardwoods K107 Northern hardwoods - fir forest K108 Northern hardwoods - spruce forest K110 Northeastern oak - pine forest SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 5 Balsam fir 12 Black spruce 13 Black spruce - tamarack 19 Gray birch - red maple 21 Eastern white pine 37 Northern white-cedar 38 Tamarack 45 Pitch pine 97 Atlantic white-cedar 107 White spruce SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Leatherleaf is a dominant shrub in seral dwarf-shrub wetland communities [15,16,48]. Leatherleaf occurs in pure stands on floating mats and in mixed stands that are grounded [33]. Leatherleaf associations are the most extensive communities in the bogs of the Lake States. Several subtypes of leatherleaf associations have been described for New England peatlands [20]. Sphagnum-leatherleaf community types have been described for this region and Canada [17]. Leatherleaf is usually present in the tall-shrub community types of bogs or heathlands [20,76]. In central and northern Canada, leatherleaf has been included in various open black spruce (Picea mariana) vegetation types [17,43,49,73]. Leatherleaf is named as a dominant or indicator species in the following classifications: (1) Ecology of peat bogs of the glaciated northeastern United States: A community profile [16] (2) Community classification of the vascular vegetation of a New Hampshire peatland [20] (3) Plant communities of Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, U.S.A. [48]. Species associated with leatherleaf that are not mentioned above are codominant shrubs such as bog kalmia (Kalmia polifolia), sheep laurel (K. angustifolia), bog labrador tea (Ledum groenlandica), blueleaf bog-rosemary (Andromeda glaucophylla), bog cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos), and sweet gale (Myrica gale) [20,48,55,73,76]. Other species occurring with leatherleaf are roundleaf sundew (Drosera rotundifolia), pitcherplant (Sarracenia purpurea), and sedges (Carex spp.) [16,17,39,48].

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Leatherleaf is browsed and used for nesting by wildlife. It was a minor part of white-tailed deer winter browse in New Jersey [54]. Leatherleaf was consumed in small amounts by caribou in Michigan and northern Canada [14,61,67,69]. Sharp-tailed grouse browsed leatherleaf twigs during the winter in Wisconsin [68]. Moose occasionally browsed leatherleaf from June to November on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska [51]. Mallards nest in leatherleaf in North Dakota [13]. Leatherleaf occurred in cover types used year-round by ruffed grouse [57]. PALATABILITY : NO-ENTRY NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Current year's growth of leatherleaf that was collected in July and August in southeastern Manitoba had 7.5 percent crude protein, 48.1 percent acid detergent fiber, and 49.3 percent dry matter digestibility. One-year-old leaves had slightly more crude protein (8.0 percent) and less acid detergent fiber (33.4 percent) and dry matter digestibility (44.3 percent) [67]. COVER VALUE : NO-ENTRY VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : Leatherleaf reclaimed large areas in raised bogs in the eastern United States that had been denuded by commercial peat removal over the past 4 to 92 years [24]. Seven years after powerline construction in a treed bog in northern Manitoba, leatherleaf had two times more biomass than other shrubs present. It had a frequency of 78 percent in disturbed areas and 94 percent in the control [71]. In the Pinhook Bog of Indiana, sphagnum mats containing leatherleaf were successfully transplanted to other bog areas that had been killed by runoff from stockpiled road salt [82]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : NO-ENTRY MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Leatherleaf greatly increases following clearcutting; leatherleaf and other shrubs can suppress black spruce on medium to poor sites [42]. In Minnesota, leatherleaf and other shrubs rapidly increased after tree harvest; however, restocking was not affected by shrub density 4 to 6 years after harvest [37]. Despite dense leatherleaf in a black spruce swamp in Ontario, relative regeneration rates of black spruce were high [41]. There was no difference in stocking rates on nine burned and unburned cutover black spruce sites in northern Minnesota; seedbed cover by leatherleaf and bog labrador tea was at acceptable levels [1]. Control of leatherleaf by herbicides has been discussed [60]. Aboveground biomass of leatherleaf was estimated at 136.7 pounds per acre (122 kg/ha) for wildlife browse and ground fuels in open black spruce bogs in Nova Scotia [78]. Transplanting leatherleaf in summer or autumn stimulated shoot production more than spring transplanting [26].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Leatherleaf is a native evergreen shrub that grows up to 4.9 feet (1.5 m) tall [25,43]. Its woody rhizome extends down an average of 12.6 inches (32 cm) into organic matter [27]. Leatherleaf has many branches and forms dense thickets of up to 18.6 stems per square foot (200 stems/sq m) [10,33]. Average basal diameter of leatherleaf stems is 0.27 inch (0.68 cm) [21]. The one-sided racemes have 1 to 15 or more flowers that form persistent, many-seeded capsules [10,43,65]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Phanerophyte Geophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Moist sphagnum surrounding leatherleaf shoots, roots, and rhizomes causes vigorous vegetative growth [5,26]. Sphagnum grows on leatherleaf stems and branches but does not inhibit growth [12,18]. Ice will break up leatherleaf shrubs, resulting in rapid expansion of colonies [33]. Leatherleaf establishes in windfall areas [18]. Leatherleaf seed set is usually high (50 to 95 percent). Seed set decreased when insects such as bombus bees were excluded from flowers. When self-fertilized, leatherleaf has low seed set (1 to 15 percent) [65]. Leatherleaf seeds germinate on sphagnum or sedge mats [12]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Leatherleaf is a true bog species and is found in practically all boreal bogs [18]. It occurs in lowland sites, treed or treeless bogs, peatlands, sedge fens and meadows, black spruce muskegs, and kettle pond edges [2,19,55,59]. It is found at elevations up to 5,300 feet (1,615 m) [47]. Sites are often poorly drained or have standing water [48,63]. Leatherleaf is acid tolerant and usually occurs where the pH is less than 5; it needs acidic conditions to become dominant [11,38,66]. It commonly occurs in drier areas on sedge mats that may be floating or in wet peat that is up to 43 feet (13 m) thick [12,16,38,55,83]. Leatherleaf is found on very moist ombrotrophic or minerotrophic sites with low nutrients [3,4,7]. It occurs on substrates such as thin till overlain with sandy loam or fine loamy clays with varying depths of humus, or on entirely organic substrates [7,30,43]. Permafrost is often discontinuous and can be shallow where leatherleaf grows [6,8,58]. Leatherleaf is found in maritime to continental climates with extreme seasonal variations in temperature [8,34]. Leatherleaf grows poorly on exposed sites with severe winters [16,33]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Facultative Seral Species Although leatherleaf is not a pioneer mat former, it is a primary species in extending the bog mat [11,16,22,62]. It is the first shrub to enter a bog community after sphagnum is established [11,53]. Leatherleaf is characteristic of the mature and late stages of moss-low ericaceous shrub communities as open water in a bog sere disappears. It may dominate for 50 years in some communities [11,18,31]. Leatherleaf is shade intolerant [53,77]. Leathleaf stands begin to thin as tall shrubs or bog forest species such as tamarack (Larix laricina) and/or black spruce establish [11,33,35,63,73]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Leatherleaf flowers from March to July from buds formed the previous growing season [10,25,47,75]. Fruits develop in late summer and fall [10,47,75].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Leatherleaf's persistence in communities over long periods of time has been attributed to its regeneration following fire [17]. Its rhizomes are buried deep in the mineral soil and survive all but the most severe fires [26]. Depth of rhizomes and season of fire affect leatherleaf shoot growth and recovery. Leatherleaf rhizomes were collected in spring, summer, and autumn and subjected to wet heat treatments from 113 to 140 degrees Fahrenheit (45-60 deg C). All autumn-collected rhizomes died after treatment. Summer-collected rhizomes produced fewer shoots than spring-collected; both had significantly (p<0.05) fewer shoots than the controls [27]. Bogs are usually too wet to burn except during drought [56]. Fire is a primary factor disrupting boreal treed bog succession; leatherleaf invades after fires remove the tree associations [9,22,28,33]. Recurrent fires at approximately 50-year intervals in New England leatherleaf bogs or on peat surfaces controls tree invasion [53]. Fire recurrence in a New Brunswick bog was 370 years [28]. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Rhizomatous low woody plant, rhizome in organic mantle Surface rhizome/chamaephytic root crown Rhizomatous shrub, rhizome in soil Secondary colonizer - off-site seed

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Fire top-kills leatherleaf. Leatherleaf probably survives severe fires because rhizomes are deep in water-saturated substrates and its stems are matted in debris [28,33]. Surviving root crowns and rhizomes sprout. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Leatherleaf was only slightly injured by summer or autumn fires in New Brunswick. Following spring burning, leatherleaf showed a strong increase in stem density; apparently, it had not yet depleted its reserves and was able to support new growth. Preburn and postburn percent relative abundance (stem density) after spring, summer, and autumn fires was as follows [26,29]: Season of Postburn burn Preburn 1 month 3 months 5 months -------------------------------------------------------------------- Spring 28 42 13 -- Summer 30 29 29 17 Autumn 36 32 -- -- Ten years after a lightning fire in Alaska, leatherleaf was present in low amounts on disturbed firelines and in one burned site [80]. It was present at 0.7 percent frequency in burned and at 2 percent frequency in unburned areas 20 to 24 years following fire in the Northwest Territories [45]. In northern Quebec, leatherleaf occurred 30 years after fire at 21 to 31 percent frequency in lowland boreal black spruce forest and at 1 to 20 percent in forest-tundra sites [72]. Leatherleaf had about 40 percent frequency 94 years following a high-severity fire in central New York [50]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Leatherleaf is a flammable shrub; crowning or foliage scorch is common with leatherleaf in the understory in the pine swamps or lowlands of New Jersey [52]. Fuel loading that was predominantly leatherleaf and bog labrador tea in cutover areas of black spruce was estimated at 15 to 25 tons per acre (33-56 t/ha) in the Blackduck Burns, Minnesota [40].

REFERENCES

SPECIES: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf
REFERENCES : 1. Aksamit, Scott E.; Irving, Frank D. 1984. Prescribed burning for lowland black spruce regeneration in northern Minnesota. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 14: 107-113. [7298] 2. Argus, George W. 1966. Botanical investigations in northeastern Saskatchewan: the subarctic Patterson-Hasbala Lakes region. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 80(3): 119-143. [8406] 3. Boelter, Don H.; Verry, Elon S. 1977. Peatland and water in the northern Lake States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-31. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agrciculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 22 p. [8168] 4. Brand, Gary J. 1985. Environmental indices for common Michigan trees and shrubs. Res. Pap. NC-261. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northcentral Forest Experiment Station. 5 p. [14465] 5. Bray, William L. 1920. The history of forest development on an undrained sand plain in the Adirondacks. Syracuse, NY: New York State College of Forestry. 47 p. [21340] 6. Brown, K. R.; Zobel, D. B.; Zasada, J. C. 1988. Seed dispersal, seedling emegence, and early survival of Larix laricina (DuRoi) K. Koch in the Tanana Valley, Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 18: 306-314. [7220] 7. Brumelis, G.; Carleton, T. J. 1989. The vegetation of post-logged black spruce lowlands in central Canada. II. Understory vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology. 26: 321-339. [7864] 8. Calmes, Mary A. 1976. Vegetation pattern of bottomland bogs in the Fairbanks area, Alaska. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska. 104 p. Thesis. [14785] 9. Chandler, Craig; Cheney, Phillip; Thomas, Philip; [and others}. 1983. Fire in forestry: Vol. I. Forest fire behavior and effects. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 450 p. [12241] 10. Chapman, William K.; Bessette, Alan E. 1990. Trees and shrubs of the Adirondacks. Utica, NY: North Country Books, Inc. 131 p. [12766] 11. Conway, Verona M. 1949. The bogs of central Minnesota. Ecological Monographs. 19(2): 173-206. [16686] 12. Cooper, William S. 1913. The climax forest of Isle Royale, Lake Superior, and its development. III. Botanical Gazette. 55(3): 189-235. [11539] 13. Cowardin, Lewis M.; Gilmer, David S.; Shaiffer, Charles W. 1985. Mallard recruitment in the agricultural environment of North Dakota. Wildlife Monographs No. 92. Washington, DC: The Wildlife Society. 37 p. [18150] 14. Cringan, Alexander Thom. 1957. History, food habits and range requirements of the woodland caribou of continental North America. Transactions, North American Wildlife Conference. 22: 485-501. [15651] 15. Cronan, Christopher S.; DesMeules, Marc R. 1985. A comparison of vegetative cover and tree community structure in three forested Adirondack watersheds. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 15: 881-889. [7296] 16. Damman, Antoni W. H.; French, Thomas W. 1987. The ecology of peat bogs of the glaciated northeastern United States: a community profile. Biological Report 85(7.16). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Research and Development, National Wetlands Research Center. 100 p. [9238] 17. Dansereau, Pierre. 1959. The principal plant associations of the Saint Lawrence Valley. No. 75. Montreal, Canada: Contrib. Inst. Bot. Univ. Montreal. 147 p. [8925] 18. Dansereau, Pierre; Segadas-Vianna, Fernando. 1952. Ecological study of the peat bogs of eastern North America. Canadian Journal of Botany. 30(5): 490-520. [8869] 19. Drury, William H., Jr. 1956. Bog flats and physiographic processes in the Upper Kuskokwim River region, Alaska. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium No. 178. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, The Gray Herbarium. 127 p. [12996] 20. Dunlop, D. A. 1987. Community classification of the vascular vegetation of a New Hampshire peatland. Rhodora. 89(860): 415-440. [20275] 21. Ehrenfeld, Joan G. 1986. Wetlands of the New Jersey Pine Barrens: the role of species composition in community function. American Midland Naturalist. 115(2): 301-313. [8650] 22. Elliott-Fisk, Deborah L. 1988. The boreal forest. In: Barbour, Michael G.; Billings, William Dwight, eds. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press: 33-62. [13878] 23. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905] 24. Famous, Norman C.; Spencer, M. 1989. Revegetation patterns in mined peatlands in central and eastern North America studied. Restoration and Management Notes. 7(2): 95-96. [10171] 25. Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. [Corrections supplied by R. C. Rollins]. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press. 1632 p. (Dudley, Theodore R., gen. ed.; Biosystematics, Floristic & Phylogeny Series; vol. 2). [14935] 26. Flinn, Marguerite Adele. 1980. Heat penetration and early postfire regeneration of some understory species in the Acadian forest. Halifax, NB: University of New Brunswick. 87 p. Thesis. [9876] 27. Flinn, Marguerite A.; Pringle, Joan K. 1983. Heat tolerance of rhizomes of several understory species. Canadian Journal of Botany. 61: 452-457. [8444] 28. Flinn, Marguerite A.; Wein, Ross W. 1977. Depth of underground plant organs and theoretical survival during fire. Canadian Journal of Botany. 55: 2550-2554. [6362] 29. Flinn, Marguerite A.; Wein, Ross W. 1988. Regrowth of forest understory species following seasonal burning. Canadian Journal of Botany. 66: 150-155. [3014] 30. Ford, Mary S. (Jesse). 1990. A 10,000-yr history of natural ecosystem acidification. Ecological Monographs. 60(1): 57-89. [11411] 31. Frolik, A. L. 1941. Vegetation on the peat lands of Dane County, Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs. 11(1): 117-140. [16805] 32. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998] 33. Gates, Frank C. 1942. The bogs of northern lower Michigan. Ecological Monographs. 12(3): 213-254. [10728] 34. Glaser, Paul H. 1992. Raised bogs in eastern North America--regional controls for species richness and floristic assemblages. Journal of Ecology. 80(3): 535-554. [18425] 35. Glaser, Paul H.; Janssens, Jan A.; Siegel, Donald I. 1990. The response of vegetation to chemical and hydrological gradients in the Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota. Journal of Ecology. 78: 1021-1048. [14341] 36. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329] 37. Heinselman, M. L. 1959. Natural regeneration of swamp black spruce in Minnesota under various cutting systems. Production Res. Rep. No. 32. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 22 p. [14735] 38. Heinselman, M. L. 1970. Landscape evolution, peatland types and the environment in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands Natural Area, Minnesota. Ecological Monographs. 40(2): 235-261. [8378] 39. Hogg, Edward H.; Wein, Ross W. 1988. The contribution of Typha components to floating mat buoyancy. Ecology. 69(4): 1025-1031. [18405] 40. Humrickhouse, A. Bruce. 1986. Aerial ignition for prescribed burning in Minnesota. In: Koonce, Andrea L., ed. Prescribed burning in the Midwest: state-of-the-art: Proceedings of a symposium; 1986 March 3-6; Stevens Point, WI. Stevens Point, WI: University of Wisconsin, College of Natural Resources, Fire Science Center: 138-145. [16281] 41. Jeglum, J. K. 1975. Classification of swamp for forestry problems. In: Fraser, J. W.; Jeglum, J. K.; Ketcheson, D. E.; Robinson, F. C.; Van Bers, H. P. G.; McLain, K. M.; Auld, J. M., technical coordinators. Black Spruce Symposium; 1975 September 23-25; Thunder Bay, ON. Symposium Proceedings 0-P-4. Sault Ste. Marie, ON: Department of the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forest Research Centre: 227-241. [8837] 42. Johnston, William F. 1977. Manager's handbook for black spruce in the North Central States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-34. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 18 p. [8684] 43. Jones, R. Keith; Pierpoint, Geoffrey; Wickware, Gregory M.; [and others]. 1983. Field guide to forest ecosystem classification for the Clay Belt, site region 3e. Maple, Ontario: Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forest Research Institute. 160 p. [16163] 44. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954] 45. Kelsall, John P. 1957. Continued barren-ground caribou studies. Wildlife Management Bulletin Series 1: No. 12. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, National Parks Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service. 148 p. [16597] 46. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 47. Kudish, Michael. 1992. Adirondack upland flora: an ecological perspective. Saranac, NY: The Chauncy Press. 320 p. [19376] 48. Kurmis, Vilis; Webb, Sara L.; Merriam, Lawrence C., Jr. 1986. Plant communities of Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Botany. 64: 531-540. [16088] 49. Larsen, James A. 1971. Vegetational relationships with air mass frequencies: boreal forest and tundra. Arctic. 24: 177-194. [8258] 50. LeBlanc, Cheryl M.; Leopold, Donald J. 1992. Demography and age structure of a central New York shrub-carr 94 years after fire. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 119(1): 50-64. [18208] 51. LeResche, Robert E.; Davis, James L. 1973. Importance of nonbrowse foods to moose on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management. 37(3): 279-287. [13123] 52. Little, S. 1964. Fire ecology and forest management in the New Jersey pine region. In: Proceedings, 3rd annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1964 April 9-10; Tallahassee, FL. No. 3. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 35-59. [5893] 53. Little, Silas. 1974. Effects of fire on temperate forests: northeastern United States. In: Kozlowski, T. T.; Ahlgren, C. E., eds. Fire and ecosystems. New York: Academic Press: 225-250. [9859] 54. Little, Silas; Moorhead, George R.; Somes, Horace A. 1958. Forestry and deer in the Pine Region of New Jersey. Station Pap. No. 109. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 33 p. [11681] 55. Laderman, Aimlee D.; Golet, Francis C.; Sorrie, Bruce A.; Woolsey, Henry L. 1987. Atlantic white cedar in the glaciated Northeast. In: Laderman, Aimlee D., ed. Atlantic white cedar wetlands. [Place of publication unknown]: Westview Press: 19-34. [15872] 56. Loope, Walter L. 1991. Interrelationships of fire history, land use history, and landscape pattern within Pictured Rocks National Seashore, Michigan. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 105(1): 18-28. [5950] 57. Magnus, Lester T. 1949. Cover type use of the ruffed grouse in relation to forest management on the Cloquet Forest Experiment Station. Flicker. 21(2): 29-44. [16207] 58. Maikawa, E.; Kershaw, K. A. 1976. Studies on lichen-dominated systems. XIX. The postfire recovery sequence of black spruce-lichen woodland in the Abitau Lake region, N.W.T. Canadian Journal of Botany. 54: 2679-2687. [7225] 59. Maini, J. S. 1966. Pytoecological study of sylvotundra at Small Tree Lake, N.W.T. Arctic. 19: 220-243. [8259] 60. Martin, Alex C.; Erickson, Ray C.; Steenis, John H. 1957. Improving duck marshes by weed control. Circular 19 (Revised). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. 60 p. [16324] 61. Miller, Donald R. 1976. Taiga winter range relationships and diet. Canadian Wildlife Service Rep. Series No. 36. Ottawa, ON: Environment Canada, Wildlife Service. 42 p. (Biology of the Kaminuriak population of barren-ground caribou; pt 3). [13007] 62. Motzkin, Glenn H.; Patterson, William A., III. 1991. Vegetation patterns and basin morphometry of a New England moat bog. Rhodora. 93(876): 307-321. [17360] 63. Pearce, C. M.; McLennan, D.; Cordes, L. D. 1988. The evolution and maintenance of white spruce woodlands on the Mackenzie Delta, N. W. T., Canada. Holarctic Ecology. 11(4): 248-258. [10472] 64. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843] 65. Reader, R. J. 1977. Bog ericad flowers: self-compatibility and relative attractiveness to bees. Canadian Journal of Botany. 55(17): 2279-2287. [10089] 66. Santelmann, Mary V. 1991. Influences on the distribution of Carex exilis: an experimental approach. Ecology. 72(6): 2025-2037. [17244] 67. Schaefer, James A.; Pruitt, William O., Jr. 1991. Fire and woodland caribou in southeastern Manitoba. Wildlife Monograph No. 116. Washington, DC: The Wildlife Society, Inc. 39 p. [15247] 68. Schmidt, F. J. W. 1936. Winter food of the sharp-tailed grouse and pinnated grouse in Wisconsin. Wilson Bulletin. September: 186-203. [16729] 69. Scotter, George W. 1967. The winter diet of barren-ground caribou in northern Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 81: 33-39. [16672] 70. Seymour, Frank Conkling. 1982. The flora of New England. 2d ed. Phytologia Memoirs 5. Plainfield, NJ: Harold N. Moldenke and Alma L. Moldenke. 611 p. [7604] 71. Sims, R. A.; Stewart, J. M. 1981. Aerial biomass distribution in an undisturbed and disturbed subarctic bog. Canadian Journal of Botany. 59: 782-786. [8414] 72. Sirois, Luc; Payette, Serge. 1989. Postfire black spruce establishment in subarctic and boreal Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research. 19: 1571-1580. [10110] 73. Stallard, Harvey. 1929. Secondary succession in the climax forest formations of northern Minnesota. Ecology. 10(4): 476-547. [3808] 74. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090] 75. Stone, W. 1973. The plants of southern New Jersey. Boston, MA: Qarterman Publications, Inc. 892 p. [21089] 76. Strang, R. M. 1971. The ecology of the rocky heathlands of western Nova Scotia. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1970 August 20-21; Fredericton, NB. No. 10. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 287-292. [5466] 77. Taft, John B.; Solecki, Mary Kay. 1990. Vascular flora of the wetland and prairie communities of Gavin Bog and Prairie Nature Preserve, Lake County, Illinois. Rhodora. 92(871): 142-165. [14522] 78. Telfer, E. S. 1972. Understory biomass in five forest types in southwestern Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Botany. 50: 1263-1267. [13933] 79. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573] 80. Viereck, Leslie A. 1982. Effects of fire and firelines on active layer thickness and soil temperatures in interior Alaska. In: Proceedings, 4th Canadian permafrost conference; 1981 March 2-6; Calgary, AB. The Roger J.E. Brown Memorial Volume. Ottawa, ON: National Research Council of Canada: 123-135. [7303] 81. Vogl, Richard J. 1964. The effects of fire on a muskeg in northern Wisconsin. Journal of Wildlife Management. 28(2): 317-329. [12170] 82. Wilcox, Douglas A.; Ray, Gary. 1989. Using "living mat" transplants to restore a salt-impacted bog (Indiana). Restoration and Management Notes. 7(1): 39. [8063] 83. Zoltai, S. C.; Tarnocai, C. 1971. Properties of a wooded palsa in northern Manitoba. Arctic and Alpine Research. 3(2): 115-129. [9778]

Index

Related categories for Species: Chamaedaphne calyculata | Leatherleaf

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.