1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Shrub > Species: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
ABBREVIATION : TOXRAD SYNONYMS : Rhus radicans L. Rhus toxicodendron L. R. t. var. malacotrichocarpa (A. H. Moore) Fern. SCS PLANT CODE : TORA2 COMMON NAMES : poison-ivy eastern poison-ivy vine poison-ivy TAXONOMY : The currently accepted name of poison-ivy is Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze; it is in the cashew family (Anacardiaceae) [39]. Poison-ivy is a highly variable taxon. There is disagreement in the literature regarding this species and its infrataxa. This report follows the nomeclature of Gillis [39]. Recognized subspecies are geographical segregates. Two subspecies present in eastern Asia are T. r. ssp. orientale and T. r. ssp. hispidum [39]. Subspecies found in North and Central Americas are [39]: Taxon Location T. r. ssp. radicans Atlantic Coast T. r. ssp. barkleyi Gillis Mexico & Central America T. r. ssp. divaricatum (Greene) F. A. Barkl. Mexico & Arizona T. r. ssp. eximium (Greene) Gillis Mexico & Texas T. r. ssp. negundo (Greene) Gillis west of Appalachians T. r. ssp. pubens (Engelm. ex S. Wats.) Gillis southeastern United States T. r. ssp. verrucosum (Scheele) Gillis Oklahoma & Texas. LIFE FORM : Vine, Shrub FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY COMPILED BY AND DATE : Diane S. Pavek, December 1992 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Pavek, Diane S. 1992. Toxicodendron radicans. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : The range of poison-ivy extends from southern Ontario east to Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island [47,59,70,103]. Poison-ivy occurs in all states east of the southern Cascades, Great Basin, and Mojave Desert [39,41,60,95,104]. Populations continue southward through Central America to Guatemala [18,39,40,60,112]. Poison-ivy is also native to eastern Asia [39]. Although poison-ivy has been listed as occurring in the following parks, it is probably misindentified, as these parks are within the range limits of western poison-ivy (Toxicondendron rydbergii): Arches National Park (ARCH), Canyonlands National Park (CANY), Capitol Reef National Park (CARE), Coulee Dam Recreation Area (CODA), Glacier National Park (GLAC), Grand Teton National Park (GRTE), Gulf Islands National Seashore (GUIS), John Day Fossil Beds National Monument (JODA), Natchez Trace Parkway (NATR), Natural Bridges National Monument (NABR), Timpanogos Cave National Monument (TICA), Yellowstone National Park (YELL), Zion National Park (ZION). [See the western poison ivy write-up in the FEIS data base.] ECOSYSTEMS : FRES12 Longleaf - slash pine FRES13 Loblolly - shortleaf pine FRES14 Oak - pine FRES15 Oak - hickory FRES16 Oak - gum - cypress FRES17 Elm - ash - cottonwood FRES18 Maple - beech - birch FRES19 Aspen - birch FRES21 Ponderosa pine FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe FRES35 Pinyon - juniper FRES38 Plains grasslands FRES39 Prairie STATES : AL AZ AR CO CT DE FL GA IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MO NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK PA RI SC SD TN TX VT VA WV NS ON PE PQ MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : ACAD ALPO ANTI ASIS BADL BAND BIBE BICY BISO BITH BLRI BUFF CACH CACO CAHA CALO CACA CATO CHCH COLO COSW CORO CUGA CUIS CUVA DEWA DINO EFMO EVER FIIS FOBO FODO GATE GWCA GWMP GRSM GUMO HOBE HOSP INDU ISRO JECA JOFL LAMR MACA MANA MEVE MORR NERI OBRI OZAR PIRO RICH ROCR ROMO SAGU SHEN SHIL SLBE THRO VAFO WACA WICR BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 7 Lower Basin and Range 13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont 14 Great Plains 16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland K024 Juniper steppe woodland K031 Oak - juniper woodlands K061 Mesquite - acacia savanna K067 Wheatgrass - bluestem - needlegrass K069 Bluestem - grama prairie K072 Sea oats prairie K079 Palmetto prairie K080 Marl - everglades K081 Oak savanna K086 Juniper - oak savanna K091 Cypress savanna K098 Northern floodplain forest K099 Maple - basswood forest K100 Oak - hickory forest K101 Elm - ash forest K102 Beech - maple forest K103 Mixed mesophytic forest K104 Appalachian oak forest K106 Northern hardwoods K110 Northeastern oak - pine forest K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest K112 Southern mixed forest K113 Southern floodplain forest SAF COVER TYPES : 14 Northern pin oak 20 White pine - northern red oak - red maple 24 Hemlock - yellow birch 25 Sugar maple - beech - yellow birch 26 Sugar maple - basswood 27 Sugar maple 40 Post oak - blackjack oak 42 Bur oak 52 White oak - black oak - northern red oak 53 White oak 59 Yellow-poplar - white oak - northern red oak 60 Beech - sugar maple 61 River birch - sycamore 62 Silver maple - American elm 63 Cottonwood 64 Sassafras - persimmon 65 Pin oak - sweetgum 70 Longleaf pine 71 Longleaf pine - scrub oak 74 Cabbage palmetto 75 Shortleaf pine 76 Shortleaf pine - oak 80 Loblolly pine - shortleaf pine 81 Loblolly pine 82 Loblolly pine - hardwood 83 Longleaf pine - slash pine 88 Willow oak - water oak - diamondleaf oak 89 Live oak 92 Sweetgum - willow oak 93 Sugarberry - American elm - green ash 94 Sycamore - sweetgum - American elm 95 Black willow 96 Overcup oak - water hickory 97 Atlantic white-cedar 98 Pond pine 100 Pondcypress 101 Baldcypress 102 Baldcypress - tupelo 108 Red maple SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Poison-ivy is not an indicator or uniquely associated with a particular community type [119]. It is a dominant understory plant in Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii) community type [80]. Poison-ivy was one of the seven most frequently occurring plants in the herbaceous layer of a shagbark hickory (Carya ovata) community type. There were an average of 3,540 stems per acre (8741 stems/ha), with 80 individuals attaining a size class 2 (0.01-0.5 inch [0.03-1.3 cm] d.b.h.) [113]. Poison-ivy was an understory dominant in a northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis)- cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var. pagodaefolia) community. Poison-ivy occurred with 55 percent relative frequency in the Wisconsin habitat type white pine/hog peanut (Pinus strobus/Amphicarpa bracteata) [63]. Poison-ivy is subdominant in Nebraska smooth sumac-American hazel (Rhus glabra-Corylus americana) associes, bur oak-bitternut hickory (Quercus macrocarpa-Carya cordiformis) associes, and green ash-American elm (Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Ulmus americana) associes [3]. It is subdominant in buffaloberry (Shepherdia argentea) communities in North Dakota [51]. Poison-ivy occurs in the spike grass-beardgrass-croton (Uniola laxa-Andropogon spp.-Croton glandulosus) community type [10]. Poison-ivy is listed as a dominant in the following community or habitat type publications: (1) Phytogeographia Laurentiana. II. The principal plant associations of the Saint Lawrence Valley [20]. (2) The "big woods" of Minnesota: its structure, and relation to climate, fire, and soils [21]. (3) Field guide to forest habitat types of northern Wisconsin [63]. (4) Woodland communities and soils of Fort Bayard, southwestern New Mexico [80]. (5) An ecological investigation of the oakwood bottoms Greentree Reservoir in Illinois [113].

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Animals generally are not susceptible to poison-ivy-induced dermatitis [60,109]. In southern Indiana, poison-ivy was one of the seven most important taxa consumed in winter by white-tailed deer [106]. Two studies showed that white-tailed deer preferred to eat poison-ivy over other available browse [55,85]. Poison-ivy leaves were eaten by white-tailed deer with greater frequency in summer (81 percent) than in spring (67 percent) [85,106]. Nixon and others [90] reported that white-tailed deer ate poison-ivy fruits as a principal food item; fruits were consumed fall through spring. Poison-ivy produces soft mast [88]. A wide variety of migrant and resident nongame and upland game birds consume the fruits; it is considered a preferred species [11,45,56,64,77]. Ripe fruits become conspicuous and are usually one of the most abundant foods available for birds in fall and winter [45,61,77,79,126]. PALATABILITY : NUTRITIONAL VALUE : NO-ENTRY COVER VALUE : NO-ENTRY VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : For 50 years, poison-ivy has been planted to prevent dike erosion in the Netherlands [39]. To restore Louisiana bottomland that had been cleared for farming, oaks (Quercus spp.) were planted. Other species, including poison-ivy, were allowed to move in naturally. Within several years, poison-ivy occurred in all land sites in varying densities [5]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : Poison-ivy sap has been used to make indelible ink [120]. Despite its dermatitis-causing properties, poison-ivy is cultivated in gardens [39]. It is used for horticultural displays where it is valued for its red autumn foliage [39]. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Poison-ivy sap causes allergic contact dermatitis in humans [72]. The active agent is urushiol, which exudes from broken resin ducts in most plant parts [84]. Plants are variously poisonous depending on time of year and plant maturity, and people vary in susceptibility [79,109]. Symptoms and treatment are detailed [27,71,72,79]. Ingested leaves do not confer immunity and can cause humans serious gastric disturbance [60,109]. Poison-ivy is an important component in wetlands used for sewage management. Secondarily treated waste water or waste water from a septic tank has been dumped into pond cypress (Taxodium distichum var. nutans) stands for over 45 years; numbers of poison-ivy plants did not decline [87]. Ewel [29] compared vegetation occurring on cypress domes after various treatments with waste water; poison-ivy persisted despite the treatments. Nutrient changes did not exclude poison-ivy in New Jersey wetlands; poison-ivy occurred with high cover in control and developed sites near unpaved roads, septic systems along wetland edges, and direct stormwater sewer outfall [26]. In eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) stands thoughout the Mississippi Valley, poison-ivy vines of 4 to 5 inches (10.2-12.7 cm) in diameter grow up tree boles. There is conflicting literature stating that poison-ivy does and does not inhibit eastern cottonwood diameter growth [58]. Presence or absence of canopy cover does not influence poison-ivy growth. There was no significant (p>0.05) difference in poison-ivy productivity, measured as leaf area and biomass, after canopy removal in mixed hardwood stands in southern Michigan [78]. With a gradual increase in canopy closure (from 9 to 40 percent tree cover) and a cessation of grazing, poison-ivy cover only marginally increased [32]. Poison-ivy sometimes is an invading species. Although no attempts were made to control it, poison-ivy was a competing understory vegetation with oak seedlings in Pennsylvania and Maryland [50]. Hardin [44] evaluated an Ohio mixed oak-prairie tension zone that was not actively managed for 22 years. Poison-ivy was not present originally; however, after 22 years, it had an 8 percent cover in the transition zone. Poison-ivy was a principal invader of this grassland, with greatest abundance under overhanging tree limbs [44]. Biological Control: Grazing can control poison-ivy under specific conditions; very heavy grazing inhibits fruit production [28]. However, this is considered a stop-gap measure because release from grazing results in heavy poison-ivy infestations [28]. In the southeastern United States, larvae of poison-ivy sawfly have been studied as possible control agents for poison-ivy [28]. Poison-ivy is parasitized by a rust (Pileolaria shiraiana) which may offer future biological control [39]. Chemical Control: Poison-ivy should be treated with herbicide before flowering [28]. However, Kunzmann and Bennett [68] suggest that herbicide application should be at the height of the growing season, which is after flowering. Evans [28] recommends using glyphosate at 1 to 4 pounds active ingredient per acre (1.1-4.5 kg ai/ha) in the spring (May) or fall (September to November). Poison-ivy foliage has been wiped with a 2 percent solution of glyphosate for successful control [86]. Poison-ivy has been controlled with 3 to 4 pints active ingredient per acre (3.5-4.7 L ai/ha) of imidazolinone [68].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Poison-ivy is a native dioecious shrub, subshrub, or woody vine with various growth forms: dwarf, erect, decumbent, or high climbing [70]. It grows from 1.6 to 6.6 feet (0.5 to 2 m) high [70,109]. The trunk can grow to 5.9 inches (15 cm) in diameter [70]. Adventitious roots allow poison-ivy vines to grow to 150 feet (45.7 m) in length [22,70]. Rhizomes may be at the surface or deep in the soil [70]. Leaves are three-foliate and deciduous [79]. Flowers are in axillary panicles. The fruit is a dry, round drupe [109]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Chamaephyte Geophyte Hemicryptophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Poison-ivy reproduces vegetatively and sexually [70]. It sprouts from aboveground vines, rhizomes, and root crowns [70]. Plants take 3 years from seed to reach the flowering stage [39]. Artigas and Boerner [9] found 11 plus or minus 7 seeds per square foot (116.8 plus or minus 75.2 germinable seeds/sq. m) in mineral soil to a depth of 4 inches (10 cm) in a 20- to 60-year-old white and red pine (Pinus strobus and P. resinosa) plantation. Seeds have an oily covering and are primarily dispersed by animals [79,88]. Since the covering is buoyant, the fruit is also dispersed by waterways [79]. Poison-ivy seeds that had passed through sharp-tailed grouse digestive tracts gave good to excellent germination after both warm (86 degrees Fahrenheit [30 deg C]) and cold (68 degrees Fahrenheit [20 deg C]) stratification [64]. Seeds regurgitated by a crow exhibited 90 percent germination [79]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Poison-ivy grows in semiarid to humid regions [51,118,122]. One exception is maritime areas where it grows in a perhumid climate with localized fog [81,91]. Climate is typically continental, with short, warm to hot summers and long, cold to cool winters [51,62]. Average growing season ranges from about 150 days at its northern limit in Quebec to 240 days in the south in Florida [54,62]. Minimum temperature averages 41.6 degrees Fahrenheit (5.3 deg C) in the north and a maximum average of 66.2 degrees Fahrenheit (19 deg C) in the west [54,128]. Annual precipitation averages from a minimum of 15.4 inches (391 mm) in the northern part of its range and 18.3 inches (465 mm) in the western part to a maximum of 57 inches (1,450 mm) at the southern limit [35,48,51]. Snowfall averages between 12 and 74 inches (30.5-188 cm) over most of its range [51]. Poison-ivy occurs in a large variety of soil conditions. Soil textures may be poorly drained clays with gleying and mottling present [34,38,44,98]. Soils also may be well-drained silty loams to loamy sands [46,81,105,116,122]. Under loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) on well-drained sites, poison-ivy had an average cover of 1.4 percent; poison-ivy cover decreased to a trace in poorly drained swales of Chinese tallowtree (Sapium sebiferum) [49]. In green ash-hickory stands, poison-ivy seedlings were of higher importance (49.16) on silt loam soil compared to 7.65 importance rating on silty clay soil [43]. Soil pH varies from acidic (pH 6.0) to moderately alkaline (pH 7.9) [24,35]. Topography is flatland to rolling hills [33,56,116]. Poison-ivy also occurs on steeper slopes in the southwestern states [71]. Upper elevation limits for poison-ivy growth are 7,080 feet (2,158 m) in New Mexico and 1,700 feet (518 m) in Tennessee [35,94]. Poison-ivy is found under all moisture conditions. It was the most widely distributed species along a moisture gradient in central Illinois [1]. Poison-ivy occurs most frequently on moist, open sites [71,113]. However, Archambault and others [8] noted that poison-ivy was most characteristic of dry, open sites in Michigan. Poison-ivy is an important species in swamps and is mostly restricted to mixed swamps in Florida, not extending into bayheads [82]. It is tolerant of brackish or mildly saline water [12]. Poison-ivy can survive inundation and fluctuations in water levels (e.g., in cypress (Taxodium spp.) swamps or cabbage palmetto (Sabal palmetto) communities) because of adventitious roots along the climbing vine [118]. Seasonally flooded areas often are more alkaline because decaying plant material is washed away; poision-ivy grows better in these sites [82,83]. Poison-ivy decreased in importance with an increase in flooding depth [83]. There was no difference in poison-ivy cover between a young oxbow marsh area (inundated at some point during the year) and a mid-age oxbow. Poison-ivy was not present on the oldest oxbow, located above the floodplain [53]. Poison-ivy occurs on a large variety of sites. It is found in riparian communities, gallery forests, open dry or wet woods, and hillsides [100,121]. It occurs on sand dunes of lake shores and barrier islands [10,75,92,128]. Poison-ivy roots on the bases of cypress (Taxodium distichum) in large peat mats [23,25,83,102]. It is also found on hammocks [4,62]. Poison-ivy is common in disturbed places, such as roadside thickets, stone walls, fences, railroads, clearcuts, and orchards [18,59,104,111]. It also occurs in urban settings. Poison-ivy was 1 of 10 species most important (42.4 percent frequency) in an herbaceous layer in the Bronx, New York [127]. Common overstory associates of poison-ivy not included in Distribution and Occurrence are bur oak-aspen (Populus tremuloides), green ash, American elm, Florida torrey (Torreya taxifolia), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica) [17,73,87,107,121]. Additionally, poison-ivy occurs with sycamore (Platanus wrightii), boxelder (Acer negundo), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and redbay (Persea borbonia) [16,25,82,92, 117]. Common understory shrub associates are skunkbush (Rhus trilobata), snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis), common chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), blackberries (Rubus spp.), trumpetcreeper (Campsis radicans), and sweet fern (Comptonia peregrina) [34,37,94,107,125,128]. Associated vines are greenbrier (Smilax spp.), grapes (Vitis spp.), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) [57,93]. Other species found with poison-ivy are broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus, heartleaf foamflower (Tiarella cordifolia), sweet spire (Itea virginiana), brackenfern (Pteridium aquilinum), and lizardtail (Saururus cernuus) [16,87,99,102,108,114]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Facultative Seral Species Poison-ivy is a common intruder into ruderal sites in North America, while in Japan, it is a component of old growth [39]. Poison-ivy is an early competitor with other species that may become established in the overstory [88]. Cowles [19] classified poison-ivy as a primary dune colonizer, establishing before the xerophytic evergreen flora [19]. Poison-ivy is somewhat shade tolerant [67]. However, it was unable to compete with an introduced noxious species, Brazilian pepper-tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Florida pineland [74]. Poison-ivy occurs in subclimax associations of oak (Quercus spp.) and aspen in the Great Plains and in climax types of sugar maple-basswood (Acer saccharum-Tilia grandifolia) [14,21]. In sugar maple-basswood/prairie ecotone, poison-ivy occurred with a 3 percent frequency [65]. Poison-ivy occurs in late seral and climax communities. In secondary succession of old fields, poison-ivy was present in seral stages of 30- to 100-year-old stands (the pine stage with loblolly and shortleaf pines [Pinus echinata]) and in 150-year-old stands (the pine-hardwood stage with shortleaf pine, northern red oak [Quercus rubra], magnolia [Magnolia grandiflora], and American beech [Fagus grandifolia]) [89]. In another study, poison-ivy occurred in late seral stages of pine-hardwoods and in climax communities of magnolia and American beech [69]. Poison-ivy was present in climax white oak (Quercus alba)- American beech communities [91]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Poison-ivy flowers when the leaves are about half open [70]. It blooms May to July throughout its range [22,40,59,110]. Fruits mature from August through November [95,104,111]. Fruit may persist until the flowering next season [70,79]. Leaves are dropped after freezing temperatures in the fall.

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : With its widespread distribution, poison-ivy is a component of many fire-influenced communities. Rhizomes buried moderately deep in the soil would survive most fires. Sprouting after fire indicates that poison-ivy is adapted to moderately severe fires [31,55]. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Prostrate woody plant, stem growing on organic mantle Surface rhizome/chamaephytic root crown Rhizomatous shrub, rhizome in soil Geophyte, growing points deep in soil Secondary colonizer - off-site seed

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Poison-ivy is top-killed by fire [56]. Fruits, with their fatty covering, are probably killed along with aerial stems. Surviving rhizomes and root crowns will sprout to establish stands [31]. Fire may slow the development of surviving plants. Leafing out was delayed 1 month on burned plots compared to unburned plots in oak-hickory forests in Tennessee [31]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Poison-ivy vines may survive under unburned litter [31]. These vines provided a large portion of sprouting after a fire, although the majority of poison-ivy growth appeared to be from rhizomes protected in the soil [31]. This sprouting may result in denser growths than were present before burning [31,37]. Poison-ivy has variable responses to burning, influenced by season of burning, community type, and subsequent environmental conditions. It significantly (p<0.05) increased on burned plots [31,55]. However, Adams and others [2] rated poison-ivy as a decreaser after it was eliminated from sites by both summer and late winter burning. In Ontario pine-mixed hardwoods, poison-ivy decreased in frequency and biomass after late spring (May, June, or July) burning [42,105]. However, in longleaf pine-turkey oak (Pinus palustris-Quercus laevis) forest, poison-ivy had greater abundance on areas burned in mid-winter (January) compared to controls [7]. In oak savanna, poison-ivy increased after fall burning [6]. In a plains cottonwood (Populus sargentii) community that sustained different classes of fire damage, poison-ivy was most abundant (had the highest frequency) in stands with upper crown damage [96]. However, in a similar study in a loblolly pine stand, poison-ivy increased more after surface fire than it did after crown fire [52]. The highest poison-ivy frequency occurred with a 2-year-fire/2-year-rest rotation [124]. In bur oak-pin oak community, poison-ivy had higher frequency (12.7 percent) in plots burned annually for 14 years than in controls (5 percent) [123]. Poison-ivy was most abundant 4 years after being top-killed during fall and spring prescribed fires [56]. In Michigan, poison-ivy had the greatest frequency in communities 38 and 51 years after fire [101]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Climbing vines of poison-ivy form fuel ladders; fine fuels in ladders may be consumed in flare-ups [31]. The poison-ivy dermatitis-causing compound, urushiol, is not a volatile oil; however, it can be carried by particles of soot when the plant is burned [84,109,120]. Eyes especially should be protected [79]. The role of fire controlling poison-ivy has not been fully examined [28]. In general, carbohydrate reserves remain high until flowering, which precludes the use of spring fires as an effective control [28]. Prescribed fires and herbicide were tested for control of poison-ivy. Significantly (p<0.05) more growing points were killed when glyphosate was applied to burned plots than were killed in burned plots without herbicide [31].

REFERENCES

SPECIES: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy
REFERENCES : 1. Adams, Dwight E.; Anderson, Roger C. 1980. Species response to a moisture gradient in central Illinois forests. American Journal of Botany. 67(3): 381-392. [13295] 2. Adams, Dwight E.; Anderson, Roger C.; Collins, Scott L. 1982. Differential response of woody and herbaceous species to summer and winter burning in an Oklahoma grassland. Southwestern Naturalist. 27: 55-61. [6282] 3. Aikman, John M. 1926. Distribution and structure of the forests of eastern Nebraska. University Studies. 26(1-2): 1-75. [6575] 4. Alexander, Taylor R. 1955. Observations on the ecology of the low hammocks of southern Florida. Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences. 18(1): 21-27. [11467] 5. Allen, James A. 1990. Establishment of bottomland oak plantations on the Yazoo National Wildlife Refuge Complex. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 14(4): 206-210. [14615] 6. Apfelbaum, Steven I.; Haney, Alan W. 1990. Management of degraded oak savanna remnants in the upper Midwest: preliminary results from three years of study. In: Hughes, H. Glenn; Bonnicksen, Thomas M., eds. Restoration `89: the new management challenge: Proceedings, 1st annual meeting of the Society for Ecological Restoration; 1989 January 16-20; Oakland, CA. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Arboretum, Society for Ecological Restoration: 280-291. [14705] 7. Arata, Andrew A. 1959. Effects of burning on vegetation and rodent populations in a longleaf pine turkey oak association in north central Florida. Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences. 22(2): 94-104. [12260] 8. Archambault, Louis; Barnes, Burton V.; Witter, John A. 1989. Ecological species groups of oak ecosystems of southeastern Michigan. Forest Science. 35(4): 1058-1074. [9768] 9. Artigas, Francisco J.; Boerner, Ralph E. J. 1989. Advance regeneration and seed banking of woody plants in Ohio pine plantations: implications for landscape change. Landscape Ecology. 2(3): 139-150. [13633] 10. Au, Shu-fun. 1974. Vegetation and ecological processes on Shackleford Bank, North Carolina. Scientific Monograph Series No 6: NPS 113. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 86 p. [16101] 11. Baird, John W. 1980. The selection and use of fruit by birds in an eastern forest. Wilson Bulletin. 92(1): 63-73. [10004] 12. Beaven, George Francis; Oosting, Henry J. 1939. Pocomoke Swamp: a study of a cypress swamp on the eastern shore of Maryland. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 66: 376-389. [14507] 13. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434] 14. Bird, Ralph D. 1930. Biotic communities of the aspen parkland of central Canada. Ecology. 11(2): 356-442. [15277] 15. Breitung, August J. 1954. A botanical survey of the Cypress Hills. Canadian Field-Naturalist. 68: 55-92. [6262] 16. Brown, David E.; Lowe, Charles H.; Hausler, Janet F. 1977. Southwestern riparian communities: their biotic importance and management in Arizona. In: Johnson, R. Roy; Jones, Dale A., tech. coords. Importance, preservation and management of riparian habitat: a symposium: Proceedings; 1977 July 9; Tucson, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-43. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment 201-211. [5348] 17. Buell, Murray F.; Facey, Vera. 1960. Forest-prairie transition west of Itasca Park, Minnesota. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 87(1): 46-58. [14171] 18. Correll, Donovan S.; Johnston, Marshall C. 1970. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Renner, TX: Texas Research Foundation. 1881 p. [4003] 19. Cowles, Henry Chandler. 1899. The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Botanical Gazette. 27(4): 361-391. [11536] 20. Dansereau, Pierre. 1959. The principal plant associations of the Saint Lawrence Valley. No. 75. Montreal, Canada: Contrib. Inst. Bot. Univ. Montreal. 147 p. [8925] 21. Daubenmire, Rexford F. 1936. The "big woods" of Minnesota: its structure, and relation to climate, fire, and soils. Ecological Monographs. 6(2): 233-268. [2697] 22. Deam, Charles C. 1932. Shrubs of Indiana. Indianapolis, IN: W.B. Burford Printing Co. 351 p. [19529] 23. Dorge, Carol L.; Mitsch, William J.; Wiemhoff, John R. 1984. Cypress wetlands in southern Illinois. In: Ewel, Katherine Carter; Odum, Howard T., eds. Cypress swamps. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press: 393-404. [14861] 24. Eckardt, Nancy A.; Biesboer, David D. 1988. Ecological aspects of nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) associated with plants of a Minnesota wetland community. Canadian Journal of Botany. 66: 1359-1363. [14893] 25. Egler, Frank E. 1952. Southeast saline Everglades vegetation, Florida, and its management. Vegetatio. 3: 213-265. [11479] 26. Ehrenfeld, Joan G.; Schneider, John P. 1991. Chamaecyparis thyoides wetlands and suburbanization: effects on hydrology, water quality and plant community composition. Journal of Applied Ecology. 28(2): 467-490. [16958] 27. Epstein, William. 1990. Poison ivy, oak or sumac. Grist. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service, National Recreation and Park Association; 34(3): 29. [13794] 28. Evans, James E. 1983. Literature review of management practices for smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), poison ivy (Rhus radicans), and other sumac species. Natural Areas Journal. 3(1): 16-26. [6248] 29. Ewel, Katherine Carter. 1984. Effects of fire and wastewater on understory vegetation in cypress domes. In: Ewel, Katherine Carter; Odum, Howard T., eds. Cypress swamps. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press: 119-126. [14845] 30. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905] 31. Faulkner, Jerry L.; Clebsch, Edward E. C.; Sanders, William L. 1989. Use of prescribed burning for managing natural and historic resources in Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park, U.S.A. Environmental Management. 13(5): 603-612. [13020] 32. Fitch, Henry S.; Kettle, W. Dean. 1983. Ecological succession in vegetation and small mammal populations on a natural area of northeastern Kansas. In: Kucera, Clair L., ed. Proceedings, 7th North American prairie conference; 1980 August 4-6; Springfield, MO. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri: 117-121. [3211] 33. Fitzgerald, Charles H.; Belanger, Roger P.; Lester, William W. 1975. Characteristics and growth of natural green ash stands. Journal of Forestry. 73: 486-488. [5122] 34. Francis, John K. 1987. Regrowth after complete harvest of a young bottomland hardwood stand. In: Phillips, Douglas R., compiler. Proceedings, 4th biennial southern silvicultural research conference; 1986 November 4-6; Atlanta, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-42. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: 120-128. [4200] 35. Freeman, C. E.; Dick-Peddie, W. A. 1970. Woody riparian vegetation in the Black and Sacramento Mountain ranges, southern New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist. 15(2): 145-164. [6470] 36. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998] 37. Gartner, F. Robert. 1975. Final Report: Wind Cave National Park grassland ecology. Unpublished paper on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT: 29 p. [3869] 38. Gilliam, Frank S.; Christensen, Norman L. 1986. Herb-layer response to burning in pine flatwoods of the lower Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 113(1): 42-45. [4419] 39. Gillis, William T. 1971. The systematics and ecology of poison-ivy and the poison-oaks (Toxicodendron, Anacardiaceae). Rhodora. 73: 370-443. [8104] 40. Gleason, H. A.; Cronquist, A. 1963. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. 810 p. [7065] 41. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603] 42. Grelen, Harold E. 1975. Vegetative response to twelve years of seasonal burning on a Louisiana longleaf pine site. Res. Note SO-192. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 4 p. [13842] 43. Hamilton, Ernest S.; Limbird, Arthur. 1982. Selective occurrence of arborescent species on soils in a drainage toposequence, Ottawa County, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science. 82(5): 282-292. [4343] 44. Hardin, E. Dennis. 1988. Succession in Buffalo Beats Prairie and surrounding forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 115(1): 13-24. [4414] 45. Hardin, Kimberly I.; Evans, Keith E. 1977. Cavity nesting bird habitat in the oak-hickory forests--a review. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-30. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 23 p. [13859] 46. Hartley, Jeanne J.; Arner, Dale H.; Hartley, Danny R. 1990. Woody plant succession on disposal areas of the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. In: Hughes, H. Glenn; Bonnicksen, Thomas M., eds. Restoration '89: the new management challenge: Proceedings, 1st annual meeting of the Society for Ecological Restoration; 1989 January 16-20; Oakland, CA. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Arboretum, Society for Ecological Restoration: 227-236. [14698] 47. Harrington, H. D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. 2d ed. Chicago: The Swallow Press Inc. 666 p. [6851] 48. Hebb, Edwin A.; Clewell, Andre F. 1976. A remnant stand of old-growth slash pine in the Florida panhandle. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 103(1): 1-9. [12739] 49. Helm, A. C.; Nicholas, N. S.; Zedaker, S. M.; Young, S. T. 1991. Maritime forests on Bull Island, Cape Romain, South Carolina. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 118(2): 170-175. [15686] 50. Hix, David M.; Fosbroke, David E.; Hicks, Ray R., Jr.; Gottschalk, Kurt W. 1991. Development of regeneration following gypsy moth defoliation of Appalachian Plateau and Ridge & Valley hardwood stands. In: McCormick, Larry H.; Gottschalk, Kurt W., eds. Proceedings, 8th central hardwood forest conference; 1991 March 4-6; University Park, PA. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-148. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: 347-359. [15323] 51. Hladek, Kenneth Lee. 1971. Growth character. & utiliz. of buffaloberry (Shepherdia argentea Nutt.) in the Little Missouri River badlands of southwestern North Dakota. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University of Agriculture & Applied Sci. 115 p. Dissertation. [12120] 52. Hodgkins, Earl J. 1958. Effects of fire on undergrowth vegetation in upland southern pine forests. Ecology. 39(1): 36-46. [7632] 53. Holland, Marjorie M.; Burk, C. John. 1990. The marsh vegetation of three Connecticut River oxbows: a ten-year comparison. Rhodora. 92(871): 166-204. [14521] 54. Houle, Gilles; Bouchard, France. 1990. Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) at the northeastern limit of its distribution in North America: pop. structure & radial growth patterns. Canadian Journal of Botany. 68: 2685-2692. [13457] 55. Huntley, Jimmy C.; McGee, Charles E. 1981. Timber and wildlife implications of fire in young upland hardwoods. In: Barnett, James P., ed. Proceedings, 1st biennial southern silvicultural research conference; 1980 November 6-7; Atlanta, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-34. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 56-66. [12080] 56. Hurst, George A. 1978. Effects of controlled burning on wild turkey poult food habits. Proceedings, Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 32: 30-37. [14648] 57. Johnson, A. Sydney; Hillestad, Hilburn O.; Shanholtzer, Sheryl Fanning; Shanholtzer, G. Frederick. 1974. An ecological survey of the coastal region of Georgia. Scientific Monograph Series No 3, NPS 116. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 233 p. [16102] 58. Johnson, R. L.; Burkhardt, E. C. 1976. Natural cottonwood stands--past management and implications for plantations. In: Thielges, Bart A.; Land, Samuel B., Jr., eds. Proceedings: Symposium on Eastern Cottonwood and Related Species; 1976 September 28 - October 2; Greenville, MS. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, Division of Continuing Education: 20-29. [7374] 59. Jones, G. N.; Fuller, G. D. 1955. Vascular plants of Illinois. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. 593 p. [18964] 60. Kingsbury, John M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 626 p. [122] 61. Koehler, Gary M. 1981. Ecolog. require. for pileated woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus) & potent. impacts of surface mining on their habitat & recomm. for mitigation. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. On file at:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station,Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 49 p. [17176] 62. Kossuth, Susan V.; Michael, J. L. 1990. Pinus glabra Walt. spruce pine. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654.. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 355-358. [13195] 63. Kotar, John; Kovach, Joseph A.; Locey, Craig T. 1988. Field guide to forest habitat types of northern Wisconsin. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Department of Forestry; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 217 p. [11510] 64. Krefting, Laurits W.; Roe, Eugene I. 1949. The role of some birds and mammals in seed germination. Ecological Monographs. 19(3): 269-286. [8847] 65. Kucera, C. L.: McDermott, R. E. 1955. Sugar maple-basswood studies in the forest-prairie transition of central Missouri. American Midland Naturalist. 54(2): 495-503. [11121] 66. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 67. Kudish, Michael. 1992. Adirondack upland flora: an ecological perspective. Saranac, NY: The Chauncy Press. 320 p. [19376] 68. Kunzmann, Michael R; Bennett, Peter S. 1989. Arsenal as a control agent for saltcedar (tamarix). In: Kunzmann, Michael R.; Johnson, R. Roy; Bennett, Peter, technical coordinators. Tamarisk control in southwestern United States; 1987 September 2-3; Tucson, AZ. Special Report No. 9. Tucson, AZ: National Park Service, Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, School of Renewable Natural Resources: 82-90. [11354] 69. Kurz, Herman. 1944. Secondary forest succession in the Tallahassee Red Hills. Proceedings, Florida Academy of Science. 7(1): 59-100. [10799] 70. Lakela, O. 1965. A flora of northeastern Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 541 p. [18142] 71. Lampe, Kenneth F. 1986. Contact dermatitis from Sonoran desert plants. Desert Plants. 8(1): 32-37. [3959] 72. Lampe, Kenneth F.; Fagerstrom, Rune. 1968. Plant toxicity and dermatitis: A manual for physicians. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins Co. 231 p. [19526] 73. Lawson, Edwin R. 1990. Pinus echinata Mill. shortleaf pine. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 316-326. [13394] 74. Loope, Lloyd L.; Dunevitz, Vicki L. 1981. Impact of fire exclusion and invasion of Schinus terebinthifolius on limestone rockland pine forests of southeastern Florida. Report T-645. Homestead, FL: U.S. Department of the Interior, South Florida Research Center, Everglades National Park. 30 p. [17457] 75. Lortie, J. P.; Sorrie, B. A.; Holt, D. W. 1991. Flora of the Monomoy Islands, Chatham, Massachusetts. Rhodora. 93(876): 361-389. [17708] 76. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496] 77. McDonnell, Mark J. 1986. Old field vegetation height and the dispersal pattern of bird- disseminated woody plants. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 113(1): 6-11. [4563] 78. Rickard, W. H. 1964. Demise of sagebrush through soil changes. Bioscience. 14(1): 43-44. [1976] 79. McNair, James B. 1923. Rhus dermatitis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 298 p. [19527] 80. Medina, Alvin L. 1987. Woodland communities and soils of Fort Bayard, southwestern New Mexico. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science. 21: 99-112. [3978] 81. Milne, Bruce T.; Forman, Richard T. 1986. Peninsulas in Maine: woody plant diversity, distance, and environmental patterns. Ecology. 67(4): 967-974. [4557] 82. Monk, Carl D. 1966. An ecological study of hardwood swamps in north-central Florida. Ecology. 47: 649-654. [10802] 83. Monk, Carl D.; Brown, Timothy W. 1965. Ecological consideration of cypress heads in north-central Florida. American Midland Naturalist. 74: 126-140. [10848] 84. Muenscher, W. C. 1940. Poisonous plants of the United States. New York: MacMillan Co. 266 p. [18141] 85. Murphy, Dean A. 1970. Deer range appraisal in the Midwest. In: White-tailed deer in the Midwest: Proceedings of a symposium, 30th Midwest fish and wildlife conference; 1968 December 9; Columbus, OH. Res. Pap. NC-39. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 2-10. [13667] 86. Neidich-Ryder, Carole; Ryder, Richard D. 1990. Restoration of eastern prairie underway. Restoration & Management Notes. 8(2): 100-101. [14155] 87. Nessel, John K.; Bayley, Suzanne E. 1984. Distribution and dynamics of organic matter and phosphorus in a sewage- enriched cypress swamp. In: Ewel, Katherine Carter; Odum, Howard T., eds. Cypress swamps. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press: 262-278. [14851] 88. Newling, Charles J. 1990. Restoration of bottomland hardwood forests in the lower Mississippi Valley. Restoration & Management Notes. 8(1): 23-28. [14611] 89. Nicholson, Stuart A.; Monk, Carl D. 1974. Plant species diversity in old-field succession on the Georgia piedmont. Ecology. 55: 1075-1085. [17523] 90. Nixon, Charles M.; McClain, Milford W.; Russell, Kenneth R. 1970. Deer food habits and range characteristics in Ohio. Journal of Wildlife Management. 34(4): 870-886. [16398] 91. Ogden, J. Gordon, III. 1962. Forest history of Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. I. Modern and pre-colonial forests. American Midland Naturalist. 66(2): 417-430. [10118] 92. Oosting, Henry J. 1954. Ecological processes and vegetation of the maritime strand in the southeastern United States. Botanical Review. 20: 226-262. [10730] 93. Priester, David S. 1990. Magnolia virginiana L. sweetbay. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 449-454. [16258] 94. Quarterman, Elsie; Turner, Barbara Holman; Hemmerly, Thomas E. 1972. Analysis of virgin mixed mesophytic forests in Savage Gulf, Tennessee. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 99(5): 228-232. [11128] 95. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606] 96. Ralston, Robert Dean. 1960. The structure and ecology of the north slope juniper stands of the Little Missouri Badlands. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah. 85 p. Thesis. [192] 97. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843] 98. Robertson, Philip A.; Weaver, George T.; Cavanaugh, James A. 1978. Vegetation and tree species patterns near the northern terminus of the southern floodplain forest. Ecological Monographs. 48(3): 249-267. [10381] 99. Roland, A. E. 1991. Coastal-plain plants in inland Nova Scotia. Rhodora. 93(875): 291-298. [16490] 100. Rucks, Michael G. 1984. Composition and trend of riparian vegetation on five perennial streams in southeastern Arizona. In: Warner, Richard E.; Hendrix, Kathleen M., eds. California riparian systems: Ecology, conservation, and productive management: Proceedings of a conference; 1981 September 17-19; Davis, CA. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 97-107. [5831] 101. Scheiner, Samuel M.; Teeri, James A. 1981. A 53-year record of forest succession following fire in northern lower Michigan. Michigan Botanist. 20(1): 3-14. [5022] 102. Schlesinger, William H. 1978. On the relative dominance of shrubs in Okefenokee Swamp. American Naturalist. 112(987): 949-954. [15360] 103. Scoggan, H. J. 1978. The flora of Canada. Ottawa, Canada: National Museums of Canada. (4 volumes). [18143] 104. Seymour, Frank Conkling. 1982. The flora of New England. 2d ed. Phytologia Memoirs 5. Plainfield, NJ: Harold N. Moldenke and Alma L. Moldenke. 611 p. [7604] 105. Sidhu, S. S. 1973. Early effects of burning and logging in pine-mixed woods. I. Frequency and biomass of minor vegetation. Inf. Rep. PS-X-46. Chalk River, ON: Canadian Forestry Service, Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. 47 p. [7901] 106. Sotala, Dennis J.; Kirkpatrick, Charles M. 1973. Foods of white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, in Martin County, Indiana. American Midland Naturalist. 89(2): 281-286. [15056] 107. Stalter, Richard. 1990. Torreya taxifolia Arn. Florida torreya. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 601-603. [13420] 108. Stalter, Richard; Seyfert, Wayne. 1989. The vegetation history of Hempstead Plains, New York. In: Bragg, Thomas B.; Stubbendieck, James, eds. Prairie pioneers: ecology, history and culture: Proceedings, 11th North American prairie conference; 1988 August 7-11; Lincoln, NE. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska: 41-45. [14017] 109. Stephens, H. A. 1980. Poisonous plants of the central United States. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas. 165 p. [3803] 110. Stevens, O. A. 1956. Flowering dates of weeds in North Dakota. North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station Bimonthly Bulletin. 18(6): 209-213. [5168] 111. Steyermark, J. A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. 1725 p. [18144] 112. Tampion, John. 1977. Dangerous plants. New York: Universe Books. 176 p. [19528] 113. Thomson, Paul M.; Anderson, Roger C. 1976. An ecological investigation of the Oakwood Bottoms Greentree Reservoir in Illinois. In: Fralish, James S.; Weaver, George T.; Schlesinger, Richard C., eds. Central hardwood forest conference: Proceedings of a meeting; 1976 October 17-19; Carbondale, IL. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University: 45-64. [3812] 114. Triquet, A. M.; McPeek, G. A.; McComb, W. C. 1990. Songbird diversity in clearcuts with and without a riparian buffer strip. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. [Volume unknown]: 500-503. [13502] 115. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573] 116. Vincent, Gilles; Bergeron, Yves; Meilleur, Alain. 1986. Plant community pattern analysis: a cartographic approach applied in the Lac des Deux-Montagnes area (Quebec). Canadian Journal of Botany. 64: 326-335. [16948] 117. Vogl, Richard J. 1973. Effects of fire on the plants and animals of a Florida wetland. American Midland Naturalist. 89: 334-347. [14580] 118. Wade, Dale D.; Langdon, O. Gordon. 1990. Sabal palmetto (Walt.) Lodd. ex J. A. & J. H. Schult. cabbage palmetto. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 762-767. [13806] 119. Wali, M. K.; Killingbeck, K. T.; Bares, R. H.; Shubert, L. E. 1980. Vegetation-environment relationships of woodland and shrub communities, and soil algae in western North Dakota. ND REAP Project No. 7-01-1, No. 79-16. Grand Forks, ND: University of North Dakota, Department of Biology, Project of the North Dakota Regional Environmental Assessment Program (REAP). 159 p. [7433] 120. Walker, Laurence C. 1991. The southern forest: A chronicle. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 322 p. [17597] 121. Wanek, Wallace James. 1967. The gallery forest vegetation of the Red River of the North. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University. 190 p. Dissertation. [5733] 122. Weber, M. G. 1990. Response of immature aspen ecosystems to cutting and burning in relation to vernal leaf-flush. Forest Ecology and Management. 31: 15-33. [10373] 123. White, Alan S. 1983. The effects of thirteen years of annual prescribed burning on a Quercus ellipsoidalis community in Minnesota. Ecology. 64(5): 1081-1085. [3518] 124. White, Alan S. 1986. Prescribed burning for oak savanna restoration in central Minnesota. Res. Pap. NC-266. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 12 p. [3487] 125. Whiting, R. Montague, Jr.; Fleet, Robert R.; Rakowitz, Vincent A. 1987. Herpetofauna in loblolly-shortleaf pine stands of east Texas. In: Pearson, Henry A.; Smeins, Fred E.; Thill, Ronald E., compilers. Ecological, physical, and socioeconomic relationships within southern National Forests: Proceedings of the southern evaluation project workshop; 1987 May 26-27; Long Beach, MS. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-68. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 39-48. [11630] 126. Williamson, Penelope. 1971. Feeding ecology of the red-eyed vireo (Vireo olivaceous) and associated foliage-gleaning birds. Ecological Monographs. 41(2): 129-152. [8103] 127. Yost, Susan E.; Antenen, Susan: Harvigsen, Gregg. 1991. The vegetation of the Wave Hill natural area, Bronx, New York. Torreya. 118(3): 312-325. [16546] 128. Zhang, Jianhua; Maun, M. A. 1991. Establishment and growth of Panicum virgatum L. seedlings on a Lake Erie sand dune. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 118(2): 141-153. [15700]

Index

Related categories for Species: Toxicodendron radicans | Poison-Ivy

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.