1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Plant Species > Graminoid > Species: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


Introductory

SPECIES: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge
ABBREVIATION : CARROS SYNONYMS : Carex brevipes Boott SCS PLANT CODE : CARO5 COMMON NAMES : Ross' sedge TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name of Ross' sedge is Carex rossii Boott [13,19,30,40]. LIFE FORM : Graminoid FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : See OTHER STATUS OTHER STATUS : The Nature Conservancy ranks Ross' sedge as globally secure (G5) but critically imperiled (S1) in the state of Washington [45]. There are several occurrences of Ross' sedge in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests of the Black Hills, South Dakota, where it is at the edge of its natural range. It appears to be secure in South Dakota at this time but is uncommon and may be localized or declining [20]. COMPILED BY AND DATE : Amy B. Cope. August 1992 LAST REVISED BY AND DATE : NO-ENTRY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Cope, Amy B. 1992. Carex rossii. In: Remainder of Citation

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Ross' sedge is a cordilleran species which occurs from Manitoba to Alaska south to California, Arizona, and New Mexico, and east to Minnesota [13,16,24,30]. East of the Rocky Mountains its occurrence is irregular [19]. Ross' sedge occurs in isolated stands in South Dakota and Michigan [19,24]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES20 Douglas-fir FRES21 Ponderosa pine FRES23 Fir - spruce FRES26 Lodgepole pine FRES28 Western hardwoods FRES29 Sagebrush FRES35 Pinyon - juniper FRES36 Mountain grasslands FRES38 Plains grasslands STATES : AK AZ CA CO ID MI MN MT NE NV NM OR SD UT WA WY AB BC MB SK YT ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS : BIHO BRCA CRLA DEVA DEPO GLAC GRCA GRTE LAVO LABE MORA OLYM ROMO TICA YELL ZION BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 1 Northern Pacific Border 2 Cascade Mountains 3 Southern Pacific Border 4 Sierra Mountains 5 Columbia Plateau 6 Upper Basin and Range 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 9 Middle Rocky Mountains 11 Southern Rocky Mountains 12 Colorado Plateau 15 Black Hills Uplift 16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K008 Lodgepole pine - subalpine forest K011 Western ponderosa forest K012 Douglas-fir forest K014 Grand fir - Douglas-fir forest K016 Eastern ponderosa forest K017 Black Hills pine forest K022 Great Basin pine forest K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland K029 California mixed evergreen forest K034 Montane chaparral K037 Mountain-mahogany - oak scrub K038 Great Basin sagebrush K050 Fescue - wheatgrass K051 Wheatgrass - bluegrass K055 Sagebrush steppe K056 Wheatgrass - needlegrass shrubsteppe K063 Foothills prairie K066 Wheatgrass - needlegrass K098 Northern floodplain forest SAF COVER TYPES : 206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir 210 Interior Douglas-fir 213 Grand fir 217 Aspen 218 Lodgepole pine 219 Limber pine 220 Rocky Mountain juniper 229 Pacific Douglas-fir 237 Interior ponderosa pine 238 Western juniper 239 Pinyon - juniper 243 Sierra Nevada mixed conifer 244 Pacific ponderosa pine - Douglas-fir 245 Pacific ponderosa pine 246 California black oak 247 Jeffrey pine 248 Knobcone pine 249 Canyon live oak 250 Blue oak - Digger pine 255 California coast live oak 256 California mixed subalpine SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Ross' sedge is dominant or codominant in xerophytic grasslands, open timber stands, and exposed hillsides of montane and subalpine zones [15,24,31]. It also occurs in forest understory but usually is not dominant there [17,28]. Ross' sedge is listed as a plant associate in the following published classifications: Forest habitat types of Medecine Bow National Forest in Wyoming [1]. Forest and shrubland community types of Silver Lake in Oregon [8]. General vegetation community type of Blue Mountains in eastern Washington and southeast Oregon [14]. Forest habitat types of Roosevelt National Forest in Colorado [17]. General vegetation community types of coastal British Columbia [21]. Forest habitat types of northern Utah (Uintah Mountains) [27]. Lodgepole pine community types of Colorado [28]. Aspen community types of southern Utah and Nevada [29]. Forest habitats of eastern Idaho and western Wyoming [33]. Grand fir/blue huckleberry habitat types of central Idaho [34]. Grand fir/mountain maple habitat types of central Idaho [32]. Forest vegetation habitat of the Transverse and Peninsular Ranges of California [38]. Lodgepole pine community types and plant associations of the western United States [41].

VALUE AND USE

SPECIES: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : NO-ENTRY IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Pocket gophers are most common in communities with productive herbaceous understories, which include Ross' sedge, for grazing and cover [42]. Ross' sedge provides forage for livestock and wildlife [15]. PALATABILITY : Ross' sedge palatability varies depending on site and animal. Cattle graze it sparsely on pinyon-juniper sites; sheep graze it rather heavily in aspen parks [24]. Generally, palatability to elk, mule deer, and moose is moderate to high, and it is highly preferred by bighorn sheep [15]. In the spring, Ross' sedge is highly palatable to black bears. In the summer, palatibility for black bears, elk, and sheep is moderate; and low for deer and cattle. In the fall Ross' sedge palatability is low for black bears; in the winter palatability is low for deer and elk [34]. NUTRITIONAL VALUE : The food value of Ross' sedge is poor for mule deer, white-tailed deer, and pronghorn, but fair for elk and small mammals [9]. Ross' sedge has a good to fair forage value for sheep in the Rocky Mountains and Colorado Basin [15]. In early spring, grasses such as Thurber needlegrass (Stipa thurberiana), squirreltail (Elymus elymoides), Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda Presl.), Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), and junegrass (Koeleria cristata) exceed Ross' sedge in protein, phosphorus, calcium, crude fat, and apparent digestibility. Crude fiber is high in March for Ross' sedge. As the growing season progresses through summer and into the fall, Ross' sedge increases to surpass the grasses in protein, calcium, crude fat, and apparent digestibility. Ross' sedge was highest in moisture from late July to October. The calcium-phosphorous ratio is good during this time (0.5:1) and dry matter disapperance (DMD) was 40 percent in the summer and fall [18]. One year after logging, Ross' sedge increased in crude protein and continued to increase for 3 more years [7]. COVER VALUE : In Wyoming, cover value of Ross' sedge is poor for pronghorn, elk, mule deer, white-tailed deer, upland game birds, and waterfowl. For small mammals and small nongame birds the cover value is fair [9]. VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : Ross' sedge sprouts readily on disturbed sites. It survived fuel oil spills in southeastern British Columbia [15], and despite heavy density losses, Ross' sedge recovered well from log skidding disturbances. On disturbed sites that are seeded with grass, Ross' sedge is outcompeted and less prevalent than on sites that are not seeded [12,26]. Ross' sedge's extensive root system and ability to grow on unstable or loose material give it good soil-building and erosion-control capabilities [15]. At campsites, Ross' sedge is not significantly affected by trampling [6]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : NO-ENTRY MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Ross' sedge is a persistent, winter-hardy plant that is drought and browse tolerant [15]. It is one of the most difficult understories to remove. One year after removal with a grub hoe, it had reestablished an extensive root system [3]. Logging practices that disturb soils beyond a depth of 2 inches (5 cm) destroy the rhizomes of sedges. On steep slopes, logging with horses or cable minimize disturbance [12]. Ross' sedge seed is not commercially available. Splitting and transplanting the clumps may be effective for establishment. More research is needed in this area [15]. Cutting in lodgepole pine and ponderosa pine habitats of which Ross' sedge is the understory dominant should be restricted to light or moderate shelterwood. Partial cutting and minimizing disturbance will prevent Ross' sedge from increasing, preserve the site, and maintain diversity [17]. There are no significant pests or diseases of Ross' sedge [15].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Ross' sedge is a native, long-lived perennial graminoid [15]. The stems are reddish at the base and occur in bunches, forming medium-sized clumps [24]. The stems are 2 to 12 inches (5-30 cm) tall, often equaling or exceeding the leaves. The leaves are thin, flat, and narrow. Its fruit is an achene [16]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Hemicryptophyte Geophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Ross' sedge reproduces by rhizome growth and by seed production [9,14]. It is wind pollinated. Seeds buried less than 1.5 inches (4 cm) deep are capable of germination, but germination was best following heat treatment. Seed may remain dormant for long periods of time prior to germination [37]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Ross' sedge occurs at dry, well-drained sites. Typical climates are boreal, temperate, cool, semiarid, mesothermal, and xerophytic [15,31]. Ross' sedge is most commonly associated with xeric grasslands, aspen parkland, open woods, and disturbed or exposed sites of montane and subalpine regions [15,24,31]. Soil types are shallow, dry to moderately dry, coarse or fine textured, ranging from sandy loam to clay loam [15,17,21,43]. They may be unstable or compact, mildly saline, nitrogen moderate, with a pH range of 6.0 to 6.7 [15,17,21]. Ross' sedge occurs sporadically on stony or rocky soils [21]. Slopes generally range from 0 to 35 percent [17]. Precipitation is variable. Ross' sedge prefers a southern aspect, but it will grow on other aspects [34]. Ross' sedge grows at a variety of elevations but is a strong competitor at lower elevations [44]. Below are some elevations at which Ross' sedge occurs [9,15,30,37,43]: feet meters California 0-12,400 0-3,760 Colorado 5,500-12,000 1,670-3,640 Montana 4,300- 9,500 1,300-2,880 Oregon 4,225- 4,620 1,280-1,400 Utah 6,000-12,000 1,820-3,640 Washington 3,000- 5,800 910-1,760 Wyoming 4,800- 9,800 1,455-2,960 In forest habitats, Ross' sedge is sparse but dominant [17]. These habitats are usually low in timber productivity, potential for improvement, and water productivity [1,17,27]. In addition to those previously listed under Distribution and Occurrence, Ross' sedge associates include: mountain maple (Acer spicatum), blue huckleberry (Vaccinium globulare), snowbrush (Ceanothus velutinus), brittlebrush (Purshia tridenta), sagebrush (Artemisia spp.), gland cinquefoil (Potentilla glandulosa), elk sedge (Carex geyeri), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), pinegrass (Calmagrostis rubescens), Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), and squirreltail (Elymus elymoides) [12,17,34,44]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Obligate Initial Community Species Ross' sedge is most common in early seral communities and unstable situations [31,34]. It is an aggressive pioneer of hostile sites and is partially shade tolerant [15]. Ross' sedge is often replaced by larger shrubs and trees as succession progresses [31,34,44]. In a study by Zamora [44], Ross' sedge was dominant for 3 years following clearcut and broadcast burning. By year 8, it was codominate with shrubs but was still dominant at lower elevations and less-shaded sites; by year 12 it was subdominant; and by year 23 it was rare. Ross' sedge occurs but is not very common in climax habitats [27,29]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Growth begins in spring. Flowering occurs between May and June [9]. Seeds are possibly produced in early July. Seedlings emerge in late fall or early winter [18].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Ross' sedge survives fire through buried seed with long-term viability [33]. These seeds germinate after heat treatment [5]. Ross' sedge's rhizomes survive low- to moderate-severity fires [5,43]. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Rhizomatous herb, rhizome in soil Ground residual colonizer (onsite, initial community) Secondary colonizer - onsite seed Secondary colonizer - offsite seed

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Fire top-kills Ross' sedge. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Ross' sedge is resistant to fire. It regenerates through rhizomes and seed germination [2,43]. Recovery is rapid to moderate, taking 2 to 10 years to return to preburn frequency [43]. Ross' sedge increases after fires that heat the soil but do not completely consume duff [5]. After the Sundance Fire of northern Idaho, Ross' sedge was one of the most widely distributed plants [36]. Ross' sedge occurred on burned and grass-seeded plots but was more prevalent on unseeded burn plots [23]. Ross' sedge increased for 4 years following the fire [43]. Season of fire does not appear to have a major effect on plant recovery [23,43]. At some sites, Ross' sedge may be part of the prefire vegetation but may exist as "residual seed in the ground awaiting fire to create the proper germination conditions" [2]. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : NO-ENTRY FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Development of Ross' sedge cover is best at lower elevations (below 3,800 feet [1,150 m]) [43]. Vigor of first-year plants after early spring or summer burns may be reduced by grazing [41].

References for species: Carex rossii


1. Alexander, Robert R.; Hoffman, George R.; Wirsing, John M. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Medicine Bow National Forest in southeastern Wyoming: a habitat type classification. Res. Pap. RM-271. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 39 p. [307]
2. Ash, Maria; Lasko, Richard J. 1990. Postfire vegetative response in a whitebark pine community, Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana. In: Schmidt, Wyman C.; McDonald, Kathy J., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on whitebark pine ecosystems: ecology and management of a high-mountain resource; 1989 March 29-31; Bozeman, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-270. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 360-361. [11705]
3. Barrett, James W. 1970. Ponderosa pine saplings respond to control of spacing and understory vegetation. Res. Note PNW-106. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 16 p. [15815]
4. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
5. Bradley, Anne F.; Noste, Nonan V.; Fischer, William C. 1992. Fire ecology of forests and woodlands of Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-287. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 128 p. [18212]
6. Cole, David N.; Hall, Troy E. 1992. Trends in campsite condition: Eagle Cap Wilderness, Bob Marshall Wilderness, and Grand Canyon National Park. Res. Pap. INT-453. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 40 p. [17764]
7. Crouch, Glenn L. 1985. Effects of clearcutting a subalpine forest in central Colorado on wildlife habitat. Res. Pap. RM-258. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 12 p. [8225]
8. Dealy, J. Edward. 1971. Habitat characteristics of the Silver Lake mule deer range. Res. Pap. PNW-125. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 99 p. [782]
9. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
10. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
11. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
12. Garrison, George A.; Rummell, Robert S. 1951. First-year effects of logging on ponderosa pine forest range lands of Oregon and Washington. Journal of Forestry. 49(10): 708-713. [16711]
13. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
14. Hall, Frederick C. 1973. Plant communities of the Blue Mountains in eastern Oregon and southeastern Washington. R6-Area Guide 3-1. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 82 p. [1059]
15. Hardy BBT Limited. 1989. Manual of plant species suitability for reclamation in Alberta. 2d ed. Report No. RRTAC 89-4. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Land Conservation and Reclamation Council. 436 p. [15460]
16. Hermann, Frederick J. 1970. Manual of the Carices of the Rocky Mountains and Colorado Basin. Agric. Handb. 374. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 397 p. [1139]
17. Hess, Karl; Alexander, Robert R. 1986. Forest vegetation of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests in central Colorado: a habitat type classification. Res. Pap. RM-266. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 48 p. [1141]
18. Hickman, O. Eugene. 1975. Seasonal trends in the nutritive content of important range forage species near Silver Lake, Oregon. Research Paper PNW-187. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 32 p. [1145]
19. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 730 p. [1168]
20. Houtcooper, Wayne C.; Ode, David J.; Pearson, John A.; Vandel, George M., III. 1985. Rare animals and plants of South Dakota. Prairie Naturalist. 17(3): 143-165. [1198]
21. Klinka, K.; Krajina, V. J.; Ceska, A.; Scagel, A. M. 1989. Indicator plants of coastal British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press. 288 p. [10703]
22. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
23. Leege, Thomas A.; Godbolt, Grant. 1985. Herebaceous response following prescribed burning and seeding of elk range in Idaho. Northwest Science. 59(2): 134-143. [1436]
24. Lewis, Monte E. 1958. Carex - its distribution and importance in Utah. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. I(II): 1-4. [18788]
25. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
26. Majerus, Mark E. 1991. Yellowstone National Park-Bridger Plant Marterials Center native plant program. In: Rangeland Technology Equipment Council, 1991 annual report. 9222-2808-MTDC. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Technology and Development Program: 17-22. [17082]
27. Mauk, Ronald L.; Henderson, Jan A. 1984. Coniferous forest habitat types of northern Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-170. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 89 p. [1553]
28. Moir, William H. 1969. The lodgepole pine zone in Colorado. The American Midland Naturalist. 81: 87-98. [10798]
29. Mueggler, Walter F. 1988. Aspen community types of the Intermountain Region. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-250. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 135 p. [5902]
30. Munz, Philip A. 1973. A California flora and supplement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1905 p. [6155]
31. Ramaley, Francis. 1919. The role of sedges in some Colorado plant communities. American Journal of Botany. 6: 120-130. [18409]
32. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
33. Steele, Robert; Cooper, Stephen V.; Ondov, David M.; [and others]. 1983. Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho-western Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-144. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 122 p. [2230]
34. Steele, Robert; Geier-Hayes, Kathleen. 1987. The grand fir/blue huckleberry habitat type in central Idaho: succession and management. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-228. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 66 p. [8133]
35. Steele, Robert; Geier-Hayes, Kathleen. 1989. The grand fir/mountain maple habitat type in central Idaho: succession and management. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 148 p. Review draft. [8435]
36. Strickler, Gerald S.; Edgerton, Paul J. 1976. Emergent seedlings from coniferous litter and soil in eastern Oregon. Ecology. 57: 801-807. [2039]
37. Thorne, Robert F. 1977. Montane and subalpine forests of the Transverse and Peninsular ranges. In: Barbour, Michael G.; Major, Jack, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley and Sons: 537-557. [7214]
38. Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Klock, Glen O. 1976. Development of vegetation after fire, seeding, and fertilization on the Entiat Experimental Forest. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1974 October 16-17; Portland, OR. No. 15. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 171-191. [2328]
39. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
40. Volland, Leonard A. 1985. Ecological classification of lodgepole pine in the United States. In: Baumgartner, David M.; Krebill, Richard G.; Arnott, James T.; Weetman, Gordon F., compilers and editors. Lodgepole pine: The species and its management: Symposium proceedings; 1984 May 8-10; Spokane, WA; 1984 May 14-16; Vancouver, BC. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: 63-75. [9441]
41. Volland, Leonard A. 1974. Relation of pocket gophers to plant communities in the pine region of central Oregon. In: Black, Hugh C., ed. Wildlife and forest management in the Pacific Northwest: Proceedings of a symposium; 1973 September 11-12; Corvallis, OR. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, School of Forestry, Forest Research Laboratory: 149-166. [8003]
42. Volland, Leonard A.; Dell, John D. 1981. Fire effects on Pacific Northwest forest and range vegetation. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Range Management and Aviation and Fire Management. 23 p. [2434]
43. Zamora, Benjamin Abel. 1975. Secondary succession on broadcast-burned clearcuts of the Abies grandis-Pachistima myrsinites habitat type in northcentral Idaho. Pullman, WA: Washington State University. 127 p. Dissertation. [5154]
44. Washington Natural Heritage Program, compiler. 1994. Endangered, threatened, and sensitive vascular plants of Washington. Olympia, WA: Department of Natural Resources. 52 p. [25413]


[25413] Index

Related categories for Species: Carex rossii | Ross' Sedge

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.