1Up Info - A Portal with a Difference

1Up Travel - A Travel Portal with a Difference.    
1Up Info
   

Earth & EnvironmentHistoryLiterature & ArtsHealth & MedicinePeoplePlacesPlants & Animals  • Philosophy & Religion  • Science & TechnologySocial Science & LawSports & Everyday Life Wildlife, Animals, & PlantsCountry Study Encyclopedia A -Z
North America Gazetteer


You are here >1Up Info > Wildlife, Animals, and Plants > Wildlife Species > Mammals > Wildlife Species: Cervis elaphus | Elk
 

Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 


Wildlife, Animals, and Plants

 

Wildlife Species

  Amphibians

  Birds

  Mammals

  Reptiles

 

Kuchler

 

Plants

  Bryophyte

  Cactus

  Fern or Fern Ally

  Forb

  Graminoid

  Lichen

  Shrub

  Tree

  Vine


FIRE EFFECTS AND USE

WILDLIFE SPECIES: Cervis elaphus | Elk
DIRECT FIRE EFFECTS ON ANIMALS : Young calves can be trapped and killed by fire, although losses are probably not significant [25]. HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS : Following fire most preferred elk forage species are enhanced by an increase in nutrients [2,14,27,43]. Many studies, however, conclude that an increase in quantity of forage is more significant than an increase in quality [3,10,11,12,13,22,24,28,31]. Site preference studies show that elk usually prefer to graze on burned as opposed to unburned sites [10,11,27,31,32,43]. Spring and fall prescribed burning in Montana on rough fescue (Festuca scabrella)-bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicatum) winter range killed rough fescue. Mortality of rough fescue was attributed to too much litter, which caused prolonged burning near the stem base. Burning did not negatively affect Idaho fescue (F. idahoensis) or bluebunch wheatgrass. Burning in Pacific bunchgrass foothill ranges in Washington did not increase winter elk use but did reduce litter, which encouraged early spring green-up [45]. Grazing can reduce fuel buildup in grasslands, thereby decreasing the ability of a range to carry fire [44]. Fire in a Southwestern ponderosa pine forest increased forbs, grasses, and shrubs, created edge, and provided snags for cover. Elk increased in the burn, reaching a peak 7 years after fire when grasses were most abundant [31]. Fire improves the quality of forage under aspen stands [10,11,14,22]. Canon [10] cited several studies on fire effects in aspen communities. Fire regenerates decadent aspen stands, opens the understory, increases forbs and grasses by reducing shrubs, and increases aspen suckering, which may provide enough browse to compensate for overgrazing [22]. Leege [27,28] conducted several burns in the Lochsa River drainage of Idaho. Repeated burning of brushfields in the grand fir (Abies grandis)-pachistima (Pachistima myrsinites) type produced sprouting in all shrubs except bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata), which is not a preferred browse. Leege [28] concluded that burns at 5-year intervals would be more beneficial in maintaining adequate quality and quantity of browse than the recommended 10- to 15-year intervals for grand fir-pachistima types. Merrill [39] reported that common snowberry (Symphoricarpos alba) on dry slopes will not respond as well to fire as taller shrubs on moist sites, but burning common snowberry every 10 years will rejuvenate decadent plants. FIRE USE : Prescribed fire is used routinely to creat or enhance elk habitat in many Western states. Historical evidence shows that early Native Americans used fire to attract ungulates [38]. Fire can be used to rejuvenate aspen stands, encourage early spring green-up of grasslands by reducing litter, slow or prevent conifer dominance in important foraging areas, increase palatability of foods, reduce the height of browse species, and stimulate regeneration through sprouting or heat scarification of seed [24,28,49]. In Glacier National Park fires increased carrying capacity on winter range by creating a mosaic of thermal and hiding comver and forage areas [37]. Prescribed burns in the Lochsa River drainage of Idaho, produced the best results when conducted from the end of March until mid May [27,30]. Hot summer fires are needed to germinate redstem ceanothus (Ceanothus sanguineus), an important forage species [49]. Where elk forage heavily in aspen stands, large areas should be burned to reduce grazing pressure by encouraging elk to disperse [6]. Also, burning several small units nearby will improve elk dispersal and lessen grazing impact. Kramp and others [25] reported that elk prefer burns less than 8.6 acres (3.5 ha), and use of burns decreased with an increase in distance to cover. Standing dead trees may provide adequate cover within burns [12,13]. Burning in bunchgrass communities on the front range of the Northern Rocky Mountains is not advisable in fall due to soil erosion by high winds [24]. If ranges have much litter, burning is recommended in years with normal or above normal precipitation. In rough fescue grasslands burning should be done soon after spring snow melt to prevent a possible 3 year reduction of rough fescue [24]. REFERENCES : NO-ENTRY

Related categories for Wildlife Species: Cervis elaphus | Elk

Send this page to a friend
Print this Page

Content on this web site is provided for informational purposes only. We accept no responsibility for any loss, injury or inconvenience sustained by any person resulting from information published on this site. We encourage you to verify any critical information with the relevant authorities.

Information Courtesy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System

About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Links Directory
Link to 1Up Info | Add 1Up Info Search to your site

1Up Info All Rights reserved. Site best viewed in 800 x 600 resolution.