Finland Wood-Processing Industries
Pulp mill and paper factory at Mänttä in the province of Häme
Courtesy Embassy of Finland, Washington
Wood processing has long been the mainstay of the
Finnish
economy. Facilitated by extensive timber supplies,
convenient
transportation, and abundant water power, lumbering and
papermaking developed rapidly after 1860 to meet growing
European
demand for paper products and lumber. Production and
export
patterns established before 1900 lasted until the second
half of
the twentieth century; in the 1950s, wood and paper
products
accounted for some 80 percent of total exports. By the
1980s,
however, although the sector had continued to expand in
absolute
terms, its share of exports had fallen to about 40 percent
as a
result of the rapid growth of the metalworking sector,
which had
surpassed woodworking in both value added and employment
in 1969.
Despite this relative decline, forest products were
still the
country's most important earner of foreign exchange in the
late
1980s. Roughly four-fifths of wood and paper production
was sold
abroad, while most raw materials--including energy--were
produced
at home; and, although the sector contributed only about
onefifth of industrial value added, it still accounted for
about
one-quarter of industrial employment.
Analysts conventionally divided the woodworking
industries
into two branches, mechanical and chemical, depending on
the
primary means of processing in each branch. The mechanical
branch
comprised milling, manufacturing of plywood and particle
board,
and fabrication of furniture and building components. In
1986 the
branch included some 200 large sawmills that produced most
exports and some 6,000 small mills that met local needs.
Products
of the chemical branch included pulp and paper, cardboard,
and
packaging materials. In 1986 the chemical branch
encompassed
twenty-four pulp mills, thirty paper plants, and sixteen
cardboard factories. The division between the two branches
was
somewhat artificial, however, as many leading firms
operated
integrated plants in which sawdust, waste wood, and
chemical
byproducts of mechanical processes served as raw materials
for
such chemical products as pulp and turpentine. Industrial
waste
also supplied a large share of the industry's needed
energy,
making the chemical branch self-sufficient and reducing
the
energy demands of the mechanical branch.
Finnish manufacturers had long been leaders in
developing new
wood-processing technologies. Several firms had developed
their
own shops for machine building, and their highly efficient
papermaking equipment had captured an important share of world
markets.
In the 1980s, Finland's wood industries experienced
increasing difficulties in exporting, largely as a result
of
rising input costs. Wages and stumpage (value of standing
timber)
rates were traditionally higher in Finland than they were
in many
competitor countries. Moreover, by the early 1990s
analysts
believed that the mechanical branch, which consumed about
onethird of Finland's electricity, might face an energy
shortage
because of the 1986 decision not to build a fifth nuclear
plant
(see Energy
, this ch.). In response, firms modernized
their
plants and shifted to higher-value-added products.
In the mid-1980s, interfirm cooperation and a wave of
mergers
resulted in concentration of production at a smaller
number of
centers, and observers expected that industry
restructuring would
continue into the 1990s. An increasing tendency to build
plants
overseas, which improved access to Finland's main markets,
complemented the merger drive. The government had stepped
in with
the Forest 2000 program and with a system of tax
incentives for
logging, both of which were designed to allow wood
harvests to
increase by about 3 percent per year until the end of the
century
(see Forestry
, this ch.). By 1986, moreover,
representatives for
workers and landowners, apparently recognizing some of the
difficulties faced by the industry, had negotiated
decreases in
both wages and stumpage prices.
Data as of December 1988
|