Haiti Assembly Manufacturing
Craftsman with a woven soleil (sunburst)
Courtesy Inter-American Foundation
Apparel assembly operation, Port-au-Prince Industrial Park
Courtesy Inter-American Foundation
The development of assembly manufacturing in Haiti was
an
outgrowth of the island's cheap labor, its proximity to
the
United States market, the increasing multinational nature
of
modern firms, and changes in the United States Tariff
Code, which
in 1962 began to exact duties only on the value-added of
products
assembled overseas. Assembly operations--typical examples
included the sewing of garments, the stuffing of toys, or
the
stringing of baseballs--grew modestly in the depressed
economic
climate of the 1960s, but they accelerated rapidly in the
early
1970s in response to new fiscal incentives enacted by the
government. The warming of Haitian-United States relations
after
1973 encouraged foreign investment. The number of assembly
enterprises swelled from only 13 companies in 1966 to 67
by 1973
and then to 127 by 1978. When the subsector peaked in
1980, an
estimated 200 assembly firms employed nearly 60,000
workers.
Political instability, increased regional competition
under the
CBI, nascent union activity, and the failure of government
institutions to attract further investment all contributed
to a
decline in assembly investment and employment after 1986.
In 1989
approximately 150 assembly companies employed only 41,000
workers, more than three-quarters of them women. Assembly
exports
continued to expand, however, as a result of increased
productivity on the part of assembly exporters.
Despite the low wages paid to workers, future growth in
the
assembly subsector was uncertain. Numerous constraints to
growth
included the highest utility costs in the Caribbean,
excessive
shipping and warehousing costs, underdeveloped
infrastructure, a
largely illiterate work force, scarce managerial
personnel,
foreign-exchange shortages, expensive or inferior-quality
local
inputs, political instability, and the personalized nature
of
business activity. Some United States officials predicted
in the
1980s that Haiti would progress to become the "Taiwan of
the
Caribbean." The implementation of the CBI, however,
appeared to
hurt Haiti's position in assembly production, as other
countries,
such as the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, and Costa Rica,
began to
capitalize more effectively on the advantages of the
initiative.
In the mid-1980s, more than 40 percent of all assembly
operations
were owned by Haitians. The other operations were either
owned by
firms based in the United States or jointly owned by
Haitian and
United States interests. Asian investment in the country
continued to grow.
Four industrial parks catered to the assembly industry;
two
were run by the government's National Industrial Park
Company
(Société Nationale des Parcs Industriels--Sonapi) and two
by a
private
company. Most firms operated with short-term
subcontracting
arrangements under which Haitian factories filled requests
of
American companies that provided partial products, inputs,
and
machinery. Workers earned piece-work wages, with a
guaranteed
minimum wage of US$3 a day in 1989, and most made slightly
more
than that amount. These workers were among the best paid
in
Haiti, but most of them supported an average of four
people on
their wages.
The major products assembled in Haiti were garments,
electronics, baseballs, games, sporting goods, toys,
footwear,
and leather products. The largest assembly activity in the
late
1980s produced garments. The fastest-growing activity
produced
electronics; it included subcontracting work for the
United
States Department of Defense. One of the island's major
baseball
producers, MacGregor Sporting Goods, decided in 1988 to
move its
baseball-sewing operations to Mexico, however; and, as a
result
of the deteriorating political situation in Haiti, other
assembly
companies decided to fill their orders at the Free Zone of
San
Isidro, Dominican Republic.
Many Haitians were eager to find jobs in the assembly
sector,
but some criticized the effects of the industry on workers
and on
the economy. For example, unions complained that new
employees
earned only 60 percent of the minimum wage for their first
few
months and that short-term contracts and seasonal demand
led to
job instability and the annual dismissal of as many as
5,000
workers with no compensation. Some economists noted that,
although assembly operations provided badly needed urban
jobs,
these operations industries forged few linkages with the
rest of
the economy. A few local plants utilized domestically
produced
glue, thread, sisal, and textiles, but the overwhelming
share of
producers opted for imported inputs, which were generally
cheaper, of better quality, and more plentiful. Finally,
others
disapproved of the generous tax holidays and the duty-free
imports that both domestic and foreign manufacturers
enjoyed.
Data as of December 1989
|