Sri Lanka Chapter 4. Government and Politics
Parliamentary building at Sri Jayewardenepura, in Kotte
IN THE YEARS following Sri Lanka's attainment of independence
on February 4, 1948, the country's political system appeared to
be the very model of a parliamentary democracy. The country stood
virtually alone among its South and Southeast Asian neighbors in
possessing a viable two-party system in which the conservative
United National Party (UNP) and the left-of-center Sri Lanka
Freedom Party (SLFP) alternated with each other in power after
fairly contested elections. Respect for legal institutions and
the independence of the judiciary were well established. Sri
Lanka's military, never sizable, refrained from intervening in
politics, and the country's leadership pursued generally moderate
policies in its relations with other states. Although per capital
income was low compared to that of India and other South Asian
countries, over the decades successive governments invested
heavily in health, educational, and other social service
facilities. As a result, standards of health and literacy were
high and seemed to provide a firm foundation for democracy and
political stability.
Sri Lanka was, however, heir to cultural and historical
traditions at variance with its constitutionally defined
parliamentary political institutions. Family and caste played
major roles in determining the leadership of the major parties
and the ebb and flow of political patronage. But ethnicity and
religion were the most important and politically relevant
determinants in this traditionally diverse society. After 1948
and especially after passage of the Official Language Act,
popularly known as the "Sinhala Only" bill, in 1956, the Sri
Lankan Tamil community, which was largely Hindu, came to feel
that its political interests were being ignored and belittled by
the mainstream political parties led by Buddhist Sinhalese. The
feeling of grievance festered during the 1970s in the wave of
preferential policies that favored Sinhalese applicants for
university positions and government jobs. Abandonment of the idea
of a secular state--the 1972 constitution guaranteed "the
foremost place" for the Buddhist religion of the Sinhalese--
further aroused Tamil alienation. Conversely, the Sinhalese, who
regarded the Tamils as an economically and educationally
privileged group, were determined to secure what they considered
"majority rights," including freedom from alleged economic
exploitation by Tamils. They also feared that the Sri Lankan
Tamils could be a "fifth column" for the much larger Tamil
population in neighboring India. From the Buddhist Sinhalese
perspective, it was they, living in a "sea" of Hindu Tamils, who
were the true minority, not the Sri Lankan Tamils.
In a sense, the effectiveness of democratic institutions in
conveying the viewpoints of middle class and working-class
Sinhalese, electorally a majority of voters, promoted ethnic
polarization. Politicians such as the S.W.R.D. and Sirimavo
Bandaranaike effectively used appeals to Sinhalese chauvinism to
unseat their UNP opponents. Neither the UNP nor the SLFP parties
dared make concessions to the Tamils for fear of alienating the
majority Sinhalese. Thus the UNP government of Junius Richard
(J.R.) Jayewardene, which came to power in July 1977, was as
determined as the earlier SLFP governments not to yield to Tamil
demands for language parity and regional autonomy. By the early
1980s, armed groups of young Tamil extremists, committed to
establishing an independent Tamil Eelam, or state, were well
established in Tamil-majority areas in the northern and eastern
parts of the country or operating out of bases in India's Tamil
Nadu State.
In July 1977, Jayewardene won an unprecedented majority in
the national legislature, gaining 140 out of 168 seats. In 1978 a
new Constitution, the third in Sri Lanka's postindependence
history, was promulgated providing for a strong presidency.
Jayewardene became the first chief executive under the new
system. Some observers interpreted controversial amendments to
the Constitution, such as the extension of the life of Parliament
for another six years, passed in December 1982, as an
illegitimate manipulation of the legal political process designed
to give the UNP a virtually uncontested monopoly of political
power. In terms of the ethnic crisis, an August 1983 amendment
outlawing the advocacy of separatism, which resulted in the
expulsion of members of the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF)
from Parliament, was most fateful. Against a background of
escalating communal violence, it deprived Sri Lankan Tamils of
political representation.
July 1983 was a turning point in the worsening ethnic crisis.
Anti-Tamil riots in Colombo and other cities, prompted by the
killing of thirteen Sinhalese soldiers by Tamil Tiger guerrillas
in the north, resulted in hundreds and perhaps as many as 2,000
deaths. The government was unprepared for the scale of violence
and faced accusations of sublime unconcern for the Tamils'
welfare, while foreign observers told of the active connivance of
government figures in mob violence. The inability or
unwillingness of President Jayewardene and the UNP to forge a
workable settlement of ethnic issues brought India, which had
immense interests of its own in the matter, directly into the
crisis. According to the Indian press, under the government of
Prime Minister Indira Gandhi India unofficially permitted the
establishment of training camps for the Sri Lankan Tamil
insurgents in the state of Tamil Nadu. With the assumption of
power by Gandhi's son and successor, Rajiv Gandhi, New Delhi
adopted a more even-handed approach and sought to mediate the
escalating crisis in Sri Lanka by bringing government and Tamil
insurgent negotiators together for talks. Eventually, the New
Delhi government went further and came down squarely on the side
of Colombo with the signing of the Indo-Sri Lankan Accord of July
29, 1987. The pact committed New Delhi to the deployment of a
peacekeeping force on the island, as asked by the Sri Lankan
government, and made the Indian government the principal
guarantor of a solution to the ethnic crisis.
The accord was designed to meet Sri Lankan Tamil demands for
self-determination through the merging of the Northern and
Eastern provinces and the devolution of substantial executive,
legislative, and judicial powers. Tamil was made an official
language, on a par with Sinhalese. A cease-fire was arranged, and
the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and other guerrilla
groups surrendered some but not all of their arms. Many doubted
that the accord, which the guerrillas had not played a role in
formulating and the LTTE opposed, would bring lasting peace. By
mid-1988, the Indian Army, in a series of hard-fought engagements
that had caused it several hundred casualties, generally cleared
the Jaffna Peninsula in Northern Province of Tamil guerrillas.
The Indian Peacekeeping Force established a semipermanent
garrison, and a measure of tranquility returned to the area. In
Eastern Province, the Indian Peacekeeping Force had less success
in suppressing the insurgents and the situation remained
precarious. Bands of Tamil guerrillas remained at large,
surfacing apparently at will to initiate violent incidents that
led to an unremitting loss of life among innocent civilians,
Sinhalese and Tamil, as well as among military personnel of both
the Sri Lankan and Indian armed forces. In the predominantly
Sinhalese, southern fringe of the island, the Jayewardene
government faced escalating violence at the hands of Sinhalese
militants who opposed the Indo-Sri Lankan Accord as a sellout to
the Tamil extremists.
Data as of October 1988
|