Egypt CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
Immigration officer checking passport of one of about
2 million tourists who visit annually
Courtesy Embassy of Egypt, Washington
The Judicial System
Egypt based its criminal codes and court operations primarily
on British, Italian, and Napoleonic models. Criminal court
procedures had been substantially modified by the heritage of
Islamic legal and social patterns and the legacy of numerous kinds
of courts that formerly existed. The divergent sources and
philosophical origins of these laws and the inapplicability of many
borrowed Western legal concepts occasioned difficulties in
administering Egyptian law. The Criminal Procedure Code of 1950
prescribed the jurisdiction of various courts and provided basic
guidance for the conduct of investigations and trial procedures.
The Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups brought
demands on the government to adopt Islamic sharia. Government
officials argued that adopting Islamic sharia was not necessary
because 95 percent of Egypt's laws were already consistent with or
derived from Islamic law. In 1985 the People's Assembly rejected
demands for the immediate adoption of the sharia but supported a
recommendation to review all statutes and change the ones that
conflicted with Islamic law. This process, which continued for
years, necessitated the review of approximately 6,000 laws and
10,000 peripheral legal acts.
The criminal code listed three main categories of crime:
contraventions (minor offenses), misdemeanors (offenses punishable
by imprisonment or fines), and felonies (offenses punishable by
penal servitude or death). Lower courts handled the majority of the
cases that reached adjudication and levied fines in about nine out
of ten cases. At their discretion, courts could suspend fines or
imprisonment (when a sentence did not exceed one year). At the
village level, an umdah (pl., umada, village headman)
representing the central authority was responsible for maintaining
order. The umdah could also adjudicate some minor offenses
and impose short prison sentences.
Capital crimes that carried a possible death sentence included
murder, manslaughter occurring in the commission of a felony, arson
or the use of explosives that caused death, rape, treason, and
endangerment of state security. Few convictions for capital crimes,
however, resulted in execution. The supreme court, the
mufti (see Glossary) of Egypt,
and the president reviewed each death sentence.
In 1987 Egypt executed six individuals for murder and two others
for abduction and rape.
The investigation of a crime was a sort of preliminary trial,
and the results of the investigation determined the disposition of
the case. The Office of the Public Prosecutor, an institution under
the Ministry of Justice, conducted investigations. After an
investigation with the help of police officials from the district
involved, the public prosecutor could decide to drop a case if the
charges were not serious enough to warrant a trial.
Egypt's laws required that a detained person be brought before
a magistrate and formally charged within forty-eight hours or
released. The accused was entitled to post bail and had the right
to be defended by legal counsel. Searches could not be conducted
without a warrant. Trials were open to the public, but the court
could choose to hold all or part of the hearing in camera "in order
to preserve public order or morals." According to the United States
Department of State's Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices, Egypt's judiciary acted independently and carefully
observed constitutional and legal safeguards in arrests and
pretrial custody. The Emergency Law of 1958 outlined special
judicial procedures for some cases. The law enabled authorities to
circumvent the increasingly independent regular court system in
cases where people were charged with endangering state security.
The law applied primarily to Islamic radicals but also covered
leftists suspected of political violence, drug smugglers, and
illegal currency dealers. It also allowed detention of striking
workers, pro-Palestinian student demonstrators, and relatives of
fugitives.
The Emergency Law of 1958 authorized the judicial system to
detain people without charging them or guaranteeing them due
process while an investigation was under way. After thirty days, a
detainee could petition the State Security Court to review the
case. If the court ordered the detainee's release, the minister of
interior had fifteen days to object. If the minister overruled the
court's decision, the detainee could petition another State
Security Court for release after thirty more days. If the second
court supported the detainee's petition, it released the detainee.
The minister of interior could, however, simply rearrest the
detainee. The government commonly engaged in this practice in cases
involving Islamic extremists.
The State Security Courts in the trials they conducted barred
secret testimony, upheld defendants' rights to be represented by an
attorney, and gave attorneys access to the prosecution's
investigations. Trials were usually in public, except in some cases
involving political violence. Convicted persons could appeal to the
Court of Cassation
(see The Judiciary, Civil Rights, and the Rule of Law
, ch. 4). The State Security Courts drew their judges from
the ranks of the senior judiciary.
In most cases, detainees were released after a period of
interrogation and were never brought to trial. In mid-1989 the
minister of interior stated that a total of 12,000 individuals had
been detained under the Emergency Law of 1958 during the preceding
three years. The minister of interior stated that as of early 1990
the government was detaining 2,411 individuals, 813 of whom were
being held on political charges.
In certain instances, civilian suspects could be turned over to
military courts for trial on the basis of a presidential order.
This practice was the subject of a constitutional challenge
initiated in 1989.
In 1980 the government created a separate judicial institution,
the Court of Ethics, together with its investigating arm, the
Office of the Socialist Prosecutor, to investigate complaints of
widespread corruption in government. The court was charged with
trying offenses against "socialist values," which included
corruption and illegal business practices. The Office of the
Socialist Prosecutor served as watchdog against abuses by
government officials; approved the credentials of candidates for
office in the trade union movement, professional syndicates, and
local government councils; and performed security checks on senior
government appointees.
Data as of December 1990
|