Colombia The Society and Its Environment
The varied people of Columbia
COLOMBIA IS THE FIFTH LARGEST country in Latin America and
has the
third largest population (28 million) in the region.
Unlike most of
its Andean neighbors, Colombia is a nation of cities;
almost 70
percent of the people lived in urban areas in the late
1980s. In
addition to Bogotá, the capital, which had an estimated
population
of 5 million in 1988, three other cities had populations
of 1
million or more: Cali, Medellín, and Barranquilla.
Fourteen other
urban centers had populations of between 100,000 and
500,000. More
than 100 cities had 10,000 or more inhabitants.
Three-fifths of the country was sparsely populated
tropical
lowlands and jungle. Ninety-eight percent of the
population was
concentrated in the interior two-fifths of the national
territory--
mainly in the narrow valleys and intermontane basins
formed by the
three ranges of the Andes Mountains that divide the
country from
north to south. The dominant language was Spanish, and the
vast
majority of the people were (at least nominally) Roman
Catholic.
Seventy percent of the population was of mixed blood;
Caucasians,
Indians, and blacks accounted for the rest. The country's
economic
and political elite remained predominantly white, however.
Over the past nearly 500 years, Colombian society has
been
highly stratified, with a castelike elite, correlation
between skin
color and class membership, and limited vertical mobility.
Modern
social structure was the offspring of a colonial society
that was
rigidly segregated into two groups: the white elite of
educated,
cultured, rich, and politically powerful persons and the
mass of
proletarians and peasants. A small middle group, composed
of
merchants and minor officials, actually belonged with the
lower
class in terms of powerlessness.
Independence did little to change this configuration,
and
prestige continued to be determined by birth and
landownership. The
postindependence period did not encourage a revolutionary
change in
the stratification system but instead reinforced the
status quo.
The continuing political anarchy, the difficulty of
economic
development because of ineffective use of capital and
resources,
and the lack of an urban labor movement inhibited change
throughout
the nineteenth century and discouraged the growth of an
independent, viable middle class.
The rugged terrain and inadequate transportation system
reinforced social and geographic distance, keeping the
numerically
superior but disunited masses fragmented and powerless.
The nascent
middle sector lacked a collective consciousness,
preferring to
identify individually with the upper class. The elite was
the only
social group with sufficient cohesion to articulate goals
and make
them known to the rest of the society.
In the twentieth century, the society began to
experience
change--not so much in values or orientation but in
broadening of
the economic bases and an expansion of the social classes.
Improvements in transportation, communication, and
education--
coupled with industrialization and rapid urban
growth--opened the
society somewhat by expanding economic opportunities.
Individuals
moved up from the masses into the lower, the middle, and
infrequently the upper classes. Nevertheless, the
traditional upper
class continued to dominate the country by maintaining
strict
control over forces that encouraged change and by
absorbing or coopting other social sectors into the economic and
political system.
Generally, however, the upper class did not admit these
upwardly
mobile groups to the inner circle of power cliques and
informal
social contacts.
Data as of December 1988
|