Japan THE SELF-DEFENSE FORCES
Armored exercises in Shizuoka Prefecture
Courtesy Asahi Shimbun
Figure 12. Organization of the Japanese Defense Establishment, 1990
Based on information from Japan, Defense Agency, Defense of
Japan, 1990, Tokyo, 1990, 310-12.
Unavailable
Figure 13. Deployment of the Ground, Maritime, and Air Self-Defense
Forces, 1990
Source: Based on information from Japan, Defense Agency,
Defense of Japan, 1990, Tokyo, 1990, 309.
Maritime Self-Defence Force ships on patrol in Tokyo Bay
Courtesy Asahi Shimbun
Figure 14. Ranks and Insignia of the Self-Defense Forces, 1990
Unavailable
F-15J interceptor at airbase in Fukuoka Prefecture
Courtesy Asahi Shimbun
Japan's defeat in World War II, the only major military
defeat
in the country's history, had a profound and lasting
effect on
national attitudes toward war, the armed forces, and
military
involvement in politics. These attitudes were immediately
apparent
in the public's willing acceptance of total disarmament
and
demobilization after the war and in the alacrity with
which all
military leaders were removed from positions of influence
in the
state. Under General Douglas MacArthur of the United
States Army,
serving as the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, and
in
concert with the wishes of most Japanese, occupation
authorities
were committed to the demilitarization and democratization
of the
nation. All clubs, schools, and societies associated with
the
military and martial skills were eliminated. The general
staff was
abolished, along with army and navy ministries and the
Imperial
Army and Imperial Navy. Industry serving the military also
was
dismantled.
The trauma of defeat produced strong pacifist
sentiments that
found expression in the United States-fostered 1947
constitution,
which forever renounces war as an instrument for settling
international disputes and declares that Japan will never
again
maintain "land, sea, or air forces or other war potential"
(see The Postwar Constitution
, ch. 6). Later cabinets interpreted
these
provisions as not denying the nation the right to
self-defense and,
with the encouragement of the United States, developed the
SDF.
Antimilitarist public opinion, however, remained a force
to be
reckoned with on any defense-related issue. The
constitutional
legitimacy of the SDF was challenged well into the 1970s,
and even
in the 1980s the government acted warily on defense
matters lest
residual antimilitarism be aggravated and a backlash
result.
Data as of January 1994
|