Spain CASTILE AND ARAGON
Figure 2. The Reconquest: Reconquering Spain from the Moors
Resistance to the Muslim invasion in the eighth century
had
been limited to small groups of Visigoth warriors who took
refuge
in the mountains of Asturias in the old Suevian kingdom,
the
least romanized and least Christianized region in Spain.
According to tradition, Pelayo (718-37), a king of Oviedo,
first
rallied the natives to defend themselves, then urged them
to take
the offensive, beginning the 700-year Reconquest (Spanish,
Reconquista), which became the dominant theme in medieval
Spanish
history
(see
fig. 2). What began as a matter of survival
in
Asturias became a crusade to rid Spain of the Muslims and
an
imperial mission to reconstruct a united monarchy in
Spain.
Pelayo's successors, known as the kings of Leon,
extended
Christian control southward from Asturias, tore away bits
of
territory, depopulated and fortified them against the
Muslims,
and then resettled these areas as the frontier was pushed
forward. The kingdom's political center moved in the
direction of
the military frontier.
In the tenth century, strongholds were built as a
buffer for
the kingdom of Leon along the upper Rio Ebro, in the area
that
became known as Castile, the "land of castles." The region
was
populated by men--border warriors and free peasants--who
were
willing to defend it, and were granted fueros
(special
privileges and immunities) by the kings of Leon that made
them
virtually autonomous. Castile developed a distinct society
with
its own dialect, values, and customs shaped by the hard
conditions of the frontier. Castile also produced a caste
of
hereditary warriors whom the frontier "democratized"; all
warriors were equals, and all men were warriors.
In 981 Castile became an independent county, and in
1004 it
was raised to the dignity of a kingdom. Castile and Leon
were
reunited periodically through royal marriages, but their
kings
had no better plan than to divide their lands again among
their
heirs. The two kingdoms were, however, permanently joined
as a
single state in 1230 by Ferdinand III of Castile (d.
1252).
Under the tutelage of the neighboring Franks, a barrier
of
pocket states formed along the range of the Pyrenees and
on the
coast of Catalonia to hold the frontier of France against
Islamic
Spain. Out of this region, called the Spanish March,
emerged the
kingdom of Aragon and the counties of Catalonia, all of
which
expanded, as did Leon-Castile, at the expense of the
Muslims.
(Andorra is the last independent survivor of the March
states.)
The most significant of the counties in Catalonia was
that
held by the counts of Barcelona. They were descendants of
Wilfrid
the Hairy (874-98), who at the end of the ninth century
declared
his fief free of the French crown, monopolized lay and
ecclesiastical offices on both sides of the Pyrenees, and
divided
them--according to Frankish custom--among members of the
family.
By 1100 Barcelona had dominion over all of Catalonia and
the
Balearic Islands (Spanish, Islas Baleares). Aragon and the
Catalan counties were federated in 1137 through the
marriage of
Ramon Berenguer IV, count of Barcelona, and Petronilla,
heiress
to the Aragonese throne. Berenguer assumed the title of
king of
Aragon, but he continued to rule as count in Catalonia.
Berenguer
and his successors thus ruled over two realms, each with
its own
government, legal code, currency, and political
orientation.
Valencia, seized from its Muslim amir, became federated
with
Aragon and Catalonia in 1238. With the union of the three
crowns,
Aragon (the term most commonly used to describe the
federation)
rivaled Venice and Genoa for control of Mediterranean
trade.
Aragonese commercial interests extended to the Black Sea,
and the
ports of Barcelona and Valencia prospered from traffic in
textiles, drugs, spices, and slaves.
Weakened by their disunity, the eleventh-century
taifas fell piecemeal to the Castilians, who had
reason to
anticipate the completion of the Reconquest. When Toledo
was lost
in 1085, the alarmed amirs appealed for aid to the
Almoravids, a
militant Berber party of strict Muslims, who in a few
years had
won control of the Maghreb (northwest Africa). The
Almoravids
incorporated all of Al Andalus, except Zaragoza, into
their North
African empire. They attempted to stimulate a religious
revival
based on their own evangelical brand of Islam. In Spain,
however,
their movement soon lost its missionary fervor. The
Almoravid
state fell apart by the mid-twelfth century under pressure
from
another religious group, the Almohads, who extended their
control
from Morocco to Spain and made Seville their capital. The
Almohads shared the crusading instincts of the Almoravids
and
posed an even greater military threat to the Christian
states,
but their expansion was stopped decisively in the epic
battle of
Las Navas de Tolosa (1212), a watershed in the history of
the
Reconquest. Muslim strength ebbed thereafter. Ferdinand
III took
Seville in 1248, reducing Al Andalus to the amirate of
Granada,
which had bought its safety by betraying the Almohads'
Spanish
capital. Granada remained a Muslim state, but as a
dependency of
Castile.
Aragon fulfilled its territorial aims in the thirteenth
century when it annexed Valencia. The Catalans, however,
looked
for further expansion abroad, and their economic views
prevailed
over those of the parochial Aragonese nobility, who were
not
enthusiastic about foreign entanglements. Peter III, king
of
Aragon from 1276 until 1285, had been elected to the
throne of
Sicily when the French Angevins (House of Anjou) were
expelled
from the island kingdom during an uprising in 1282.
Sicily, and
later Naples, became part of the federation of Spanish
crowns,
and Aragon became embroiled in Italian politics, which
continued
to affect Spain into the eighteenth century.
Castile, which had traditionally turned away from
intervention in European affairs, developed a merchant
marine in
the Atlantic that successfully challenged the Hanseatic
League (a
peaceful league of merchants of various free German
cities) for
dominance in the coastal trade with France, England, and
the
Netherlands. The economic climate necessary for sustained
economic development was notably lacking, however, in
Castile.
The reasons for this situation appear to have been rooted
both in
the structure of the economy and in the attitude of the
Castilians. Restrictive corporations closely regulated all
aspects of the economy--production, trade, and even
transport.
The most powerful of these corporations, the mesta,
controlled the production of wool, Castile's chief export.
Perhaps a greater obstacle for economic development was
that
commercial activity enjoyed little social esteem. Noblemen
saw
business as beneath their station and derived their
incomes and
prestige from landownership. Successful bourgeois
entrepreneurs,
who aspired to the petty nobility, invested in land rather
than
in other sectors of the economy because of the social
status
attached to owning land. This attitude deprived the
economy of
needed investments and engendered stagnation rather than
growth.
Feudalism, which bound nobles to the king-counts both
economically and socially, as tenants to landlords, had
been
introduced into Aragon and Catalonia from France. It
produced a
more clearly stratified social structure than that found
in
Castile, and consequently it generated greater tension
among
classes. Castilian society was less competitive, more
cohesive,
and more egalitarian. Castile attempted to compensate
through
political means, however, for the binding feudal
arrangements
between crown and nobility that it lacked. The guiding
theory
behind the Castilian monarchy was that political
centralism could
be won at the expense of local fueros, but the
kings of
Castile never succeeded in creating a unitary state.
Aragon-
Catalonia accepted and developed--not without
conflict--the
federal principle, and it made no concerted attempt to
establish
a political union of the Spanish and Italian
principalities
outside of their personal union under the Aragonese crown.
The
principal regions of Spain were divided not only by
conflicting
local loyalties, but also by their political, economic,
and
social orientations. Catalonia particularly stood apart
from the
rest of the country.
Both Castile and Aragon suffered from political
instability
in the fourteenth and the fifteenth centuries. The House
of
Trastamara acquired the Castilian throne in 1369 and
created a
new aristocracy to which it granted significant authority.
Court
favorites, or validos (sing., valido), often
dominated
their Castilian kings, and, because the kings were weak,
nobles
competed for control of the government. Important
government
offices, formerly held by members of the professional
class of
civil servants who had urban, and frequently Jewish,
backgrounds,
came into the possession of aristocratic families who
eventually
held them by hereditary right. The social disruption and
the
decay of institutions common to much of Europe in the late
Middle
Ages also affected Aragon, where another branch of the
Trastamaras succeeded to the throne in 1416. For long
periods,
the overextended Aragonese kings resided in Naples,
leaving their
Spanish realms with weak, vulnerable governments. Economic
dislocation, caused by recurring plagues and by the
commercial
decline of Catalonia, was the occasion for repeated
revolts by
regional nobility, town corporations, peasants, and, in
Barcelona, by the urban proletariat.
Data as of December 1988
|